Revisiting William Shakespeare

INTRODUCTION

William Shakespeare, a romantic dramatist, shared all the characteristics of a Renaissance humanist with a longing to look for reality with regards to human characteristics. He was additionally a playwright of most elevated culture with an enormous commonality of man in a characteristic or fake condition and unnatural environmental factors. He completely mirrored their conclusions, considerations, reasons, and emotions. In his plays, Hamlet and Macbeth, he addresses all the inquiries regarding the prizes of life and puzzle of human nature. Shakespeare's plays are for sure devoted reflections of habits and of life to his pursuers. His characters are the authentic descendants of normal humanity. His characters have a widespread intrigue and essentialness with general interests and standards. These plays expand our widespread skylines through a delighting and lifting experience instead of a discouraging one. In Hamlet and Macbeth, Shakespeare represents the profundity of the human brain and soul, and morality and immorality of human conduct. He contends that men can be interrelated with one another and he disentangles reality with regards to the bestial and humanistic pieces of the human brain in arranging and planning abhorrent or great activities. He, in like manner, endeavors to caution his crowd and perusers about their actual duties in this world.

William Shakespeare is a rich and interesting author as far as making understudies aware of issues in ladies' investigations and sex belief system. In spite of the fact that Shakespeare reflects and on occasion bolsters the English Renaissance generalizations of ladies and men and their different jobs and duties in the public arena, he is additionally an essayist who questions, challenges, and alters those portrayals. His accounts, as we as a whole know, are utilized in optional and school study halls even today and, hence, bear the cost of chances not exclusively to comprehend Renaissance culture better yet additionally to stand up to our own contemporary speculations about sex, particularly being female. Time permitting, Shakespeare appears to have been bringing up issues about the standard pictures of guys and females, about what the characteristics of every sexual orientation are, about what is characterized as manly and ladylike, about how every sex has both manly and female characteristics and practices, about the nature and intensity of a domineering man controlled society, and about the jobs ladies and men should play in showcasing the tales of their lives. Since women's activist analysis today centers around huge numbers of these equivalent issues, we can carry such basic investigation into the homeroom by posing clear inquiries of and about Shakespeare's accounts.

as for the greater part of Renaissance society, ladies as the female spoke to the accompanying temperances which, critically, have their significance in relationship to the male; acquiescence, quiet, sexual celibacy, devotion, quietude, consistency, and persistence. Notwithstanding, sexual orientation characteristics were socially built and there was a simple traverse of manly and female attributes to the two sexes. Characterizing manly and ladylike characteristics permitted essayists like Shakespeare to draw guys with certain "female" characteristics and females with certain "manly" characteristics. This converging of manly and ladylike in the two guys and females may assist with clarifying how simple it was for the Elizabethan stage to utilize and acknowledge every single male cast and use men to play solid female characters like Juliet, Lady Macbeth, Cleopatra, and Kate, the Shrew. Contemporary crowds, so set on isolating female from male, would have extraordinary trouble coming back to this standard act of the Renaissance. In fact, both manly and ladylike characteristics were portions of what the Renaissance considered "human nature" and every sexual orientation partook in the two arrangements of characteristics to differing degrees. For instance, take the demonstration of sobbing. Albeit the two sexual orientations cried and were "permitted" by the culture to sob (think about all the tears men shed in Julius Caesar over the passings of other men), tears were thought of as "ladylike" yet not solely female. In Hamlet, when Laertes learns of the demise of his sister Ophelia, he sobs in distress, with authentic inclination, yet shouts, "The lady will be out," which means his tears speak to his "womanly" part that can't be smothered (or curbed) by his manly quality." Similarly as the Renaissance characterized female jobs, it obviously appointed certain practices to guys. Theirs was a male centric culture. We get a brief look at this man centric society in a play like Romeo and Juliet with the intensity of Lord Capulet. It's anything but difficult to see that the male had a spot and a task to carry out, similarly as the female had a lesser spot and a job. The lady is either in the place of her dad as Juliet is or in the place of her significant other as Lady Macbeth may be. Notice in Macbeth that Lady Macbeth is watched distinctly inside the stronghold at Enverness, and it is her obligation to make "arrangements" for the appearance of King Duncan. Master Capulet underscores this female obligation when he declares, fully expecting the marriage of Paris and Juliet, which he will "play the housewife for this once." In Macbeth, as in Renaissance society, men were relied upon to take part in open undertakings (as warriors, government officials, pioneers), to be talkers, decide, push ladies were required to expect an increasingly uninvolved job. For instance, toward the start of Romeo and Juliet when the young men are processing around the boulevards of Verona and speaking profanely about young ladies, Sampson (one of Capulet's workers) comments, "And in this manner ladies, being the more vulnerable vessels, are ever pushed to the divider; in this way I will push Montague's men from the divider, and push his house keepers to the divider." The entry is ready with cliché Renaissance thinking: ladies are more fragile (genuinely, inwardly, mentally, ethically), and they exist for male sexual satisfaction they're just useful for "pushing" to the divider. At the point when Lady Macbeth chooses to turn into a "functioning" accomplice in her better half's dangerous fiendishness, she needs to ask "Come, you spirits ... unsex me here,/and fill me from the crown to the toe topful/of direst brutality," which proposes that it isn't "normal" for a lady to be pitiless. However, as is frequently the situation, these ideological explanations, regularly positioned in the mouths of minor characters, are addressed, refuted, turned around in the recounting the story. Shakespeare transcends the cliché perspectives on Renaissance society as he depicts ladies as more than latent vessels. For instance, the affection for Romeo and Juliet is an impartial encounter. Each accepts obligations for making their relationship work. Woman Macbeth goes past Juliet's cooperative nature and assumes responsibility for her relationship with Macbeth. At the point when Macbeth sends his better half a letter relating all the bizarre happenings and predictions so she may know all-realize that what is guaranteed is guaranteed not exclusively to him however to her, he calls her "my dearest accomplice of enormity." Perhaps she sees herself progressively "masculine" than her significant other, for she fears his thoughtfulness and lack of involvement, calling him to her-"Hie thee here." Certain characteristics were related with the male and an alternate set with the female. Shakespeare mirrors this Renaissance qualification between, and joining of, the manly and the ladylike, a juxtaposition which is likewise clear in the female ruler of his day, Queen Elizabeth. The central concern of Elizabethan guys was to get the Queen offered to somebody so she could create youngsters. Definitely she realized that in the event that she had done quite recently that, she would have lost the extraordinary force she had as an unmarried Renaissance female ruler. Elizabeth, obviously, was not above playing with sex qualifications when it was for her potential benefit. In her well known discourse to the soldiers at Tilbury who had accumulated for the arrival of the Spanish Armada, Elizabeth played both the female ... I myself will wage war, I myself will be your general, judge, and remunerated of all of your excellencies in the field." Like Elizabeth, the great courageous women of the lighthearted comedies Beatrice in Much Ado About Nothing, Rosalind in As You Like It, and Viola in Twelfth Night-mirror this mix of female and manly mentalities and practices. Despite the fact that they are ladies, subject sooner or later in each play to the consideration of fathers, siblings, and additionally spouses, each is likewise "manly" in her activities. As "solid females," they show more mindfulness than the men; they utilize their explanation, they talk, they are versatile, frequently found in the out-of-entryways as opposed to inside their dads' or spouses' homes. They control the activity. Portia, for instance, controls the last scene of The Merchant of Venice by realizing the defeat of Shylock through her treating of equity with leniency and by controlling the powers which empower her to live joyfully ever after with Bassanio. Viola, as well, gains marriage with the man of her decision by acting actually as both male and female, and cunningly controlling the Duke's relationship with Olivia. Like Portia, Rosalind commands the activity in As You Like It. She is wise, solid of character, understanding, and shows an unfaltering honesty. Besides, she is solid and ready to shield herself when dishonestly blamed for conspiracy. Notwithstanding the legitimacy in looking at artistic characters absolutely inside the setting of the work wherein they show up, an instructor utilizing Shakespeare's plays for sex concentrate in the study hall and the understudies doing the investigation ought to have some foundation information on the time in which the works were composed. This perusing and conversation could confine the result of the examination by characterizing the Renaissance lady utilized as a model for Shakespeare's work and, accordingly, making these courageous women unsurprising in conduct and limited to Renaissance measures as it were. An incredible inverse occurs, in any case, as a result of the contradictions which show up in research on sexual orientation characterized jobs of that period. Researchers are not in understanding with regards to whether Shakespeare's ladies and men mirror his time or challenge his time, regardless of whether they mirror society's disposition or just the author's mentality, whether they are ladies and men for all ages or the Renaissance just, and whether the Renaissance man and lady were truly freed scholars or individuals firmly limited by their general public. Amusingly and superbly, the all the more perusing one does about the period, the more muddled the issue becomes. What a brilliantly ripe base for study which energizes different idea about explicitly characterized jobs of present day youthful grown-ups. William Shakespeare (April 23, 1564-April 23, 1616) was an English playwright. His dad, John Shakespeare, was a dealer in calfskin, corn, wheat, and other horticultural items. His mom named Mary Arden was the girl of a rich rancher. Shakespeare's folks were uneducated. He went to Grammar School and learned Latin and Greek in his town. His town was a lovely and beguiling spot. A few factors, for example, the old strongholds of Warwick and Worthwhile, The timberlands of Arden, and the old Roman camps and military streets made his creative mind be enacted and reflected in his plays. In 1587 he went to the Globe Theater in London to advance his virtuoso in artistic action as an entertainer and playwright upon the phase of theater in London. It was a decent an ideal opportunity for him to portray the entire existence of individuals in his plays. He composed seventeen plays in the field of parody, ten ones in the field of history, and ten ones in the field of catastrophe. In addition, he has five works in verse. He was not an old style researcher but rather he was one of the best Renaissance humanists who was recognizable (in interpretation or unique) with a considerable lot of incredible old researchers. His ageless plays drew motivation from Romans and Greeks and loaded up with the soul of Renaissance components. In any case, the scope of Shakespeare's thoughts and subjects are more noteworthy than that of old style screenwriters. Renaissance's anxiety with independence is clear with Shakespeare's profound enthusiasm for impression of internal psychological clash in character. As Wells declared that Shakespeare's plays show their humanist beginnings in the subjects they perform (Wells, 2004). Stated: "Shakespeare is maybe the ideal articulation of Renaissance humanism. His significant compassion toward humanity empowers him to penetrate the very center of his characters; his unexcelled blessings as a writer made his people life-changing animals of fragile living creature and blood". Shakespeare's plays are profoundly good and manage human creatures' moral and good duty regarding their activities.

Brain is considered as the starting point and wellspring of human characteristics. On the development of our advanced and current idea of the brain, the roots can be followed to old Greek scholar, Plato's concept of the spirit. In his book, The Phaedo, Plato depicts the principal sketch of the hypothesis of the spirit. He accepted that each human being has two sections, physical body and faculties from one viewpoint and the spirit as the "genuine self" then again. So soul is consistently alive and is isolated after one's passing and liable for his activity in the Day of Judgment. Plato

screen of human practices and activities. Through solid depiction of human brain science, Shakespeare portrays human creatures' idea, oblivious topic, feelings, emotional dreams, feeling, activities, strife with themselves and one another, internal real factors, the psychological torment and enduring of human creatures, a feeling of associations among past, present, and future. He accepts that human characteristics are the result of their psyches. His scholarly force, sensational force, and intensity of articulation made him give a lot of consideration to darker side of human experience, shortcoming and sins of man. His incredible catastrophes like Hamlet and Macbeth appreciate such shocking points of interest. Roosevelt states," Men and ladies are not detainees of destiny, yet just detainees of their own psyche." The brain has a lot of intensity. It likewise has the ability to fix and mend the infections. It is boundless in its capability to arrive at the outcomes it wants. It is human being who confines himself with his idea, and the other way around. He can have all that he wants or wishes. The psyche shapes what our identity is and what we do. It is our brain that shapes our conviction framework for programming, thinking, thinking and capacity. Human oblivious psyche has boundless open door when he is sleeping. That is the reason his subdued oblivious wants have opportunity to occur in his fantasy. Shakespeare is a sort of therapist who accepts that there is not much or great however it is we who think and name something as great and others as terrible. So these considerations and presumptions are helpless against mistake through misperception and distortion. Montaigne says" If that which we call insidiousness and torment, be neither torment, nor detestable, yet that our extravagant just gives it that quality, it is in us to transform it: and having its decision, if none constrain us, we are very nitwits, to bandy for that party, which is annoying unto us". Thusly, the impression of occasions and their resulting translation dependent on one's information or conviction makes us do activity. It is a forceful mental proposal which moves into a physical sign. It is likewise a psychological marvel in the domain of trancelike state and interesting impacts upon the creative mind and connected with the notion of the "hostile stare". The term interest as the significance of bewitchment is an outline of mental "enchantment". Bewitchment remembers material components for its procedures toxins, elixirs or thoughtful mystical things. It is an apparent nearness of an individual or creature. As indicated by Johnson the action word "to intrigue" signifies; to charm; to captivate; to impact in some mischievous and mystery way, and the thing "interest" signifies the creatures discover their methods of living and relationship with one another dependent on examples of their brain. The marvel of interest is made inside the personnel of recognition. It is amazing in its fantasies. Somebody's activity is impacted essentially by his view of what establishes his present reality. Recognition can be considered our window to our specific situation. The seed of desire in Macbeth made him grasp a hypothetical reality. He fantasized about wiping out King Duncan. Huge numbers of problems, enticements, inner questionings and dealings cause Macbeth to discover their underlying foundations. Bewitchment is a psychological misbehavior which shows the impacts of interest. Macbeth encounters the impacts of prediction and is encircled by the displays of internal and external symbolisms which contort his comprehension of the real world and caused bogus ends. His bogus impression of Weird Sisters' prescience made him slaughter the King. Hamlet's impression of Ghost didn't cause him to do broken activities. His sound brain welcomes him to research increasingly more so as to ensure about Claudius' violations. So his faltering is one reason of his sound psyche. Mental negligence plans against amicability and security. The course of our "internal" drives us to develop or destruct the "outward". Human underhandedness is the aftereffect of numbness and deception. In 1895, Dr. Freud is notable as the dad of therapy, broke down writing, craftsmanship, religion, and even legislative issues, at that point created contemplating humankind and his psychological procedure and explained a whole hypothesis about mental working. He accepts that human's practices start from his character which is as the result of psyche.

Through examining writing, analysts utilize their own methodology as apparatus for "perusing underneath the lines". For legitimate rendering of writing, the total playwright of the English Renaissance, Shakespeare with his announcements of minds about the good and enthusiastic impacts of catastrophe, was psychological the writing. During the twentieth century, psychological analysis has been related with a unique way of thinking; Freud as the dad of psychoanalyst has come to organize. He has conceived an informational prospect of psychological methodology so as to empower peruses to acknowledge writing as distinguishing human Hamlet, the two are among his rundown of "the ten generally huge and great works of world literature"(Holland, 1960:165). In this exposition, Freud (1916) demonstrates the baffling wonder that "individuals every so often become sick when a profoundly established and since quite a while ago appreciated wish has come to be finished". He calls attention to that Shakespeare is a genuine pioneer in researching the human brain in his shows. He needs to underscore Shakespeare's conclusion about psyche that "the desire is the dad to the idea" (King Henry IV section 2). So he reaches to an outcome in which our musings are conceived from our expectations, wants, dreams, and wishes. Blossom expresses," Shakespeare's dramatizations are the wheel for our entire lives, and show us whether we are boneheads of adoration, or of time, or of fortune, or of ourselves, or of our folks." Shakespeare underscored the characteristics of brain and soul of a human being (2004) Freud accepts that there are three highlights in human brain which shape his character as the best or most exceedingly terrible. They are the id, the inner self and the superego. The id is the darkest piece of the brain which is related with dim deeds, for example, gore, infidelity, interbreeding, usurpation, bad form, black magic, and animosity. Subsequently, darkest piece of psyche the id-entices the character to structure the abhorrent activity. Haziness makes the shrewd condition of the play. The plays Hamlet and Macbeth live in dimness. This obscurity demonstrates a psychological point about human characteristics. These plays are about feeling, considerations and arranging than of activity. They manage blend of the real world and fantasy. Dimness identifies with self of the characters. The murkiness in these plays alludes to strife, movement of the activity, and disclosure of startling considerations and thoughts. In these two plays, the first and most significant threatening domain of the dimness is the brain research of human nature, especially that of Macbeth, and Claudius. The second domain of this haziness exists in the deed attempted by these characters. Bradley (1905) considered haziness in Macbeth as," Darkness, we may even say obscurity, agonizes over this catastrophe. It is noteworthy that practically all the scenes which without a moment's delay repeat to memory occur either around evening time or in some dull spot. The vision of the knife, the homicide of Duncan, the homicide of Banquo, the rest strolling of Lady Macbeth, all come in night-scenes. The witches move in the thick quality of a tempest, or, 'dark and 12 PM witches,' get Macbeth in a sinkhole. The obscurity of night is to the legend a thing of dread, even of frightfulness; and that which he feels turns into the soul of the play. The swoon glimmerings of the western sky at sundown are here threatening: it 'light thickens,' when 'night's dark specialists to their prey do awaken,' when the wolf starts to yell, and the owl to shout, and wilted homicide takes forward to his work. Macbeth offers the stars shroud their flames that his 'dark' wants might be hidden; Lady Macbeth approaches thick night to come, palled in the dunnest smoke of damnation." The play Macbeth creates in the psychological space which dominated by the murkiness. Before Macbeth comes to think about the predictions made by the witches and starts contemplating them, he strolls in the territory of obscurity that demonstrates a piece of his character. The shadow of darkness develops until Macbeth starts perpetrating wrongdoings. He plots the homicide of Duncan so as to satisfy the Witches' predictions. His desires and dreams originate from his id which assumes control over his still, small voice so as to get his own delight as opposed to thinking about the unsoundness of his deeds. Macbeth is the casualty of his dull psyche which rules him and affected different characters. Hamlet is likewise the casualty of his uncle's dim brain. In Macbeth, Shakespeare delineates the impacts of quelled feeling on the oblivious and cognizant conditions of Lady Macbeth and Macbeth as the two focal characters in this play. Woman Macbeth as an example of separated individual without any youngsters and no buddy, influenced with wanders off in fantasy land. This segregation drives her to wandering off in fantasy land, narcissism, and delirium. Macbeth is the main character whose deeds speak to the three degrees of cognizance. Actually, at the degree of sense of self he varies into various degrees of cognizance in which Macbeth tells his better half that "[They] will continue no further around here", on the grounds that King Duncan has regarded them and thusly their arrangements deceive their own qualities, their King and their nation. The superego is clear as a part of Macbeth's character, and can be represented by Macbeth's fantasies, dreams and fears. Truth be told, it is the tongue of one's still, small voice which discloses to him whether what he is doing is ethically right or wrong. Macbeth's superego works in his psyche and causing him to perceive of what he had fouled up. Through the perspective of superego, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth understand their own nonsensical activities. This disclosure is practiced with the battle between Macbeth's driven clouded side and great self of his character. In play Hamlet, haziness is related with the internal characteristics of Claudius, Gertrude, Polonius, Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern. The Ghost in Hamlet is just obviously an apparition which is considered Hamlet's superego, the moral and good part that makes his still, small voice, and oversees him to act as per the ethical rule. In the profound

self. The issue is that Hamlet faces with two dads; at the one hand King Hamlet as his own dad, at the other hand Claudius as his progression father. In view of basic remarks, Hamlet's existence guideline can advise him to waver between the two powers. Thusly, his postponement in delivering retribution shows that he is being pulled by his own superego, his own dad, in the same class as heavenly attendant and his id, his progression father, as a satyr. His superego, the apparition of his dad, guides him to subdue his id, his progression father, Claudius.

Through these plays, Shakespeare plans to advise us about the contention among abhorrent and great. Our abhorrence begins from our id (our bestial and darkest piece of psyche) however our integrity starts from our superego (our coherent piece of brain): • Shakespeare features the carnal part in Macbeth' words; "O, brimming with scorpions is my mind"(3.2:41) whereby he needs to caution the crowd against their destructive bestial piece of brain, id. These are considered as two main impetuses which push human being to do activity simultaneously. Inner voice alludes to one's ability to recognize rightness and misleading quality and eagerness to pick the right. • Shakespeare utilizes Hamlet as a man who is conflicted between his id and superego yet is fruitful with his heart. Hamlet was placed in a dualistic second," To be, or not to be, that is the issue" (3.1:57).The idea of self-destruction floats in his psyche. It is his inner voice that permits him to consider the immorality of such a shrewd deed. • Shakespeare matches the hands with human defective deeds especially grisly deeds. So he makes reference to that human creatures figuratively attempt to wash their hands so as to dispose of the weight of wrongdoing upon their still, small voice. So Macbeth as a liable individual attempts to wash his hands so as to decrease his psychological pressure; "What hands are here? ha! they pluck out mine eyes!/Will all extraordinary Neptune's sea wash this blood/Clean from my hand? (2.2:58-59)" • Shakespeare attempts to caution the crowds and perusers about the tricky nature in every human being that lead to annihilation. Freud accepts that everyone has this tricky nature in his id. It is an unreasonable drive for smothering the truth. Beguiling nature of plays encounters or orders on certain types of misleading to cloud reality. In this way, one must be wary about confiding in others. A man with tricky appearance regularly controls or disguises reality to serve his needs. The truth of circumstance is covered up by tricky appearance. Through Hamlet's tongue, Shakespeare condemns legislators who deliberately utilize beguiling appearance as a way to accomplish their goals;"This may be the pate of a government official, which this ass now/Over spans, one that would evade God/… our insights do,/An evil to compose reasonable (5.1:78 and 5.2:33-34)" • Macbeth is bamboozled by the guide of Weird Sisters and his significant other. Be that as it may, his misleading nature is enacted by their beguiling appearances. The comments of the Witches; "Reasonable is foul, and foul is reasonable" accentuation this issue and show the hole among appearance and reality. Woman Macbeth seems, by all accounts, to be a benevolent and cherishing spouse; past that, she is brutal so as to get her way at any expense. She encourages her better half to have a tricky appearance; "… To bewilder the time,/Look like the time, bear welcome in your eye,/Your hand, your tongue: resemble the' guiltless blossom,/But be snake under (1.5:61-64)"

Shakespeare interprets human being through their internal characteristics which lead to their enormity or even to their hopelessness. He has exhibited how humans' dull idea, for example, unadulterated ravenousness, self-included or self-concern, and desire can be risky. Actually, if human being knows his elevated situation as the paragon of creatures, he doesn't permit dull idea to connect with his psyche. He shows the mystery and logical inconsistency in human being. That is the reason one can be base and coldblooded, however he can likewise give incredible sympathy and grace. Humanity isn't naturally acceptable or intrinsically abhorrent; he is fit for both. It is human psyche which picks great or fiendishness. Humans are variable. It is malevolent that slaughters families and undermines and harms the life of countries. Shakespeare educates his crowd about some unpreventable characteristics as inborn element in human being. For instance, voracity is a piece of every single human being. It is inevitable; however everybody can control it in a specific way. Self-concern is another natural trademark that human up the fundamental undertaking of Shakespeare recorded as a hard copy Hamlet and Macbeth through the expressions of Tibbles;"The fate of man is to turn out to be continuously not so much human but rather more humane, not so much impulsive but rather more imaginative.

1. Aristotle. Poetics. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Vol. 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1984. 2316- 340. Print. 2. Bradley, A. C. Shakespearean Tragedy. London: MacMillan, 1964. 3. Corrigan, Robert W., ed. Tragedy: Vision and Form. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1981. 4. Krook, Dorothea. Elements of Tragedy. New Haven: Yale U. P., 1969. 5. Shakespeare, William. Othello. The Norton Shakespeare. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt, Suzanne Gossett, and Gordon McMullan. By Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, and Katharine Eisaman Maus. 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton, 2016. 2084- 158. Print 6. Wasserman, Earl R. ―The Pleasures of Tragedy.‖ ELH 14.4 (1947): 283-307. 7. Bloom H (2004).Macbeth. Chelsea House Publishers, USA. 8. Bradley AC (2006). Shakespearean Tragedy. Oxford University Press Grebanier BDN (1957). 9. Shakespeare on Masculinity.Cambridge University Press. 10. Eagleton, Terry. The New Left Church. London: Sheed & Ward, 1966. Print. Shakespeare and Society: Critical Studies in Shakespearean Drama. London: 11. Chatto & Windus, 1967. Print. ---, ed. Directions: Pointers for the Post-Conciliar Church. London: Sheed & Ward, 1968. 12. Chatto & Windus, 1970. Print. The Body as Language: Outline of a 'New Left' Theology. London: Sheed & Ward, 1970. Print. 13. Myths of Power: A Marxist Study of the Brontës. 1975. London: Macmillan, 1988. Print. 15. Marxism and Literary Criticism. 1976. London: Routledge, 2002. Print. 16. Brecht and Company. 1979. MS. ---. Walter Benjamin or Towards a Revolutionary Criticism. 1981. London: Verso, 2009. Print.

Assistant Professor & Head, Department of English & American Studies, K. K. P. G. College, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh