Effects and factors of multiple practice session for a sports player carrier achievement

The Importance of Multiple Practice Sessions for Sports Player Achievement

by R. Ananda Ravi*, S Dinesh Philip Vinoth,

- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540

Volume 20, Issue No. 2, Apr 2023, Pages 96 - 103 (8)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

Purpose Sports players reach their peak positions by putting their physical and mental efforts into practice. Few of them are achieving higher-level certificates and jobs. Most sportspeople have stopped their careers and started a new lifestyle. Method The data from a physical education institute was used to analyze the performance of male and female sports students' daily practice sessions. The 258 students from various sports, like volleyball, kabaddi, basketball, weightlifting, cricket, football, and athletics, were considered for this analysis. Result The observed frequency data showed fewer males and females practicing one session daily, and more students were doing two sessions daily. Some average numbers of students are practicing three times a day and earning more strength and skills. The achievements of the three-session practicing students are higher than the data. Chi-square analyses were performed to detect differences in the number of practice sessions between the sexes. The significant difference for gender and number of practice sessions was 0.05, respectively. Conclusion This research should help players and coaches understand the importance of three practice sessions daily. Therefore, training sessions could be more position-specific, maximising the player's physiological outcome in order to optimise performance.

KEYWORD

sports player, practice sessions, achievement, factors, multiple

INTRODUCTION

Sport is any competitive or organized physical activity or game that maintains or improves physical ability and skills while entertaining participants and spectators (van Dijk et al., 2022). Participation in sports, whether on a casual or more structured basis, has been shown to have positive effects on physical health (Cortés et al., 2017). There are countless sports to choose from, ranging from those contested between two individuals to those involving hundreds of people playing in teams or as individuals simultaneously (Buekers, 1991; Franks & Moore, 1969; Puhl et al., 1982). In some sports, such as racing, multiple competitors may compete concurrently or sequentially to determine a single winner (Cayres et al., 2015). In others, the contest (a match) is between two teams, each seeking to surpass the other. Some sports permit a "tie" or "draw," in which there is no single winner, while others employ tie-breaking techniques to ensure one winner and one loser (Cumming & Quinton, 2022). A tournament is a series of competitions that produce a champion. Many sports leagues determine an annual champion by scheduling games during the regular season and, in some circumstances, playoffs. The roots of periodization can be traced back to Hans Selye's General Adaption Syndrome (GAS). The General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS) describes three fundamental stages of the stress response: 1. The Alarm stage involves the initial shock of the stimulus on the system. 2. The Resistance stage involves the system's adaptation to the stimulus. 3. The Exhaustion stage is when repairs are inadequate, and system function decreases. The core of periodic training prevents the body from entering the depletion stage while remaining in the resistance stage (Fair & Champa, 2022; Green, 2000; Parker & Curtner-Smith, 2005). By adhering to cycle training, the body can recover from considerable stress before engaging in new training. The objective of periodization in athletics is to lessen stress at the end of the resistance stage, so the body has time to recover. Thus, the exhaustion phase does not diminish the gains; the body can recover and remain above its initial equilibrium position after each cycle. Before a competition or performance, training should be coordinated and planned using the macrocycle, mesocycle, and microcycle (Jenkinson et al., 2014; Makopoulou, 2018). It must consider the athlete's talent, performance in exams or competitions, and the competition schedule (Cox et al., 1982; Eom & Schutz, 1992b; Starkes et al., 1995). It must be straightforward, provocative, and, most importantly, adaptable so that its content may be tweaked to accommodate the athlete's rate of improvement. A macrocycle refers to an entire season of training. This annual strategy aims to peak for the year's goal competition (Chow et al., 2021). The macrocycle consists of three phases: preparation, competition, and transition. A mesocycle is a specific training block, such as a strength or endurance phase, within a season. A mesocycle is also several consecutive weeks during which the training program emphasizes the same physical adaptations, such as muscle mass and anaerobic ability (Kirk et al., 1997; Warburton et al., 2020). During the preparatory phase, a mesocycle typically consists of four to six micro-cycles; however, during the competitive phase, it consists of two to four micro-cycles, depending on the competition's schedule. A mesocycle is a specific training block, such as a strength or endurance phase, within a season (Uddin et al., 2020). A mesocycle is also several consecutive weeks during which the training program emphasizes the same physical adaptations, such as muscle mass and anaerobic ability (Eom & Schutz, 1992a; Fellingham et al., 1994; Pfeifer & Deutsch, 1981). During the preparatory phase, a mesocycle typically consists of four to six micro-cycles; however, during the competitive phase, it consists of two to four micro-cycles, depending on the competition's schedule (Wassenaar et al., 2019). Sports management is a business discipline that focuses on sports and recreation. Sports management encompasses any skills associated with planning, organizing, directing, controlling, budgeting, leading, and assessing any organization or corporation in the sports industry (Kok et al., 2020; Polet et al., 2019). The Physical Education Department is the origin of the area of sport management. Over time, the field has become anchored in the history and sociology departments. In 2018, esport management had grown to a $4.5 billion sector over the past decade due to the expansion of sport management. Opportunities in sport management have increased to encompass sports marketing, sports media analytics, sports sponsorships, and the management of sports facilities (García-González et al., 2019; Røset et al., 2020). Various schools and universities offer bachelor's and master's degrees in sport management (Hermens et al., 2017; Lagestad & Mehus, 2018; van Abswoude et al., 2018). When researching the influence of sports degrees, it is essential to focus on sports science. The average salary for sport management positions in the postal service, ICF, police, customs, electricity, GST, and other professional or amateur sports leagues in terms of marketing, health, and promotions. Jobs in sports management include the following positions: athletic coach, athlete development specialist, athletic director, business development coordinator, contract administrator, etc (Tolgfors, 2020). A chi-squared test (χ2 test) is a statistical hypothesis test used to study large sample sizes for contingency tables (Pavlovic et al., 2021). In simpler terms, this test aims to determine if two categorical factors (two dimensions of the contingency table) influence the test statistic independently (values within the table) (Bird & Karageorghis, 2020; Groffik et al., 2020; Takamido et al., 2021). Specifically, Pearson's chi-squared test and variations are true when the test statistic is chi-squared distributed under the null hypothesis (Gao et al., 2021). Pearson's chi-squared test is utilized to assess if there is a statistically significant discrepancy between the predicted and observed frequencies in one or more categories of a contingency table (Lucena Filho et al., 2022; Persson et al., 2021; Therell et al., 2022). Therefore, the present study's aim was to make a detailed record of the number of practice sessions done by male and female sports players in a day in the physical education institute. We hypothesized that there would be differences between the sexes and practice sessions. It was also anticipated that players who practiced for more sessions (such as three sessions) would likely achieve and perform better.

METHODS

We analyzed the three-year data from 153 male and 105 female sports professional students during 2020–2022 at a physical education institute in Tirunelveli, India. The students used to practice for one, two, and three sessions in a day to achieve in the top university and national games (Donnelly et al., 2022). The two- and three-session practicing students‘ achievements are greater than those of single-session students. Especially three session practicing students easily achieved more universities and national game awards (Goodyear et al., 2019). Table 1 shows the observed results of several male and female students spending daily practice sessions in the physical education institute.

Table 1. Observed results of male and female students spending daily practice sessions

Students session 2 sessions 3 sessions Total Male 36 72 45 153 Female 22 51 32 105 Total 58 123 77 258 In a pilot study, we compared male and female players with several practicing hours and found the average number of practicing sessions to depend on the student type (Rekaa et al., 2019). The Figure 1. displays the gender distribution across the practice sessions.

Figure 1. Gender distribution across practice session

In a single practice session, either the morning or evening, the players couldn‘t spend all the time on strengthening, fitness, jumps, ideas, meditation, stretching, agility, and game practice (Van den Berghe et al., 2014). The well-trained person is used to practicing in two or three sessions, compulsorily, under the guidance of the coach. Particularly learning and practicing three sessions in a day promotes the players in all kinds of sports (Bailey, 2005; Renshaw et al., 2010). The appropriate schedule for the three sessions of practicing players is that in the morning, during the first session between 07.00 and 08.00 a.m., they do the stretches. In the second session, 09.30–11.00 a.m., they used to do their agility, strengthening, weighting, and jumping workouts, and in the third session, between 5.00–07.00 p.m., they executed their strength and effort in their respective sports. The three-session periodic practice benefits the players in every aspect of sports, i.e., muscle strength, fitness, agility, ability, and others (Barba-Martín et al., 2020; Bores-García et al., 2021; Quennerstedt, 2019). It is also the major reason they achieve in the university, national, and international games.

RESULTS

Based on the student's practice with this parameter, we need to perform a test of independence using a practice sessions is independent of the student's gender. The alternative hypothesis H1 is to test if the number of practice sessions depends on the type of student. To calculate the degrees of freedom df=(R-1) (C-1) is used (Haegele, 2019). Our contingency table has two rows for the males and females and three columns for the practice sessions. The degrees of freedom in this study are 2. Therefore, the test of independence is typically a right-cell test. The shape of the chi-square distribution, critical value, and rejection region is displayed in Fig. 2. The area to the right is the area of the rejection region, and this is going to be alpha (α), which is 0.05, respectively (Ali et al., 2021; Tilga et al., 2019). In this study, we determined our critical chi-squared value and compared it with the calculated chi-square value. If our calculated chi-square value falls in a rejection region, we are going to reject the null hypothesis. If it falls below the critical value, we are not going to reject the null hypothesis. In the chi-square distribution table, we had 2 degrees of freedom, and for the area to the right of the critical value, we said it was 0.05 alpha (Lemes et al., 2021; Pollock et al., 2021). This gives us our critical value of 5.99, marked in Figure 2. Table 2 displays the expected results of male and female students spending daily practice sessions. The expected values were found through the formula , its going to be the row total the column total divided by N.

Table 2. Expected results of male and female students spending daily practice sessions

The calculated chi-square value is found through the formula

∑ 2 / E

The calculated chi-square value, Cv = 0.228, lies to the left of the critical value in a right-tailed test. The calculated chi-square value falls in the critical region.

0

100

1 session2 session3 session

Number of students Number of practice session

Gender distribution accross

practice sessions

MaleFemale

Figure 2. Chi-Square Distribution Graph (critical region and rejection region)

CONCLUSION

The data, corresponding to the number of practice sessions done by the male and female players, were solved through the chi-square test. The table chi-square value (χ2=5.99) and the calculated chi-square values (χ2=5.99) were obtained. The calculated chi-square value is less than the table value, which lies in the critical region. It has strong evidence to suggest that the number of sessions played by the players is independent of the type of student. So, we can see that male and female players spend much time practicing for two sessions a day in the institute. Similarly, most of the achievements were done by the players, who did three practice sessions daily. The null hypothesis is always what you currently believe to be true. So, we have to believe that the rows are independent of the columns, or, in other words, the gender is completely independent of the practice session you support. The practice session is independent of gender; gender does not influence which practice session you support. The value of 0.228 doesn‘t fall in the rejection region, which means we cannot reject the null hypothesis. We fail to reject the null hypothesis. In other words, we accept the null hypothesis. We have to accept that the practice session is independent of gender. Gender does not have any influence on your practice session preferences. This study provided a deeper understanding of the performance of sports person and their several training sessions.

Implications for coaches

Every type of sportsman must train three times every day and take one day off per week. Three daily training sessions are required for the overall development of an individual or group. The coaches are more accountable for monitoring the students' achievements. This idea, which follows logically from the findings of this study, is absolutely at odds with the normal practice sessions undertaken before to official events. Similarly, with sufficient time, coaches can train endurance, agility, strengthening, jumps, workouts, stretching, and games easily and quickly increase their skills.

Acknowledgments Declarations Ethical Approval

Not Applicable

Competing interests

The author(s) declared no competing interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article

Authors' contributions

R Ananda Ravi - Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing Original Draft, Visualization and Data Curation. S Dinesh Philip Vinoth – Resources, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing - Review & Editing, Project Administration, Supervision

FUNDING

This study was funded by St. John's college of physical education.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

REFERENCES

1. Ali, M. F., Kundra, S., Alam, M. A., & Alam, M. (2021). Investigating stress, anxiety, social support and sex satisfaction on physical education and sports teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 7(8), e07860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07860 2. Bailey, R. (2005). Evaluating the relationship between physical education, sport and social inclusion. Educational Review, 57(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191042000274196 3. Barba-Martín, R. A., Bores-García, D., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., & González-Calvo, G. (2020). The application of the teaching games for understanding in physical education. Systematic review of the last six years. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093330 4. Bird, J. M., & Karageorghis, C. I. (2020). A Grounded Theory of Music-Video Use in an Exercise Facility. Research Quarterly for 5. Bores-García, D., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Fernandez-Rio, F. J., González-Calvo, G., & Barba-Martín, R. (2021). Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five Years. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 92(1), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2020.1719276 6. Buekers, M. J. A. (1991). The time structure of the block in volleyball: A comparison of different step techniques. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62(2), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1991.10608715 7. Cayres, S. U., Vanderlei, L. C. M., Rodrigues, A. M., Silva, M. J. C. e, Codogno, J. S., Barbosa, M. F., & Fernandes, R. A. (2015). Sports practice is related to parasympathetic activity in adolescents. Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition), 33(2), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2359-3482(15)30048-8 8. Chow, J. Y., Komar, J., Davids, K., & Tan, C. W. K. (2021). Nonlinear Pedagogy and its implications for practice in the Singapore PE context. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1886270 9. Cortés, A. S., Correa-Díaz, A. M., Benjumea-Arias, M. L., Valencia-Arias, A., & Bran-Piedrahita, L. (2017). Motivational Factors and Effects Associated with Physical-sport Practice in Undergraduate Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237(June 2016), 811–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.153 10. Cox, R. H., Noble, L., & Johnson, R. E. (1982). Effectiveness of the Slide and Cross-Over Steps In Volleyball Blockin–A Temporal Analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 53(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1982.10605235 11. Cumming, J., & Quinton, M. L. (2022). Improving the reporting of sport imagery interventions with TIDieR. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsep.2022.07.003 12. Donnelly, S., Buchan, D. S., McLellan, G., & Arthur, R. (2022). The Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Parent and Child Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity and Body Mass Index. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 93(4), 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2021.1918322 13. Eom, H. J., & Schutz, R. W. (1992a). Statistical analyses of volleyball team performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise

14. Eom, H. J., & Schutz, R. W. (1992b). Transition play in team performance of volleyball: A log-linear analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63(3), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1992.10608741 15. Fair, R. C., & Champa, C. (2022). Estimated costs of injuries in college and high school female sports. Sports Economics Review, 1(November 2022), 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serev.2022.100006 16. Fellingham, G. W., Collings, B. J., & McGown, C. M. (1994). Developing an optimal scoring system with a special emphasis on volleyball. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1994.10607624 17. Franks, B. D., & Moore, G. C. (1969). Effects of calisthenics and volleyball on the aahper fitness test and volleyball skill. Research Quarterly of the American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 40(2), 288–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1969.10614825 18. Gao, P., Li, J., & Liu, S. (2021). An Introduction to Key Technology in Artificial Intelligence and big Data Driven e-Learning and e-Education. Mobile Networks and Applications, 26(5), 2123–2126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01777-7 19. García-González, L., Sevil-Serrano, J., Abós, A., Aelterman, N., & Haerens, L. (2019). The role of task and ego-oriented climate in explaining students‘ bright and dark motivational experiences in Physical Education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(4), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1592145 20. Goodyear, V. A., Parker, M., & Casey, A. (2019). Social media and teacher professional learning communities. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(5), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1617263 21. Green, K. (2000). Extra‐Curricular Physical Education in England and Wales: A Sociological Perspective on a Sporting Bias. European Journal of Physical Education, 5(2), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740898000050206 22. Groffik, D., Mitáš, J., Jakubec, L., Svozil, Z., & Frömel, K. (2020). Adolescents‘ Physical Activity in Education Systems Varying in the Number of Weekly Physical Education Lessons. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 91(4), 551–561. Questioning the Inclusiveness of Integrated Physical Education: 2019 National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education Hally Beth Poindexter Young Scholar Address. Quest, 71(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2019.1602547 24. Hermens, N., Super, S., Verkooijen, K. T., & Koelen, M. A. (2017). A Systematic Review of Life Skill Development Through Sports Programs Serving Socially Vulnerable Youth. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 88(4), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2017.1355527 25. Hutzler, Y., Meier, S., Reuker, S., & Zitomer, M. (2019). Attitudes and self-efficacy of physical education teachers toward inclusion of children with disabilities: a narrative review of international literature. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1571183 26. Jenkinson, K. A., Naughton, G., & Benson, A. C. (2014). Peer-assisted learning in school physical education, sport and physical activity programmes: A systematic review. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(3), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.754004 27. Kirk, D., O‘Connor, A., Carlson, T., Burke, P., Davis, K., & Glover, S. (1997). Time Commitments in Junior Sport: Social Consequences for Participants and their Families. European Journal of Physical Education, 2(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740898970020105 28. Kok, M., Komen, A., van Capelleveen, L., & van der Kamp, J. (2020). The effects of self-controlled video feedback on motor learning and self-efficacy in a Physical Education setting: an exploratory study on the shot-put. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1688773 29. Kulinna, P. H., McCaughtry, N., Cothran, D., & Martin, J. (2006). What do urban/inner-city physical education teachers teach? A contextual analysis of one elementary/primary school district. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 11(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980500466920 30. Lagestad, P., & Mehus, I. (2018). The Importance of Adolescents‘ Participation in Organized Sport According to VO2peak: A Longitudinal Study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 89(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2018.1448050 psychological satisfaction in physical education, sports practice, and health indicators with physical activity: Direct and indirect ways in a structural equation model proposal. International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 8(4), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.11.004 32. Lucena Filho, A., Lima, R. A., Soares, F. C., Bezerra, J., & de Barros, M. V. G. (2022). The Role of Adiposity in the Association Between Physical Activity and Blood Pressure in Children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 93(3), 578–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2021.1878089 33. Makopoulou, K. (2018). An investigation into the complex process of facilitating effective professional learning: CPD tutors‘ practices under the microscope. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1406463 34. Nelson, L., Cushion, C., & Potrac, P. (2013). Enhancing the provision of coach education: The recommendations of UK coaching practitioners. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2011.649725 35. Parker, M. B., & Curtner-Smith, M. (2005). Health-related fitness in sport education and multi-activity teaching. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740898042000334872 36. Pavlovic, A., DeFina, L. F., Natale, B. L., Thiele, S. E., Walker, T. J., Craig, D. W., Vint, G. R., Leonard, D., Haskell, W. L., & Kohl, H. W. (2021). Keeping children healthy during and after COVID-19 pandemic: meeting youth physical activity needs. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10545-x 37. Persson, E., Andersson, M., & Blomqvist, S. (2021). Differences in Physical Demands Among Offensive and Defensive Players in Elite Men Bandy. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 92(4), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2020.1788203 38. Pfeifer, P. E., & Deutsch, S. J. (1981). A Probabilistic Model for Evaluation of Volleyball Scoring Systems. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 52(3), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1981.10607880 39. Polet, J., Hassandra, M., Lintunen, T., Laukkanen, A., Hankonen, N., Hirvensalo, M., Tammelin, T., & Hagger, M. S. (2019). Using physical education to promote out-of https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6478-x 40. Pollock, E. R., Young, M. D., Lubans, D. R., Coffey, J. E., Hansen, V., & Morgan, P. J. (2021). Understanding the impact of a teacher education course on attitudes towards gender equity in physical activity and sport: An exploratory mixed methods evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103421 41. Puhl, J., Case, S., Fleck, S., & Van Handel, P. (1982). Physical and Physiological Characteristics of Elite Volleyball Players. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 53(3), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1982.10609351 42. Quennerstedt, M. (2019). Physical education and the art of teaching: transformative learning and teaching in physical education and sports pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society, 24(6), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1574731 43. Rekaa, H., Hanisch, H., & Ytterhus, B. (2019). Inclusion in Physical Education: Teacher Attitudes and Student Experiences. A Systematic Review. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 66(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2018.1435852 44. Renshaw, I., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Hammond, J. (2010). A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: A basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980902791586 45. Røset, L., Green, K., & Thurston, M. (2020). Norwegian youngsters‘ perceptions of physical education: exploring the implications for mental health. Sport, Education and Society, 25(6), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1634043 46. Starkes, J. L., Edwards, P., Dissanayake, P., & Dunn, T. (1995). A new technology and field test of advance cue usage in volleyball. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66(2), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1995.10762223 47. Takamido, R., Yokoyama, K., & Yamamoto, Y. (2021). Effect of Manipulating Advanced Kinematic Information on Hitting Movement Prediction, Perception, and Action. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 92(4), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2020.17733 Economy in Elite Junior Cross-Country Skiers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 93(3), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2021.1887441 49. Tilga, H., Hein, V., Koka, A., Hamilton, K., & Hagger, M. S. (2019). The role of teachers‘ controlling behaviour in physical education on adolescents‘ health-related quality of life: test of a conditional process model*. Educational Psychology, 39(7), 862–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1546830 50. Tolgfors, B. (2020). Promoting integration through physical education (?). Sport, Education and Society, 25(9), 1029–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1687442 51. Uddin, R., Salmon, J., Islam, S. M. S., & Khan, A. (2020). Physical education class participation is associated with physical activity among adolescents in 65 countries. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79100-9 52. van Abswoude, F., Nuijen, N. B., van der Kamp, J., & Steenbergen, B. (2018). Individual Differences Influencing Immediate Effects of Internal and External Focus Instructions on Children‘s Motor Performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 89(2), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2018.1442915 53. Van den Berghe, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Cardon, G., Kirk, D., & Haerens, L. (2014). Research on self-determination in physical education: Key findings and proposals for future research. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(1), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.732563 54. van Dijk, L. M., van Eikenhorst, L., & Wagner, C. (2022). Daily practice performance (Work-as-Done) compared to guidelines (Work-as-Imagined) of medication reconciliation at discharge: Outcomes of a FRAM study. Safety Science, 155(January), 105871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105871 55. Warburton, V. E., Wang, J. C. K., Bartholomew, K. J., Tuff, R. L., & Bishop, K. C. M. (2020). Need satisfaction and need frustration as distinct and potentially co-occurring constructs: Need profiles examined in physical education and sport. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09798-2 56. Wassenaar, T. M., Wheatley, C. M., Beale, N., Salvan, P., Meaney, A., Possee, J. B., Atherton, K. E., Duda, J. L., Dawes, H., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2019). Effects of a mental health and the brain of adolescents (Fit to Study): Study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial. Trials, 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3279-6

Corresponding Author R Ananda Ravi*

Department of Physical Education, St. John's College of Physical Education, Veeravanallur, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu 627426, India