Analysis of powdered calendula officinalis linn

Traditional medicines that are being used today sometimes consist fully or mostly of plant-based substances. For this reason, they are intrinsic to the product's biological efficacy. Chromatography is a relatively new scientific technique that has shown to be helpful in the standardization of plants and herbal blends. Standardizing a wide range of plant species by testing for marker compounds and fingerprint analysis assists in determining their correct botanical identification.[1] Analytical chromatography is used to precisely measure the concentrations of specific analytes, whereas traditional chromatography is used on larger quantities of material. For this reason, we cannot say that one precludes the other. Separating constituent parts of a chemical is a typical use of High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC). High-performance thin-layer chromatography is a development of the original thin-layer technique (TLC). Automating its many procedures, increasing its resolution, and allowing for more exact quantitative measurements are all possible enhancements to the core operation of thin layer chromatography. [2-3] Thin-layer chromatography is superior to other chromatographic techniques because it generates chromatographic fingerprints, which may be used as a reliable identifier. HPTLC analysis is often used to evaluate the components of herbal and animal extracts, fermentation mixtures, medicinal and excipient substances, and formulated herbal products. [4] establishing standards for the quality of plant materials used in medical applications. These standard compounds are subsequently used as indicators of the sample's genuine botanical origin. Thus, modern HPTLC-based studies are developing ways for standardizing medicinal plants by making use of a number of different marker molecules. [5-6] Using its full potential, thin-layer chromatography might form the foundation for a very sophisticated instrumental method called as high-performance thin-layer chromatography. It is a helpful analytical tool for acquiring chromatographic data on complicated mixtures of medicines, natural products, clinical samples, foods, etc. because of its automation, scanning, complete optimization, selective detection principle, minimum sample preparation, hyphenation, etc. [7] The value and importance of HPTLC have been widely acknowledged. Current efforts are mostly focused on standardizing testing protocols. Although there have been advancements in chromatography techniques, HPTLC is still the gold standard. HPTLC is a chromatographic technique used for determining the concentration of an active molecule, identifying and quantifying impurities, and identifying components. Since it is one of the most flexible, reliable, and cost-effective separation methods, HPTLC is ideal for the research of botanicals and established techniques guarantees repeatable results. [8] The pharmaceutical sector, clinical chemistry, forensic chemistry, chemistry, cosmetics, drug and food analysis, or environmental analysis all make extensive use of high-performance liquid chromatography. One of its numerous benefits is that, unlike any other chromatographic technique, it provides a pictorial depiction of the data. There is also the potential for a large number of detections, rapid results generation, a large sample capacity, and low costs proven HPTLC to be a reliable method for analyzing salbutamol concentrations in serum samples during clinical trials. [9-10] In addition to its use in evaluating and studying a wide range of lipids, HPTLC has also been used to successfully separate 20 different lipid subclasses. The field of clinical medicine is well-represented in the many periodicals available, many of which feature reports of research. HPLC is widely used for the analysis of pharmaceuticals in serum and other tissues.[11-12]

1. One may utilize high performance liquid chromatography (HPTLC) for several types of analysis, including fingerprinting, biological research, and the measurement of herbal drugs. 2. When compared to traditional methods, HPTLC is both quick and cheap. 3. HPTLC is often used for the examination of vitamins, water-soluble food dyes, and pesticides in various foods. 4. The great sample throughput & cheap cost per analysis offered by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPTLC) are only two of its many benefits. 5. Improved resolution across a given range, 6. Improved efficiency in development time and decreased solvent use.

Water suitable for HPLC analysis, ethyl acetate of analytical grade (99.6% purity), and methanol (99.9% purity) were all purchased from E.Merck in Mumbai, India. Formic acid and glacial acetic acid of analytical quality were purchased from Qualigens Fine Chemicals in Mumbai, India.

One thousand micrograms of Rutin per milliliter of methanol was made into a stock solution. A 10.0 mg sample of standardRutin was weighed precisely and then transferred to a 10.0 mL standard volumetric flask. The flask's contents were dissolved in 5.0 mL of methanol, sonicated, and then diluted to the appropriate volume with more methanol.

Methanolic Chlorogenic acid stock solution (1000 g/mL) was made. Accurately weighing 10.0 mg of standardChlorogenic acid, 10.0 mL of standard volumetric flask was subsequently filled with the substance. The flask's contents were dissolved in 5.0 mL of methanol, sonicated, and then diluted to the appropriate volume with more methanol.

There was made a methanolic stock solution of Hyperoside (1000 g/mL). An precisely weighed sample of standard Hyperoside (10.0 mg) was poured into a 10.0 mLstandard volumetric flask. The flask's contents were dissolved in 5.0 mL of methanol, then sonicated, and finally diluted to the appropriate level with more methanol. The aforementioned stocks of rutin, chlorogenic acid, and hyperoside were used to create a calibration curve with solutions ranging from 0.1- to 0.05-.

Dried flowers from Calendula officinalis Linn., about one thousand milligrams in total, were weighed and placed in a round-bottom flask. Following the addition of 10 mL of methanol, the flask was placed in a boiling water bath and allowed to reflux for 30 minutes. Once the extract was filtered, we used Whatman filter paper no. 1. Finally, the volume was brought to 5.0cm3 using methanol in a volumetric flask after the contents were evaporated to dryness.

After extensive testing, it was determined that the newly created technique was suitable for its intended use via a thorough validation procedure. Prior to demonstrating the validity of a technique, validation is a methodical process of identifying, measuring, assessing, recording, and re-evaluating all the important processes involved. One area where focus is directed is on the pharmaceutical industry: the validation of chromatographic procedures. When a technique is validated, it is shown to be accurate, These are the factors that were taken into account during the HPTLC method validation for the determination of Rutin, Chlorogenic acid, and Hyperoside concentrations in C.Officinalis Linn. flower extracts. Were, 1. Linearity and range a) LDR b) LWR 2. Limit of Detection(LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) 3. Precision a) Repeatability b) Intermediate Precision

How closely a calibration plot of detector response vs concentration follows a straight line is how linear a technique is defined. To find out what concentrations of Rutin, chlorogenic acid, and hyperoside are optimal for use, we conducted the following experiment. Rutin, chlorogenic acid, and hyperoside's linear dynamic ranges were calculated using series of standard solutions containing 0.1 to 1.00 g per band, 0.2-1.20 g per band, and 0.05 to 0.50 g per band, respectively. The plate was developed and scanned after the bands were applied from the bottom at a distance of 8.0mm. Densitograms were generated after each Rutin, chlorogenic acid, and hyperoside application, and the peak regions of these compounds were measured and recorded. The concentrations of rutin, chlorogenic acid, and hyperoside used in the experiment were plotted against the peak areas of the three compounds (Y-axis) in a scatter plot (X-axis).

Triplicate applications of standard solutions of rutin (0.10 g to 1.0 g per band), chlorogenic acid (0.05 g to 0.5 g per band), and hyperoside (0.20 g to 1.20 g per band), developed and scanned under the optimum conditions described above, yielded identical results. Peak regions of rutin, chlorogenic acid, and hyperoside were detected in the densitograms. Linear working range for Rutin,Chlorogenic acid and Hyperoside

As the name implies, the LOD is the lowest concentration of an analyte that can be identified by a given technique under normal working circumstances. The LOQ is the lowest concentration of an analyte in a sample that can be determined with sufficient precision and accuracy, given the operating parameters of the technique. The signal-to-noise ratios of 3:1 and 10:1 were used to get the LOD and LOQ values, respectively. The significance of Rutin's limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ). The concentrations of chlorogenic acid, hyperoside, and rutin per band were 0.03 g, 0.03 g, and 0.01 g, respectively.

Methanolic floral extract was performed in six duplicates with intermediate accuracy. Officinalis, and it was tested over the course of three consecutive days (interday). Six separate daily weights were taken of a powdered form of dried flowers averaging about 1000mg. After the methanolic extract was made, it was analyzed. A test solution was made from the extracted sample solution. On the same day, we made a note of the peak area values for Rutin, Chlorogenic Acid, and Hyperoside. We determined the average peak areas, standard deviations, and percentage relative standard deviations (RSDs) for Rutin, Chlorogenic acid, and Hyperoside. You may see the intermediate accuracy findings from three consecutive days.

The relative standard deviation (RSD) values for the peaks of Rutin, Chlorogenic acid, and Hyperoside in C.Officinalis Linn. flowers are shown below as percentages. Achieving statistical significance for six replicates across three days of testing. The recovery values obtained for rutin ,chlorogenic acid and hyperoside were in the acceptable range of 85% - 115%. This indicates excellent reliability, accuracy and reproducibility of the method.

In the current study, a normal phase HPTLC technique was established for the determination of rutin, chlorogenic acid, and hyperoside in the powdered flowers of C.Officinalis Linn. To date, there is no record of a study that measured rutin, chlorogenic acid, and hyperoside all at once. In the current study, we employ normal mode separation to determine the exact amounts of rutin, chlorogenic acid, and hyperoside in a powder made from the flowers of the C.Officinalis Linn plant. Solvents with varying degrees of polarity, including polar, mid-polar, and non-polar, were tested. Glacial acetic acid, formic acid, ethyl acetate, and water The dilution conditions of 10:1.1:1.1:2.3 (v/v/v/v) were suitable for the separation of Rutin (Rf = 0.61), Chlorogenic Acid (Rf =0.71), and Hyperoside (Rf = 0.71), which can be separated from the other components of the C.Officinalis Linn. flower powder ethanolic extract by using a volumetric ratio of toluene, ethyl acetate, and formic acid.

hyperosidemarkers in C.Officinalis Linn flower powder. Flower powder from the C.Officinalis Linn. Plant can be easily analyzed using the proposed method because it is quick, easy, and accurate.

1. Ashwlayan VD, Kumar A, Verma M, Garg VK, Gupta SK. Therapeutic potential of calendula officinalis. Pharm Pharmacol Int J. 2018;6(2):149155. DOI:10.15406/ ppij.2018.06.00171 2. Arora D, Rani A, Sharma A. A review on phytochemistry and ethnopharmacological aspects of genus Calendula. Pharmacognosy Reviews. 2019;7(14):179. doi:10.4103/0973-7847.120520. 3. Khairnar MS, Pawar B, Marawar PP, Mani A. Evaluation of Calendula officinalis as an anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis agent. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2018; 17 (6):741- 47. doi:10.4103/0972-124X.124491 4. Adela P, Bele C, Sanda A, Carmen S. HPLC analysis of carotenoids in four varieties of Calendula officinalis L. flowers. Acta Biol Szeged. 2018; 47(47):1-437. 5. Al-Snafi AE. The chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of calendula officinalis -a review. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Research. 2015;5(3):172-85. 6. Preethi KC, Kuttan G, Kuttan R. Anti-oxidant potential of Calendula officinalis flowers in vitro and in vivo. Pharm Biol. 2016;44(9):691-97. 7. Chakraborthy GS, Arora R, Majee C. Anti-diabetic and Anti-hyperlipidaemic Effect of Hydoalcoholic extract of Calendula officinalis. Int ResJ Pharm. 2021;2(1):61-65. 8. Khalid KA, Da Silva JAT. Biology of Calendula officinalis Linn: focus on pharmacology, biological activities and agronomic practices. Med Aromat Plant Sci Biotechnol. 2020;6:12-27. http://www.globalsciencebooks.info/Online/ GSBOnline/images/2012/MAPSB_6(1)/MAPSB_6(1)12-27o.pdf 9. Boucaud Maitre Y, Algernon O, Raynaud J. Cytotoxic and antitumoural activity of Calendula officinalis extracts. Pharmazie. 2017; 43:220-21. 10.5005/jp/ books/11166_5 parasite Cuscuta campestris. PLoS One. 2019;9: e116049. 11. Ukiya M, Akihisa T, Yasukawa K, Tokuda H, Suzuki T, Kimura Y. Anti-inflammatory, anti-tumour-promoting, and cytotoxic activities of constituents of marigold (Calendula officinalis) flowers. J Nat Prod. 2016; 69 (12):1692-96. 12. Matysik G, Wójciak-Kosior M, Paduch R. The influence of Calendulae officinalis flos extracts on cell cultures, and the chromatographic analysis of extracts. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015; 38 (2):285-92.

Research Scholar, Faculty of Basic & Applied Sciences, Maharishi Arvind University, Jaipur (Rajasthan)-302041