Stress Management Strategies Adopted By Private Enterprises and Their Effect on Employees’ Efficiency

Examining the impact of stress management strategies on employees' efficiency in private enterprises

by Prof. (Dr.) Chandra Prakash Verma*,

- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540

Volume 16, Issue No. 9, Jun 2019, Pages 1474 - 1480 (7)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

In the current times, Stress on the workplace has been experience by several employees in organizations. Most of the management requires understanding the psychological standard and physical potential before actually handover the work to the workers. Frequent changing demand of the world can enhance the standard of the strain and mainly on those who are continuously working under pressure. Even though, pressure has a positive impact on enhancing the performance of the organization, if these types of pressure becomes greater than capability then it can lead to the stress which can also makes a negative impact on the organization. The analysis basically concentrates on the support of the stress management approach by several private enterprises and their impact on employee’s capability. The investigation determines that strain mainly programs interventions and training and growth have an essential impact on impact on potential of employees. This makes it authoritative for privateorganization to invest essential assets and resources in growing approach and the intervention to decrease the strain of work.

KEYWORD

stress management strategies, private enterprises, employees' efficiency, psychological standard, physical potential, changing demand, workplace stress, performance enhancement, negative impact, interventions and training

I. INTRODUCTION

Workplace stress is a consistent rising issue in the organization because it doesn‘t only makes an impact on the work life of employee but also influence on the family life of employees. Work strain basically refers to the pressure or tension that generated in people‘s mind which they feel in their life. IT is also observed that workplace stress is an essential fact that affects the health and mental ability of the employees. It also quiet affects the behaviour of employees and it has a far reaching influence on the motivation and satisfaction of workers. The efficiency of the workers and the overall effectivity of the organization are influenced by more stress and motivation. Most of the times, stress basically causes many mental problems such as anger, depression, anxiety and tension. As per the theory of Paul, Elam, &Verhaut, (2007), Stress at the work place is basically considered as one of the prime elements which highly affect the performance and obligation of the workers. It is a psychological and physical condition that affects an efficiency, personal health and quality of work of one‘s (Holmlund-Rytkönen & Strandvik, 2005). Strain related to the work created an unusual misbalance between the surrounding demands and the potential of the organization (Redfern and Rees, 2003). Basically stress is refers to the degree of tension experienced by the sole facing the ultimate strain and the constraints or chances (Erkutlu & Chafra, 2006). The slowly increase in their jobs , less engagement and developing impatience between the top managers (Ogle and Pflanz, 2006). This is basically because of the competitive nature and standard of the atmosphere of job. This is may be the normal pattern and trend which points out the reduction in the performance and efficacy of the organization. Workplace stress basically affects mentally and emotionally, and is intimately connected to various wellbeing issues, mainly coronary heart problems. Different types of feelings highly pushed, pulled, squeezed by outside and inside elements which requires to be recognized. Most of the times of the causes should be identified as whether they are valuable or not. Different techniques and programs can assist sole cope with stress in individual life and surroundings of work (Vinassa, 2003). Stress controlling and managing is a vital issues for sole and institutions. It is quite about the understanding that is basically exposed to stressors. Many times Strain becomes avoidable whenever the institutions are approachable to

is a tendency to exert higher efforts and perform better. In equality raises when dissatisfaction and disenchantment Carolina, 2007). Therefore, productive and effective strain management techniques always assist organization to enhance the performance of the sole, community and in turn that of the institutions itself. Strain is a common sensation and is present in every organization irrespective of their nature and size. Institutions most of the times adopt their own management programs of stress that basically help workers to feel calm and also overcome the issues at the time of work. The management programs of stress are commonly practices in the private sector as this sector is mainly considered as highly prone to stressful responses. The current analysis basically concentrates on the strain management approaches adopted by private sector organization.

A. Objectives of the Study

The primary objective of the study is to study the productive way and approach of management of stress that adopted by private enterprises and their consequences on the efficacy of employees.

II. STRESS MANAGEMENT

Folksman (1994) believes that stress management is the need of great importance, anyway diligently we attempt to go past a stress circumstance; life appears to discover better approaches for stressing us out tormenting us with nervousness assaults. Also, is it uneasiness, mind-body weariness or our blundering perspectives, we will in general ignore the reasons for stress, its belongings and how to oversee stress enough. In such unsetting minutes, we frequently fail to remember that stressors, if not escapable, are genuinely sensible and treatable. Stress management alludes to interventions intended to decrease the effect of stressors in the work environment. These can have an individual center, pointed toward expanding a person's capacity to adapt to stressors. The objective of stress management is to assist the person with dealing with the stress of regular daily existence. As per Bruce (2003) stress management is a demonstrated gathering of methods for altering stress, delivering considerations, loosening up away physical and emotional tension and learning how to make changes to our current circumstance (or circumstance) at whatever point conceivable. Compelling stress management can assist us to determine clashes with others assertively and confidently become better issue solvers notwithstanding life's requests and to like the helpfulness of activity and recreation. are more versatile than a large portion of us understand. Stress management is powerful in light of the fact that it teaches relationship building abilities for turning around the "stress reaction". Through stress management, we realize where our genuine control lies and how to oversee stress adequately. Newman (2009) proposes that a significant part of stress management is cognitive restructuring or changing the manner in which we think. Our convictions are the lens through which we take a gander at life. In the event that the assumptions we have for ourselves, others and the work don't coordinate reality, we will encounter cognitive dissonance. Stress management courses and projects likewise show individuals the job of activity and diet in solid live, how to confidently and assertively express our longings in stressful circumstances, approaches to be better managers within recent memory and assets lastly making our work more significant and gainful. Moreover, learning about stress management is a fundamental advance to forestalling numerous medical issues related with it. Stress management manages the decrease of stress and different stressors in our everyday lives.

A. Stress Management in Organizations

Of all stress impacts, the psychological ones are the most inconspicuous and hard to manage on the grounds that a great many people won't acknowledge emotional distress. Individuals are all the more ready to admit to physical disorders however ordinarily will deny psychological pain. To oversee organizational stress successfully thusly requires appropriate identification of the accessible wellsprings of stress, close by a conclusion of the symptoms of employment stress. This will help managers in tackling stress-related issues from their foundations. Robbins (2005) pointed out that from the organization's viewpoint management may not be concerned, when representatives experience low or, and moderate levels of stress. The explanation as pointed out before in this investigation is that such levels of stress may be useful and lead. To higher representative execution. Be that as it may, significant levels of stress, or even low levels supported throughout extensive stretches of time, can prompt decreased representative execution and, this requires activity by management for development. While restricted measure of stress many advantage a person's presentation. We don't anticipate that workers should see it that, path from the people angle, even low levels of stress are probably going to be seen as unwanted. It isn't likely, accordingly for workers keeps the adrenaline running" is probably going to be viewed as "unreasonable weight" by representatives.

B. Employee Efficiency

Ogboso and Amah (2016) believes that productivity alludes to the achievement of objectives with least assets or waste. It incorporates measures, for example, time minimization, cost minimization, and waste minimization. Speed and time are significant assets for any organization and should be believed to look to boost speed and limit time. The manner in which an organization does this shows how proficient and gainful they are. Speed and time were the embodiment of time and movement concentrates since the day of logical management acquainted by Taylor that drove with management proficiency. They are wellsprings of upper hand. Making the best choice in corporate administration terms is a significant, however not an adequate, condition for execution. What's more, doing some unacceptable thing (for example an insufficient review board of trustees, or absence of autonomy among the chiefs) will make it more hard for an organization to perform yet isn't a proportion of accomplishment or absence of it all things considered. The inquiries identifying with organization effectiveness are: How compelling is the organization in dispatching organizations (counting through organization panels in and among gatherings) and following up on choices, does the organization distinguish and center around key (not simply a considerable rundown of) issues and dangers confronting the organizations; is the organization ready to take activities, managing emergencies and recognizing arising issues. The origination of time here is the length taken to achieve an undertaking. These genuine inquiries are both a matter of decision. Since it is generally simply after an all-inclusive period is it conceivable to know whether the organization has managed the correct issues, how well it has done as such, and which issues have not been tended to. Likewise, neglecting to guarantee progression or put resources into new innovation is similarly as much about execution as effective ability management or frameworks speculation. Organizations can be truly useful in recognizing chances that chief alone, some of the time distracted with current difficulties, and might not have spotted. There are two inquiries as opposed to one here on the grounds that a background marked by managing central points of contention as they emerge isn't sufficient. The capacity to take activities, manage emergencies and distinguish issues that are not piece of „normal business‟ is an essential differentiator between a productive and an average organization. For a similar explanation ―meeting organization objectives‖ is excluded as an exhibition measure, since it risks being too internal looking and inactively taking things a lot as they may be. environment stress among the representatives is fundamental to be acquainted with the zones covered and will assist with finding the revealed zones to examine them inside and out. Working environment stress is the reaction of representatives to work requests and weights that are not in accordance with their insight, interest, skills and capacities [41]. Stress emerges in wide-running work circumstances yet turns out to be more terrible when representatives since they have practically zero power over work measures. Work environment stress can be brought about by helpless work configuration, absence of acknowledgment, inflexible administrative structure, office ergonomics, helpless management style, horrible working conditions, pay imbalance, and job strife [55]. [50] the ramifications of work environment stress on organizational execution. The aftereffects of the investigations show that job compatibility, value, acknowledgment, and distance, affect organizational execution. [36]stress positively affects representatives of any organization yet up partially which a worker can adapt to, much of the time on the off chance that it surpasses as far as possible it brings about negative outcomes on workers' exhibition. [48] stress is a general component and people from pretty much every speed of life need to confront stress. Stress can affect both the representative and the organization. The investigation distinguished that word related stress is discovered higher among private area representatives contrasted with public area workers. Among various words related stress factors job over-burden, job authority, job strife and absence of senior-level help offer more to the word related stress. The representatives can't manage the cost of an opportunity to unwind and slow down when they are confronted with work assortment, segregation, bias, and designation and clashing undertakings. [54] representatives at bank are an excess of stressed with their occupation with the weighty outstanding burden, so the worker's master some reviving occasions to accumulate in their work environment like diversion, trips, lunch breaks, stretches every so often during chunks of work. Likewise, the workers anticipate a climb in their compensation from their value execution. [45] Stress is inescapable and unavoidable. A larger part of the representatives face serious stress-related illnesses and a ton of psychological issues. Subsequently, the management should take a few activities in assisting their workers with defeating its heartbreaking impact. Since stress is generally because of overabundance of work

[57] inappropriate conduct with respect to the management and poor administrative styles are the primary driver of work environment stress. Different components which add to working environment stress incorporate helpless correspondence styles, an absence of authority and of lucidity about the vision, mission and the goals of the organization just as the very idea of the organization itself. [43] A model where stress is characterized regarding the awkwardness between requests from the workplace and the capacity of the person to satisfy those needs. This lopsidedness can be caused either by an excessive amount of work or such a large number of obligations to expect or a mix of both. [49] bring up that job equivocalness and job strife are two major reasons for stress. Job equivocalness happens when representatives are confronted with vulnerabilities, absence of data about the job they should play in the working environment and ambiguities about the assumptions and duties of them. This makes clashes which thusly show itself in physiological infirmities, organizational brokenness and brought down levels of efficiency. [46] there are a few parts of employment content which are discovered to be perilous and add to stress. These incorporate low worth attributed to the work appointed to a representative, diminished usage of skills, monotonous nature of work, vulnerability, absence of chances for development and improvement, high regard for subtleties of the work, clashes popular and inadequate assets to take care of the work. [35] work with high requests on the brain joined with an extreme amount of both work and time compels prompts business related stress, despondency and nervousness among the respondents considered. There is a high connection between's stress risks like wretchedness, physical infirmities and heftiness among laborers with high work requests. [44] showed that there exists a critical connection between work stress and worker execution. The free factors underutilization of skills and work over-burden essentially connects to worker execution while there was no huge connection between job equivocalness and representative execution. [37] An absence of lucidity on the way forward as far as profession development has been viewed as the fundamental wellspring of business related stress. This absence of lucidity is showed as absence of preparing and advancement, helpless [34] Secured that position control is basic to improving emotional well-being and responsibility and diminishing non-appearance. An absence of control, joined with upgraded work requests brings about an improve in the probability of exits from the workforce. [38] found that an unevenness between close to home endeavors put into a specific work and the prizes got regarding compensation, advancement and profession movement brought about unreasonable coronary illness. Here it was less the strain caused in the work and the requests of the work yet the relationship between's high exertion and low prize that brought about business related stresses showed as expanded heartbeat and hypertension. [47] show nine kinds of changes in the work environment. These incorporate moderate change, new vision, new innovation, and decrease in individual power, debates, excess, changes because of outside intimidation, change as a beginning stage of new action and changes because of novel thoughts. An absence of comprehension of the elements of progress and change builds the likelihood of business related stresses. Stress lessens to how much an individual is psychologically appended to a utilizing undertaking through inclination, for example, faithfulness, warmth, worth, belongingness, delight, etc. The examination tries to inspect the impact of working environment stress management procedures on representatives' productivity in private endeavors. In particular, the examination looks to build up the impact of stress program interventions and preparing and advancement on representatives' effectiveness.

IV. METHODOLOGY

The study is descriptive in nature dependent on secondary information. The secondary information was gathered from books, periodicals, reports and the Internet.

V. CONCLUSION

The prime aim of the analysis is to recognize the connection between stress at work place and efficiency and efficacy of workers of private organization. It is proved that approaches of stress management at work place basically affect the efficacy of employees. So, the analysis gives overview into the consequences of stress at work place which taking into consideration variables like stress techniques interventions, and growth of efficiency of workers. The execution for the study the variables on performance of organization and give interventions. Most of the time, managers need to pay more attention to every approach for management for stress as these have makes positive and essential impact on the efficacy of the workers.

REFRENCES

[1] Amah, E. (2014).Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. Ibadan: Ibadan University Press. [2] Baridam, D. M. (2001). Research methods in administrative sciences 3rd edition.Port Harcourt Sherbrook Associates. [3] Baridam, D.M. (2006). Research Method in Administrative Sciences, Port Harcourt: Belks Publishers Limited. [4] Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley and Sons. [5] Brown, M.E. & Mitchell, M.S. (2010). Ethical and Unethical Leadership: Exploring New Avenue forFuture Research Business Ethics. [6] Bruce, T.R. (2003). Assessing the Sustained effects of Stress Management Interventions of Anxiety and Locus of Control. Academy of Management Journal, 18, (6) pp. 151-203 [7] Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology.In M. D. Dunnette& L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1, pp. 687-732. [8] Dex, S., & Smith, C. (2002). The Nature and Pattern of Family-Friendly Employment Policies in Britain . Bristol: Policy Press and Joseph Rowntree Foundation. [9] Folksman, G.H. (1994). Managing Stress Subjectivity and Power in the Workplace. Thousand Oaks, cliff, sage Wharton A.S. and Brikson. R.I. pp. 457. [10] Glass, J. L., & Finley, A. (2002).Coverage and effectiveness of family-responsive workplace policies. Human Resource Management Review, 12, pp. 313–337 [11] Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, pp. 161-178. of Human Resource Management, 8, pp. 263-276. [13] Guest, D.E. (1999). Human resource management: the workers verdict. Human Resource Management Journal, 9, pp. 5-25. [14] Harris, L., & Foster, C. (2005). Small, Flexible and Family Friendly – Work Practices in Service Sector Businesses. London: Department of Trade and Industry, Employment Relations Research Series No.47 [15] Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World. [16] Insan, A.N., Astuti, E.S., Raharjo, K. & Hamid, D. (2013). The effect of transformational leadership model on employees job satisfaction and performance at perusahaanlistriknegara (plnpersero) in south Sulawesi, Indonesia. Information and Knowledge Management, 3. pp. 135–142. [17] Kerr, J.H. & M.C. Vos (1993). Employee fitness programmes, absenteeism and general well-being. [18] Maxwell, G., Rankine, L., Bell, S., &MacVicar, A. (2007). The incidence and impact of flexible working arrangements in smaller businesses. Employee Relations, 29, pp. 138-152. [19] Morhead, G.N. & Griffins, D.A., (2005).Theory and Practice of Management Development: USA, Macmillan Book Publishing Company Limited. [20] Newman, B. A. (2009). Managing workplace stress. San Franscioso: Jossy Bass Publication limited. [21] Pierce, J.L. & Newstrom, J.W. (1980). Toward a conceptual clarification of employee responses to flexible working hours: a work adjustment approach. Journal of Management, 6, pp. 117-134. [22] Pronk, N.P. & Kottke, T.E. (2009). Physical activity promotion as a strategic corporate priority to improve worker health and business performance. Prev. Med., 49: pp. 316-321.

[24] Rath, T., & Conchie, B. (2009). Strengths Based Leadership: Great Leaders, Teams, and Why People [25] Robbins, I.E. (2005). Personal and Organizational Strategies for Handling Job Stress Personnel Psychology. Spring: New York, Spring publisher Ltd. [26] Sarmiento, R., & Beale, J. (2007). Determinants of performance amongst shop-floor employees. Management Research News, 30 (12), pp. 915-927. [27] Savery, I.K. Inks. J.A (2000). Long hours at work - are they dangerous and do people consent to them'. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, [28] Selye, N.O. (2011). Occupational Sources of Stress: a Review of the Literature Relating to Coronary Heart Disease and Mental LU. Health, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 23(3): pp. 23-56. [29] Sundi, K. (2013). Effect of transformational leadership and transactional leadership on employee performance of Konawe Education Department at Southeast Sulawesi.International Journal of Business and Management Invention. [30] Venkatruman, H. &Ramanuiam, S. (2006). Managing human resources. Delhi: Parakash Books Ltd. [31] Yahaya, A., Yahaya, N., Bon, A.T., Ismail, S. & Noor, N.M. (2012). The relationship between big five personality with work motivation, competitiveness and job satisfaction. Elixir Psychology, 44(a). [32] Yerkes, R., & Dodson, J. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation, Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, pp. 459-482. [33] Yusuf, M.O., Muhammed, U.D., &Kazeem, A.O. (2014). Management of Leadership Style: An Approach to employee performance and Effectiveness in Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education , 1(2), pp. 17-29. [34] Band, D., Tustin, C. (2011). Strategic downsizing. Management Decision, Vol. 33, No. 8, pp. 36-45. [36] Brynien, D. (2006). Stress management, finding benefit, and immune function: positive mechanisms for intervention effects on physiology. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 56(1), pp. 9–11. [37] Cameron, D. (2012). Strategies for Successful Organisational Downsizing.Human Resource Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 189-211. [38] Cooper, L. C., Pandey, A., Quick, J. C. (2012). Downsizing: Is Less Still More? New York: Cambridge University Press. [39] Erkutlu, J., &Chafra, P. (2006). Industrial and Organizational Behavior (5th ed.). Wiley: Hoboken, NJ. [40] Fapohunda, M., &Tinuke, M. (2012). The Global Economic Recession: Impact and Strategies for Human Resources Management in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 07-12. [41] Hicks, T., & Caroline, M. (2007). A guide to managing workplace stress. California: Universal Publishers. [42] Holmlund-Rytkönen, &Strandvik, N. (2005). Organizational Behavior.Tsing Hua University Press. [43] Isabella, L. A. (2009). Downsizing: Survivors' Assessments. Business Horizons, 32(3), pp. 35-41. [44] Jalagat, R. (2017). Determinants of Job Stress and Its Relationship on Employee Job Performance. American Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 2(1), pp. 1-10. [45] Jayashree, R. (2010). Stress Management with Special Reference to Public Sector Bank Employees in Chennai. International Journal of Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(3). [46] Jones, G. (2011). The History of the British Bank of the Middle East, Volume 1, Cambridge University Press. [47] Kowske, Brenda, Lundby, Kyle and Rasch, L Rena (2014). Turning ‗Survive‘ Into ‗Thrive‘: Managing Survivor [48] Malik, N. (2011). A study on occupational stress experienced by private and public banks employees in Quetta city.African Journal of Business Management, 1. [49] Mayer, M., Smith, A. and Whittington, R. (2012).Organising for Success in the 21st Century, CEOs and HR managers‘ perceptions, Chartered Instituted of Personnel and Development, London. [50] Osibanjo, O. A., Salau, O. P., FALOLA, H .O. & Oyewumi, A. E. (2016). Workplace stress: implications for organizational performance in a Nigerian public university, Business: Theory and Practice, 17(3), pp. 261–269. [51] Paul. G., Elam, &Verhulst, (2007). A longitudinal study of employees‘ perceptions of using deep breathing meditation to reduce testing stresses. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 19(3), pp. 278-292. [52] Pflanz, S. E., & Ogle, A. D. (2006).Job Stress, Depression, Work Performance and Perceptions of Supervisors in Military Personnel. Military Medicine, 171(9), pp. 861-865. [53] Rees, M., & Redfern, C. (2003).The Leadership Challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [54] Shruti M. (2009) – A Study on Stress Management of Employees at Syndicate Bank Hassan – A dissertation submitted to H.R. Institute of Higher Education, Hassan. [55] Stecher, M. D., &Rosse, J. G. (2007). Understanding reactions to workplace injustice through process theories of motivation: a teaching module and simulation, Journal of Management Education, 31, pp. 777–796. [56] Vinassa, A. (2003). Stress Management. People Dynamics, 21(3), pp. 20-22. [57] Whittington, R, Mayer, M, Molloy, E and Smith, A. (2012). The practice of organising – negotiating the routinization and standardization traps. Academy of Management, Best Papers and Proceedings.

Prof. (Dr.) Chandra Prakash Verma*

Dean, Department of Management and Commerce, Sanskriti University, Mathura cpverma.somc@sanskriti.edu.in