INTRODUCTION

Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has transformed the way financial transactions are made and brought a lot of financial benefits to the masses. It has transformed the way how to conduct financial transactions by providing a secure, cost-effective, and instant payment method. It improves financial inclusion and offers digital payments to businesses and people, especially the ones in semi-urban and rural areas where banking services are not available everywhere. By saving transaction costs for financial institutions and users, UPI improves overall financial efficiency, enabling “small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)” to allocate resources for organizational growth rather than high transaction charges (Joshi et al, 2025).

UPI plays a vital role in enhancing cashless economy and cutting costs related to distribution, printing, and managing currency. It promotes transparency in transactions to curb the risk of tax evasion and reduce issues related to black money. With potential for real-time payments, UPI improves economic performance, contributing directly to the growth of GDP by promoting e-commerce and more efficient processes.  In addition, it has become a key enabler of economy, empowering start-ups, businesses, and consumers with innovative solutions to improve both convenience and efficiency (Joshi et al, 2025).

On the other hand, UPI enhances stability by improving validation and traceability of financial transactions, which ultimately reduces shadow economy and improves tax compliance. By integrating global payment systems smoothly, UPI plays a vital role in global trade and enables smooth “cross-border transactions.” In addition, it has significant contribution to form a competitive environment driving innovation in fintech, resulting in technological advancements and services. UPI promotes both businesses and consumers, catalyzing modernized economy in India, and promoting reasonable growth while focusing on digital finance (Joshi et al, 2025).

This study aims to investigate the impact of UPI adoption in small and medium enterprises. It transforms the lives of masses but also poses security threats. In 2024, 2,92,800 cases had been registered against cybercrime, costing around Rs. 2054.6 crores to Indian economy. It may reach 1 trillion per annum by the year 2033. As per RBI in response to RTI application, there were 5,82,000 cases of cyberfraud reported from FY 2020 to FY 2024 and over Rs. 3207 Cr were spent (Siddiqui and Ahamed, 2024). Computer networks in India may face over 1 trillion cyberattacks every year by 2033 and 17 trillion by the year 2047, as per a study by PRAHAR (The Hindu, 2024).

On addition, UPI apps have transformed Indian payment system rapidly. The payment system of UPI was introduced by the “National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI)” as the forerunner of digital payment solutions in India to promote real-time, instant inter-bank transactions. Even till October 2024, UPI had managed 16.58 billion transactions successfully with Rs. 23.5 trillion. In FY 2023-24, another boost was UPI reaching over 131 billion transactions (Siddiqui and Ahamed, 2024). Some of the key market players are GPay, PhonePe, and PayTM enabling businesses and consumers to adapt to new digital payment environments. The concept of digitalization provides effective and various platforms to reshape financial sector in India.

LITERATURE REVIEW

UPI provides smooth, cost-effective, and secure digital payments with improved convenience and large-scale acceptance. Sharma and Chauhan (2025) conducted a case study which covers the perspective of merchants. How have soundboxes and UPI transformed their practices and operations? They delved into merchants’ experiences who use UPI, focusing on digital ecosystem, role in improving financial inclusion, and encouraging cashless economy.

Phatak (2023) focused on the increasing realm of online payment solutions and their effect on small enterprises in Pune, Maharashtra. The methodology covers structured questionnaire, distributed offline and online, to target different small businesses. This study has achieved a rich dataset of 300 businesses. Findings of the study revealed huge positive impact of adoption of digital payments on customer satisfaction and sales volume. A notable number of organizations have saved transaction costs and enhanced operational efficiency. Challenges like security and technical failure were also the problem. There was a strong correlation between business type and extent of benefits from digital payments.

Joshi et al (2025) examined how UPI transforms lives, although it also poses security risks. They conducted a survey on 513 participants as per security concerns, demographic trends, and payment options. It is observed that there was a vast adoption of UPI in Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad. Google Pay emerged as a market leader, after PhonePe and PayTM. There were security issues which underscore the need for better digital infrastructure to improve user satisfaction and trust.

Bhosale and Khaire (2025) highlighted how adoption of UPI has reduced dependence on cash transactions, expanded market reach, and improved management of cash flow for small organizations with an in-depth assessment.  In addition, it determines challenges that entrepreneurs face, such as, security issues, infra limitations, and challenges related to digital literacy, which may affect the efficiency of UPI adoption. Findings of the study provide important insights on the role of digital payments in promoting economic growth and provide recommendations to improve the adoption of UPI.

Research Gap

A lot of studies have focused on the impact of adopting UPI on SMEs. However, most of them have focused on metro cities or at national levels. So, localized analysis was required in tier-2 and tier-3 cities. Hence, this study fills a huge gap in investigating the adoption of UPI and its impact on growth and automation of SMEs in a tier-2 city like Jabalpur, India.

Research Objectives

·         To investigate the impact of UPI adoption among SMEs in Jabalpur and its effect on automation

·         To identify key factors which may impact UPI adoption and determine its impact on consumer experience and efficiency in SMEs

Hypotheses

H1 – There is a significant impact of UPI adoption on operational efficiency and automation in SMEs in Jabalpur

H2 – Perceived Ease of Use, Security, and Digitalization significantly predict adoption of UPI among SMEs in Jabalpur

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research Design

This study is based on a cross-sectional, quantitative research design which systematically analyses the impact and adoption of UPI transactions among SMEs in Jabalpur. This approach captures an insight to existing levels of adoption, perceived benefits of adoption of digital payments, and operational challenges.

Sampling

A stratified random sampling technique has been adopted for selecting SMEs from sectors like services, retail, and manufacturing to ensure sector-wise representation. Hence, target sample size is around 300 participants from these businesses, offering huge statistical strength for data analysis.

Data Collection

A self-structured questionnaire will be used for collecting primary data for measuring important constructs like perceived impact, level of adoption, automation, efficiency, and consumer experience. The questionnaire consists of demographic and closed-ended (5-point Likert scale) questions. Data will be collected using Google Form distributed through email and social messaging apps.

Data Analysis

Data collected will be analyzed and processed with statistical software. Frequency distribution will be conducted to analyze the frequency of responses. For hypotheses testing, one-sample t-test and Linear Regression tests will be conducted to determine the impact and associations of UPI adoption on customer experience and business operations. Cronbach’s Alpha test will be conducted to analyze the reliability of survey tools.

DATA ANALYSIS

Demographics

In this study, 134 (45%) SMEs are engaged in service sector, 133 (44%) SMEs belong to retail sector, and 33 (11%) SMEs are in manufacturing sector out of 300 participants from SMEs participated in this study. It reflects majority of participants are from service and retail sectors (Table 1) (Figure 1). 

Table 1: Type of Business

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Manufacturing

33

11.0

11.0

11.0

Retail

133

44.3

44.3

55.3

Service

134

44.7

44.7

100.0

Total

300

100.0

100.0

 

 

Figure 1 - Type of Business

In this study, 166 (55%) participants have 1 to 5 employees. Hence, majority of SMEs are micro-businesses. In addition, 66 (22%) SMEs have 6 to 20 employees, 35 (12%) SMEs have more than 50 employees, and only 33 (11%) SMEs have 21 to 50 employees (Table 2) (Figure 2).

Table 2: No. of employees

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

1–5 employees

166

55.3

55.3

55.3

21–50 employees

33

11.0

11.0

66.3

6–20 employees

66

22.0

22.0

88.3

More than 50 employees

35

11.7

11.7

100.0

Total

300

100.0

100.0

 

 


Figure 2: No. of Employees

There are 116 (39%) SMEs who use UPI as a primary mode of digital payment, beating all other modes of payment like wallets or cards. There are 72 (24%) SMEs offering debit/credit cards as mode of payment, 48 (16%) SMEs offer mobile wallets as mode of payment, and only 10 (3%) SMEs were offering only cash as mode of payment. Finally, 54 (18%) SMEs have all of the above payment modes (Table 3) (Figure 3). Overall, UPI is most adopted system for digital payments and it is also the core of operational digitalization in urban centers in India.

Table 3: Mode of payment offered to customers

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

All of the above

54

18.0

18.0

18.0

Cash

10

3.3

3.3

21.3

Debit/Credit Cards

72

24.0

24.0

45.3

Mobile wallets

48

16.0

16.0

61.3

UPI

116

38.7

38.7

100.0

Total

300

100.0

100.0

 

 


Figure 3: Mode of payment offered to customers

When it comes to level of adoption of UPI, there are 151 (50%) SMEs who use UPI every day, 112 (37%) SMEs use UPI several times in a day, and only 37 (12%) SMEs use UPI only 1 to 2 times a week. It shows deep market penetration of UPIs and increased frequency of using UPIs (Table 4) (Figure 4).

Table 4: Frequency of UPI use (Level of adoption)

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

1-2 times a week

37

12.3

12.3

12.3

Daily

151

50.3

50.3

62.7

Multiple times daily

112

37.3

37.3

100.0

Total

300

100.0

100.0

 

 


Figure 4: Frequency of UPI use (Level of adoption)

UPI Adoption and Business Automation

Table 5 shows responses on adoption of UPI and influence on business operations from 300 SMEs. There are 45% participants who strongly agree and 22% participants agree that adoption of UPI has automated financial transactions, which means they feel that UPI has automated their financial operations significantly, cutting manual handling. Around 67% participants strongly affirm that UPI has reduced manual effort in processing payments and keeping record. There are 67% SMEs that perceive a rise in business transactions since they have adopted UPI. There are 22% participants who strongly disagree and 11% participants who disagree that UPI payments are more convenient than other modes, while around half (56%) participants found it more convenient than debit cards and cash for customers. Finally, strong majority of population (68%) believe that processing customer payments has been faster with adoption of UPI.

Overall, UPI is widely accepted when it comes to transform the way transactions are conducted in SMEs in India, making operations more scalable, efficient and aligned with the push towards cashless economy.

Table 5: Adoption of UPI and Automation of Business

Responses

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Adoption of UPI has automated financial transactions

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

66 (22%)

135 (45%)

UPI reduces manual effort in record-keeping and processing payments

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

34 (11%)

167 (56%)

There has been a rise in transactions after UPI adoption

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

67 (22%)

134 (45%)

UPI payments are more convenient than cash and debit cards for customers

66 (22%)

33 (11%)

34 (11%)

66 (22%)

101 (34%)

Processing customer payments has been faster with UPI adoption

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

68 (23%)

133 (44%)

 

Perceived Impact and Factors

There are 55% SMEs which agree that UPI improves operations and has improved efficiency for them. There are 66% participants who positively affirm that adoption of UPI is strongly promoted by ease of use. Opinions among participants vary. Security is widely recognized to reflect various levels of confidence. When it comes to customer preference for UPI, it is found to be moderately positive, suggesting varied consumer behaviors. Finally, strong internet connectivity is well regarded to be important for smooth adoption of UPI, highlighting infrastructure as an important enabler (Table 6).

Table 6: Perceived Impact and Factors Influencing UPI adoption

Responses

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

UPI has improved overall efficiency of businesses

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

68 (23%)

66 (22%)

100 (33%)

Secure transactions improves willingness to use UPI

33 (11%)

66 (22%)

68 (23%)

66 (22%)

67 (22%)

Ease of using UPI makes it easy to adopt for a lot of transactions

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

34 (11%)

34 (11%)

166 (55%)

UPI is preferred by consumers over card or cash payments

66 (22%)

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

67 (22%)

101 (34%)

Solid internet connectivity promotes adoption of UPI

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

167 (56%)

34 (11%)

 

Factors related to Attitude and Barriers

Table 7 suggests that most of the SMEs feel that their confidence has been increased by security in UPI transactions (around 55% agreeing and strongly agreeing). Similarly, 55% SMEs feel that UPI platforms are user-friendly for both owners and staff. Majority (56%) participants feel that they have enough digital skills for operating UPI. However, 56% SMEs have reported that UPI transactions are constantly affected by technical issues. Around 45% SMEs find perceived costs related to transaction fees or devices as a significant barrier for adoption. Even though adoption of UPI has been supported by positive perception for usability and security, it still has cost and technical barriers.

Table 7: Factors associated with Challenges and Attitude

Responses

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Security of UPI enhances confidence for business

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

67 (22%)

100 (33%)

67 (22%)

UPI platforms are user-friendly for both staff and owner

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

67 (22%)

67 (22%)

100 (33%)

I have enough digital skills for using UPI smoothly in operations

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

168 (56%)

Technical issues often affect UPI transactions

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

33 (11%)

168 (56%)

Perceived costs like device cost, transaction charges, etc. are a significant challenge for adoption of UPI

33 (11%)

66 (22%)

34 (11%)

33 (11%)

134 (45%)

 

Hypotheses Testing

Before hypothesis testing, Cronbach’s Alpha test was conducted using SPSS software. Alpha value of 0.955 indicates excellent internal reliability for 15 items in the questionnaire. Hence, questionnaire is found to be highly consistent for adoption and perception (Table 8).

Table 8: Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.955

15

 

H1 – There is a significant impact of UPI adoption on operational efficiency and automation in SMEs in Jabalpur

In order to test the impact of adoption of UPI on automation and operational efficiency, one sample t-test was conducted. Table 9 lists one-sample statistics which consists of Mean and Standard Deviation. Mean value for all measures of impact of UPI (such as, reducing manual effort, automation, convenience, and payment speed) is ranging from 3.34 to 3.90 with test value of 3 (neutral) (Table 9).

Table 9: One-Sample Statistics

 

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Adoption of UPI has automated financial transactions

300

3.79

1.397

.081

UPI reduces manual effort in record-keeping and processing payments

300

3.90

1.447

.084

There has been a rise in transactions after UPI adoption

300

3.79

1.396

.081

UPI payments are more convenient than cash and debit cards for customers

300

3.34

1.564

.090

Processing customer payments has been faster with UPI adoption

300

3.78

1.394

.080

 

In one sample t-test (Table 10), all items related to impact are statistically significant (p < 0.001) with test value of 3, having confidence intervals (CI) and mean differences not going above zero. It supports the belief that UPI actually improves operations related to SMEs.

Table 10: One-Sample Test on impact of UPI adoption on operational efficiency and automation

 

Test Value = 3

t

df

Sig.

(2-tailed)

Mean Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Lower

Upper

Adoption of UPI has automated financial transactions

9.793

299

.000

.790

.63

.95

UPI reduces manual effort in record-keeping and processing payments

10.735

299

.000

.897

.73

1.06

There has been a rise in transactions after UPI adoption

9.763

299

.000

.787

.63

.95

UPI payments are more convenient than cash and debit cards for customers

3.802

299

.000

.343

.17

.52

Processing customer payments has been faster with UPI adoption

9.734

299

.000

.783

.62

.94

 

H2 – Perceived Ease of Use, Security, and Digitalization significantly predict adoption of UPI among SMEs in Jabalpur

When it comes determine the prediction of perceived ease of use, digitalization, and security on adoption of UPI, Linear Regression test was conducted using SPSS software. In Model Summary, R value of 0.957 and R-square value of 0.915, suggest that 91.5% of variance is found in adoption of UPI explained by perceived security, costs, and digitalization (Table 11).

Table 11: Model Summary for Perceived Ease of Use, Security, and Digitalization

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

.957

.915

.915

1.10913

 

When looking at ANOVA table, F value was 1067.79 and significant value of p<0.001 suggests highly significant model (Table 12).

Table 12: ANOVA Table for Perceived Ease of Use, Security, and Digitalization

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

3940.659

3

1313.553

1067.791

.000b

Residual

364.127

296

1.230

 

 

Total

4304.787

299

 

 

 

a. Dependent Variable: UPI adoption

b. Predictors: (Constant), Digitalization, Security, Perceived costs

 

Digitalization is found to be the strongest positive predictor with Standardized Beta value of 0.935 and Unstandardized Beta value of 1.006 (p<0.001). There is a significant positive impact of security on adoption of UPI, with Standardized Beta value of 0.455 and unstandardized Beta value of 0.818 (p <0.001). However, there was significant negative effect of perceived costs (with Standardized Beta of -0.424 and Unstandardized Beta value of -1.073) (p<0.001). Hence, higher trust in security and digital preparedness improve the adoption of UPI (Table 13).

Table 13: Coefficients table for Perceived Ease of Use, Security, and Digitalization

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

-2.474

.256

 

-9.654

.000

Perceived costs

-1.073

.109

-.424

-9.822

.000

Security

.818

.056

.455

14.481

.000

Digitalization

1.006

.045

.935

22.494

.000

a. Dependent Variable: UPI adoption

 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Findings of the study suggest that UPI has been strongly accepted with frequent use and positive perceptions of its impact on efficiency and automation of businesses in SMEs based in Jabalpur. Majority of SMEs have reported that they have experienced improvement in record-keeping, convenience, and speed after adoption of UPIs, which aligned with national trends for digitalization in SME sector. Security perceptions and digitalization are strong factors for adoption of UPI, as per regression analysis. Cost has been the most noticeable challenge. It suggests that UPI penetration has been improved by reducing them. While a lot of SMEs are concerned about technical issues, SMEs are usually confident with use of UPIs because of reliable internet connectivity and ease of use.

This study strongly supports both hypotheses. Adoption of UPI has improved automation and operational efficiency for SMEs and perceived security and digitalization have strongly and positively influenced adoption of UPI. As SMEs in Jabalpur have turned out to be more mature digitally, such knowledge underscores the need for strong security measures, digital literacy, and reducing costs of adoption to achieve sustainable SME growth and complete modernization of payment system.