A Concise Review on Targeted Nanocarriers for Cancer Chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is uncontrolled cell multiplication that forcefully attacks different pieces of the body. As indicated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 14.1 million new instances of cancer were assessed to happen in 2012, with practically 8.2 million mortality cases. In light of IARC gauges, cancer is the second most basic reason for death in both monetarily creating and created nations. About 13% of worldwide cancer cases are assessed to have happened in southwestern of Asia. The fundamental cancer therapy methodology, chemotherapy, has impediments that including different results. To diminish untimely mortality from cancer, the goal: Cancer Prevention and Control in the Context of an Integrated Approach (WHA70.12) was passed in 2017 by the World Health Assembly.1 As per Hanahan and Weinberg, cancer cells show six significant changes in their own physiology: (1) independence in signs of development, (2) inhumanity toward signals repressing development, (3) protection from apoptosis, (4) limitless proliferative potential, (5) supported angiogenesis and (6) metastasis. One of the accessible therapies for cancer is chemotherapy, which all the time has a place with the fundamental decision of therapy. Lamentably, chemotherapy can prompt harm of sound cells and tissues or advancement of medication obstruction. Nanoparticles hold huge potential as a successful medication conveyance framework. Nano systems with various structures and organic properties have been widely researched for drug conveyance applications. To accomplish effective medication conveyance, it is critical to comprehend the cooperation‘s of nanomaterials with the organic climate, targeting cell-surface receptors, drug discharge, and various medication administration. The utilization of nanomaterials including peptide-based nanomaterial to target the vascular endothelial development factor is another way to deal with control illness movement. A few enemies of cancer drugs including paclitaxel, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil and dexamethasone have been effectively figured utilizing nanomaterials. Quantom specks, chitosan, Polylactic/glycolic corrosive (PLGA) and PLGA-based nanoparticles have additionally been utilized for in vitro RNAi conveyance. Against cancer medications, for example, loperamide and doxorubicin bound to nanomaterials have been appeared to cross the flawless blood-mind hindrance and delivered at remedial fixations in the cerebrum. In light of the above insights, new cancer-particular restorative specialists with upgraded wellbeing profile for cancer therapy are expected to diminish the mortality in patients with cancer. Subsequently current audit zeroed in on different systems for targeted drug conveyance of hostile to cancer therapeutics. Dynamic targeting of nanocarriers can be accomplished by the formation of NPs with targeting ligands, for example, antibodies, peptides, nucleic corrosive aptamers and carbohydrates.2 As conversation in the following segment of this audit, some remedial forms are under clinical turn of events. Anyway, achievement of these form is restricted to exemplification proficiency of medication and safeguarding of receptor explicitness of targeting ligand. Macromolecular medication transporters are an alluring cancer drug conveyance technique since they seem to target tumors and have restricted poisonousness in typical tissues. The polymer-based medications are the main full scale atomic medication transporters for the analysis and therapy of cancer, and they have been broadly examined for this purpose.3 Polymer drug form (PDC) conveyance depends on the EPR impact for targeting tumors. EPR considers latent targeting of huge atomic weight mixes, and inactive targeting because of EPR has gotten one of the advancement regions for targeting strong tumors.4 The utilization of microparticles (>1mm) and nanoparticles (<1mm) as conveyance vehicles for anticancer therapeutics can possibly change the eventual fate of cancer treatment. Microparticles have been utilized a transporter framework for anticancer medications utilizing various kinds of polymers, for example, poly (d,l-lactic-co-glycolic corrosive) (PLGA). For instance, supported delivery anastrozole-stacked PLGA microparticles have been produced for the drawn-out therapy of bosom cancer.5 Micelles are self-gathering nanosized colloidal particles with a hydro-phobic center and hydrophilic shell. Micelles have been effectively used to convey ineffectively dissolvable drugs, and they are alluring medication transporters for cancer treatment. Polymeric micelles, micelles shaped from amphiphilic block co-polymers, have high soundness both in vitro and in vivo and great biocompatibility. Lipid-center micelles will be micelles that are framed by forming dissolvable copolymers with lipids. Niosomes, non-ionic surfactant vesicles are presently generally concentrated as an option in contrast to liposomes, since they ease the impediments related with liposomes like chemical flimsiness, variable immaculateness of phospholipids and significant expense. Niosomes have a few points of interest over the other medication conveyance frameworks like liposomes, including less complex readiness strategies, ease, underlying adaptability and lower poisonousness because of their non-ionic structure. In addition, niosomes are bio-reliable, biodegradable and non-immunogenic, while they can Liposomes are the most broadly read transporter framework for anticancer medication conveyance. A liposome is a round vesicle going from 50nm to a few microns in size, with a film made out of a phospholipid and cholesterol bilayer, ordinarily containing a hydrophilic center. The primary preferences of liposomal definitions incorporate the accompanying: (1) improved pharmacokinetics and medication discharge, (2) upgraded intracellular entrance, (3) tumor targeting and forestalling unfriendly results and (4) capacity to join a few prescriptions into a solitary medication conveyance system.8 Liposomes made their effective section into the market in 1995 with the advancement of the PEGylated liposomal plan Doxil®. Since its entrance, there has been no thinking back for these conveyance frameworks, which have been investigated for different sicknesses going from cancer therapy to torment management.9,10 Different kinds of liposomes, e.g., PEGylated liposomes (Lipodox), temperature touchy liposomes (ThermoDox), cationic liposomes (EndoTAG-1) and liposomal immunizations (Epaxal and Inflexal V), exhibit the extraordinary exploration on liposomes.11 Several liposomes were effectively converted into the center and other liposomal plans are in various periods of clinical examination. Albeit a considerable lot of these items have been demonstrated to be valuable in preclinical preliminaries, just definitions that show viability in clinical preliminaries will advance into the center. In synopsis, the liposomes right now in clinical preliminaries may give advantages to the differentiated patient populace for different remedial applications. Thermoresponsive materials have been utilized to form into thermosensitive transporter frameworks, intended to deliver drug when a specific stage progress temperature is accomplished at or close to the target site (for example tumor).12 Temperature-delicate liposomes (TS-liposomes) have been read for chemotherapeutic purposes to upgrade the arrival of anticancer medications at tumor locales. TS-liposomes can be set up by slight film hydration and ensuing sonication and portrayed for size, stage change temperature, in vitro drug delivery and security.13 As talked about before, drug–polymer forms are likely contender for the specific conveyance of anticancer specialists to tumor tissue. Joining corrosive delicate connections between the medication and the polymer is an appealing methodology since it guarantees compelling arrival of the polymer-bound medication at the tumor site. This delivery is extracellular, coming about because of the somewhat acidic pH of the

Strategies of Drug Targeting Medication targeting to a territory of interest inside the body builds the remedial viability just as it diminishes the poisonousness that may emerge something else. Two methodologies are generally utilized for drug targeting to the ideal organ/tissue.14

The methodology depends on novel properties of tumor microenvironment, eminently: I) broken tumor vasculature, which is exceptionally porous to macromolecules than typical tissue. II) an ill-advised capacity of lymphatic waste framework, which is liable for improved liquid maintenance in the tumor interstitial space. This depends on the amassing of medication at regions around the site of interest, for example, if there should be an occurrence of tumor tissues. The tumor explicit statement, additionally called improved porousness maintenance (EPR) impact. As consequence of these attributes, convergence of NPs and macromolecules found in tumor tissue can be up to 100x higher than those in typical tissue. In spite of the fact that the EPR impact applies for nanoparticle controlled, the lion's share (>95%) of these nanoparticles will in general amass in organs other than those of premium, for example, liver, lungs and spleen. In this way, it is the dissemination of medication by blood course. Models incorporate the utilization of antimalarial drugs being targeted for the treatment of microbial contaminations, for example, leishmaniasis, candidiasis and brucellosis. The degree of NPs passage in tumor vasculature is rely upon the size of open interendothelial hole intersections and trans-endothelial channels. The cutoff size of these hole intersections is accounted for between 400-600 nm. Active targeting In examination with detached targeting, which utilizes contrast among ordinary and cancerous tissue for site explicit conveyance of medication stacked nanocarriers, dynamic targeting is accomplished by conveying drug stacked NPs to novel distinguished site.2 Using ligand-receptor associations, dynamic targeting portrays the medication targeting collaborations. Be that as it may, associations between a ligand and a receptor are conceivable just when the two are in close propinquity, (for example not exactly about 0.5mm). The presently accessible medication conveyance frameworks can arrive at the target by the ideals of blood dissemination and extravasation. In this way, we can infer that dynamic receptor targeting really implies ligand-receptor connection yet that happens simply after blood flow First order targeting This is the dissemination of medication to hairlike beds of target destinations organ or tissue, for instance, if there should be an occurrence of lymphatic tissue, peritoneal hole, pleural hole, cerebral ventricles, eyes, joints, and so forth. Second order targeting

One of the widely contemplated and used targeting atoms for against cancer drug conveyance is folic corrosive (folate). This nutrient is a normally utilized ligand for against cancer therapeutics targeting on the grounds that folate receptor (FRs) are over-communicated on a large portion of the tumor cells.15,16As a targeting ligand, folate offers a few preferences, as it is financially savvy, steady and non-immunogenic when contrasted with antibodies.17 Moreover, folate tie to FRs with high fondness (Kd= 10-1 M), as result folate formed nanocarriers can explicitly disguise in tumor cells with high efficiency.18 FRs comprised of 229-236 amino acids containing folate restricting proteins which are encoded by three unique qualities α, β and γ situated on chromosomes 11.19Folate receptor (FRα) is generally overexpressed in a few sorts of carcinomas, particularly in ovarian carcinomas, uterine carcinomas, testicular carcinomas, pleural mesotheliomas and less every now and again in bosom, colon and renal cell carcinomas. Folate receptor (FRβ) overexpressed in persistent myelogenous leukemia One of the widely examined and used targeting atoms for hostile to cancer drug conveyance is folic corrosive (folate). This nutrient is a usually utilized ligand for hostile to cancer therapeutics targeting on the grounds that folate receptor (FRs) are over-communicated on a large portion of the tumor cells.15,16As a targeting ligand, folate offers a few favorable circumstances, as it is practical, steady and non-immunogenic when contrasted with antibodies.17 Moreover, folate tie to FRs with high fondness (Kd= 10-1 M), as result folate FRs comprised of 229-236 amino acids containing folate restricting proteins which are encoded by three unique qualities α, β and γ situated on chromosomes 11.19Folate receptor (FRα) is generally overexpressed in a few sorts of carcinomas, particularly in ovarian carcinomas, uterine carcinomas, testicular carcinomas, pleural mesotheliomas and less every now and again in bosom, colon and renal cell carcinomas. Folate receptor (FRβ) overexpressed in persistent myelogenous leukemia.20,21,22 Folate explicitly tie to FRs with liking, consequently can be use as compelling instrument for conveyance of against cancer medications to cancer cells without making hurt typical cells.2 Several medication transporters including liposomes, NPs, straight polymers and dendrimers have been utilized to convey drugs into cancer cells by using FR-intervened endocytosis.23,24 Qu et al.25have used FRs for successful conveyance of paclitaxel (PTX) stacked polymeric micelle to tumor cells. Targeting ligand was blended by uniting to folic corrosive on N-octyl-N-phthalyl-3,6-O-(2-hydroxypropyl) chitosan (OPHPC). The upgrade of cell take-up by PTX stacked OPHPC micelles (PTX-OPHPC) and PTX stacked folate-OPHPC micelles (PTX-FA-OPHPC). This recently combined polymeric transporter have answered to frame round formed micelles, with a PTX drug-stacking rate going from 33.6% to 45.3% and an ensnarement productivity going from 50.5% to 82.8%. OPHPC and FA-OPHPC demonstrated moderately non-cytotoxicity against L-O2 cells. Folic corrosive formed polymeric micelle was accounted for to enter MCF-7 cells through folate receptor-intervened endocytosis.The polymeric micelle detailing expanded its clear solvency by 4000-overlap in contrast with free PTX in a fluid medium. The cell take-up examinations featured fundamentally higher take-up of folic corrosive formed polymeric micelle in a human bosom adenocarcinoma cell line (MCF-7 cells) contrasted and free taxol. You et al.26Synthesized of folate-formed stearic corrosive joined chitosan oligosaccharide. Stearic corrosive united chitosan can act naturally aggregate in a watery climate and structure micelles in which PTX could be stacked. In this framework, the hydrophobic center fills in as a store stacked with PTX, while the hydrophilic shell can be chemically adjusted by means of a response between the folic corrosive carboxyl gatherings and the amino gatherings present on the outside of the chitosan micelle. In the examination, micelles were named with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) to research its take-up and intracellular area in two sorts of tumor cell lines. The human lung epithelial adenocarcinoma (A549) cell line and human epithelial carcinoma (HeLa) cell line, were utilized for cell take-up investigation. The creators announced more since FRs articulation was more if there should be an occurrence of HeLa cells. PTX-stacked micelles indicated improved cytotoxicity versus Taxol, as recommended by IC50 estimations of >20-overlay lower, because of an expanded intracellular conveyance of the medication. Sahuet al.27 detailed the utilization of stearic corrosive grafted carboxymethyl chitosan (Mv 230 ± 40 kDa and degree of deacetylation (DD) 85%) adjusted with folic corrosive to shape amphiphilic nanoparticles having pH-touchy disintegration (pH 5.6), low cytotoxicity and high sum drug epitome. PTX-stacked nanoparticles (5-25 µg/mL) displayed a huge feasibility hindering impact on the tumor cells (HeLa) overexpressing FR in contrast with non-overexpressing NIH/3T3 cells, with IC50 estimations of PTX-stacked nanoparticles of 10.5 and 25 µg/mL individually. Shen et al, have planned novel captothecin (CPT) stacked chitosan-based attractive nanoparticles (CLMNPs) utilizing chitosan, cadmium telluride quantum dabs, and superparamagnetic iron oxide. The folatecoating on NPs accomplished through two distinctive tetrapeptide linkers, Gly-Phe-Phe-Gly (GFFG) and Lue-Gly-Pro-Val (LGPV). The NPs (breadth size < 200 nm) with typified CPT showed consolidated attractive and fluorescentproperties. The in vivo attractive collection contemplates showedthat the copolymers could be caught in the tumor cells under attractive direction. The delivery profile for the initial 28 hoursshowed that CPT delivery could arrive at 55% at pH 5.3 and 46%at pH 7.4 with CPT-stacked CLMNPs-GFFG-FA, and 69% and57% at pH 5.3 and pH 7.4, separately, with CPT-loadedCLMNPs-LGPV-FA. CPT-stacked CLMNPs-tetrapeptide-FAshowed explicit targeting to A549 cells in vitro due to folatereceptor-intervened endocytosis. Parveen et al.28have detailed folic corrosive formed doxorubicin stacked chitosan NPs. Formation of folate to NPs was affirmed by atomic attractive reverberation. The MTT examine on retinoblastoma cells demonstrated higher harmfulness impact because of folate formed NPs when contrasted with that of unconjugated one. The folate formed NPs displayed critical more take-up (30%) in cells when contrasted with unconjugated NPs (13.24%). Hence folate formation can essentially improve take-up and cytotoxicity capacity of NPs.

Manufactured and biomimetic oligopeptides have been utilized as novel apparatus in therapy of cancer, cardiovascular sicknesses and

epitomized nanocarriers like NPs, liposomes to tumor cells. When contrasted with polypeptides and proteins, oligopeptides offer a few focal points like ease, great solidness, simplicity of huge scope combination and plausibility of decrease in safe responses. Likewise, the greater part of the examinations has revealed that oligopeptides corrupt into nontoxic metabolites in vivo.

Targeting tumor vasculature is one of the productive procedures for cancer therapy. Peptides are turning out to be intense targeting ligand to antibodies due to their little size, low immunogenicity and high stability.29,30,31Integrins, APN and Bip/GRP78 are generally overexpressed on tumor vasculature which can be explicitly target utilizing certain peptides.2 Angiogenesis is basic for tumor development. The strangely communicated proteins in tumor angiogenesis goes about as expected target for site explicit conveyance drug epitomized nanocarriers. Integrin αvβ3 is basically associated with angiogenesis, metastasis and attack of strong tumor and is generally communicated on tumor vasculature during angiogenesis. Cilengitide is a cyclic tripeptide specifically tie to integrins and can be utilized for the therapy of non-little cell lung cancer.32 Cyclic RGD pentapeptides show particular proclivity toward integrin and it has been broadly utilized for specific conveyance of nanocarriers to tumor cells. NGR is tripeptide (Asn-Gly-Arg) utilized by Flavio et al.,33for particular conveyance of TNF-gold NPs to tumor vasculature. WIFPWIQL peptide explicitly tie to Bip/GRP78 along these lines can be utilized for conveyance of hostile to cancer drugs. Wang et al.34 have created NGR peptide-based enemy of cancer specialist for targeted drug conveyance and tumor imaging /GRP78, a particle, was generally overexpressed endothelial cells of human umbilical vein. Yasufumi et al.,35have showed BiP targeting capability of WIFPWIQL changed liposomes for specific conveyance of hostile to cancer therapeutics to tumor vasculature.

These are class of peptides that are cell explicit and disguise by endocytosis in explicit cell. Samuel et al.,36identified glioma undifferentiated cell targeting (GSCT) peptide. It was exhibited that; this peptide has restricting liking to numerous glioma immature microorganism subsequently can conceivably use for targeted hostile to cancer drug conveyance. Moreover, numerous investigations have announced that protein AAC-11 is upregulated in most cancer cells.37

Aptamers are novel class of single abandoned oligonucleotide ligand, which has potential for helpful and conclusion applications. Intramolecular connection inside oligonucleotide chain liable for folds inside aptamers, which profit one-of-a-kind compliances for ligand restricting capacity. Aptamers are chosen from pools of arbitrary nucleic corrosive oligonucleotides by a methodical development of ligand by remarkable improvement (SELEX).38 Figure 1 features aptamer choice by SELEX strategy. Two groundwork restricting successions on the two closures (5' and 3') of the irregular oligonucleotide considers enhancement by PCR. The oligonucleotides are then hatched with a target (Proteins, nucleic corrosive or cells) under indicated stockpiling conditions. In next stage oligonucleotide arrangement with high restricting liking is independent from feeble one by dividing measure. The oligonucleotide succession is then eluted by separation of DNA or RNA complex and exposed to enhancement by PCR which is then exposed to SELEX. This cycle is rehashed for 10-15 rounds to improve oligonucleotide grouping official to relating target. The most encouraging oligonucleotide groupings are arbitrarily cloned to get individual aptamer that are explicitly associated with target recongnization.39 Aptamer brightened NPs are more productive in targeted conveyance of therapeutics than nontargeted NPs. As indicated by past report, aptamer formed NPs can specifically target the prostate explicit layer antigen (PSMA), a transmembrane protein that is overexpressed in different cancer. The NPs were accounted for to be effective in relapse of tumor size of LNCaP Bagalkot et al. (94) have utilized aptamer-based procedure for conveyance of doxorubicin. Aptamers can likewise be formed to liposomes to improve their flow time in vivo, accordingly gave a novel stage to advancement. Carbohydrates as targeting molecule Various cells express surface sugar receptors; these receptors are known as lectins and in light of these receptors various starches can be utilized as targeting ligand to target drugs.40The association of sugar moored mixes with lectins can be concentrated by surveying the cooperation lectin, for example, Ricinuscommunis agglutinin and concanavalin A with starch secured mixes. Various sugars, for example, mannose, galactose, fructose, lactose and fucose can explicitly tie to starch receptors along these lines can be use as likely ligand for targeted hostile to cancer drug conveyance. Jain et al., 201041 have defined mannose secured doxorubicin stacked strong lipid nanoparticles for site explicit enemy of cancer drug conveyance. SLNs were set up from tristearin, stearyl amine and soya lecithin utilizing dissolvable vanishing strategy. Mannose covering on preformed SLNs was done by response among mannose and stearyl amine lipid lattice. The response between carbonyl gathering of mannose and essential amine gathering of stearyl amine was surveyed by FTIR. The readied mannose covered SLNs were assessed as for molecule size, drug content, surface morphology, hemolytic harmfulness and cell take-up examination. The readied SLNs were accounted for to be in nano size range with 70.3% capture of doxorubicin and less harmful (6.1%). The cell take-up of FITC named SLNs in A549 and MCF-7 tumor cell line was surveyed utilizing stream cytometer. The FITC marked dansylated SLNs indicated most extreme fluorescent power (63%) in this manner huge cell take-up than unconjugated SLNs. In this way study finished up aminoxylation fundamentally improved tumor cell explicitness of medication stacked SLNs. Sahu et al., 201427 have planned paclitaxel stacked mannosylated SLNs to target alveolar macrophages. Paclitaxel SLNs was set up by dissolvable infusion method utilizing strong lipid and covered with d-mannose utilizing free amine gathering of stearyl amine. The readied SLNs was portrayed concerning molecule size, zeta potential, capture proficiency, in-vitro discharge study, in-vitro cytotoxicity study and biodistribution qualities. SLNs were discovered to be round with molecule size 254 nm and positive zeta potential. In-vitro discharge study demonstrated supported drug release profile more than 48 hours. Mannosylated SLNs was found demonstrated less poisonousness and convey higher convergence of medication in alveolar cells as contrast with that of macrophages. Ye et al., 201942 have evaluated tumor development inhibitory capability of medication free mannosylated liposomes. DSPE-PEG2000-Manoose was utilized as targeting ligand. The mannosylated liposomes were set up by dainty film hydration strategy. Cytotoxicity and cell take-up investigation of arranged liposomes were evaluated in RAW 264.7 cell line. Cytotoxicity study uncovered % cell reasonability over 90% along these lines‘ immaterial harmfulness. Mannosylated liposomes indicated greatest fluorescent power than that of unconjugated liposomes hence critical cell take-up than unconjugated liposomes. Tang et al.43 have used oxidized and decreased mannan in quality exchange for cancer immunotherapy. In-vivo concentrates in C57BL/6 mice answered to shield mice from tumors by means of mannan intervened quality exchange. Irache et al.44 evaluated on Mannose-targeted frameworks for the conveyance of therapeutics, the audit featured the capability of mannose-targeted drug/antigen conveyance frameworks for inoculation and treatment of sicknesses restricted in macrophages and other antigen-introducing cells.

The vast majority of the analysts have evaluated likely utilizations of antibodies for the executives of cancers.45Monoclonal antibodies were favored class of targeting particles for particular targeting overexpressed antigens on harmful cells.46 To diminish immunogenicity of antibodies, the current advancement is centered around fanciful, adapted and completely acculturated subsidiaries. A portion of these antibodies-based medications have been effectively gone through clinical turn of events and converted into the clinical environment.2 Such models incorporate rituximab, transtuzumab, cetuximab, bevacizumab. In 1997 FDA has endorsed rituximab for targeting B-cell lymphoma. Another fruitful illustration of immunizer is transtuzumab, which endorsed by FDA in 1998 for therapy of bosom cancer. Transtuzumab can specifically tie to HER2 receptors. Cetuximab, which specifically ties to epidermal development factor receptors (EGFR), was endorsed in 2004 and in 2006 for therapy of colorectal cancer and head/neck cancer separately. Another effective helpful counter acting agent is bevacizumab, which specifically tie to vascular endothelial development factor and endorsed for the therapy of colorectal cancer. Monoclonal antibodies-based enemy of cancer treatment is fruitful, yet number of patients doesn't

specialists. Against cancer specialists are form with antibodies utilizing reversible cross-linker. Therefore, one immune response can convey up to ten medication particles, to improve drug stacking productivity, the novel method was advanced. Ongoing examinations have centered to embody drug in nanocarriers and afterward functionalization of nanocarriers with antibodies to keep up targeting viability. For instance, rituximab and transtuzumab formed poly (lactic corrosive) NPs indicated six creases better take-up in cancer cell when contrasted with that of unconjugated NPs.47,48 Despite the immense endeavors dedicated for their turn of events, antibodies intervened drug conveyance actually experience numerous difficulties and constraints.

1. Blackadar CB (2016). Historical review of the causes of cancer. World J Clin Oncol.; 7(1): pp. 54-86. doi:10.5306/wjco.v7.i1.54 2. Gu FX, Karnik R, Wang AZ, et. al. (2007). Targeted nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Nanotoday.; 2(3): pp. 14-21. 3. Arbor A (2002). Dendritic polymer macromolecular carriers for drug delivery Anil K Patri , István J Majoros and James R Baker Jr * Specific types of dendrimers for drug delivery Perhaps the family of dendrimers most investigated for Dendrimers in drug delivery. Curr Opin Chem Biol.; 6: pp. 466-471. doi:10.1016/S1367-5931(02)00347-2 4. Myles DG, Biol D, Jaffe LA, et. al. (1994). Biodegradable Long-Circulating Polymeric Nanospheres ILlauana Upon solvent evaporation , the.; 263: pp. 1600-1603. 5. Zidan AS, Sammour OA, Hammad MA, et. al. (2006). Formulation of Anastrozole Microparticles as Biodegradable Anticancer Drug Carriers. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech.; 7(3): pp. 1-9. 6. Yeo PL, Lim CL, Chye SM, Pick A, Ling K, Koh RY (2018). Niosomes : a review of their structure , properties , methods of preparation , and medical applications. Asian Biomed.; 11(4): pp. 301-314. doi:10.1515/abm-2018-0002 7. Kanaani L, Ebrahimifar M, Ebrahimi H, Khiyavi AA, Mehrdiba T (2017). Effects of Cisplatin-Loaded Niosomal Nanoparticleson BT-20 Human Breast Carcinoma Cells. 8. Torchilin VP (2005). RECENT ADVANCES WITH LIPOSOMES AS PHARMACEUTICAL CARRIERS. Drug Discov.; 4: pp. 145-160. doi:10.1038/nrd1632 9. Green AE, Rose PG (2006). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer. Int J Nanomedicine.; 1(3): pp. 229-239. 10. Milleron B, Pujol J, Breton J, et. al. (2005). Original article Gemcitabine – docetaxel versus cisplatin – vinorelbine in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer : a phase III study addressing the case for cisplatin. Ann Oncol.; 16: pp. 602-610. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi126 11. Andresen TL, Jensen SS, Jørgensen K (2005). Advanced strategies in liposomal cancer therapy : Problems and prospects of active and tumor specific drug release. Progrss Lipid Res.; 44: pp. 68-97. doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2004.12.001 12. Mazzotta E, Tavano L, Muzzalupo R. (2018). Thermo-Sensitive Vesicles in Controlled Drug Delivery for Chemotherapy. Pharmaceutics.; 10(3): pp. 150-170. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics10030150 13. Al-jamal WT, Al-ahmady ZS, Kostarelos K (2012). Biomaterials Pharmacokinetics & tissue distribution of temperature-sensitive liposomal doxorubicin in tumor-bearing mice triggered with mild hyperthermia. Biomaterials.; 33: pp. 4608-4617. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.018 14. Rani K, Paliwal S (2014). Review Article A Review on Targeted Drug Delivery : its Entire Focus on Advanced Therapeutics and Diagnostics. J Appl Med Res.; 2(1): pp. 328-331. 15. Ak G, Yilmaz H, Güneş A, Sanlier SH (2018). In vitro and in vivo evaluation of folate receptor- targeted a novel magnetic drug delivery system for ovarian cancer therapy. Artif Cells, Nanomedicine, Biotechnol.; 0(0): pp. 1-12. doi:10.1080/21691401.2018.1439838 16. Yoo HS, Park TG (2004). Folate-receptor-targeted delivery of doxorubicin nano-aggregates stabilized by doxorubicin – PEG – folate conjugate. J Control 17. Zhao X, Li H, Lee RJ (2008). Targeted drug delivery via folate receptors. Drug Deliv.; 5(3): pp. 309-320. 18. Leamon CP, Reddy JA (2004). Folate-targeted chemotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev.; 56: pp. 1127-1141. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2004.01.008 19. Vllasaliu D, Casettari L, Bonacucina G, Cespi M, Palmieri GF, Illum L (2013). Folic Acid Conjugated Chitosan Nanoparticles for Tumor Targeting of Therapeutic and Imaging Agents. Pharm Nanotechnol.; 1: pp. 184-203. 20. A JSB, Lee RJ (2000). Targeted drug delivery via the folate receptor. Adv Drug Deliv Rev.; 41: pp. 147-162. 21. Parker N, Jo M, Westrick E, et. al. (2005). Folate receptor expression in carcinomas and normal tissues determined by a quantitative radioligand binding assay. Anal Biochem.; 338: pp. 284-293. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2004.12.026 22. Kamen BA, Smith AK (2004). A review of folate receptor alpha cycling and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate accumulation with an emphasis on cell models in vitro. Adv Drug Deliv Rev.;56: pp. 1085-1097. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2004.01.002 23. Quintana A, Raczka E, Piehler L, et. al. (2002). Design and Function of a Dendrimer-Based Therapeutic Nanodevice Targeted to Tumor Cells Through the Folate Receptor. Phamraceutical Res.; 19(9): pp. 1310-1316. 24. Benns JM, Mahato RI, Kim SW (2002). Optimization of factors influencing the transfection efficiency of. J Control Release.; 79: pp. 255-269. 25. Qu D, Lin H, Zhang N, Xue J, Zhang C (2013). In vitro evaluation on novel modified chitosan for targeted antitumor drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym.; 92(1): pp. 545-554. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.112 26. You J, Li X, Cui F De, Du Y, Yuan H (2008). Folate-conjugated polymer micelles for active targeting to cancer cells : preparation , in vitro evaluation of targeting ability and cytotoxicity. Nanotechnology.; 19(4). doi:10.1088/0957-4484/19/04/045102 27. Sahu PK, Mishra DK, Jain N, Rajoriya V, Jain AK (2014). Mannosylated solid lipid 28. Parveen S, Sahoo SK (2010). Evaluation of cytotoxicity and mechanism of apoptosis of doxorubicin using folate-decorated chitosan nanoparticles for targeted delivery to retinoblastoma. Cancer Nano.;(1): pp. 47-62. doi:10.1007/s12645-010-0006-0 29. Krag DN, Shukla GS, Shen G, et. al. (2006). Selection of Tumor-binding Ligands in Cancer Patients with Phage Display Libraries. Cancer Res.; 66(15): pp. 7724-7733. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4441 30. Shukla GS, Krag DN (2005). Phage display selection for cell-specific ligands : Development of a screening procedure suitable for small tumor specimens. J Drug Target.; 13(1): pp. 7-18. doi:10.1080/10611860400020464 31. Ji Y, Qiao H, He J, et. al. (2017). Functional oligopeptide as a novel strategy for drug delivery. J Drug Target. doi:10.1080/1061186X.2017.1309044 32. Burke PA, Denardo SJ, Miers LA, Lamborn KR, Matzku S, Denardo GL (2002). Cilengitide Targeting of ␣ v ␤ 3 Integrin Receptor Synergizes with Radioimmunotherapy to Increase Efficacy and Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Xenografts 1. Cancer Res.; 62: pp. 4263-4272. 33. Curnis F, Fiocchi M, Sacchi A, Gori A, Gasparri A, Corti A (2016). NGR-tagged nano-gold : A new CD13-selective carrier for cytokine delivery to tumors. Nano Res.;9(5): pp. 1393-1408. doi:10.1007/s12274-016-1035-8.NGR-tagged 34. Wang RE, Niu Y, Wu H, Hu Y, Cai J (2012). Development of NGR-Based Anti-Cancer Agents for Targeted Therapeutics and Imaging. Anticancer Agents Med Chem.; 12: pp. 76-86. 35. Katanasaka Y, Ishii T, Asai T, Naitou H, Maeda N, Koizumi F (2010). Cancer antineovascular therapy with liposome drug delivery systems targeted to BiP / GRP78. Int J Cancer.; 127: pp. 2685-2698. doi:10.1002/ijc.25276 36. Beck S, Jin X, Yin J, et. al. (2011). Identification of a peptide that interacts with Nestin protein expressed in brain cancer stem cells. Biomaterials.; 32: pp.

37. Golstein P, Kroemer G. (2006). Cell death by necrosis : towards a molecular definition. TRENDS Biochem Sci.; 32(1): pp. 37-43. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2006.11.001 38. Jayasena SD (1999). Aptamers : An Emerging Class of Molecules That Rival Antibodies in Diagnostics. Clin Chem.; 49(9): pp. 1628-1650. 39. Zhou G, Latchoumanin O, Bagdesar M, et. al. (2017). Theranostics Aptamer-Based Therapeutic Approaches to Target Cancer Stem Cells. Theranostics.;7(16): pp. 3948-3961. doi:10.7150/thno.20725 40. Jain K, Kesharwani P, Gupta U, Jain NK (2012). Biomaterials A review of glycosylated carriers for drug delivery. Biomaterials.; 33(16): pp. 4166-4186. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.033 41. Jain A, Agarwal A, Majumder S, Lariya N, Khaya A, Agrawal H. (2010). Mannosylated solid lipid nanoparticles as vectors for site-speci fi c delivery of an anti-cancer drug. J Control Release.; 148(3): pp. 359-367. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.09.003 42. Ye J, Yang Y, Dong W, et. al. (2019). Drug-free mannosylated liposomes inhibit tumor growth by promoting the polarization of tumor-associated macrophages. Int J Nanomedicine.; 14: pp. 3203-3220. 43. Apostolopoulos V, Pietersz GA, Tsibanis A, et. al. (2014). Dendritic cell immunotherapy : clinical outcomes. Clin Transl Immunol.; 3(7): pp. e21-4. doi:10.1038/cti.2014.14 44. Irache JM, Salman HH, Gamazo C, Espuelas S (2008). Mannose-targeted systems for the delivery of therapeutics. Expert Opin. 2008;5(6): pp. 703-724. 45. Adams GP, Weiner LM (2005). Monoclonal antibody therapy of cancer. Nat Biotechnol.; 23(9): pp. 1147-1157. doi:10.1038/nbt1137 46. Weiner LM, Adams GP (2000). New approaches to antibody therapy. Oncogene; 19: pp. 6144-6151. 47. Eisenbeis CF, Grainger A, Fischer B, et. al. (2004). Combination Immunotherapy of B-Cell Non-Hodgkin ‘ s Lymphoma with Rituximab and Interleukin-2 : A Preclinical and Phase I Study. Clin Cancer Res.; 10: pp. 6101-6110. for active targeting. Eur Jounal Pharm anf Biopharm; 58: pp. 483-490. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.04.006

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jaipur National University, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India prashantmane01@gamil.com