Effectiveness of Hatha Yoga Versus Conventional Therapeutic Exercises for Chronic Non-Specific Low-Back Pain

Discomfort in the lower back is characterised by soreness, muscular tension, or rigidity below the costal border and above the inferior gluteal folds. It's possible to have low back pain without any associated leg pain. When symptoms persist for more than 12 weeks, medical professionals call the condition chronic. Pain in the lower back that cannot be linked to an identifiable disease is referred to as nonspecific low-back pain [1]. The term "chronic nonspecific low back pain," or CNLBP for short, is a socioeconomic and health issue that is exceedingly prevalent in today's culture. Between 40.7% and 42.4% of the Indian population suffers from low back discomfort at any one time. Conventional therapy exercises, also known as CTEs, are the no pharmacologic treatment that is utilised the most often and has previously been shown to be a useful component in the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). Yoga-based therapy has also shown promise for lowering pain and pain-related impairment in those with persistent low back pain. This provides support for the possibility that yoga-based treatments are useful for CNLBP [2-3]. According to a recent meta-analysis, not enough studies have directly compared yoga to therapeutic activities for the treatment of dysfunction and discomfort in the back. In addition, it came as a surprise to learn that, despite Yoga's long history on the Indian subcontinent, very little published research has examined the efficacy of Yoga therapy for people suffering with CNLBP in the Indian community [4-5]. As a consequence, researchers devised a randomised controlled trial to assess Yoga's efficacy relative to other therapeutic activities for people with CNLBP. This consisted of a planned, 35-minute weekly course of yoga treatment with CTEs over a period of 6 weeks, and was supported with home practise. The objective was to help people with CNLBP alleviate their discomfort and restore their function. It was hypothesised that people with chronic non-specific low back pain will benefit as much from yoga treatment as from CTEs in terms of reducing pain and improving back-related dysfunction. (CNLBP). If, on the other hand, yoga is shown to be less beneficial than other treatments, then having this knowledge can assist guide better treatment selections and avoid the needless Yoga and CTEs were compared in terms of their ability to alleviate pain, improve back function, reduce the need for pain medication, and improve patients' views of their own development. After 6 weeks of treatment, people in both the Yoga and CTE groups reported significantly less dysfunctions of the back and the back itself, and these results persisted at the 12-week follow-up assessment [8]. The findings provide credence to the concept that patients suffering from CNLBP experience a comparable reduction when it comes to back issues, pain, and dysfunction as those suffering from CTEs as a consequence of yoga treatment. The results of both of these therapies were found to be successful, which is consistent with the findings of earlier research. Another finding that came out of the research was the average number of medications taken per week. According to the study of the groups' intentions to be treated, there was no statistical significance found for the CTE or Yoga groups [14]. In light of the fact that these findings run counter to their predictions, exercising some degree of care is strongly recommended here. Both the Yoga and CTE groups were confirmed to have statistical significance once the data were reanalysed in accordance with the methodology. It is possible to presume that the dropouts are to blame for the findings that were not obtained, and this may be a legitimate assumption to make [15-17]. Statistical analysis reveals that the majority of research volunteers have no longer felt the need to take medicines; although 46 persons were taking pills at the start of the trial, just three were still taking pills by the conclusion of the study. This suggests that most people were OK going without any kind of pharmaceutical assistance. With these factors in mind, the researchers concluded that Yoga and CTEs had a clinically meaningful effect on drug use. Williams et al. [6] found that Yoga patients reduced their use of opioids at the 12-week mark of their study, but this result has to be confirmed since the control group did not engage in any physical activity. As a corollary, the usual levels of back pain and dysfunction were significantly reduced. No discernible gap emerged between the Yoga and CTE groups in terms of statistical significance. Even though the findings did not attain statistical significance, the results are clinically significant since a proportion of the individuals reported that they had improved since the beginning of the treatment [16]. During the course of the current research, it was discovered that both yoga and the CTE treatment were risk-free, with just a few mild adverse effects, most of which were associated with an increase in low-back discomfort. There have only been a few studies done in the past that have revealed that the adverse effects were largely linked to moderate self-limiting joint and back pain, and that In terms of frequency and intensity, One of the merits of their study is that they used accepted end factors, computerised randomization that minimised problems with sample selection, assessment, and statistical analysis blinding to ensure their research was methodologically sound. Other strengths include the use of adequate outcome variables. Blinding of the participants was not even a remote possibility in this kind of investigation. In next research, the reasons and motives for the participants' compliance with the study may be investigated. At least in clinical contexts, this knowledge might be utilised to inform the development of strategies for patient retention. [19]. In light of this, the current protocol did not make any efforts to increase compliance, nor did it implement any strategies intended to urge participants to stick to the procedure. Such characteristics were conceived of with the broad application of the findings in mind throughout the design process. Given the prevalence of yoga in modern culture, it would be fascinating to see data indicating either is a practise that is strongly ingrained in the culture of India. As a result, conducting such studies has its own unique set of obstacles and strengths [20].

 The research was a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the benefits of weekly supervised 35-minute Yoga sessions to those of CTE sessions, both designed for CNLBP. The trial consisted of two phases: an initial 6-week intervention period consisting of a 35-minute weekly supervised session at the institute and practise at home on no class days, followed by a 6-week follow-up period. All participants were encouraged to practise at home throughout the 6-week follow-up period. The study protocol was approved by the institute's ethics committee, and all participants provided oral and written informed consent prior to eligibility screening and baseline assessment, respectively.  Situations and players: This investigation during the months of February 2017 and May 2017 and April 2018 at a tertiary care hospital's Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR) and Centre for Integrative Medicine and Research (CIMR). Eligibility was determined for patients between the ages of 18 and 55 who presented as outpatients to the PMR department with a complaint of CNLBP lasting 12 weeks and a pain rating of 4 on a 0–10 numeric rating scale (0 = no pain to 10 = worst conceivable pain). The patient's medical history and clinical examination findings were recorded. Every patient received a complete blood count (haemoglobin, total leukocyte count, differential leukocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and a radiograph of the lumbar spine minute Yoga sessions at the CIMR and six regular 35-minute CTE sessions at the PMR Department. The CTE intervention was a 35-minute session held once a week, much as the Yoga classes. Postural care instruction for CNLBP was given to both groups. On days when there was no scheduled lesson, all students in both groups were obliged to practise for 30 minutes using given materials.  Conventional Hatha yoga practises were coupled with the CIMR to create an integrated yoga therapy module for chronic non-specific low back pain. This combination allowed for the creation of an integrative yoga therapy module. The researchers came to the conclusion that it would be most practical and economical to carry out their investigation during a yoga session that took place once a week for a total of 35 minutes. Each session started out with an explanation of what Hatha yoga is, and then moved on to flexibility exercises, four distinct Yogasanas, a quick meditation approach, pranayama, and a deep meditation practise. The last portion of the programme consisted of a lengthy relaxation exercise. (Table 1). The lesson was led by a certified yoga therapist who also had a teaching licence. When there was a gap in the schedule for yoga sessions, participants were encouraged to practise yoga on their own for a period of thirty minutes at home.

 Outcome measures: The key indicators of success were assessments of pain intensity and function associated with the back. The secondary outcomes were pain medication use and perceived recovery of back pain and dysfunction following intervention. Assessments were conducted at baseline, after six weeks of intervention, and at 12-week follow-up intervals [9]. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, which consists of 24 questions, was used to evaluate back-related dysfunction. (RDQ). Because each inquiry is worth one point, the total score might vary anywhere from 0 (indicating no impairment) to 24. (severe disability). Validity, dependability, and adaptability are hallmarks of the RDQ [10-11]. These key outcomes were collected at the beginning of the study, when the intervention was completed 6 weeks later, and again 12 weeks later. A version of the RDQ that was translated into the local language (Hindi), for those individuals who felt more comfortable speaking it, was made available. A series of questions were posed in order to ascertain the quantity of pain medication used on a weekly basis [12] for the treatment of intervention, respectively. The patient judged his or her recovery from back-related pain and dysfunction using a seven-point Likert scale that ranged from "very large improvement" (including total recovery) to "much improved" to "little improved" to "unchanged" to "little worse" to "much worse" to "very much worse" [13]. The scores were reviewed based on how they had changed from the previous time point.  Calculation of sample size: The sample size was determined beforehand and was performed using the study of Nambi et al, in which the mean pain-related functional disability and standard deviation were reported as 2.5 and 3.0, respectively. Assuming a significance level of 5% and a power of 95%, the requisite sample size for measuring the effect was 30 subjects per group. Considering a 10% attrition rate, the ultimate sample size for each cohort was 35. The total number of samples was 70.  Randomization and blinding: A random number generator was used to assign participants to treatment groups sequence (block randomization; 70 participants were assigned to one of two blocks containing 35 samples each). There were used opaque, sealed envelopes to conceal the allocation. Investigators involved in study design, recruitment, eligibility, outcome assessment, and statistical analysis were unaware of the intervention allocation; only the intervention administrators and carers were aware of the allocated intervention, but they had no impact on recruitment, eligibility, or study conclusions.  Statistical analysis: Using Shapiro– Wilk normality tests, the data were examined for normal distribution. The dependent variables were reported pain severity, back-related dysfunction, weekly medication use, and self-reported improvement. Comparisons of outcomes were made using both an intention-to-treat analysis (in which missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward) and a per-protocol analysis. Since it was not possible to assume a normal distribution, numerical variables were reported as medians. (first quartile, third quartile). Two-group comparisons of the impact of Yoga against CTEs were reported using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test for intention-to-treat protocol and the Mann-Whitney U-test for per-protocol analysis. The impact of each treatment on back pain was characterised via multiple group comparisons utilising the Friedman test for intention-to-treat protocol and the Kruskal-Wallis H-test for per-protocol analysis. (within-group comparisons). Categorical data was evaluated using the Chi-square test. GraphPad Prism was used for the analysis, and the significance level was set at 0.01.  Additional Analysis: To check whether the planned interventional sessions and the procedure supervised Yoga or CTE sessions, while a "poor adherence" rate was assigned to those who attended at least two sessions. Participants were regarded to have "completed" the study if they returned to the clinic for all scheduled evaluations of end measures, whereas those who were unable to do so were judged to have "not completed" the trial.

suggesting less pain and difficulty with movement in the back. At the 6- and 12-week points, there was little variation between the Yoga and CTE groups (Table 5). Twenty-one people said they were using painkillers before the study began.

not the pain-relieving and function-improving benefits of Hatha yoga treatment for patients with chronic nonspecific low-back pain are comparable to those of conventional therapeutic activities (CTEs). An initial session of supervised intervention lasting for six weeks was followed by a period of follow-up lasting for the same amount of time. The Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, in conjunction with the Centre for Integrative Medicine, as well as an investigation of a tertiary care facility, carried out this inquiry. Patients between the ages of 18 and 55 with a 12-week history of CNLBP and a pain level of 4 on a numeric pain grading scale (0–10). Individuals with CNLBP who had never participated in a yoga or CTE class before will be offered six weekly, 35-minute Group Hatha yoga classes and six weekly CTE sessions of 35 minutes each. Both groups will meet six times per week. individuals diagnosed with CNLBP saw a reduction in pain intensity and an improvement in back-related dysfunction that was equivalent to that seen in individuals diagnosed with CTEs. The Defence and Veterans Pain Rating Scale, which ranges from 0 to 10, and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, which has 24 points, were the major instruments used to assess the outcomes. (RDQ). The most recent observation was used in the analysis, which is consistent with the intention-to-treat method of data interpretation.

1. Chou, R. (2010). Low back pain (chronic). BMJ clinical evidence, 2010. 2. Ganesan, S., Acharya, A. S., Chauhan, R., & Acharya, S. (2017). Prevalence and risk factors for low back pain in 1,355 young adults: a cross-sectional study. Asian spine journal, 11(4), 610. 3. Mathew, A. C., Safar, R. S., Anithadevi, T. S., Banu, M. S., Shankar, S. L. R., Rai, B. K. D., & Chacko, T. V. (2013). The prevalence and correlates of low back pain in adults: A cross sectional study from Southern India. International Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 3(4). 4. Van Middelkoop, M., Rubinstein, S. M., Verhagen, A. P., Ostelo, R. W., Koes, B. W., & van Tulder, M. W. (2010). Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain. Best practice & research Clinical rheumatology, 24(2), 193-204. 5. Searle, A., Spink, M., Ho, A., & Chuter, V. (2015). Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clinical rehabilitation, 29(12), 1155-1167. 6. Williams, K., Abildso, C., Steinberg, L., Doyle, E., Epstein, B., Smith, D., ... & Cooper, L. (2009). Evaluation of the effectiveness and Raghuram, N. (2008). Effect of short-term intensive yoga program on pain, functional disability and spinal flexibility in chronic low back pain: a randomized control study. The journal of alternative and complementary medicine, 14(6), 637-644. 8. Wieland, L. S., Skoetz, N., Pilkington, K., Vempati, R., D'Adamo, C. R., & Berman, B. M. (2017). Yoga treatment for chronic non‐specific low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1). 9. Nassif, T. H., Hull, A., Holliday, S. B., Sullivan, P., & Sandbrink, F. (2015). Concurrent validity of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale in VA outpatients. Pain Medicine, 16(11), 2152-2161. 10. Roland, M., & Morris, R. (1983). A study of the natural history of back pain: Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. spine. 11. Roland, M., & Fairbank, J. (2000). The Roland–Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine, 25(24), 3115-3124. 12. Williams, K. A., Petronis, J., Smith, D., Goodrich, D., Wu, J., Ravi, N., ... & Steinberg, L. (2005). Effect of Iyengar yoga therapy for chronic low back pain. Pain, 115(1-2), 107-117. 13. Jellema, P., Van der Roer, N., Van Der Windt, D. A., Van Tulder, M. W., Van Der Horst, H. E., Stalman, W. A., & Bouter, L. M. (2007). Low back pain in general practice: cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychosocial intervention versus usual care. European Spine Journal, 16, 1812-1821. 14. Nambi, G. S., Inbasekaran, D., Khuman, R., Devi, S., & Jagannathan, K. (2014). Changes in pain intensity and health related quality of life with Iyengar yoga in nonspecific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled study. International journal of yoga, 7(1), 48. 15. Sherman, K. J., Cherkin, D. C., Wellman, R. D., Cook, A. J., Hawkes, R. J., Delaney, K., & Deyo, R. A. (2011). A randomized trial comparing yoga, stretching, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain. Archives of internal medicine, 171(22), 2019-2026. 16. Highland, K. B., Schoomaker, A., Rojas, W., Suen, J., Ahmed, A., Zhang, Z., ... & Buckenmaier III, C. C. (2018). Benefits of the restorative exercise and strength training for operational resilience and excellence yoga program for chronic low back pain in service members: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 99(1), 91-98. 17. Saper, R. B., Lemaster, C., Delitto, A., Sherman, K. J., Herman, P. M., Sadikova, E., ... & Weinberg, J. (2017). Yoga, physical 18. Tilbrook, H. E., Cox, H., Hewitt, C. E., Kang'ombe, A. R., Chuang, L. H., Jayakody, S., ... & Torgerson, D. J. (2011). Yoga for chronic low back pain: a randomized trial. Annals of internal medicine, 155(9), 569-578. 19. Sedgwick, P. (2014). Explanatory trials versus pragmatic trials. Bmj, 349. 20. Cramer, H., Lauche, R., Langhorst, J., & Dobos, G. (2015). Are Indian yoga trials more likely to be positive than those from other countries? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 41, 269-272.

Yoga & Fitness Guru, Founder Director, Yoga Sanskar Sutra, Yoga & Fitness Training Kendra