The Effect of Circuit Training on Selected Motor Fitness Components and Physiological Variables among College Level Basketball Players

A sport is a sorted out, focused and capable physical movement requiring responsibility and reasonable play. Some viewsports as varying from amusements dependent on the way that there are generally more elevated amounts of associationand fiscal advantages related with it. Physical wellness is characterized as the ability to complete each day exercises withouunnecessary weariness and with enough vitality for possible later use for crises. Studies have over and over appearedsuccessful exercise program ought to be created to improve the physical wellness among competitors. Aerobics program isan accumulation of preparing which improves the solid quality, continuance and cardiovascular wellness of the person. As faas anyone is concerned, no information are accessible on the job of high-intensity aerobics on engine wellness segments, foexample, speed, quality continuance, dangerous power etc.and on physiological factors like cardio respiratory perseveranceand resting beat rate among school level basketball players. Along these lines current examination was to consider theimpact of high-intensity exercise on chosen engine wellness parts and physiological factors among school level basketbalplayers. Thirty basketball players were chosen as subjects from Newman College of Arts and Science, Thodupuzha, Kerala in theage gathering of 18-25. The arbitrary gathering configuration was utilized as trial plan for this examination. The informationgathered from the high-intensity exercise gathering and control bunch amid pretest and posttest on speed, qualitycontinuance, hazardous power, cardio respiratory perseverance and resting beat rate were utilized for measurableexamination to discover noteworthy contrast between the pretest and posttest implies by figuring subordinate 'F' tes(ANCOVA) for every factor independently. In all cases 0.05 dimension of certainty was used to test the noteworthiness. Group I = Experimental Group (15) Group II= Control Group I (15)

In the present study, circuit training was considered as independent variable.

A. Motor fitness components  Speed  Strength endurance  Explosive power B. Physiological variables  Cardio respiratory endurance  Resting pulse rate.

The reason for the examination was to discover the impact of high-intensity aerobics on chose engine wellness segmentsand physiological factors among school level basketball players. According to the accessible writing, the accompanying testswere utilized to gather applicable information on the chose ward factors and they were displayed in the table 1(Clarke. et al.1972).

This is the essential segment in landing at the end by looking at the theories. The technique of testing the speculations wasfinished either by tolerating the outcomes got in connection to the dimension of certainty. The dimension of certainty wasfixed at 0.05 dimensions which were viewed as adequate for this investigation. The tests are generally called trial ocriticalness since we test whether the distinctions among the pretest and post scores of the examples are huge or not. In thepresent investigation if the acquired qualities were more prominent than the classified esteem, the theories will beacknowledged such that there existed noteworthy contrasts among the methods for gatherings thought about. What's more, ithey got qualities were not exactly the required qualities at 0.05 dimension then the speculations will be rejected such thathere existed no huge contrast among the methods for the gatherings under investigation.

The obtained results were analyzed statistically using mean, standard deviation and „F‟ test to find out the level osignificance. The obtained „F‟ test ratio was compared to 0.05 level of significance which had a value of 3.34.

In order to measure the motor fitness component speed, 50 meter dash test was performed. The significant mean differencebetween adjusted initial means and final means among the control and experimental group were analysed using ANCOVAand the result was tabulated in table 2.

The table 2 shows that the pre and posttest means of experimental group and control group for speed were 8.13, 8.30 and7.84, 8.25 respectively. The obtained „F‟ ratio 12.99 was greater than the table value 3.34. Hence there was significandifference between the experimental and control group.

In an attempt to evaluate the strength endurance, Knee bent Sit-ups test was performed. The significant mean differencebetween adjusted initial means and final means among the control and experimental group were analysed using ANCOVAand the result was tabulated in table 3.

27

28

29

30 31

32

33 34

35

36 37

32.47

30.6

36.2

31.07

35.33

31.93

Mean Pre Mean Post

Adjusted Mean

Scores of endurance Experimental group Control group

From the data on strength endurance, the pre and posttest means of experimental group and control group for strengthendurance were 32.47, 36.20 and 30.60, 31.07 respectively were calculated. The obtained „F‟ ratio 62.16 was greater thanthe table value 3.34. Thus it shows that there was significant difference between the experimental and control group.

In order to assess the explosive power, the standing board jump test was performed. The significant mean differencebetween adjusted initial means and final means among the control and experimental group were analysed using ANCOVAand the result was tabulated in table 4.

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

32.64

2.32 2.8 2.36

2.672.48

Mean Pre

Mean Post

Adjusted Mean

Scores of explosive power Experimental groupControl group

From the table showing the data on explosive power, the pre and posttest means of experimental group and control group foexplosive power were 2.64, 2.80 and 2.32, 2.36 respectively were obtained. The obtained „F‟ ratio 42.41 was greater than thetable value 3.34. Hence there was significant difference between the experimental and control group.

In order to assess the cardio respiratory endurance, Coopers 12 minutes run/ walk test was performed. The significant meandifference between adjusted initial means and final means among the control and experimental group were analysed usingANCOVA and the result was tabulated in table 5.

1950

2000 2050

2100

2150 2200

2250

2180.67

2089.07 2107.33 2168.61 2084.59

Mean Pre

Mean Post

Adjusted Mean

Scores of cardiovascular endurance Experimental group Control group

From the table on the data on cardio respiratory endurance, the pre and posttest means of experimental group and controgroup for cardio respiratory endurance were 2180.67, 2282.00 and 2289.07, 2107.33 respectively were obtained. Theobtained „F‟ ratio 35.54 was greater than the table value 3.34. Hence there was significant difference between theexperimental and control group.

In an attempt to evaluate the resting pulse rate, radial pulse rate was recorded. The significant mean difference betweenadjusted initial means and final means among the control and experimental group were analysed using ANCOVA and theresult was tabulated in table 6.

65.5

66

66.5

67

67.5

68

68.5

69

69.5

70

70.5 7170.7370.47

69.6 67.52

69.74

Mean Pre

Mean Post Adjusted Mean

Scores of radial pulse rate Experimental

groupControl group

From the table showing the data on resting pulse rate, the pre and posttest means of experimental group and control groupfor cardio resting pulse rate were 70.73, 67.67 and 70.47, 69.60 respectively were obtained. The obtained „F‟ ratio 0.35 wasgreater than the table value 3.34. Hence there was significant between the experimental and control group.

 The result of this examinations demonstrates that there was a critical distinction of speed in exploratory gathering, asan aftereffects of 12 weeks of chose high-intensity aerobics program. The 'F' proportion was 12.99. Since there wasa distinction in the mean qualities, it demonstrated measurably huge outcome.  The aftereffect of this examinations demonstrates that there was critical contrast of solidarity continuance in tesgathering, as a results of 12 weeks of chose aerobics program. The 'F' proportion was 62.16. Since there was adistinction in the mean qualities, it demonstrated factually critical outcomes.  The result of this examinations demonstrates that there was huge contrast of unstable power in exploratorygathering, because of 12 weeks of chose high-intensity aerobics program. The 'F' proportion was 42.41. Since therewas contrast in the mean qualities, it demonstrated measurably huge outcome.  The aftereffect of this examinations demonstrates that there was noteworthy contrast of cardio respiratoryperseverance in exploratory gathering, as a results of 12 weeks of chose high-intensity exercise program. The 'Fproportion was 35.54. Since there was a distinction in the mean qualities, it indicated factually huge outcome.  The results of this examination demonstrates that there was noteworthy contrast of resting beat rate in test gatheringas an aftereffects of 12 weeks of chose high-intensity exercise practice. The 'F' proportion was 92.48. Since therewas a distinction in the mean qualities, it demonstrated factually critical outcome.

Inside the impediments of the present examination, the accompanying ends were drawn. • The aftereffect of the test bunch indicated critical enhancement for speed when thought about inside its posttestWhat's more, the control bunch indicated irrelevant enhancement for speed. • The result of the test bunch demonstrated critical enhancement for quality continuance when looked at inside itsposttest. Also, the control bunch indicated irrelevant enhancement for quality continuance. about inside its posttest. Furthermore, the control bunch demonstrated immaterial enhancement for dangerouspower. • The result of the test bunch indicated noteworthy enhancement for cardio respiratory continuance when analyzedinside its posttest. What's more, the control bunch indicated immaterial enhancement for cardio respiratorycontinuance. • The result of the test bunch demonstrated critical enhancement for resting beat rate when analyzed inside itsposttest. What's more, the control bunch demonstrated irrelevant enhancement for resting beat rate.

Burkow-Heikkinen L. (2011). “Non-Invasive Physiological Monitoring of Exercise and Fitness” Neurological Research, 33 (1)pp. 3-17. Charles, A., Bucher., Deborah, A. and Wuest. (1987). Foundations of Physical Education and Sports. Saint Louis: TimesMirror and Mosby College Publishing.

Yang, D. J., Kang, D. M. and Yang, Y. A. e. a. (2009). Improvement of physical fitness and work ability of the middle-agedand aged workers through exercise prescription program. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 19, 297–306. Williams A.D., Anderson M.J., Selig S., Carey M.F., Febbraio M.A., Hayes A., Toia D., Harrap S.B., Hare D.L. (2010)“Differential response to resistance training in CHF according to ACE genotype”, School of Human Life SciencesUniversity of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia. Scholtes V.A., Becher J.G., Comuth A., Dekkers H., Van Dijk L, Dallmeijer A.J. (2010). “Effectiveness of functionaprogressive resistance exercise strength training on muscle strength and mobility in children with cerebral palsy: arandomized controlled trial”, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care ResearchVU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Mudge S., Barber P.A. & Stott N.S. (2009). “Circuit-based rehabilitation improves gait endurance but not usual walkingactivity in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial” School of Rehabilitation and Occupation Studies, AUTUniversity, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Dixon C.B. & Andreacci J.L. (2009). “Effect of resistance exercise on percent body fat using leg-to-leg and segmentabioelectrical impedance analysis in adults”, Department of Health Science, Lock Haven University, Lock HavenPennsylvania, 2009.

Ph.D. Scholar, Tamil Nadu Physical Education and Sports University, Thodupuzha