A Study on the Process of Mutagenesis of Soyabean

INTRODUCTION

Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill,) is a yearly leguminous species developed for the most part for its seed. It is utilized in an assortment of ventures, giving items to human utilization, domesticated animals feed and modern purposes. Soybean seed comprises of 35% starch, 5% debris, 40% protein and 20%o oil; and is a significant wellspring of protein and oil for business items. It is likewise used to create a high protein creature feed. About 40%o of the world's consumable vegetable oil originates from soybeans (Hildebrand et al, 1986). The soy proteins have the most elevated dietary benefit of all the plant proteins for human nourishment, being especially high in lysine. Soybean in this manner is a basic business crop and is in the second biggest situation among money crop in United States behind com (Soybean Research Advisory Institute, 1984) with most of development situated in the mid western and southern United States (Moore and Collins, 1989; Comptonis, 1995). Soybean positions first among the significant oilseed crops of the world and has now discovered a conspicuous spot in India (Mahna, 2005). All the more as of late, Chauhan (2008) detailed that soybean has involved first position among oil seeds in Quite a while 2005 onwards. According to Liu (1997), the world market for nourishment grade soybeans was evaluated as one million metric tons and kept on developing with the steady advancement of new ad soyfoods. Soybean began from northeastern China around 4,000 years prior and is presently become around the world. The principle soybean makers incorporate the United States, Brazil, China, Argentma, Indonesia, and Russia (Hildebrand et al, 2016)

BREEDING

Soybean that possesses a desired spot among the oilseed crops and being developed everywhere throughout the world, is a financially significant leguminous crop for oil, feed and nourishment items. The significant requirements for low efficiency of soybean are its poor seed reasonability and non-accessibility of early developing, photograph obtuse, high yielding cultivars with protection from biotic and abiotic stresses (Bhatnagar and Karmakar, 2000). In the same manner as other plant reproducers, the vegetable raiser's prime target has been to create genotype fit for delivering ideal yield of palatable quality, improvement in either single or few polygenically controlled financial characteristics and quality properties isn't regularly accomplished by hybridization inside most limited conceivable time. Moreover, in spite of the fact that choice for a financially valuable unconstrained mutations still happens with significant achievement, intentional enlistment of an explicitly wanted mutations at explicit time and place and in chose genotype can be a substantially more alluring alternative (Harten, 1998). One of the main preferences of customary

valuable in numerous fundamental investigations, for example, recognizable proof of amino corrosive deposits basic for catalyst movement (Chopra, 2015). Albeit customary change breeding has lost its superior position, prompted mutations keep on being in extraordinary interest for different biotechnological applications (Chopra, 2005). The techniques for transformation enlistment and investigations of freaks have seen incredible changes as of late. The present day soybean cultivars are gotten from slender hereditary base. The hereditary changeability present in any crop is of indispensable significance in the plan of compelling breeding project. Consequently, the hereditary fluctuation created by initiated mutations can positively recuperate the alleles for higher profitability and furthermore for better plant type. Be that as it may, transformation breeding examinations in soybean has lingered behind other financially significant crops (Singh and Hymowitz, 2005). On the other hand it has been imagined that the focused on recombinants without upsetting the yield/quality status of the current all around adjusted assortments are reachable inside most brief time period by transformation. The improvement and creation of high yielding assortments have been significant for differed agro-climatic districts of our nation. The determination estimation of the freak quality has involved a significant paradigm in developing high yielding assortments through change breeding. It is conceived that through suitable hereditary control, the advancement of against metabolite free soybean genotypes with no attending cut off yield punishment would get conceivable. Keeping this end in see the modem cytogenetic methodology of transformation breeding has been viewed as worth going after for getting the attractive genotypes of soybean for agronomic characteristics and oil quality.

Ahmad et al. (1977) revealed paracentric reversals in the cross breeds between the two types of soybean as the portion was expanded. Qing et al. (1997) detailed that after illumination of soybean seeds for 3 days with 500 rad gamma beams, the quantity of mitochondria per cell diminished, while the quantity of vacuoles expanded and cell structure changed drastically with certain organelles having deteriorated. Treatment with 5000 rad gamma beams caused huge cell harm and restrained cell development. Ping et al. (1998) contemplated cytomorphology of a male clean freak NJ89-1 in soybean and detailed that the perceptions on anther and dust arrangement, dust divider and anther divider, and so forth. NJ89-1 showed comparative meiotic irregularities of asynapsis or desynapsis to those of st2-st5 freaks by varied from st2-st5 freaks in female fruitfulness with females of st2-st5 freaks being firmly hindered. Bione et al. (2002) watched numerous univalent a couple bivalents in diakinesis of a freak line BR97-13774H. Telophase II displayed a fluctuated number of various measured cores; dust sterility was assessed at 93.12%. Bione et al. (2002b) detailed that numerous univalent, few or absolute nonattendance of bivalents were found in diakinesis of BR97-12986H, soybean freak. Bivalents introduced in or two terminal chiasmata, while univalents held the sister chromatedattachment. Bivalents and most univalent congregated at the tropical plats, albeit univalent often moved to the shafts rashly. Slouches coming about because of postponement in chiasmata terminalizationwere likewise recorded. Dust sterility was assessed at 91.2% isolation proportion for sterility in this line and its descendants arrived at 3:1.

Hassan et al. (1985) lighted seeds of Bragg, Hodgson and Lee-74 containing 1113% dampness content with 100 to 500 Gy gamma beams and 5 to 30 Gy quick neutrons and revealed that development restraint expanded with expanding portions and germination was hindered distinctly at the higher dosages. Lee-74 was the most touchy assortment to gamma radiation and Bragg the most delicate to quick neutron dosages over 20 Gy, as uncovered by contrasts in epicotyl length. Bhatnagar et al. (2006) treated seeds of soybean cv. Bragg with EMS (ethyl methanesulfonate) and gamma beams, with or without extra presentation to UV light for2 h at 260 edge and detailed that change recurrence in the M2 extended from 2.24 to 22.85%. Among the freaks got T-214 was from the 25 kR gamma radiation + UV treatment. It surpassed the parent in germinability by 15% and was 5 days sooner in development. Legacy of dark colored stem spoil opposition in soybean cultivar BSR 101 was examined by Eathington et al, (2006) comparatively the legacy of soybean protection from purple seed recolor has been considered by Srisombun and Supapomhemin (1993). The hereditary variety with respect to the oil content in F2-F5 offspring of soybean has been turned out by Peng et al. (1993). Another variation of SBTi (Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor assigned as Tix) was found by this character applied by single significant quality.

After the atomic besieging with obliterating consequences for the populaces of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, extraordinary endeavorswere made to utilize nuclear vitality for quiet purposes, particularly by the Western countries drove by the United States. One of such endeavors was to utilize ionizing radiation as a device to prompt valuable mutations in crop plants. The revelation that X-beams instigated mutations in the fhiit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Muller, 1927) and in grain (Stadler,2000) started another field incited mutagenesis, which later was to turn into the most significant apparatus in finding qualities on chromosomes, examining quality structure, articulation and guideline, and for investigating genomes. Not long after this revelation many plant raisers and geneticists began to research the utilization of radiation-actuated mutations for changing plant qualities. Gamma beams, at present, are the most supported mutagenic operator found by Villard (2006). Ionizing radiation and profoundly effective synthetic mutagens are typically applied for the advancement of changed ages. Like ionizing radiation, utilizing synthetic concoctions to initiate mutations in plants for breeding purposes got well known, particularly in Sweden. During the 1950s, incited mutagenesis was generally sought after in the US, Europe, Japan and China. Following the spearheading radiation investigations of Muller and Stadler, the revelation that synthetics can actuate mutations in Drosophila and plants was made in the USSR and United Kingdom during 1940s and became known after the second worid war (Auerbach and Robson, 2016, Rapoport, 2016). Harten (1998) exhorted that considering the possibilifies and constraints of synthetic mutagenesis in higher plants, plant reproducers should attempt synthetic compounds like ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS), sodium azide (NaNa) and nitroso mixes and initiate a wide range of (helpful) mutations. Dry seeds can be presented to various centralizations of a mutagen for a more extended term or seeds can be presoaked (for DNA engineered movement) and treated for brief time (Harten, 2018).

1) To study effectiveness and efficiency of the mutagenic treatments. 2) To study the mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency for both gamma rays and EMS. 3) Selection of some high yielding mutants in Mz and M3 generations. the Center for Application of Isotope and Rays, National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia, South Jakarta, Indonesia. The solid seeds were illuminated by gamma-beams with dosages of 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280, and 2560 Gy, and masterminded in a totally randomized square plan in three replicates.After mutagenesis, the seeds were splashed for 24 hours in aquadest at a temperature of around 25 0C. Germination. Three repeats of 50 seeds of every mutagen portion were sprouted in plastic box containing sand, and held under lab condition .It was provided with water each day so as to keep up sand dampness. Physiological attributes of soybean as affected by mutagenesis. The seeds from mutagenesis were considered germinating when the protrusion of radicle by≥ 2 mm. Median lethal dose (LD50) was calculated at 5th day after germination, based on the number of surviving seedlings in different mutagen doses . Germination rate at the fifth day (first check) and the eighth day the last tally) were determined after the equation of Marcu et al., in which NT = extent of the sprouting seeds of every treatment; N = number of seeds utilized in bioassay. Mean germination time (MGT) was resolved utilizing the recipe of Σ f.x/Σ f; f = seeds sprouted on the day "x". The lower MGT values show the quicker a populace of seeds has developed. First day of germination (FDG) was the day wherein the main germination happened. The quicker commencement of germination has the lower estimation of FDG . A day ago of germination (LDG) was the day where the last germination happened. The lower the LDG esteems show a quicker consummation of germination . Coefficient of velocity of germination (CVG) was determined using the formula of N1 + N2+ ... + Nx/100 x N1T1 + ... + NxTx; N = number of seeds germinated each day, T = number of days from seeding corresponding to N. The CVG gives an indication of germination rapidity. The value of CVG increases when the number of germinated seeds increases and the time required for germination decreases. The highest CVG possible is 100, if all seeds germinated on the first day.

subsequent to planting, G2 = germination rate x 100 at the second day in the wake of planting. Germination rate list (GRI) ascertains germination rate on every day of germination period. Higher and quicker germination has higher GRI esteem . Germination file (GI) was resolved utilizing the equation of (10 x n1) + (9 x n2) + ... + (1 x n10); n1, n2, ... n10 = number of developed seeds on the principal, second and consequent days until the tenth day; 10, 9, ... 1 are loads given to the quantity of developed seeds on the primary, second and resulting days until the tenth day, separately. In figuring of GI, estimation of ten as most extreme weight is given to the seeds developed on the primary day and less to those sprouted later on. The estimation of one as most reduced weight will be for seeds developed on the tenth day. The GI accentuates on both the germination rate and its speed. Higher rate and pace of germination has higher GI esteems . Time spread of germination (TSG) was the time in days between the first and last germination happened. More noteworthy contrast of germination speed between the quick and moderate sprouting sees has higher TSG values . Morphological properties of soybean as influenced by mutagenesis.Seedling execution was assessed through assurance of seedling tallness and root length [29]. Seedling stature was estimated purpose of association of the hypocotyl with the root, up to its place of association of the apical bud to the stem. Seedling root length was estimated from the tip of the root up to its place of association with the hypocotyl. Anatomical properties of soybean as influenced by mutagenesis.Stomatalsize (width and length) and thickness were resolved utilizing the fast engraving technique[30]. The abaxial leaf surface was taken right off the bat and washed utilizing the faucet water. At that point it was dried, the straightforward nail clean was applied consistently with a brush superficially. It was then dried at the room temperature for roughly 20 minutes. The nail clean engravings were put on glass spread slips, and captured under a model CX31 trinocularmicroscope (Olympus, Japan) with a mounted E330-ADU1.2X camera (Olympus, Japan). Factual analysis.Stomatal pictures were dissected to decide size utilizing the Optilab Image Raster programming. Information were examined utilizing CurveExpert 1.4 programming for LD50, and summed up direct model in the PROC-GLM method of SAS University Edition programming for different parameters. The methods were looked at through Dunnett choice, at likelihood level of 5%, so as to

Soybean seed presentation to gamma beams caused genuine consequences for seed germination. The endurance level of lighted soybean cv. Dering 1 diminished as the gamma portion expanded (Figure 1). At this analysis, the LD50 got dependent on endurance rate was 314.78 Gy. The LD50 is the portion relating to half diminish of the endurance rate. The ideal change can be found arroundLD50 . Comparable trials have been completed in soybean [32] [33],The endurance rates as LD50 were 457.17 Gy for cv. Argomulyo, 583 Gy for cv. CO2, and 620 Gy for cv. CO1. It is disclosed the radiosensitivity to gamma beams were genotypes subordinate. The irrays impact was likewise recognizable in the deferral of seed germination as per the dosages, and demonstrated development hindrance as a typical impact.

GR = gamma beams; GP 1 = germination rate at the fifth day (first check); GP 2 = germination rate at the eighth day (last tally); MGT = mean germination time; FDG = the principal day of germination; LDG = a day ago of germination; CVG = coefficient of speed of germination; GRI = germination rate record; GI = germination file; TSG = time spread of germination. Information were changed by arcsine(1) and Log (X+1) (2)prior to examination; nontransformed information are displayed; * critical distinction at P ≤ 0.05; ** noteworthy at P ≤ 0.01 check was fundamentally diminished with expanding gamma beam dosages. The base and most extreme diminished were come to at 8% and 92% for 5 and 2560 Gy, individually. Besides, germination rate at the last tally was likewise fundamentally diminished with as gamma beam portions expanded beginning from 10 Gy. The coefficient of germination speed, germination rate record, germination list as seed germination potential demonstrated the equivalent diminishing example by expanding the beams portions. Also, mean germination time, at the principal day and the most recent day of germination, expanded as gamma beams dosages expanded. Nonetheless, time spread of germination increment not reliable with expanding gamma beams portions, it relies upon the distinction in germination speed between the quick and moderate sprouting. The higher gamma beam portions decided higher inhibiton of the germination procedure. Figure 2. Effects of gamma rays on the seedling growth of Soybean (Glycine max L. cv. Dering 1).A = at 5th day after germination =at the 14th day after germination Gamma beam not just effect the germination potential,but additionally real characteristics of the developed seedlings, for example, seedling tallness and root length (Table 2). The biometric estimations show a huge lessening, the greatest seedling tallness and root length were recorded at the control (0 Gy), while the seedling stature presented to 160 – 2560 Gy decline by 43.40 – 91.17 %, and the seedling root length presented to 40 – 2560 Gy diminished by 38.31 – 64.13 %. Result indicated that gamma beam with portions higher than 160 Gy essentially repressed the seedling stature and root length got from lighted seeds. These outcomes were in consistence with the others specialists who revealed that expanding the gamma beam dosages were diminished the seed germination and seedling development. Extremely low and low portions of gamma beams were accounted for cause a critical postponement of germination process, reduction of endurance precentage, and seedling tallness and root length in wheat [13], maize [16], tumeric [34], and soybean [35]. Gamma beam actuated hindrance of development through controlling cell cycle during physical cell and harming whole genome .

Auxin synthesis was hindered by low dosages of gamma beams, while auxin decimation was brought about by higher portions of gamma beams. There were three different ways of that reasons: 1) DNA is required for and is recently orchestrated sequently to auxin arrangement, and gamma beams square occuring nucleic corrosive development; 2) essential gamma beams square is in auxin synthesis, the auxin required for DNA arrangement; and 3) impact of gamma beams is on an indistinct element in response past to and basic for both DNA and auxin synthesis [37]. The natural impact of gamma beams is likewise for the most part because of the arrangement of free radicals by water hydrolisis, and brings about adjustment of antioxidative framework, and aggregation of phenolic mixes and chlorophyll colors [38]. In any case, these radicals can harm or change significant parts of plant cell and influence differentially the organic chemistry, physiology, life systems, and morphology of plants [39]. The recurrence of chromosomal harm cause the metabolic issue and might be liable for less germinability or to endure over scarcely any days. In this examination, seedling got from seeds presented to higher portions (640, 1280, and 2560 Gy) didn't get by for over 20 days, so it was impractical for stomata assessments. In figure 3, the stomatal mechanical assembly of soybean lighted by gamma beams were indicated utilizing nail clean engraving technique. The stomatal size (width and length) and thickness were obviously conflicting (decline or increment) with expanded gamma beam portions (Table 3). In this investigation, it was discovered that the stomatal width diminished 1.10 to 1.43 occasions, and the stomatal length diminished from 1.10 to 1.16 occasions. Stomatal thickness went from 149.69 to 300.84 mm-2 relies any case, Celik et al. watched various outcomes that soybean plant leaves created from gamma illuminated seeds demonstrated decreases in stomatal thickness contrasted with the control plant. The capacity of stomatal is associated with procedure of transpiration and photosynthesis that occured in the leaves. Stomata biometric estimations have a significant job in transpiration and photosynthesis process by altering gas trade between the leaves and the air [41]. Stomatal size impacts trade of CO2, consequently the greater stomatal size will build the trading of CO2. It is clarify the pace of photosynthesis is progressively productive. In addition, the higher thickness of stomatal likewise permits the higher gas trade, subsequently; the pace of photosynthesis is higher than control. The higher photosynthesis bolsters the plant development. In this way, extraordinary stomatal size and thickness of every genotype can be utilized as roundabout choice criteria. It was reasoned that various dosages of gamma beams impacted the germination and seedling development of Soybean (Glycine max L.cv. Dering 1). Low to low portions of gamma beams (5-320 Gy) may be utilized to think about the improvement of soybean diversity.It was reasoned that various dosages of gamma beams impacted the germination and seedling development of Soybean (Glycine max L.cv. Dering 1). Exceptionally low to low portions of gamma beams (5-320 Gy) may be utilized to examine the improvement of soybean diversity.It was inferred that various dosages of gamma beams affected the germination and seedling development of Soybean (Glycine max L.cv. Dering 1). Low to low portions of gamma beams (5-320 Gy) may be utilized to contemplate the improvement of soybean decent variety.

It was reasoned that various dosages of gamma beams impacted the germination and seedling development of Soybean (Glycine max L.cv. Dering 1). Low to low portions of gamma beams (5-320 Gy) may be utilized to think about the improvement of soybean decent variety.

1) Krishnan H.B. (2005). Engineering soybean for enhanced sulfer amino acid content. Crop Science, 45: pp. 454-461. 2) Ko T.S., Korban S.S., Somers D.A. (1996). Soybean (Glycine max) transformation using immature cotyledon explants. In Agrobacterium 3) Olhoft P.M., Donovan C.M., Somers D.A. (1996). Soybean (Glycine max) transformation using mature cotyledonary node explants. In Agrobacterium ProtocolsVolume 343. 2nd edition. Totowa N.J.: Humana Press: pp. 385-396. 4) Somers D.A., Samac D.A., Olhoft P.M. (2003). Recent advances in legume transformation. Plant Physiol, 131(3):pp. 892-899. 5) Olhoft P.M., Flagel L.E., Donovan C.M., Somers D.A. (2003). Efficient soybean transformation using hygromycin B selection in the cotyledonary-node method. Planta, 216(5): pp. 723-735. 6) Bhatnagar, Karmakar, Cho H.J., Farrand S.K., Noel G.R., Widholm J.M. (2000). High-efficiency induction of soybean hairy roots and propagation of the soybean cyst nematode. Planta, 210(2): pp. 195-204. 7) Subramanian S., Graham M.Y., Yu O., Graham T.L. (2005). RNA interference of soybean isoflavone synthase genes leads to silencing in tissues distal to the transformation site and to enhanced susceptibility to Phytophthorasojae. Plant Physiol, 137(4): pp. 1345-1353. 8) Aragåo F.J.L., Sarokin L., Vianna G.R., Rech E.L. (2000). Selection of transgenic meristematic cells utilizing a herbicidal molecule results in the recovery of fertile transgenic soybean plants at high frequency. TheorAppl Genet, 101: pp. 1-6. 9) Eathington, El-Shemy H.A., Khalafalla M.M., Fujita K., Ishimoto M. (2006). Molecular control of gene co-suppression in transgenic soybean via particle bombardment. J Biochem., Mol. Biol., 39(1): pp. 61-67. 10) Auerbach and Robson, 2016, Rapoport, 2016: Transformation of 12 different different plasmids into soybean via particle bombardment. Plant Cell Reports 1996, 15(7): pp. 500-505. 11) Villard, Gan R., Li P.L., Ma Y.Y., Zhang L.W., Zhang R., Wang Y., Wang N.N. (2006). Identification and functional characterization of a leucinerich repeat receptor-like kinase gene that is involved in regulation of soybean leaf senescence. Plant Mol.Biol., 61(6): pp. 829-844. 12) Nunes A.C., Vianna G.R., Cuneo F., Amaya-Farfan J., de Capdeville G., Rech E.L., inhibited seed development and reduced phytate content. Planta, 224(1): pp. 125-132. 13) Chopra, Carroll B.J., McNeil D.L., Gresshoff P.M. (2015). Isolation and properties of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] mutants that nodulate in the presence of high nitrate concentrations. Proc Natl AcadSci USA, 82(12): pp. 4162-4166. 14) Harten, Hoffman T., Schmidt J.S., Zheng X., Bent A.F. (2019). Isolation of ethyleneinsensitive soybean mutants that are altered in pathogen susceptibility and gene-for-gene disease resistance. Plant Physiol, 119(3): pp. 935-950. 15) Oleykowski C.A., Bronson Mullins C.R., Godwin A.K., Yeung A.T. (1998). Mutation detection using a novel plant endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res., 26(20): pp. 4597-4602. [http://tilling.fhcrc.org:9366/arab/status.html]. 16) Caldwell D.G., McCallum N., Shaw P., Muehlbauer G.J., Marshall D.F., Waugh R. (2004). A structured mutant population for forward and reverse genetics in Barley (Hordeumvulgare L.). Plant J., 40(1): pp. 143-150. 17) Slade A.J., Fuerstenberg S.I., Loeffler D., Steine M.N., Facciotti D. (2005). A reverse genetic, nontransgenic approach to wheat crop improvement by TILLING. Nat Biotechnol, 23(1): pp. 75-81. 18) Till B.J., Reynolds S.H., Weil C., Springer N., Burtner C., Young K., Bowers E., Codomo C.A., Enns L.C., Odden A.R., et. al. (2004). Discovery of induced point mutations in maize genes by TILLING. BMC Plant Biol., 4: pp. 12. 19) Greene E.A., Codomo C.A., Taylor N.E., Henikoff J.G., Till B.J., Reynolds S.H., Enns L.C., Burtner C., Johnson J.E., Odden A.R., et. al. (2003). Spectrum of chemically induced mutations from a large-scale reversegenetic screen in Arabidopsis, Genetics, 164(2): pp. 731-740. 20) Wu J.L., Wu C., Lei C., Baraoidan M., Bordeos A., Madamba M.R., Ramos Pamplona M., Mauleon R, Portugal A, Ulat VJ, et. al. (2005). Chemical- and irradiation-induced mutants of indica rice

21) Till B.J., Cooper J., Tai T.H., Colowit P., Greene E.A., Henikoff S., Comai L. (2007). Discovery of chemically induced mutations in rice by TILLING. BMC Plant Biol, 7: pp. 19. 22) Winkler S., Schwabedissen A., Backasch D., Bokel C., Seidel C., Bonisch S., Furthauer M., Kuhrs A., Cobreros L., Brand M., et. al. (2005). Targetselected mutant screen by TILLING in Drosophila. Genome Res, 15(5): pp. 718-723. 23) Richardson K.K., Richardson F.C., Crosby R.M., Swenberg J.A., Skopek T.R. (1987). DNA base changes and alkylation following in vivo exposure of Escherichia coli to N-methyl-N-nitrosourea or Nethyl-N-nitrosourea. Proc Natl AcadSci USA, 84(2): pp. 344-348. 24) Shioyama Y., Gondo Y., Nakao K., Katsuki M. (2000). Different mutation frequencies and spectra among organs by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea in rpsL (strA) transgenic mice. Jpn J Cancer Res, 91(5): pp. 482-491. 25) Weil C.F. & Monde R.A. (2007). Getting the point-mutations in maize. The Plant Genome [Crop Science Supplement], 1: pp. 60-S. 26) Hildebrand, J.A., Wang T.L., Muller, Welham T.J., Gardner S., Pike J.M., Yoshida S., Parniske M. (2003). A TILLING reverse genetics tool and a web-accessible collection of mutants of the legume Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiol, 131(3): pp. 866-871. 27) Singh and Hymowitz, Parniske M., Stougaard J. (2005). Lotus japonicus: legume research in the fast lane. Trends Plant Sci, 10(5): pp. 222-228.[http://www.soybeantilling.org]. 28) Stadler, Sebastian S.A. (2000). Soybean Products with Improved Carbohydrate Composition and Soybean Plants. vol. 6,147,193. U.S.

Research Scholar, OPJS University, Churu, Rajasthan