Understanding the Concept of Nutritional Management for Patients in ICU

The Impact of Nutritional Management on ICU Patients

by Pradeep P. Nair*, Dr. Uthramani .,

- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540

Volume 16, Issue No. 9, Jun 2019, Pages 1 - 4 (4)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

Nutrition support assumes a significant job in the management of nutritional deficiencies in appropriately chose basically ill patients. A full nutritional assessment permits the computation of suitable feeding objectives. Malnourished ICU patients experience immune dysfunction, debilitated respiratory muscles, brought down ventilation limit and diminished GI resistance. In the event that enteral nutrition isn't plausible, parenteral nutrition can be given to improve the patient's vitality prerequisites. Parenteral nutrition needs concentrated consideration and observing Current examination recommends that there is a solid positive connection between nutritional status and basic illness. Improved nut. ritional status is related with positive clinical results. Be that as it may, the proof is conflicting in supporting this relationship.

KEYWORD

nutritional management, ICU patients, nutrition support, nutritional deficiencies, nutritional assessment, immune dysfunction, respiratory muscles, ventilation capacity, GI resistance, enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, nutritional status, clinical outcomes, evidence

I. INTRODUCTION

Well over a hundred years prior, the Irish doctor Robert Graves Robert James Graves (1796-1853) over turned set up doctrine by feeding patients with fevers, appearing wiped out patients improved when sustained. Patients at outrageous danger of passing on of poor nutrition are those with pre-leaving malnutrition, and those with major physical put-down, for example, broad consumes, real injury, considerable tasks, sepsis, and major neurological affront. To put it plainly, most ICU patients! How regular is malnutrition? Most studies propose that it is amazingly normal, with up to 12% of in-medical clinic patients being seriously malnourished, and anything up to half of patients being "at high hazard for malnutrition". This works out to around 15 million individuals in USA emergency clinics being in danger, and associates with poor result. The relating increments in expenses are generous, (up to 35-75% per patient), with major and minor inconveniences expanded by up to 200%, and span of medical clinic remain delayed by up to 90%. Research supported by the Kings Fund assessed potential cost reserve funds feasible by tending to the issue of malnutrition at 266 million pounds for every year for the United Kingdom. To put it plainly, when looked with the normal ICU patient, we ought to presumably not pose the inquiry "Would it be advisable for me to encourage this patient?" but instead state "How am I going to bolster this patient?" Malnutrition is an adjustment of body synthesis in which deficiencies of macronutrients and micronutrients result in decreased body cell mass, organ dysfunction, and strange serum science esteems. Nutrition support assumes a significant job in management of nutritional deficiencies in appropriately chose basically ill patients. A full nutritional assessment permits the estimation of suitable feeding objectives. The defeat of feeding enteral or parenteral is dictated by the nearness or the nonappearance of a working digestive system and haemodynamic status of the patent. The particular job of sugar fat and protein should be considered so as to forestall over feeding and different complexities. Patients well on the way to profit by nutritional support are those with standard malnutrition in whom an extended time of starvation would somehow or another happen. Assessment of malnutrition in basically ill patients starts with getting any history of later, automatic weight misfortune (surpassing 5% inside multi month or 10% more than a half year), albeit liquid over-burden ordinarily anticipates the exact assurance of dry weight in the ICU. Physical examination should concentrate on indications of protein-calorie insufficiency, (for example, worldly squandering), indications of explicit micronutrient inadequacy, (for example, pallor, glossitis, or rash), hydration state, and characterized as the weight in kilograms isolated by the square of the height in meters. Typical BMI ranges from 19 to 25. Survival at a BMI underneath 14 is extremely surprising. Anthropometric information (skinfold thickness and arm muscle boundary), just as creatinine height index (the urinary creatinine level as indicated by height). While valuable in wandering patients, are essentially less exact proportions of malnutrition in the basically ill patient, especially in the individuals who have liquid over-burden or renal dysfunction. Egg whites is the most widely recognized lab estimation of visceral protein status. Hypoalbuminemia is all the more normally a marker of the foundational inflammatory reaction and, all things considered, has prognostic significance. It has been related with expanded horribleness and mortality among hospitalized patients. The day by day hepatic blend rate for egg whites is 120 to 170mg/kg of body weight. Egg whites is appropriated between the intravascular and extravascular spaces. During injury, the liver builds generation of intense stage proteins and decreases egg whites combination. The reduction in egg whites combined with extravasation and upgraded catabolism (both intervened by eytokines) comes full circle in hypoalbuminemia. In this way, serum egg whites fixation is a poor index of nutritional status but instead fills in as a marker of injury and metabolic stress during injury reaction."

Objectives of nutrition in the ICU

Nutritional support in fundamentally ill patients was considered as an adjunctive consideration to give exogenous energizes to support the patient during the time of stress. This support had 3 fundamental objectives: - 1. To save the fit body mass. 2. To keep up the immune capacity. 3. To keep away from metabolic complexities. Feeding an ICU patient currently stretches out past picking the correct feeding course, the rate and the caloric thickness. In current basic consideration, the idea of 'remedial nutrition' is supplanting customary 'supportive nutrition'

II. ASSESSMENT OF NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF A PATIENT

Patients in danger for creating malnutrition are: - 2. Patients with poor admission for over 5 days. 3. Patients having extended supplement misfortunes because of the nearness of fistula, ulcer, or wound. 4. Hyper-metabolic states. 5. History of liquor misuse, utilization of medications with catabolic properties. 6. Impoverishment, separation, and propelled age. Screening Tools for assessment of nutrition are:- 1. Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) 2. Abstract Global Assessment (SGA) 3. Smaller than expected Nutritional Assessment (MNA) 4. Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST). 5. Nutritional Risks Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) 6. Nutrition Risk Index (NRI) 7. Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ)

Assessment of nutritional status is finished by: - 1. Physical examination

Weight, height and body mass index (BMI) are evaluated alongside examination for indications of any supplement lack. Inadvertent weight misfortune during illness regularly reflects loss of slender body mass. Estimation of skin-overlap thickness is valuable for assessing body fat stores, on the grounds that half of body fat is regularly present in the sub-cutaneous area. Skinfold thickness additionally allows separation of fat from bulk. Triceps skin crease (TSF) thickness is commonly illustrative of the body's general fat. A TSF thickness < 3 mm proposes weariness of fat stores.

2. Biochemical tests

Albumin, transferrin, pre-egg whites and retinol-restricting protein (RBP) are negative intense stage proteins. Creactive protein (CRP) and ceruloplasmin are certain intense stage proteins. Nitrogen balance assessment is the main

III. TOTAL PARENTERAL NUTRITION IN ICU PATIENTS

When all is said in done, the enteral route is favoured over the parenteral route, as the previous is increasingly physiologic, is more averse to be related with biliary stasis and hyperglycaemia, and is altogether more affordable. Numerous examinations have implied to demonstrate that total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is related with higher contamination rates than is enteral feeding. Contraindications to enteral feeding incorporate diffuse peritonitis, intestinal impediment, recalcitrant heaving, incapacitated ileus, and serious loose bowels. Hypotension with hemodynamic precariousness is related to decreased intestinal bloodstream, and low resilience to enteral feeding is the standard. TPN assumes a significant job in patients in whom the gut can't be utilized. Organization of 25 kcal/kg of common body weight is sufficient for most patients with ordinary BMI. With BMI < 19, overfeeding may result in a refeeding disorder described by electrolyte anomalies (hypophosphatemia, hypokalaemia, and hypomagnesemia), volume over-burden, and congestive heart disappointment. Refeeding disorder is more uncertain if TPN is presented steadily. Begin without any than 100 to 150 g dextrose and low groupings of sodium chloride, and execute fixed observing of electrolytes (day by day for the initial 2 to 3 days) and blood sugars (each 6 h) The protein (amino corrosive) objective in TPN ranges from 1.2 to 1.5 g/kg/d and ought to be balanced with occasional observing to elevate nitrogen maintenance and to support protein blend. Fluid limitation is regularly essential in heart, aspiratory, post-usable and renal patients in the ICU. For such patients, TPN can be confined to 1 liter. Nutrients and follow components are typically directed at segments of the TPN. What's more, the quantity of medicine, for example, antihistamine and metaclopramide can be blended in the TPN.

IV. ENTERAL NUTRITION SUPPORT

Intragastric feeding requires sufficient gastric portability and exhausting, a remaining of in excess of 150 ml is a relative contra-sign to gastric feeding as the danger of wannabe is high. Enteral feeding is normally begun with essential formulae with diminished fat substance at a low rate until resistance is resolved. Rate might be progressed to the objective each eighth hourly, as long as the gastric remaining is low and stomach torment and distension are missing. Multivitamins should be renal, pneumonic and immune-upgrading, are accessible.

V. CONCLUSION

Various basic nutrition standards are clear. ICU patients remaining in excess of a couple of days will require nutrition support and whenever malnourished they may require it sooner. Enteral feeding ought to be energized utilizing basic feeding conventions and began early if safe to do as such. Keeping up ideal nutritional status is vital to improving clinical results of basically ill patients. Learning and skills of the human services group in nutritional management and the accessibility of management conventions are significant in keeping up ideal nutrition of basically ill patients.

REFERENCES: -

1. M. Sharada & M. Vadivela (2014). “Nutrition in critically ill patients” Journal, Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 3 & 4, July-December, 2014 2. Donnette Wright-Myrie, Dr. Eulalia Kahwa, Dawn Dover-Roberts (2013). “Nutrition in critical illness: Critical care nurses’ knowledge and skills in the nutritional management of adults requiring intensive care – A review of the literature” Nutrition in critical illness: Critical care nurses’ knowledge and skills in the nutritional management of adults requiring intensive care – A review of the literature 3. Ramprasad, R., & Kapoor, M. C. (2012). Nutrition in intensive care. Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 28(1), pp. 1–3. doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92401 4. Berger, Pichard (2012). Best timing for energy provision during critical illness. Critical Care 2012; 16: pp. 215. 5. Heyland D.K., Dhaliwal R., Drover J.W. et. al. (2003). Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2003; 27(5): pp. 355- 73. 6. Quenot, J., Plantefeve, G., Baudel, J., Camilatto, I., Bertholet., E., Cailliod, R., Reigner, J., & Rigaud, J. (2010). Bedside adherence to clinical practice guidelines for enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: A 7. Nguyen N.Q., Chapman M., Fraser R.J. et. al. (2007). Prokinetic therapy for feed intolerance in critical illness-one drug or two? Crit Care Med; 35: pp. 1-7. 8. Wright, Donnette & Kahwa, Eulalia & Dover Roberts, Dawn & Donnette Wright-Myrie, Mrs. (2013). Nutrition in critical illness: Critical care nurses' knowledge and skills in the nutritional management of adults requiring intensive care – A review of the literature. The Caribbean Journal of Nursing. 1. pp. 49-55. 9. Joseph, B., Wynne, J. L., Dudrick, S. J., & Latifi, R. (2010). Nutrition in trauma and critically ill patients. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 36, pp. 25-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-010-9213-y

Corresponding Author Pradeep P. Nair*

Ph.D. in Nursing, Department of Nursing,Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula Uttar Pradesh