Reviewed Study on Structures of Fuzzy Soft Isomorphism and Q-Fuzzy Soft Normal Subgroups
Exploring the Challenges of Modeling Uncertain Data
by Reena .*, Prof. Pardeep Goel,
- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540
Volume 16, Issue No. 5, Apr 2019, Pages 754 - 758 (5)
Published by: Ignited Minds Journals
ABSTRACT
Researchers in economics, engineering, environmental science, sociology, medical science and numerous different fields manage the complexities of modeling questionable data. Traditional methods are not constantly fruitful, in light of the fact that the vulnerabilities appearances in these spaces might be of different sorts. The majority of the current mathematical tools for formal modeling, reasoning and processing are Crisp, deterministic and exact in character. However, all things considered, circumstance, the issues in Economics, Engineering, condition, Social science, Medical science and so forth, don't generally include crisp data. Therefore, we can't effectively by utilizing the traditional old style methods as a result of different sorts of vulnerabilities in this issue. In this Article, we studied the previous reviews of Literature on structures of fuzzy soft isomorphism and q-fuzzy soft normal subgroups.
KEYWORD
fuzzy soft isomorphism, q-fuzzy soft normal subgroups, modeling, uncertainty, data
I. INTRODUCTION
Theory of algebraic structure has an imperative job in applications of numerous orders, for example, automata theory, graph theory, computer science, and signal processing, quantum physics, and control engineering, discrete arithmetic and so on. From algebraic point of view, soft algebraic theory is a valuable mathematical instrument in many connected fields. The idea of soft sets was presented, soft sets theory has been broadly considered by numerous creators. It is notable that the idea of fuzzy sets, has been broadly connected to numerous logical fields. In the event that there is an unclearness in the depiction of articles or in its connections or in both then we have to a dole out a fuzzy graph model. Fuzzy graphs are helpful to speak to connections which manage vulnerability. Fuzzy graph theory is helpful in taking care of the combinatorial issues in data structure theory, data mining, neural networks, cluster analysis and so forth. Jun et al (2009) broke down the applications of soft sets in d-algebra. Aygunouglu and Aygun (2009) presented fuzzy soft (normal) groups. Xu et al (2010) presented the thought of dubious soft set, which is an augmentation to the soft set and obscure set, examined the essential properties of unclear soft sets. While Probability theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, and other mathematical tools are outstanding and frequently helpful approaches to depict vulnerability, every one of these hypotheses has its inalienable troubles as pointed out. Burillo and Bustince (2016) demonstrated the thought of dubious sets agrees with that of intuitionistic fuzzy sets, and considered the fuzzy sets in requested groupoids. De et al (2011) read the Sanchez's methodology for medical determination and expanded this idea with the thought of intuitionistic fuzzy set theory. Dengfeng and Chuntian (2012) presented the idea of the degree similitude between intuitionistic fuzzy sets, and he introduced a few new likeness measure for measuring the level of comparability between intuitionistic fuzzy sets, which might be limited or ceaseless, and he gave relating verifications of these closeness measure, and talked about applications of the similitude measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets to perceive the pattern issues. Marashdeh and Salleh (2011) displayed another detailing of intuitionistic fuzzy rings based on the thought of intuitionistic fuzzy spaces, and a connection between intuitionistic fuzzy ring based on intuitionistic fuzzy space and common ring is gotten as far as enlistment and correspondence. There are a few hypotheses, for instance, theory of fuzzy sets, theory of intuitionistic fuzzy sets,
these hypotheses have this intrinsic challenges pointed out. The purpose behind these troubles is potentially the insufficiency of the parameterization apparatus of the hypotheses. In the event of intuitionistic fuzzy sets, there were a few endeavors to characterize intuitionistic fuzzy rings Li-mei Yan, (2008) by summing up the methodology unused to characterize fuzzy ring. They got another new definition for fuzzy rings and fuzzy ideals. Kim et al (2010) presented the thought of an intuitionistic fuzzy subquasigroup of a quasigroup. Kehayopulu and Tsingelis (2012) first considered the fuzzy sets in requested groupoids. They talked about the ideas of fuzzy sub-algebra of BG-algebra, and concentrated union, crossing point and other essential properties of fuzzy sub-algebra of BG-algebra Peng et al (2012) proposed a totally new approach for modeling unclearness and vulnerability. This is purported soft theory that is free from the challenges influencing existing methods. In soft set theory, the issue of setting the membership work among other related issues just does not emerge. This makes the theory extremely advantageous and simple to apply practically speaking soft set theory that has potential applications in a wide range of fields, including the smoothness of functions, game theory, operations inquire about, Riemann integration, Person integration, Probability theory and Measurement theory. A large portion of these applications have just been demonstrated in Molodtsov's book Jun et al (2014) presented the idea on fuzzy h-ideals in hemi rings and explored the possibility of anti-fuzzy left h-ideals in hemi rings. Some structure properties of Q-fuzzy left h-ideal are set up in a hemi ring. Comparative outcomes in the intuitionistic anti fuzzy ideal in a hemi rings are gotten. They started the Novel Concept of soft set theory which is totally new approach for modeling unclearness and Uncertainties. Soft set theory has a rich potential for applications in a few ways, few of which had been appeared. After his works, couple of various applications of soft set theory were contemplated. Rosenfeld (2011) proposed the idea of fuzzy groups so as to set up the algebraic structures of fuzzy sets. Rough groups were defined by Biswas and a few creators have considered the algebraic properties of rough sets also. As of late the numerous creators have talked about the soft set. Research on the soft set theory is advancing quickly. For instance, the idea of soft semi ring, soft group, soft BCK/BCI algebras, soft BL-algebras and fuzzy soft groups. Rough ideal were examined by Hosseini et al (2012), and some different creators like have considered the algebraic properties of soft sets also. The algebraic structure of soft set. Maji et al (2012) portrayed the utilization of soft set theory to a decision making issue utilizing rough sets. Similar creators have likewise distributed a point by point hypothetical study on soft sets. The algebraic structure of set hypotheses managing vulnerabilities has additionally been concentrated by certain creators. Zhou et al (2011) connected the idea of Intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets to semigroup theory, and the thought of Intuitionistic fuzzy soft ideals over semigroup. Some cross section structures of the set of all Intuitionistic fuzzy soft ideals of a semigroup were inferred. Zhan and Tan (2014) presented the idea of intuitionistic M-fuzzy groups and acquired couple of algebraic properties on their structures. Palaniappan et al (2009) acquired properties on intuitionistic anti fuzzy subgroups with homomorphic pictures and preimages and anti-homomorphic pictures and primages. Williams (2007, 2010) presented a thought of intuitionistic fuzzy n-ary subgroups in a n-ary group, and its different level cut sets, pictures and preimages n-ary homomorphism, and a few properties. Li Xiaoping and Wang Guijun (2000) talked about union and convergence properties of intuitionistic fuzzy groups, and intuitionistic fuzzy normal subgroups. Sharma (2012) broke down a connection between intuitionistic fuzzy set and its picture under a homomorphism, and its properties cut of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. He dissected a connection between intuitionistic fuzzy normal subgroups and its algebraic properties on them, and its properties on Klein groups. Jun (2009) got portrayals of intuitionistic fuzzy bi-ideals are given, and with some extra conditions, comparability connection on intuitionistic fuzzy bi-ideals is examined. The fuzzification of the thought on a bi-ideal in requested semigroups is considered. He demonstrated each intuitionistic fuzzy bi-ideal of an arranged semigroup is an intuitionistic fuzzy subsemigroup, and each intuitionistic fuzzy bi-ideal is consistent in a customary, left and right basic arranged semigroup. Further he gave conditions for an arranged semigroup to be totally normal as far as intuitionistic fuzzy set, and gave portrayals of intuitionistic fuzzy bi-ideal in requested semigroup. Kim (2016) considered the intuitionistic Q-fuzzification of the idea of sub algebra in BCK/BCI algebra and he clarified (I) Let A be an intuitionistic Q-fuzzy sub algebra of X. At that point XA (α,β) is a sub algebra of X with α + β ≤ 1. (ii) Any sub algebra of X can be acknowledged as both a μ-level sub algebra and a γ-level algebra of some intuitionistic Q-fuzzy sub algebra of X. (iii) Let f : X →Y be a the picture f(A) is intuitionistic Q-fuzzy sub algebra of Roventa (2011) broke down that in a crisp situation, the notions of a normal subgroup and group working on a set. He contemplated augmentations of these traditional notions to the bigger universe of fuzzy sets. At last he demonstrated a portrayal of operation of a fuzzy group on a fuzzy set regarding homomorphism of crisp group. Kim and Jun (2012) presented the idea of reasonable fuzzy R-subgroups in near rings, and they demonstrated that (I) Let S be a s-norm. Each reasonable fuzzy Rsubgroup of R regarding S is an anti-fuzzy R-subgroup of R. (ii) an onto homomorphic picture of a fuzzy right R-subgroup concerning S is a fuzzy right Rsubgroup. (iii) If μ is a fuzzy right R-subgroup of R as for s is an endomorphism's of R, at that point μ(- ) is a fuzzy right R-subgroup of R as for s. Abu Osman (1987) clarified the conclusion administrator on the set of fuzzy connection on S, and demonstrated that (I) The shut body of a fuzzy connection (s, μ) is given by Ѓ(s, μ) = (sσ, μ). (ii) The arrangement of two shut fuzzy relations need not be a shut fuzzy connection. Olson (2008) demonstrated that the central homomophism hypotheses for rings were not commonly material in hemi ring theory. He examined additionally the class of N-homomorphism of hemi ring, and the central hypothesis. Furthermore, the idea of N-homomorphism is utilized to demonstrate that each innately semi subtractive hemi ring is of sort (k). They clarified the co norm in idempotent interims. SH incited by a T-co norm on the space with the interim esteemed fuzzy sets on fuzzy groups and SH interim esteemed fuzzy groups. Meanwhile, a portion of its fundamental properties and auxiliary portrayals are examined. Likewise he built up that the hypotheses of the homomorphic picture and the converse picture are given. They demonstrated that some essential ideas of fuzzy algebra as a fuzzy invariant subgroups, fuzzy ideals and some basic properties. He additionally demonstrated that normal for a field by fuzzy ideals. Massa'deh (2008) learned about the properties of the lower and the upper approximations in a group, pointed out and demonstrated that the incorporation images in three suggestions about the upper guess were extremely the equivalent signs, which were significant in the theory of rough sets in a group. Tang and Zhang (2011) got that a technique of creating of Q-fuzzy R-sub module by a given discretionary Q-fuzzy set is given. It is demonstrated that (I) the entirety of two Q-fuzzy R-sub module of a module M is the QR-sub module generated by their union and (ii) the set of all Q-fuzzy sub module of a given module shapes a total cross section. Therefore it is built up that the accumulation of all Q fuzzy R-sub module, having similar qualities at zero, of M of the cross section of Q fuzzy R-sub module of M. installed into a grid of Q-fuzzy R-sub module of M. In this association, M indicate as Q-fuzzy R-sub module where R is the commutative near ring with solidarity. Portrayal of Q-fuzzy left R-sub modules concerning t-norm were additionally given. Zhan and Tan (2014) defined intuitionistic fuzzy subgroup as a speculation of Rosenfeld's fuzzy subgroup. By beginning with a given traditional group, they defined another class of fuzzy subgroup. Yamak et al (2010) contemplated detachable (unadulterated) intuitionistic fuzzy subgroups, and a portion of their algebraic properties. They likewise defined distinct (unadulterated) intuitionistic fuzzy subgroups on commutative groups, and gave a few applications with their level subsets. Akram and Cagman (2017) formed soft sets to the related ideas of fuzzy sets and rough sets. They additionally defined the idea of soft groups, and determined some related properties. Feng et al (2018) researched soft semi-rings by utilizing the filter set theory. They presented and examined the idea of soft BCK/BCI-algebra. Jun and Park (2018) examined the applications of soft sets in ideal theory.
II. CONCLUSION
The essential idea of fuzzy soft set. A detailed hypothetical study of fuzzy soft set is displayed, which prompted the meaning of new algebraic structures in ring structures. This work concentrated on fuzzy soft rings homomorphism of fuzzy soft rings and pre-picture of fuzzy soft rings. To broaden this work, one could study the properties of fuzzy soft sets in other algebraic structures, for example, near rings, groups, ideals, fields and G-modules. Group theory has tremendous and potential applications in many center regions like physics, science, communications, coding theory, computer science and so on.
REFERENCES
1. Jun, Y.B., Lee, K.J., Part, C.H. (2009). Soft set theory applied to ideals in d-algrbara, Comput.Math.Appl. 57, pp. 367-378. 2. Aygunouglu, A., and Aygun, H. (2009). Introduction to fuzzy soft groups, Comput.Math.Appl. 58, pp. 1279-1286. 3. Xu, W., Ma, J., Wang, S.Y., Hao, G. (2010). Vague soft sets and their properties, Comput.Math.Appl. 59, pp. 787-794.
5. De, S.K., Biswas, R., and Roy, A.R. (2011). An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis, Fuzzy sets and systems, 117, pp. 209-213. 6. Dengfeng, L., and Chuntian, C. (2012). New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to apttern recognitions, Pattern Recognition Letters, 23, pp. 221-225. 7. Mohammad F. Marashdeh and Abdul Razak Salleh (2011). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Rings, International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 5, No. 1, 37–47. 8. Li-Mei Yan (2008). Intuitionistic fuzzy ring and its homomorphism image, international Seminar on future Buimadical Information Engineerimng, fbie, pp. 75-77. 9. Kim, K.H., Dudek, A., and Jun, Y.B. (2010). On intuitionistic fuzzy subquasigroups of quasigroups, Qusigroups and related systems, 7, pp. 15-28. 10. Kehayopulu, N., and Tsingelis, M. (2012). Fuzzy sets in ordered groupoids in terms, Semigroup Forum, 65, pp. 128-132. 11. Jiayin Peng, Intuitionisitic Fuzzy B-algebras (2012). Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 4 (21), pp. 4200 - 4205. 12. Jun, Y.B., Ozturk, M.A., and Song, S.Z. (2014). On fuzzy h- ideals in hemi rings, info. Scien.162, pp. 211-226. 13. Rosenfeld, A. (2011). Fuzzy groups, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Volume 35, pp. 512–517. 14. Hosseini, S.B., Jafarzadeh, N., and Gholami, A. (2012). T- Rough (Prime, Primary) ideal and T-Rough fuzzy (Prime, Primary) ideal on commutative rngs, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 7, pp. 337–350. 15. Maji, P.K., and Roy, A. R. (2012). An application of Soft set in decision making problem, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 44, pp. 1077–1083. 16. Jiehua Zhou, Yuewu Li, and Yunqiang Yin (2011). Intuitionistic fuzzy soft semigropus, Mathematica Aeterna, Volume 1, No.3, pp. 173-183. pp. 85-90. 16. Sharma, P.K., and Vandana Bansal (2012). On intuitionistic anti-fuzzy ideal in rings, IJMS, Vol. 11, No. 3-4, pp. 237–243. 17. Jun, Y.B., Lee, K.J., Part, C.H. (2009). Soft set theory applied to ideals in d-algrbara, Comput.Math.Appl. 57, pp. 367-378. 18. Kim, K.H. (2016). On intuitionistic Q-fuzzy semi prime ideals in semi groups, Advances in fuzzy Mathematics, 1 (1), pp. 15-21. 19. Roventa A. and Spircu T. (2011). Groups operating on fuzzy sets, Fuzzy sets and systems, 120, pp. 543-548. 20. Jun, J.B., and Kim, H.H. (2012). A note on fuzzy R-subgroups of near-rings, Soochow Journal Of Mathematics Volume 28, No. 4, pp. 339-346. 21. Olson D.M. (2008). A note on the homomorphism theorem for hemi rings, IJMMS, 1, pp. 219 – 226. 22. Massa'deh M. (2008). Properties of Fuzzy Subgroups in particular the Normal Subgroups, Damascus University – Syrian Arab Republic, Doctorate Thesis. 23. Tang J., Zhang X. (2011). Product Operations in the Category of L –fuzzy groups. J. Fuzzy Math., 9: pp. 1-10. 24. Zhan and Tan (2014). Intuitionistic M-fuzzy groups, Soochow J. math. 30, pp. 85-90. 25. Yamak, S., Kazanc, O., and Davvz, B. (2010). Divisible and pure intuitionistic fuzzy subgroups and their properties, International Journal of Fuzzy systems, Volume 10, No.4, December 2010, pp. 298-307. 26. Akram and Cagman (2017). Soft sets and soft groups, Inform. Sci. 177, pp. 2726-2735. 27. Feng, F., Jun, Y. B., Zhao, X. (2018). Soft semirimg, Comput. Math. Appl. 56, pp. 2621-2628. 28. Jun, Y.B. and Park, C.H. (2018). Applications of soft sets in ideal theory of
Corresponding Author Reena*
Research Scholar, Department of Mathematics, OPJS University, Churu, Rajasthan reenasheoran3031@gmail.com