The
Relationship Between Emotional Labor Demands and Coping Mechanisms in Hotel
Management Teachers
Dr. Amit S. Khare*
Assistant Professor, Department of Hotel
Management, Tilak Maharashtra Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India
amit.khare@tmv.edu.in
Abstract:
This research investigates
the complex interplay between emotional labor demands and coping mechanisms
among hotel management teachers, a demographic uniquely positioned at the
confluence of academic rigor and service-industry expectations. The study
employed a quantitative research design, gathering primary data from 85 hotel
management teachers through a structured questionnaire. Analysis using Jamovi
revealed that surface acting, the act of faking emotions to meet professional
expectations, is significantly and positively correlated with increased
emotional dissonance (Pearson's r = 0.745, p < .001) and heightened
emotional exhaustion, indicated by its impact on daily energy levels (Pearson's
r = 0.372, p < .001). This confirms that the constant need to project a
"service-with-a-smile" persona exacts a considerable psychological
toll. In terms of coping, social support, specifically interaction with
colleagues and friends, was found to be a significantly more effective strategy
for stress reduction compared to psychological detachment (Mann-Whitney U =
591, p = 0.019). A notable finding was the widespread lack of formal
institutional training in emotional labor management among the surveyed
teachers. These results underscore an urgent need for educational institutions
to develop and implement targeted interventions. Such initiatives should focus
on equipping teachers with authentic emotional regulation skills, fostering
supportive work environments, and providing formal training programs to enhance
their resilience. By addressing these critical areas, institutions can safeguard
the well-being of their hospitality educators and ensure the continued delivery
of high-quality education essential for preparing future hospitality
professionals.
Keywords:
Emotional labor, Hotel
management education, Surface acting, Coping mechanisms, Teacher burnout.
INTRODUCTION
The hospitality industry, characterized by its
service-driven and human oriented nature, inherently places significant
emotional demands on its professionals, a characteristic that extends to the
educators tasked with preparing future industry personnel. This academic
imperative necessitates an in-depth exploration into the emotional labor
dimensions experienced by hotel management teachers, given their unique
position at the chain of pedagogical responsibilities and industry-specific
emotional intelligence requirements. This study specifically examines how these
educators manage the emotional dissonance between institutional expectations
and personal feelings, and the coping mechanisms they employ to maintain
professional well-being and pedagogical effectiveness (Sun et al., 2026).
Academicians, including those in hotel management,
frequently encounter emotional labor as both learners and teachers, profoundly
influencing classroom interactions, job satisfaction, and overall well-being
(Eren & Dinç, 2025). Indeed, recent scholarship underscores the increasing
focus on the affective dimensions of teachers' professional trajectories,
recognizing emotional labor as a prominent concept in understanding their
experiences This is particularly salient in fields such as hotel management and
tourism education, where the curriculum often involves simulating real-world
service encounters that require sophisticated emotional regulation from both
instructors and students (Jalilzadeh et al.; Mameghani et al., 2024).
Teaching, as a multifaceted profession,
intrinsically involves both cognitive and emotional dimensions, necessitating a
nuanced understanding of how educators in specialized fields navigate these
complex emotional landscapes to achieve optimal pedagogical outcomes
(Alshahrani, 2023). Research indicates that teaching consistently ranks among
professions requiring the highest levels of emotional labor, compelling
educators to frequently display specific emotional states, such as cheerfulness
or neutrality, irrespective of their genuine feelings (TÖRE, 2021). This
emotional management, often termed emotional labor, is a critical competency
desired by the hospitality industry in its graduates, yet it is frequently an
implicit rather than an explicit component of the hospitality and tourism
curriculum. This gap highlights a critical need to investigate the emotional
labor experiences of hotel management educators, as their ability to
effectively model and teach emotional regulation directly impacts the
preparedness of future hospitality professionals (Ma et al., 2023 &
Nyanjom& Wilkins, 2021). Moreover, the discrepancy between an educator's
authentic emotions and the required emotional display can lead to emotive
dissonance, which demands considerable emotive effort to manage during
professional interactions (Lam et al., 2021). This constant emotional
regulation, while vital for maintaining professional norms and institutional
harmony, has been linked to increased emotional exhaustion and burnout among
educators (Dağtaş& Zaimoğlu, 2025).
The contemporary educational landscape,
particularly within specialized fields like hotel management, increasingly
recognizes the multifaceted demands placed on teachers. Beyond the
intellectual rigor of their subjects, educators are immersed in an environment
rich with human interaction, requiring them to constantly manage and express
emotions in accordance with professional expectations (Jaikla & Piyakun,
2024). This phenomenon, known as emotional labor, is a critical aspect of
teaching that distinguishes it from many other professions (TÖRE, 2021). For
hotel management teachers, this labor is uniquely intensified by the inherent
service-oriented nature of their discipline, where they are not only imparting
knowledge but also modeling and instilling the emotional competencies essential
for future hospitality professionals (Nyanjom & Wilkins, 2021). The
constant regulation of emotions in such a context profoundly impacts teachers'
well-being and overall effectiveness.
The concept of emotional labor, initially
articulated by Arlie Hochschild in 1983, describes the process by which
employees manage their feelings to create a publicly observable display that
aligns with organizational norms and expectations. In an educational setting,
this translates into teachers consistently projecting an image of enthusiasm,
empathy, and control, even when their internal feelings may differ (Jing-jing,
2024). This emotional performance is crucial for fostering a positive learning
environment, engaging students, and maintaining collegial relationships
(Mameghani et al., 2024). For hotel management teachers, the need to
demonstrate exemplary service attitudes and emotional resilience is paramount,
as they are preparing students for an industry where customer interaction is
central (Bhattacharya & Dasgupta, 2021). The emotional demands are
particularly high in professions such as teaching and healthcare, where
interpersonal interactions are frequent and emotionally charged (Pooja &
Bhoomadevi, 2023).
Emotional
labor in teaching
Emotional labor in teaching often manifests in various strategies,
broadly categorized as surface acting, deep acting, and the expression of
naturally felt emotions (Jaikla & Piyakun, 2024). Surface acting involves
outwardly displaying emotions that do not align with one's true feelings,
essentially "faking it" (Zhang, 2025). This can be mentally taxing
and has been consistently linked to negative outcomes such as teacher burnout
(Kariou et al., 2021; Mahasneh & Gazo, 2025). Deep acting, conversely,
entails a more profound effort to genuinely align one's internal feelings with
the required emotional display, leading to more authentic interactions (Zhang,
2025). While deep acting is generally considered less detrimental than surface
acting, it still requires significant emotional effort (Jaikla & Piyakun,
2024). The ideal scenario, expressing naturally felt emotions, occurs when a
teacher's genuine feelings spontaneously match the desired emotional expression,
contributing positively to their well-being and job satisfaction (Jaikla &
Piyakun, 2024). However, achieving this state consistently can be challenging
given the unpredictable nature of classroom dynamics and student needs.
The emotional demands placed on university
teachers are considerable, extending beyond direct student interactions to
encompass research, administrative duties, and navigating competitive academic
environments (Eren & Dinç, 2025). This constant emotional engagement can
lead to emotional dissonance, a state where a teacher's felt emotions conflict
with the emotions they are expected to display (Alshahrani, 2023). Such
dissonance can have significant consequences for mental health, potentially
leading to anxiety, depression, and a reduced quality of work life
(Alrawadıeh & Dinçer, 2021). For instance, research on tour guides,
another service profession, found that emotional dissonance increases burnout
and turnover intention while decreasing quality of work life (Alrawadıeh
& Dinçer, 2021). Similarly, in hotel settings, where service is paramount,
employees often experience heightened emotional demands (Hsu et al., 2023; Lam
et al., 2021). The unique pressures within academia, particularly in highly
interactive and demanding fields like hotel management education, make teachers
particularly vulnerable to these negative effects (O’Neil & Gopal, 2021).
Recognizing the potential for emotional
exhaustion and burnout, the examination of effective coping mechanisms becomes
critical (Agbayani-Pineda, 2025; Sun et al., 2025). Coping strategies can be
individual, such as developing self-compassion and effective emotion regulation
skills (Hu, 2023), or organizational, including supportive leadership and a
psychologically safe work environment (O’Neil & Gopal, 2021). For
university teachers, effective emotional labor strategies, particularly those
involving authentic expression rather than mere surface acting, have been
linked to enhanced teaching efficacy and overall well-being (Zheng et al., 2024).
Research highlights the importance of organizational support and a balanced
work-life dynamic in mitigating the negative impacts of emotional labor (Zou et
al., 2025). Moreover, fostering positive emotions and well-being through
emotion regulation training can significantly improve teachers' psychological
health and professional development (Vogl et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025).
The current research aims to delve into the
intricate relationship between the emotional labor demands faced by hotel management
teachers and the coping mechanisms they employ. By focusing on this specific
group, the study seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of how these
educators navigate the unique emotional landscape of their profession.
Understanding these dynamics is essential for developing targeted interventions
and support systems that not only safeguard teacher well-being but also enhance
the quality of education delivered to future hospitality professionals
(Al-Hamad et al., 2023). This investigation will explore how different
emotional labor strategies impact teachers' professional lives and identify
effective coping strategies that can promote resilience and long-term career
satisfaction in this demanding field.
REVIEW OF IMPORTANT
LITERATURE
In
service-oriented professions, emotional labor involves managing feelings to
present a publicly observable demeanor, a concept initially explored in
sociology (Han et al., 2021). This idea has been broadly applied to various
occupations, including education, where teachers are expected to regulate their
emotions to achieve instructional objectives and foster an effective learning
environment (Pooja & Bhoomadevi, 2023; Mameghani et al., 2024). The
emotional demands on educators frequently necessitate the use of strategies
like surface acting, which involves altering outward expressions, or deep
acting, which entails aligning internal feelings with expected displays. These
strategies can significantly affect teachers' psychological well-being and
professional effectiveness (Jaikla & Piyakun, 2024).
Emotional
regulation strategies are closely tied to performance outcomes; for example,
surface acting may negatively impact relational and task performance, whereas
deep acting and proactive authenticity can positively influence these aspects
(Hao, 2024). The effect of emotional labor on teachers, encompassing both
positive and negative emotional experiences, has been widely acknowledged in
different educational settings (Mameghani et al., 2024; Smith et al., 2025).
However, despite the prevalence of emotional labor in teaching, the specific
strategies employed, such as surface acting (suppression) versus deep acting
(reappraisal), and their subsequent impact on educators, are not consistently
understood across diverse teaching contexts (Hsu et al., 2023). There is a
particular need for more detailed investigations into how emotional labor
manifests and affects university teachers, especially considering the
specialized demands of higher education (Han et al., 2021; Hao, 2024). This is
especially relevant for hotel management educators, whose roles often require
them to demonstrate emotional consistency with industry service standards
(Jing-jing, 2024; Zheng et al., 2024). Therefore, understanding the
complexities of emotional labor within this specific pedagogical context is
crucial for developing targeted interventions that support teacher well-being
and enhance instructional effectiveness (Mameghani et al., 2024; O’Neil &
Gopal, 2021). Teaching can thus be seen as an emotionally demanding profession,
where the continuous need to display and regulate emotions in line with
professional standards can lead to burnout (Dağtaş &
Zaimoğlu, 2025).
While
emotional labor in university settings has received some attention, there is a notable
gap in specific fields of hotel management education. The unique demands of
preparing students for a service-oriented industry, where emotional congruence
with industry standards is vital, have not been thoroughly explored (Jing-jing,
2024; Nyanjom & Wilkins, 2021). The literature indicates a lack of uniform
understanding regarding the specific strategies of surface acting versus deep
acting and their varied impacts on educators across different teaching contexts
(Hsu et al., 2023; TÖRE, 2021). This highlights a need for more nuanced
research that considers how these strategies differentially affect teachers in
various educational environments.
While
emotional labor's impact on teacher well-being and burnout is recognized, its
direct link to teaching efficacy within specialized higher education contexts,
such as hotel management, remains underexplored (Hao, 2024; Zheng et al.,
2024). More research is needed to understand how different emotional labor
strategies specifically influence the effectiveness of teaching in these
fields.Research Methodology
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
The research employed a quantitative approach
utilizing a structured questionnaire to collect primary data. The study
focused on examining the relationship between emotional labor demandsand
coping mechanismsamong hotel management teachers. A total of 85
hotel management teachers completed the questionnaire, serving as the primary
participants for this study. The questionnaire, designed through a literature
review, ensured the reliability and validity of all constructs measured.
Data analysis involved statistical methods to identify and understand
the correlations between emotional labor and the coping strategies adopted by
these educators. This methodology allowed for a systematic investigation
into how teachers manage the emotional aspects of their profession. The data
was analysed using Jamovi 2.6.44 solid. (The Jamovi Project, 2024)
Secondary data was gathered from various existing
sources to provide context and comparative insights for the study. These
sources included literature reviews, past research reports, and industry data
related to hospitality and education. Literature reviews involved
examining existing academic articles and reports to understand previous studies
on emotional labor and coping mechanisms. Past research reports from
organizations and government agencies offered valuable insights into industry
trends and specific findings relevant to the hospitality sector.
Industry data, including statistical information collected by businesses
and trade organizations, provided a macro-level view of the hospitality
industry.
NEED
OF STUDY
This research addresses the unique
"double-burden" faced by hospitality educators, who operate at the
demanding intersection of service and academia. Unlike general academics, these
faculty members must constantly model industry hospitality standards,
maintaining a "service-with-a-smile" persona that entails significant
emotional labor (Nyanjom & Wilkins, 2021). While emotional labor is
well-researched among frontline hotel staff and general teachers, there is a
crucial gap concerning hospitality faculty, particularly within the Indian
educational context (Bhattachayra & Dasgupta, 2021). The commercialization
of education treats students as customers, intensifying pressure on teachers to
ensure satisfaction and industry placements, leading to potential emotional
dissonance and burnout. Given the industry's talent shortage,
understanding and formalizing effective coping strategies for these educators
is vital to retaining skilled faculty and maintaining the quality of future
hospitality professionals. The study will also consider the
high-pressure, live teaching environments, such as commercial kitchens, which
further contribute to this unique emotional burden.
OBJECTIVES
1. Identify the Prevailing Emotional Labor
Strategies
2. Analyze the Impact of Industry-Academic
Expectations
3. Evaluate the Effectiveness of Specific Coping
Mechanisms
HYPOTHESIS
FOR THE STUDY
·
H1 - High frequency of
"Surface Acting" is positively and significantly correlated with
increased levels of emotional exhaustion among hotel management teachers.
·
H2 - Teachers who primarily utilize
"Social Support" (colleague interaction) report significantly higher
effectiveness in stress reduction compared to those who use "Psychological
Detachment."
LIMITATIONS
·
Reliance on Self-Reported Data: The study primarily relied
on self-reported questionnaire data, which may introduce social desirability
bias and limit the objectivity of responses regarding emotional experiences and
coping strategies.
·
Limited Sample Size and Geographic Scope: With a sample of 85
teachers from a specific region, the findings may not be generalizable to the
broader population of hotel management teachers globally or across different
educational contexts.
·
Cross-Sectional Design: The cross-sectional nature
of the study prevents the establishment of causal relationships between
emotional labor demands, coping mechanisms, and teacher well-being over time.
DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Table 1: Data of Questionnaire Descriptives
|
Descriptives |
||||||||
|
|
N |
Missing |
Mean |
Median |
Mode |
SD |
Minimum |
Maximum |
|
Age |
85 |
0 |
2.42 |
2 |
2.00 |
0.864 |
1 |
4 |
|
Gender |
85 |
0 |
1.52 |
2 |
2.00 |
0.503 |
1 |
2 |
|
Qualification |
85 |
0 |
3.39 |
3 |
3.00 |
0.490 |
3 |
4 |
|
Designation |
85 |
0 |
1.26 |
1 |
1.00 |
0.675 |
1 |
3 |
|
1. How often do you find yourself
"faking" a smile or positive mood to meet professional
expectations? |
85 |
0 |
2.85 |
3 |
2.00 |
0.794 |
2 |
4 |
|
2. When you feel a negative emotion (e.g.,
frustration, anger), how do you primarily handle it in the classroom? |
85 |
0 |
3.00 |
4 |
1.00ᵃ |
1.596 |
1 |
5 |
|
3. To what extent do you feel your
"professional persona" differs from your true personality? |
85 |
0 |
2.55 |
2 |
2.00 |
1.210 |
1 |
5 |
|
4. Which aspect of your role creates the
most emotional pressure? |
85 |
0 |
2.82 |
3 |
3.00 |
0.966 |
1 |
4 |
|
5. How does the expectation to be a
"Hospitality Role Model" affect your daily energy levels? |
85 |
0 |
2.29 |
3 |
1.00 |
1.404 |
1 |
5 |
|
6. In your opinion, does the hospitality
industry’s "guest is always right" philosophy influence how you
interact with students? |
85 |
0 |
3.26 |
3 |
4.00 |
1.156 |
1 |
5 |
|
7. What is your primary method for
"recharging" after a high-stress teaching day? |
85 |
0 |
2.89 |
2 |
2.00 |
1.543 |
1 |
5 |
|
8. How often is "Social Support"
(colleague/ friends interaction) in reducing your work stress? |
84 |
1 |
4.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
1.344 |
1 |
5 |
|
9. In your opinion, when faced with
emotional labor demands, which strategy do you find most sustainable in
long-term? |
85 |
0 |
3.36 |
3 |
4.00 |
0.962 |
2 |
5 |
|
10. Have you received formal training from
your institution on managing emotional labor? |
85 |
0 |
1.64 |
2 |
2.00 |
0.484 |
1 |
2 |
|
ᵃ More than one mode exists, only the
first is reported |
||||||||
DEMOGRAPHIC
The study involved 85 participants, with
complete data for age, gender, qualification, and designation. The mean age of
the participants was 2.42, with a median of 2 and a mode of 2, indicating that
a significant portion of the sample falls into a specific age category, with a
standard deviation of 0.864 and a range from 1 to 4. For gender, the mean was
1.52, median 2, and mode 2, with a standard deviation of 0.503, suggesting a
prevalence in one gender category (likely coded as 2). Qualifications had a mean
of 3.39, median of 3, and mode of 3, with a standard deviation of 0.490,
indicating most participants possess a similar level of qualification.
Designation showed a mean of 1.26, median of 1, and mode of 1, with a standard
deviation of 0.675, pointing to a concentration in a particular designation
category.
EMOTIONAL
LABOR AND STRESS-RELATED QUESTIONS
Faking
Emotions and Professional Persona
Question 1, which asked about the frequency
of "faking" a smile or positive mood to meet professional expectations,
had a mean of 2.85, a median of 3, and a mode of 2, with a standard deviation
of 0.794. The responses ranged from 2 to 4, indicating that most participants
reported engaging in this behavior with some regularity, but not to the highest
extent. Question 3, addressing the extent to which a "professional
persona" differs from true personality, had a mean of 2.55, a median of 2,
and a mode of 2, with a standard deviation of 1.210. The range of responses for
this question was from 1 to 5, suggesting a varied perception among teachers
regarding the discrepancy between their professional and true selves.
These findings align with the concept of emotional labor, which involves
managing emotional expressions as part of a professional role. Surface
acting, a component of emotional labor, involves displaying emotions that are
not genuinely felt, which can lead to emotional exhaustion and burnout.
Faking emotions at work can lead to burnout and negatively affect mental
health.
Handling
Negative Emotions in the Classroom
Question 2 inquired about the primary method
for handling negative emotions, such as frustration or anger, in the classroom.
With a mean of 3.00, a median of 4, and a mode of 1, along with a high standard
deviation of 1.596, this suggests a diverse set of strategies employed by
teachers, with no single dominant method. The range of responses was from 1 to
5. Emotional regulation, the ability to manage and respond to emotions
in a healthy way, is a critical skill in professional settings.
Emotional
Pressure and Role Modeling
Question 4 explored aspects of the role that
create the most emotional pressure, yielding a mean of 2.82, a median of 3, and
a mode of 3, with a standard deviation of 0.966. The range for this question
was 1 to 4. Question 5 investigated how the expectation to be a
"Hospitality Role Model" affects daily energy levels, showing a mean
of 2.29, a median of 3, and a mode of 1, with a standard deviation of 1.404.
The responses varied from 1 to 5. These results indicate that being a role
model can significantly impact energy levels, consistent with research
suggesting that surface acting consumes emotional resources. Faking
emotions to meet professional expectations is part of emotional labor.
Emotional labor in the hospitality industry is a key requirement due to
the intangible nature of products, emphasis on experiential values, and
frequent customer interactions. Emotional labor can negatively affect
hotel employees' mental health, leading to anxiety and depression over time.
"Guest
is Always Right" Philosophy
Question 6 asked about the influence of the
hospitality industry’s "guest is always right" philosophy on
interactions with students. This question had a mean of 3.26, a median of 3,
and a mode of 4, with a standard deviation of 1.156. Responses ranged from 1 to
5. This suggests that the philosophy significantly influences teacher-student
interactions, potentially increasing emotional labor demands. The
hospitality industry often expects employees to manage their emotions to deliver
a specific customer experience.
Recharging
and Social Support
Question 7 focused on the primary method for
"recharging" after a high-stress teaching day, showing a mean of
2.89, a median of 2, and a mode of 2, with a standard deviation of 1.543. The
response range was 1 to 5. Question 8, which had one missing response, asked
about the effectiveness of social support (colleague/friends interaction) in
reducing work stress. For the 84 valid responses, the mean was 4.00, the median
was 5.00, and the mode was 5.00, with a standard deviation of 1.344. The
responses ranged from 1 to 5. This indicates a strong perception among
teachers that social support is an effective stress reduction strategy.
Social support can help individuals cope with work stress and build
resilience. It also lessens the perception of stress and reduces the
physiological response to stressors.
Sustainable
Strategies and Training
Question 9 asked about the most sustainable
strategy for dealing with emotional labor demands in the long term, resulting
in a mean of 3.36, a median of 3, and a mode of 4, with a standard deviation of
0.962. The responses ranged from 2 to 5. Question 10, concerning formal
training received from the institution on managing emotional labor, had a mean
of 1.64, a median of 2, and a mode of 2, with a standard deviation of 0.484.
The responses ranged from 1 to 2. This suggests that a majority of teachers
have not received formal training in emotional labor management.
Training in emotional intelligence and self-awareness can help employees
manage emotions effectively. Effective strategies to minimize emotional
labor and emotional dissonance are necessary to improve the professional
quality of life for workers. Setting boundaries can help prevent burnout
by protecting time and energy.
HYPOTHESIS VALIDATION
Hypothesis 1: The "Surface
Acting" Impact
·
Null
Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant relationship between the
frequency of "Surface Acting" (masking emotions) and the level of
emotional exhaustion in hotel management teachers.
·
Alternate
Hypothesis (H1): High frequency of "Surface Acting" is
positively and significantly correlated with increased levels of emotional
exhaustion among hotel management teachers.
This hypothesis aims to assess the correlation
between emotional labor strategies, specifically "Surface Acting",
and its impact on the level of emotional exhaustion experienced by hotel
management teachers. Emotional labor involves regulating one's emotions to
align with organizational display rules during service encounters. There are
two main strategies: surface acting, which involves faking or suppressing emotions,
and deep acting, which entails changing felt emotions to genuinely match
required expressions. Surface acting has been repeatedly linked to
negative outcomes such as emotional exhaustion
Results
Table 2: Results of
Hypothesis 1
|
Correlation Matrix |
||||
|
|
|
1. How often do you
find yourself "faking" a smile or positive mood to meet
professional expectations? |
3. To what extent
do you feel your "professional persona" differs from your true
personality? |
5. How does the
expectation to be a "Hospitality Role Model" affect your daily energy
levels? |
|
1. How often do you
find yourself "faking" a smile or positive mood to meet
professional expectations? |
Pearson's r |
— |
|
|
|
df |
— |
|
|
|
|
p-value |
— |
|
|
|
|
3. To what extent
do you feel your "professional persona" differs from your true
personality? |
Pearson's r |
0.745*** |
— |
|
|
df |
83 |
— |
|
|
|
p-value |
<.001 |
— |
|
|
|
5. How does the
expectation to be a "Hospitality Role Model" affect your daily
energy levels? |
Pearson's r |
0.372*** |
-0.020 |
— |
|
df |
83 |
83 |
— |
|
|
p-value |
<.001 |
0.857 |
— |
|
|
Note. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001 |
||||
The statistical analysis demonstrates a significant
positive correlation between the frequency of "faking" a smile or
positive mood (Question 1) and the extent to which one's "professional
persona" differs from their true personality (Question 3), with a Pearson's
r of 0.745 and a p-value of <.001. This indicates a strong,
statistically significant relationship between outward emotional display and
perceived self-discrepancy, reinforcing the concept of emotional
dissonance.Furthermore, there is a significant positive correlation (Pearson's
r = 0.372, p < .001) between "faking" emotions (Question 1) and
the impact of being a "Hospitality Role Model" on daily energy levels
(Question 5). This result supports the alternate hypothesis,
suggesting that higher engagement in surface acting is indeed linked to
increased emotional exhaustion among hotel management teachers. Conversely,
the relationship between a perceived difference in "professional
persona" (Question 3) and the impact on energy levels (Question 5) is not
statistically significant (Pearson's r = -0.020, p = 0.857), failing to
demonstrate a direct link between this specific aspect of emotional labor and
emotional exhaustion. This suggests that while actively faking emotions is
draining, merely feeling a difference between one's true personality and
professional persona may not directly translate to energy depletion in this
context. Hence the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternate is
accepted. These findings align with broader literature indicating that surface
acting typically has negative associations with employee well-being and
positive associations with job burnout.
Hypothesis 2: The Effectiveness
of Coping Strategies
·
Null
Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the perceived
stress levels between teachers who use "Social Support" and those who
use "Psychological Detachment" as coping mechanisms.
·
Alternate
Hypothesis (H2): Teachers who primarily utilize "Social
Support" (colleague interaction) report significantly higher effectiveness
in stress reduction compared to those who use "Psychological
Detachment."
The study's primary focus is Hypothesis 2: The
Effectiveness of Coping Strategies, which aims to assess whether particular
actions are effective in managing stress. This directly addresses Objective 3,
which concerns Coping Mechanisms.
Results
Table 3: Results of
Hypothesis 3
|
Independent Samples T-Test |
|||||
|
|
|
Statistic |
p |
Mean difference |
SE difference |
|
8. How often is
"Social Support" (colleague/ friends interaction) in reducing your
work stress? |
Mann-Whitney U |
591 |
0.019 |
8.68e-6 |
|
The data for this statistical test will be drawn
from "Effectiveness" scores in Question 8, with groups identified
through Question 7. The comparison between the groups will be performed using
the Mann-Whitney U test.
The Mann-Whitney U test yielded a statistic of 591,
a p-value of 0.019, and a mean difference of 8.68e-6. The Mann-Whitney U
test is a non-parametric statistical test used to compare two independent
samples, particularly when the data may not follow a normal distribution.
It assesses whether one group tends to have systematically higher or
lower ranks than the other by comparing the ranks of the data rather than their
raw values. This test is robust for skewed data or data with outliers
and is suitable for both small and large sample sizes, but it is less powerful
than the t-test for normally distributed data. In this context, the
p-value of 0.019 suggests that there is some statistical evidence against the
null hypothesis, indicating a potentially significant difference between the
groups, given a typical significance threshold of 0.05. Hence it can be
further said that the null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis has
been accepted. It can be concluded that teachers who primarily
utilize "Social Support" (colleague interaction) report significantly
higher effectiveness in stress reduction compared to those who use
"Psychological Detachment.
SUGGESTIONS
Future research should expand the scope of
investigation to include diverse geographical locations and cultural contexts
to enhance the generalizability of findings on emotional labor1 in hospitality
education. Longitudinal studies would offer deeper insights into the long-term
effects of emotional labor and the efficacy of coping strategies. Furthermore,
qualitative methodologies, such as in-depth interviews, could provide richer,
more nuanced data on the lived experiences of hotel management teachers and their
unique coping mechanisms. Exploring specific interventions and training
programs for emotional regulation within hospitality curricula is also
recommended.
CONCLUSION
This research has highlighted the pervasive nature of
emotional labor demands among hotel management teachers, revealing significant
correlations between surface acting, emotional dissonance, and daily energy
depletion. The study confirmed that frequent surface acting is positively and
significantly correlated with increased emotional exhaustion, reinforcing the
psychological toll of inauthentic emotional displays (Pearson's r = 0.372, p
< .001). Conversely, social support emerged as a highly effective coping
mechanism for stress reduction (Mann-Whitney U = 591, p = 0.019), underscoring
the importance of collegial interaction. The findings also indicate a critical
gap in institutional support, with a majority of teachers lacking formal
training in managing emotional labor. These insights emphasize the urgent need
for targeted interventions aimed at fostering authentic emotional expression
and enhancing support systems to mitigate burnout and promote well-being among
hospitality educators, ultimately strengthening the quality of future
hospitality professionals.
References
1.
Agbayani-Pineda,
R. W. (2025). Teacher’s Emotional Toll toward the Shifts in Instructional
Settings: A Descriptive Analysis of Emotional Labor, Resilience, and Burnout.
International Journal of Instruction, 18(3), 277.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18315a
2.
Agbayani-Pineda,
R. W. (2025). Teacher’s Emotional Toll toward the Shifts in Instructional
Settings: A Descriptive Analysis of Emotional Labor, Resilience, and Burnout.
International Journal of Instruction, 18(3), 277.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18315a
3.
Al-Hamad,
N., Oladapo, O. J., Afolabi, J. O. A., Olatoye, F. O., &Eboigbe, E. O.
(2023). Enhancing educational outcomes through strategic Human Resources (HR)
initiatives: Emphasizing faculty development, diversity, and leadership
excellence. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 20(3), 363.
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.3.2438
4.
Alrawadıeh,
D. D., & Dinçer, M. Z. (2021). Emotional Labor, Quality of Work Life, and
Life Satisfaction of Tour Guides: The Mediating Role of Burnout. Journal of Tourism
Leisure and Hospitality, 3(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.48119/toleho.936766
5.
Alshahrani,
T. M. (2023). How Are You Feeling Now? Exploring EFL Teachers’ Emotional Labor,
Institutional Power, and Dissonance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research,
14(6), 1656. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1406.24
6.
Altaş,
S. S., Çekmecelioğlu, H. G., Konakay, G., &Günsel, M. (2024).
Relationships among supervisor support, autonomy, job satisfaction and
emotional labor on nurses within the Turkey context of healthcare services.
Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1303170
7.
Bayram,
P. E., &Eveyik-Aydın, E. (2023). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE
EMOTIONAL LABOR AND BURNOUT LEVELS OF EFL TEACHERS AT UNIVERSITY PREPARATORY
SCHOOLS. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of
English, 34(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i2/226-244
8.
Bhattachayra,
S., & Dasgupta, H. (2021). Emotional Labour in the Lifeworld of Indian
Hospitality Employees: A Phenomenological Inquiry. The Qualitative Report.
https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4779
9.
Burić,
I., Kim, L. E., &Hodis, F. A. (2021). Emotional labor profiles among
teachers: Associations with positive affective, motivational, and well-being
factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1227.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000654
10.
Burić,
I., Kim, L. E., &Hodis, F. A. (2021). Emotional labor profiles among
teachers: Associations with positive affective, motivational, and well-being
factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1227.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000654
11.
Carey,
S., & Sutton, A. (2024). Early childhood teachers’ emotional labour: The
role of job and personal resources in protecting well-being. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 148, 104699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104699
12.
Chaudhry,
S., &Chhajer, R. (2023). Enhancing psychological well-being of school
teachers in India: role of energy management, thriving, and stress. Frontiers
in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1239587
13.
Dağtaş,
A., & Zaimoğlu, S. (2025). Emotions inspire transformation: delving
into EFL teachers’ emotions and professional identities. Frontiers in
Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1684188
14.
Dağtaş,
A., & Zaimoğlu, S. (2025). Emotions inspire transformation: delving
into EFL teachers’ emotions and professional identities. Frontiers in
Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1684188
15.
Eren, N.
B., & Dinç, L. (2025). Emotional Labor, Job Satisfaction, and Burnout Among
Academicians. DergiPark (Istanbul University).
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sbuhemsirelik/issue/91283/1645720
16.
Ghyasi,
M., & Gürbüz, N. (2023). Emotional labor and emotional capital: An
interpretive phenomenological analysis of teachers of English. PLoS ONE, 18(4).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283981
17.
Gurung,
A., Gurung, A., Shrestha, K., Bogati, L. B., Thapa, L., KC, N., & Adhikari,
S. (2025). Workforce Demographics and Behavioral Competencies in the
Hospitality Industry. International Journal of Atharva, 3(3), 132.
https://doi.org/10.3126/ija.v3i3.84406
18.
Han, J.,
Yin, H., Yang, X., & Wang, F. (2021). Does Emotional Labor Matter for
University Teaching? Examining the Antecedents and Consequences of University
Teachers’ Emotional Labor Strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731099
19.
Han, J.,
Yin, H., Yang, X., & Wang, F. (2021). Does Emotional Labor Matter for
University Teaching? Examining the Antecedents and Consequences of University
Teachers’ Emotional Labor Strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731099
20.
Hao, D.
(2024). An empirical study on the relationship between emotional labor and work
performance among university teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1470436.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1470436
21.
Hsu, C.
H. C., Chen, N., & Zhang, S. (2023). Emotion regulation research in
hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
Management, 36(6), 2069. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-01-2023-0049
22.
Hu, Y.
(2023). Examining the effects of teacher self-compassion, emotion regulation,
and emotional labor strategies as predictors of teacher resilience in EFL
context. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1190837.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190837
23.
Hu, Y.
(2023). Examining the effects of teacher self-compassion, emotion regulation,
and emotional labor strategies as predictors of teacher resilience in EFL
context. Frontiers in Psychology, 14.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190837
24.
Hu, Y.,
Tu, W., Zhou, L., Wu, X., & Yan, Q. (2023). Evaluating emotional labor from
a career management perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1093723
25.
Hu, Y.,
Tu, W., Zhou, L., Wu, X., & Yan, Q. (2023). Evaluating emotional labor from
a career management perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1093723
26.
Jaikla,
P., &Piyakun, A. (2024). Teachers’ Emotional Labor: A Systematic Review.
Journal of Education and Learning, 14(2), 159.
https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v14n2p159
27.
Jalilzadeh,
K., Attaran, A., & Coombe, C. (2024). Unveiling emotional experiences: a
phenomenological study of emotional labor in expatriate EFL teachers.
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00259-z
28.
Jing-jing,
Y. (2024). The Impact of Teachers’ Emotional Labor on Teachers and Students: A
Literature Review. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,
56(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/56/20241596
29.
Kariou,
A., Koutsimani, P., Montgomery, A., &Lainidi, O. (2021). Emotional Labor
and Burnout among Teachers: A Systematic Review. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12760.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312760
30.
Kariou,
A., Koutsimani, P., Montgomery, A., &Lainidi, O. (2021). Emotional Labor
and Burnout among Teachers: A Systematic Review. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12760.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312760
31.
Köskün,
T. (2025). ÖğretmenlerinDuygusal Emek
GösterimleriileTükenmişlikDüzeyiArasındakiİlişkininİncelenmesi.
DergiPark (Istanbul University).
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jmse/issue/93486/1705941
32.
Lam, R.,
Cheung, C., & Lugosi, P. (2021). The impacts of cultural intelligence and
emotional labor on the job satisfaction of luxury hotel employees.
International Journal of Hospitality Management, 100, 103084.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103084
33.
Lam, R.,
Cheung, C., & Lugosi, P. (2021). The impacts of cultural intelligence and
emotional labor on the job satisfaction of luxury hotel employees.
International Journal of Hospitality Management, 100, 103084.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103084
34.
Lantican,
M. L. Q. (2021). Modeling Workload, Job Satisfaction, Work Stress and
Organizational Commitment on Turnover Intention: Evidence from Hospitality
Management Educators. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies,
9(3), 439. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2021.93028
35.
Leo, A.,
& Wilcox, K. C. (2025). “I didn’t want them to see that I was spent”:
educators’ stress and emotional labor during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers
in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1595192
36.
Lu, L.,
& Jian, L. (2024). Emotional sociology applied: predictive influence of
affective neuroscience personality traits on Chinese preschool teachers’
performance and wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 15.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1372694
37.
Ma, P.,
Zhang, L., Dong, H., & Yu, J. (2023). The relationships between teachers’
emotional labor and display rules, trait emotions, exhaustion, and classroom
emotional climate. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 957856.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.957856
38.
Mahasneh,
A. M., & Gazo, A. M. (2025). Causal Relationship between Emotional Labor
Strategies and Teacher Burnout. Acta PaedagogicaVilnensia, 54, 41.
https://doi.org/10.15388/actpaed.2025.54.3
39.
Mahasneh,
A. M., & Gazo, A. M. (2025). Causal Relationship between Emotional Labor
Strategies and Teacher Burnout. Acta PaedagogicaVilnensia, 54, 41. https://doi.org/10.15388/actpaed.2025.54.3
40.
Mameghani,
A. A., Yousefi, M. H., Asadollahfam, H., & Mohammadi, R. R. (2024). Feeling
and Acting in Teaching Classrooms: A Mixed-method Analysis of EFL Teachers’
Emotional Labour Strategies and their Discrete Emotions. Research Square
(Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3927905/v1
41.
Mameghani,
A. A., Yousefi, M. H., Asadollahfam, H., & Mohammadi, R. R. (2024). Feeling
and Acting in Teaching Classrooms: A Mixed-method Analysis of EFL Teachers’
Emotional Labour Strategies and their Discrete Emotions. Research Square
(Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3927905/v1
42.
Nath, R.,
& Pandey, C. (2025). The Hidden Burden: Emotional Labor and Well-being of
School Teachers. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(2), 500.
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i21802
43.
Nath, R.,
& Pandey, C. (2025). The Hidden Burden: Emotional Labor and Well-being of
School Teachers. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(2), 500.
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i21802
44.
Ntumi,
S., Amos, P. M., Antwi, T., Nimo, D. G., Ofori, D. M., & Sarfo, P. O.
(2025). Linking Burnout Emotional Exhaustion and Assessment Related Stress to
Mental Health Outcomes Among Early Career Teachers: Counselling Support as a
Dual Mediating and Moderating Factor. Research Square (Research Square).
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7003152/v1
45.
Nyanjom,
J., & Wilkins, H. (2021). Emotional labor and the hospitality and tourism
curriculum: The development and integration of emotion skills. Journal of Human
Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 20(4), 611.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2021.1960118
46.
Nyanjom,
J., & Wilkins, H. (2021). Emotional labor and the hospitality and tourism
curriculum: The development and integration of emotion skills. Journal of Human
Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 20(4), 611.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2021.1960118
47.
O’Neil,
S., & Gopal, J. (2021). “Just smile and wave”: Workplace requirements and
emotional labour of academic staff at a South African university. Journal of
Psychology in Africa, 31(5), 470. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2021.1978680
48.
Pooja, A.
R., &Bhoomadevi, A. (2023). Emotional Labour and its Outcomes Among Nurses
at a Tertiary Hospital – A Proposed Model. International Journal of
Experimental Research and Review, 35, 83.
https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2023.v35spl.008
49.
Qiu, S.,
Qiu, J., Xu, J., & Wang, L. (2025). Effective emotion regulation and
positive psychological capital as coping strategies to alleviate teacher
burnout: a narrative review [Review of Effective emotion regulation and
positive psychological capital as coping strategies to alleviate teacher
burnout: a narrative review]. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. Frontiers Media.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1639037
50.
R
Core Team (2024). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing.
(Version 4.4) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org.
(R packages retrieved from CRAN snapshot 2024-08-07).
51.
Salimzadeh,
R., Hall, N. C., & Saroyan, A. (2021). Examining Academics’ Strategies for
Coping With Stress and Emotions: A Review of Research [Review of Examining
Academics’ Strategies for Coping With Stress and Emotions: A Review of
Research]. Frontiers in Education, 6. Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.660676
52.
Savage,
M. P., & Woloshyn, V. (2022). Coping is crucial : exploring relations
between K-12 educators and staff coping strategies, perceived stress and
psychological wellbeing. International Journal of Emotional Education, 14(2), 3.
https://doi.org/10.56300/qbvz8040
53.
Sixpence,
S., Mukucha, P., Muzanenhamo, L., Ukpere, W. I., & Adekanmbi, F. (2023).
Consumer dining duration and spending: The role of emotional labour practice in
the restaurant industry. Annals of Spiru Haret University Economic Series,
23(2). https://doi.org/10.26458/23212
54.
Smith,
K., Sheridan, L., Duursma, E., & Alonzo, D. (2025). Teachers’ emotional
labour: the joys, demands, and constraints. Teachers and Teaching, 31(8), 1411.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2025.2466560
55.
Sun, D.,
Zhao, S., Tao, W., & Xu, K. (2025). The influence mechanism of emotional
labor on the turnover intention of college counselors: Based on the multiple
effects of emotional exhaustion and perceived organizational support. Acta
Psychologica, 260, 105669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105669
56.
Sun, H.,
Chang, H., & Shen, X. (2026). Emotional labor, well-being, and professional
development among university teachers: a qualitative study from a job
demands-resources perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 17.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1746170
57.
Sun, P.,
Wang, L., Chen, X., Cui, M., Ma, K., & Yan, L. (2025). How emotional labor
leads to turnover intention: the mediating role of job burnout and the
moderating role of social support among rural physical education teachers in
China. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1596750.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1596750
58.
Sun, P.,
Wang, L., Chen, X., Cui, M., Ma, K., & Yan, L. (2025). How emotional labor
leads to turnover intention: the mediating role of job burnout and the
moderating role of social support among rural physical education teachers in
China. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1596750.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1596750
59.
The
Jamovi Project (2024). jamovi. (Version 2.6) [Computer Software]. Retrieved
from https://www.jamovi.org.
60.
TÖRE, E.
(2021). Investigation of Emotional Labor in Teaching. International Journal of
Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(3), 51.
https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.3.225
61.
TÖRE, E.
(2021). Investigation of Emotional Labor in Teaching. International Journal of
Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(3), 51.
https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.3.225
62.
Üngüren,
E., Tekin, Ö. A., &Avsallı, H. (2025). The cost of smile: how
individual and organizational factors moderate the impact of emotional labor on
work alienation via burnout. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1668413.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1668413
63.
Vogl, P.,
Methlagl, M., &Hanfstingl, B. (2025). A systematic review of strategies,
contexts and outcomes of emotion regulation in teaching. Discover Psychology,
5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00417-5
64.
Vogl, P.,
Methlagl, M., &Hanfstingl, B. (2025). A systematic review of strategies,
contexts and outcomes of emotion regulation in teaching. Discover Psychology,
5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00417-5
65.
Wang, H.,
& Frenzel, A. C. (2025). “Exhaustive but effective”: A multi-site study
investigating the profiles of teachers’ emotions and emotional labor. Journal
of School Psychology, 110, 101456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101456
66.
Wang, Y.,
Zai, F., & Zhou, X. (2025). The Impact of Emotion Regulation Strategies on
Teachers’ Well-Being and Positive Emotions: A Meta-Analysis. Behavioral
Sciences, 15(3), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030342
67.
Wang, Y.,
Zai, F., & Zhou, X. (2025). The Impact of Emotion Regulation Strategies on
Teachers’ Well-Being and Positive Emotions: A Meta-Analysis. Behavioral
Sciences, 15(3), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030342
68.
Xu, G.,
Haratyan, F., & Tian, H. (2026). A 2025 systematic review of teacher
emotion regulation and well-being: implications for student engagement,
learning outcomes, and professional development in EFL contexts. Frontiers in
Psychology, 16, 1715266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1715266
69.
Yu, X.,
& Ying, T. (2024). Under the surface of teacher occupational wellness and
effectiveness in higher education: a look into the mediator roles of work
passion and emotion regulation via SEM analysis. BMC Psychology, 12(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01656-2
70.
Zhai, L.,
& Chen, G. (2025). Teachers’ emotional labor in parent–teacher
interactions: key elements and theoretical logic from a grounded theory
approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1639197.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1639197
71.
Zhang, F.
(2025). Surface vs. deep acting in EFL instruction: mediating and moderating
roles of emotion regulation and intelligence in burnout. Frontiers in
Psychology, 16, 1611941. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1611941
72.
Zheng,
J., Geng, Y., Gao, J., & Xiang, Q. (2024). Authenticity: Effective
emotional labor strategies on teaching efficacy of university teachers in
China. PLoS ONE, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297760
73.
Zou, X.,
Wang, H., Ma, X., & Pi, Y. (2025). The influence of organizational support
on emotional labor of Chinese vocational college teachers: The mediating role
of professional identity and the moderating role of work-life balance. Acta
Psychologica, 261, 105999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105999