Financial Pattern of Small Business Enterprises and Traders

Exploring the Financing Patterns and Challenges of Small Business Enterprises in India

by Kritika Singh*,

- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540

Volume 16, Issue No. 6, May 2019, Pages 498 - 505 (8)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

There is no uncertainty that entrance to finance is of pivotal significance for the progressing and supportable development and gainfulness of small and medium enterprises sector (SMEs) through its job in encouraging the production of new businesses and sustaining the advancement procedure just as advancing the development and improvement of existing businesses, which thus, help national financial development. This investigation centers around the organization-wise financing pattern of small and medium scale industries (SMEs). It endeavors to survey the connection between forms of business and sources of capital financing among SMEs in India, one of the developing markets in Asia. Utilizing factor analysis technique, the investigation finds that the capital needs of the business visionaries are met with the bank advances, cash loan specialists, creditor liability and companions and relatives. These sources of capital are not effectively open by various business organizations to satisfy their capital necessity. What's more, analysis of optional information uncovers that modern credit conveys certain banking limitations, which should be distinguished to help in advancing the SME sector by giving a few recommendations required to the new financial policy routine.

KEYWORD

finance, small business enterprises, traders, capital financing, bank loans, cash lenders, creditor liability, friends and relatives, business organizations, industrial credit

INTRODUCTION

The accessibility of finance has been featured as a main consideration in the advancement, development and achievement of SMEs. Financing methods utilized by SMEs differ from introductory internal sources, for example, proprietor manager's close to home investment funds and held benefits to informal outside sources, including financial assistance from family and companions, exchange credit, funding and holy messenger lenders (He and pastry specialist, 2007), and thus to formal external sources spoken to by financial go-betweens, for example, banks, financial institutions and protections markets). As SMEs advance through their business lifecycle, they start to step by step modify their capital structure (La Rocca, La Rocca, and Cariola, 2011). During resulting development stages as SMEs develop, they build up a reputation notwithstanding the capacity to give guarantee. This serves to improve the creditworthiness of the firm and consequently draws in the consideration of financial specialists energetically infuse cash into the business. As an outcome, firms start substituting internal with external financing sources, including investors, exchange credit and bank advances to give some examples. In the further developed stages of their development cycle, when SMEs become all the more informationally straightforward, they may create access to securitised debt and openly recorded equity markets. The SME financing pattern clarified by Berger and Udell (1998) stands out from the speculation given under pecking request theory. The pecking request theory created by Myers (1984) recommends that the capital structure choices of a firm are an element of the firm's age. As proposed by this theory, internal sources of subsidizing are organized while the utilization of external sources is deferred until the internal sources are depleted. Thusly, when looking for assets, a firm inclines toward internal equity to external debt, transient debt to long haul debt, and external debt to external equity. Accordingly, the request of inclination for the financing sources for a firm ought to pursues internal equity, issuing debt, and after that issuing equity (Cassar and Holmes, 2003). Micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) have increased expanded consideration in India lately, thinking about their vital significance to the economy and the country. MSMEs assume a significant job in creating work—48.8 million MSMEs in the country give work to 111.4 million individuals. MSMEs in the assembling sector alone produce in excess of 6,000 items and contribute 7.7% of the GDP of the country. Thus, MSMEs in

Regardless of their commitment, MSMEs in India face a few difficulties. They frequently need to keep pace with quickly changing advances and face the danger of winding up mechanically out of date. They additionally need to confront staggering expenses of credit and are normally unfit to distinguish their key aggressive qualities to keep up item principles and quality. MSMEs likewise need to manage the issue of insurance of their licensed innovation and with the shortage of gifted workers. At last, ponders on MSMEs have recognized the significance of the accessibility of sources of finance and the openness to these sources as the most vital factors to advance development of MSMEs in developing economies. In the Indian setting, both of these issues present inborn difficulties to financing of MSMEs because of absence of attention to subsidizing plans among MSME business people and the constrained job of financial speculators, nonbanking financial organizations (NBFCs), remote banks, heavenly attendant financial specialists, and beginning open contributions in financing MSMEs. In perspective on the way that banks are the transcendent wellspring of finance in India, the Reserve Bank of India incorporates micro and small enterprises in the rundown of need loaning sectors. Banks have additionally been encouraged to accomplish a year-on-year development of 20% in credit to micro and small enterprises and a yearly development of 10% in the quantity of microenterprise accounts. In perspective on such approaches, this examination endeavors to comprehend whether such motivating forces and plans have permeated down to the MSMEs and if business people know about them. While completing fundamental meetings with business people for this investigation, it ended up clear that MSMEs have various kinds of necessities at various stages of their life cycle. This drove the creators to build up a superior comprehension of various sources of finance utilized by MSMEs during various stages of their life cycle and to investigate the difficulties in getting to these sources. As there were no examinations that caught the financial needs of MSMEs at various stages of their reality, this examination is a first-of-its-kind endeavor to explore these viewpoints. Along these lines, the paper centers around the sources of finance utilized by MSMEs during various stages of the endeavor life cycle, and on the mindfulness and usage of various financial plans made accessible by government. The financing of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) has pulled in much consideration lately and has turned into a significant point for business analysts and policymakers taking a shot at financial and monetary improvement. As of late, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) have come into the front recuperation, creating work and diminishing neediness (Carbó-Valverde, S., F. Rodríguez-Fernández and G. F. Udell, 2008). Development of SMEs can decrease destitution through quickening of monetary development, evacuation of predispositions against work escalated generation, production of business open doors for the low-talented workers and formation of linkages with small providers. Notwithstanding, in India SMEs' commitment to the economy has not achieved a dimension keeping pace with SME in created nations. Different difficulties and obstacles forestall SME from developing to their maximum capacity. One of which is the entrance to formal sector financing. Besides, most enormous organizations generally begin as small enterprises, so the capacity of SMEs to create and contribute winds up urgent to any economy wishing to succeed (Beck and Demirgüç-Kunt, 2006). There is likewise the observation among scholastics and policymakers that SMEs need fitting financing and need to get unique assistance, for example, government programs that expansion loaning. Different examinations bolster this observation. Various papers find that SMEs are more financially compelled than huge firms and, significantly, absence of access to external finance is a key snag to firm development, particularly for SMEs (Beck., Demirgüç-Kunt., Laeven and Maksimovic, 2006).On the policy side, there are countless initiatives crosswise over nations to encourage SME financing including government sponsored credit extensions and open assurance reserves. One of the significant difficulties for SMEs, particularly in their beginning times of advancement, is the entrance to finance. SMEs generally speaking, and particularly their subset of micro and small enterprises (MSEs) are in a disadvantaged position regarding getting to the finance they requirement for their task, when contrasted with enormous organizations. Access to finance is a specific test in the in all respects beginning periods of big business development, for example, the pre-seed, seed, and startup stages. It is commonly acknowledged that the most widely recognized kind of finance, that is, debt finance from banks, is essentially non-accessible to businesses in their initial development stages. While bank credits are the most widely recognized kind of financing for develop and stable SMEs, they are for the most part impossible for beginning period businesses. The presence of this finance hole has solidified the need of measures to guarantee elective sources of finance for enterprises in any stages of advancement. The can't successfully supply the financial resources and different items required by the private sector, specifically the SME sector, which by and large comes up short on the scale, guarantee and connections for formal financing. (Columba, F., L. Gambacorta and P.E. Mistrulli, 2008). The current financial mediators in India commonly center around a bunch of huge organizations and government bonds. Loaning to SMEs is hampered by absence of learning of the sector, high exchange costs, constrained staff limit in financial institutions, poor credit culture among some objective SMEs just as immature tools to recognize and relieve dangers related with loaning to SMEs (Berry, A,2000). This results in an inclination for enormous borrowers and the buy of government bonds. SME markets are not just small and divided, they are seriously muddled by absence of information. Satisfactory financing is a basic part of SME improvement. Financing is required for business start-up, extension and development. However, an absence of sufficient financing restrains small business sectors. Developing nations, similar to India, specifically, face included social, social, monetary and political factors that add complexities to the arrangement of small business finance, and the development of the SME sector. Furnishing SMEs with productive financing will permit developing country SMEs to achieve their potential and be maintainable supporters of nearby advancement. Proficient financing for SMEs likewise guarantees that contributed cash will be viably used. Since developing country conditions are exceptional, and the financial and social ramifications of small business improvement have an additional criticalness, ponders are required that search for the factors that make SME finance effective. Such examinations are critical to propel business methodology, advancement theory, and to direct policy producers and SME concentrated financial specialists on the best way to create and bolster private sectors in developing nations. It is imperative to note, nonetheless, that finance alone does not ensure small firm's prosperity. Consolidating these 'achievement factors' with SME finance can fundamentally build the odds of firm development (P. Mishra, 2006). In the light of fiercer worldwide challenge activated in terms of professional career progression, venture streams and innovative advances, local co-task in help of the improvement and mix of SME is more earnest now than any other time in recent memory if the SME sector were to yield the much social and financial returns inside and crosswise over Asia. In a few created nations, SMEs contribute in any event half of the total national output. Taking SMEs as a benchmark to Indian economy, there is plainly Sector in the north area of India.

SMES CHARACTERISTICS

By and large, the attributes of SMEs influence their financial choices and conduct and at last the firm's performance and development. In this specific situation, the writing has recognized a few attributes particularly identified with the SMEs sector as factors affecting the financial conduct of firms in this sector. These incorporate firm size and age, ownership type and legal form, land location, industry sector and resource structure (mirroring the capacity to give security). Size and Age - Even however there is no accord among researchers about the criteria that ought to be utilized to gauge the size of the firm (commonly absolute assets, deals or the quantity of workers), the idea that firm size affects SME's exercises and its capability to grow seems to get general understanding. A firm's size is normally combined with its age as they will in general have comparative effect on the firm's life cycle. This impact can be emphatically seen in the basic leadership process in the firm about whether some specific kind of finance ought to be picked and used. Contemplating firms financing and capital structure utilizing a sample comprised of 292 Australian firms, Cassar (2004) inferred that the "bigger" small firms are, the more they depend on long haul debt and external financing, including bank credits. This is predictable with Story (1994) who found that on account of SMEs, the proprietor manager's close to home reserve funds are progressively significant as a wellspring of assets during the start-up stage than outside finance, for example, credits and overdrafts from banks. From another point, the degree to which firm size can affect the accessibility of finance to the firm was estimated by Petersen and Rajan (1994). They contended that as firms develop, they build up a more noteworthy capacity to augment the hover of banks from which they can obtain. They at that point furnished proof that firms managing different banks and credit institutions are almost twice as huge as those with just one bank. Ownership Type and Legal Form - There is a positive connection between SME leverage and the kind of organizational structure. This is in accordance with Abor (2008) who recognized the form of business as one of the factors clarifying the capital structure choices of Ghanaian SMEs. Likewise, ownership structure and the sort of firm were found to significantly affect the utilization of

"Proprietors propelling firms composed as either a sole ownership or non-development/producing firms ought to be set up to utilize more bootstrap financing than different firms. Proprietors of these sorts of firms ought to be set up to build up a financial arrangement that joins the utilization of more noteworthy assortment of financing choices than proprietors of firms composed other than a sole ownership non-development/producing firms. All things considered, a sole ownership of non-development/producing firms ought to perceive the potential for the related more prominent number of requirements and troubles in raising start-up capital". Location - The topographical territory where a firm is situated in the vicinity of banks is likewise accepted to have an impact on the firm's capacity to increase external finance. For instance, SMEs situated outside significant urban areas face more prominent troubles in getting external finance, particularly long haul debt, contrasted and their partners working in urban communities (Abor, 2008). In a similar respect, Fatoki and Asah (2011) included that the land location of SMEs near their banks advantages them in that they can all the more likely concrete relationship loaning with those banks. Therefore, SMEs are better ready to access bank credits utilizing close to delicate subjective information. Industry Sector - various investigations prove that factors identified with the business sector in which a firm works likewise clarify capital structure and financial choices. Firms in the administrations sector, for instance, can contrast from those working in assembling or development as far as financial needs and decisions. Michaelas et al. (1999) exactly dissected the diverse capital structure determinants crosswise over time and industries using a sample of 3,500 randomly chose SMEs crosswise over ten industries in the UK. They abridged that the effect of industry on present moment and long haul debt differs extraordinarily crosswise over industries. Assets Structure - As the arrangement of security assumes a fundamental job in facilitating SME access to debt finance. SMEs that have progressively fixed assets will in general use higher financial leverage. The purpose behind this is these firms can acquire at lower financing costs as their credits are verified with these assets filling in as guarantee. This clarifies why Coco (2000) depicts insurance as the loan specialist's second line of guard. Because of good danger and issues with information murkiness normally being progressively serious during the underlying stages of SME improvement, internal equity financing, as best spoken to by proprietor manager individual reserve funds, is a basic wellspring of subsidizing for SMEs in these beginning periods (seed financing and start-up). Thusly, in later stages, so as to create and develop SMEs will in general lessen their reliance on these sources and begin looking for elective channels for raising capital. Internally created benefits and funding represent only two of the other equity choices SMEs look to extend as they develop. Investment - Venture business people are financial delegates. Funding is that form of financing where assets are raised from speculators and redeployed by putting resources into high-chance informationally obscure firms which generally are youthful or start-up firms. Further, investors choose the planning and sort of interest notwithstanding their job in checking, screening and contracting. Besides, by performing these capacities, investors for all intents and purposes take an interest in vital arranging and basic leadership in the firm. The funding business sector incorporates an assortment of organizations, including open companies, small business speculation enterprises and private constrained associations. Business Angels - Unlike other external sources of financing, business holy messenger finance isn't intermediated. It is rather an informal market for direct finance. Blessed messengers are exceptionally particular rich people with long business experience who put legitimately in high development SMEs with which they have had no past relationship. This form of speculation is normally founded on an equity contract, regularly basic stock. In spite of the fact that blessed messengers by definition are people, they once in a while facilitate their interest in small speculation gatherings.

Debt Financing -

It is notable that capital structure choices, in SMEs as in enormous firms, identify with the utilization of either equity or debt or both. Be that as it may, Berger and Udell (1998) accept that on account of SMEs, this is somewhat erroneous in light of the fact that information murkiness is progressively serious in SMEs. Issuing extra equity to fulfill the firm's financial needs would then prompt a weakening in ownership and control. In this way, so as to keep full ownership and control of their Exchange Credit - One of the most significant sources of external financing for SMEs is exchange credit. For example, Berger and Udell (2006) evaluated that 33% of the all out debt of SMEs in the US in 1998 was spoken to by profession credit. As indicated by García-Teruel and Martínez-Solano (2010) exchange credit is a deferral in the installment for products or administrations after they have been conveyed or given because of an understanding between the provider and the firm. Subsequently, for the firm this is a wellspring of financing shows up to be decided sheet under current liabilities, though for the provider it is an interest in records receivable.

Bank Finance for SMEs -

An enormous body of the current writing has archived that banks are the fundamental external capital supplier for SMEs sector in both created and developing nations. De Bettignies and Brander (2007) accept that bank credits are accessible for SMEs on aggressive and reasonable premise.

Government Assistance and Initiatives -

In both created and developing nations, governments have perceived that the SME sector faces obliged access to external financing which may contrarily influence its urgent job in accomplishing national advancement objectives. Thusly, numerous governmental initiatives and projects have been actualized to guarantee SMEs have simpler access to financing, of which credit certification advances, factoring projects and sponsored expenses are common models.

LITERATURE REVIEW

The prevalent sources of finance utilized by MSMEs are bank credits; advances from nonbanking institutions (e.g., NBFCs); investment; microfinance institutions; advances from family, relatives, and companions; equity finance; and claim reserves. As indicated by International Finance Corporation (2012), the supply of finance to the MSME sector is evaluated to be 32.5 trillion Indian rupees (Rs). This absolute contains commitments from informal finance, formal finance, and self-finance. Informal sources and self-finance contribute Rs25.5 trillion to the sector, of which informal finance represents Rs24.4 trillion. As such, 78% of the finance utilized by MSMEs is met by informal sources and self-finance. The staying 22% (Rs6.9 trillion) is given by banks and NBFCs, of which banks give the mass (91.8%). It is far-fetched that the financial administrations offered by banks adequately address the beginning time SMEs in India. Beginning time SMEs don't have a set up credit history and have shaky equity patterns. Biswas (2014) noticed that entrance to external finance separated from banks is expensive and constrained, and represents a test to SMEs, despite the fact that it is basic for the upkeep of long haul openings and targets. These external advance items additionally require guarantee and are very valued. SMEs use finance from NBFCs and informal sources at higher rates of intrigue, especially in the beginning times. The strength of the informal sector in tending to the financial necessities of MSMEs is because of the characteristic restrictions of formal sources of finance. The Asian Development Bank (2014) has indicated out that boundaries getting to finance by SMEs in India from formal institutions incorporate the prerequisite for insurance or a certification, resolute strategies, high rates of loaning, convoluted procedures, and business visionaries' absence of financial learning of appropriate plans. Ambrose (2012) additionally distinguished hindrances to viable financial assistance to SMEs, which included nonattendance of collateralized security, and the administrative framework. What's more, the inaccessibility of gifted workers, the absence of infrastructure, and a powerlessness to raise capital through the financial exchange (particularly for MSMEs with a total assets of under Rs100 million (about $1.5 million) are different difficulties. Hindrances have likewise been inspected with regards to sex, firm size, the length of a loaning relationship, and the utilization of overdraft credit. The Reserve Bank of India (2005) recognized the accompanying issues in financing SMEs: (I) deficient access to finance by little firms because of absence of financial information and nonformal business rehearses, with an absence of access to private equity, funding and optional market instruments; (ii) discontinuity of business sectors as for their contributions just as helplessness of items because of market variances; (iii) absence of simple access to interstate and universal markets; (iv) restricted access to innovation and item advancements, and absence of attention to worldwide prescribed procedures; and (v) impressive deferrals in settlement of levy and installment of bills by huge scale purchasers. The view of a SME as a high-hazard and economically unviable suggestion to loan to has brought about just a couple SMEs accepting formal financial assistance (Ambrose 2012). Prasad (2006) featured that Indian banks specifically are not slanted to finance small enterprises, because of reasons, for example, the powerlessness to give insurance, large amounts of nonperforming assets,

Award Thornton and FICCI (2011) presumed that the expense of capital is high for MSMEs, and that there is a need to lessen the time and documentation required for getting finance. Lahiri (2012) called attention to that with MSMEs' rising requirement for present moment and long haul capital, banks should push toward progressively imaginative methods of loaning to accommodate those firms' financial needs. In light of the previously mentioned obstructions, the Government of India (2015b) started a few policy measures: (I) accomplishment of all inclusive financial incorporation of MSMEs in a period bound way, guaranteeing that each enlisted MSME has a bank record connected to the Udyog Aadhar; (ii) operationalization of a Rs100 billion equity support for the MSME sector; and (iii) extended coverage and upgraded usage of credit certification plans with consideration of a more extensive arrangement of credit suppliers, for example, NBFCs and microfinance institutions, which could include a sevenfold increment in the corpus from Rs40 billion to Rs280 billion.

METHODOLOGY

The present examination is a piece of a more extensive research on corporate financing patterns in SMEs' working in chosen urban communities of India. Given the way that the SMEs incorporate countless sectors, it is practically difficult to research all the current sectors. Inside this unique situation, it was felt proper to concentrate the ebb and flow research on those sectors that might be considered as being huge for each national economy given their commitment to the country's total national output and the quantity of representatives that they utilize. Thus, the various sectors were researched which covers the accompanying SMEs working in the five urban communities under various sectors. The city-wise percentage of item gatherings is as per the following:

Table 1 No.of SMEs in each sector.

Table 1 shows that complete no. of SMEs under Hosiery and Textile sector is 10,545 (9%). Out of the aggregate (1,21,263) units, 7,658 (6%) units has a which speaks to 8,873(7%, etc to cutting device item bunch which involves 9,193(8%) units under investigation.

Sample frame-

The sample size of the present investigation is 280 SMEs from India. The investigation concentrated on five enormous metropolitan urban areas, New Delhi, Chandigarh, Dehradun, Ludhiana and Patiala as essential sampling units. Just those units have been considered to exist in every city which appears to uncover their financial information for the general research ponders. The choice of these urban areas depends based on convergence of SMEs to these urban communities. A customized pre-notice letter was sent to every one of the 280 randomly chosen organizations clarifying the destinations of the examination and requesting collaboration, while seven days after; a phone call was made to each organization so as to analyze the likelihood of partaking in the investigation.

Research Instrument-

The information were verified by methods for a ten-page survey. Following the recommendations of numerous management research scholastics, an exertion was made to abstain from driving and unambiguous inquiries, giving specific consideration to the wording and the succession of inquiries and guaranteeing an expert style and format. Information was gathered by receiving different sorts of scales, for example, double, ordinal and Likert type.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Table 2 Form of the organisation and financing pattern of products

Table 2 uncovers that out of all out 280 respondents, 98 (35%) respondents are maintaining their business as Sole - Proprietorship, 132 (47%) respondents are maintaining their business as Partnership, and 50 (18%) respondents are maintaining their business as Private constrained organization. Fourteen respondents of Sole-Proprietorship class draw capital from their own store as sources for capital finances, 35 (42%) respondents of Sole – Proprietorship class gets capital from business banks as sources for capital finances, 6 (11%) respondents of Sole - Proprietorship class obtains prerequisite through record payable, 15 (41%) respondents of Sole – Proprietorship class procure the reserve for capital necessity from companions and relatives .Twenty respondents of Partnership class draw capital from their own store as sources for capital finances, 40 (48%) respondents of Partnership class gets capital from business banks as sources for capital finances,35 (66%) respondents of Partnership class gets capital from cash moneylenders as sources for capital finances ,27 (44%) respondents of Partnership class secure the reserve for capital prerequisite through record payable, 10 (27%) respondents of Partnership class get the reserve for capital necessity from companions and relatives. 12 (26%) respondents of Private restricted organization draw capital from their very own reserve as sources for capital finances, 8 (10%) respondents of Private constrained organization class obtains capital from business banks as sources for capital finances,12 (23%) respondents of Private restricted organization class gets capital from cash loan specialists as sources for capital finances, 6 (10%) respondents of Private restricted organization class secure the store for capital necessity through record payable,12 (32%) respondents of Private restricted organization class procure the reserve for capital prerequisite from companions and relatives. Here X2cal for level of opportunity 8 at 5% importance dimension is 1.024 and X2 tab for level of opportunity 8 at 5% dimension of centrality is 15.5 .Since X2cal is lesser than X2tab subsequently speculation is acknowledged or there is no huge distinction between Form of the organization and sources of capital for financing prerequisite.

CONCLUSION

The expanding significance of monetary commitments made by SMEs sector requires better comprehension of financial conduct and practices of SMEs. Mulling over that the financial conduct of huge firms can't be connected to SMEs as huge firms fundamentally contrast from SMEs. This paper breaks down the corporate financing patterns embraced by SME sector in the northen district of India. It is clear from this investigation that the SME sector isn't embracing a specific finance blend. It relies upon the need and internal factors of a venture to pick that finance blend which suits best to their destinations and gives most reduced expense of capital. In view of the discoveries of the writing audit and exact study discoveries, it was set up after factor analysis that two factors essentially impact the financing pattern of SME sector. The two factors worth scores are external borrowings and blended financing. The investigation further reveales that self-raised finance seems, by all accounts, to be best in elevating association firms to develop, and business bank credit likewise is by all accounts progressively vast majority of the occasions organization firms have utilized the diverse wellspring of finance to managed themselves with that ideal finance blend which regards fit to keep up consistency in ease of capital on capital utilized.

REFERENCES

1. Ambrose, J. (2012). Venture Capital (VC): The All Important MSMEs Financing Strategy under Neglect in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 3(21). pp. 234–240. 2. Asian Development Bank (2014). ADB–OECD Study on Enhancing Financial Accessibility for MSMEs: Lessons from Recent Crises. Manila. 3. Bartholdy, J. and C. Mateus (2008). Financing of SMEs: An Asset Side Story. 4. Beck, T. and Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and Medium-size Enterprises: Access to Finance as a Growth Constraint, Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, pp. 2931-2943. 5. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Laeven, L. and Maksimovic, V. (2006). The determinants of financing obstacles, Journal of International Money and Finance, 25, pp. 932-952. 6. Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1998). The Economics of Small Business Finance: The Roles of Private Equity and Debt Markets in the Financial Growth Cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, pp. 613-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00038-7 7. Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2006). A More Complete Conceptual Framework for SME Finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(11), 2945-2966. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.008 8. Berry, A. (2000). The Role of Small and Medium Enterprise Sector in Latin America, Implications for South Africa Trade and industry Monitor, Johannesburg. 9. Biswas, A. (2014). Financing Constraints for MSME Sector. International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies. 1(5). pp. 60–68.

11. Cassar, G. (2004). The Financing of Business Start-Ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), pp. 261-283. http://dx.doi.org /10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00029-6 12. Cassar, G., & Holmes, S. (2003). Capital Structure and Financing of SMEs: Australian Evidence. Accounting and Finance, 43(2), pp. 123-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-629X.t01-1-00085 13. Coco, G. (2000). On the Use of Collateral. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(2), pp. 191-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00109 14. Columba, F., Gambacorta, L. and Mistrulli, P. E. (2008) Mutual Guarantee Institutions and Small Business Finance. 15. De Bettignies, J., & Brander, J. A. (2007). Financing Entrepreneurship: Bank Finance Versus Venture Capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), pp. 808 832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.07.005 16. Fatoki, O., & Asah, F. (2011). The Impact of Firm and Entrepreneurial Characteristics on Access to Debt Finance by SMEs in King Williams‘ Town, South Africa. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(8), pp. 170-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n8p170 17. García-Teruel, P. J., & Martínez-Solano, P. (2010). Determinants of Trade credit: A Comparative Study of European SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 28(3), pp. 215-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242609360603 18. Government of India (2015b). Report of the Committee Set Up to Examine the Financial Architecture of the MSME Sector. Ministry of Finance. New Delhi. 19. La Rocca, M., La Rocca, T., & Cariola, A. (2011). Capital Structure Decisions During a Firm's Life Cycle. Small Business Economics, 37(1), pp. pp. 107-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9229-z 20. Lahiri, R. (2012). Problems and Prospects for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in India in the Era of Globalization. Paper presented at the International 21. Michaelas, N., Chittenden, F., & Poutziouris, P. (1999). Financial Policy and Capital Structure Choice in U.K. SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Company Panel Data. Small Business Economics, 12(2), pp. 113-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008010724051 22. Myers, S. C. (1984). The Capital Structure Puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), pp. 574-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2327916 23. P. Mishra. (2006). Performance of Small Scale Manufacturing Units in the Post Economic reform with Special Reference to Factor Productivity: A Study of Five Industrial Clusters in Orissa, The Asian Economic Review, 48. 24. Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1994). The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data. Journal of finance, 49(1), pp. 3-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2329133 25. Prasad, C. S. (2006). Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Financing in India Issues and Concerns. CAB Calling. July–Sept, pp. 35–40. 26. Reserve Bank of India (2005). Policy Package for Stepping Up Credit to Small and Medium Enterprises. Mumbai. 27. Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding the Small Business Sector. Thomson Learning Emea. 28. Van Auken, H. E., & Neeley, l. (1996). Evidence of Bootstrap Financing Among Small Start-Up Firms. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Small Business Finance, 5(3), pp. 235.

Corresponding Author Kritika Singh*

Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Aggarwal College kritika.singh5757@gmail.com