The role of GST in Promoting Financial Independence among Women Entrepreneurs
 
Mamta Jaisiyan*
Associate Professor, Department of Commerce, D.J. College, Baraut, Baghpat, UP, India
Email: mjaisyan7@gmail.com
Abstract - The Goods and Services Tax (GST) was implemented in India in July 2017 with the aim of streamlining the taxation system and promoting economic growth. This paper explores the impact of GST on the financial independence of women entrepreneurs. By analyzing secondary data from various sources, including government reports and academic articles, this study examines how GST has influenced business operations, access to credit, and overall financial stability among women-led enterprises. The findings suggest that while GST has simplified tax compliance and improved market access, challenges such as the initial compliance burden and complex filing procedures continue to affect the financial independence of women entrepreneurs.
Keywords: Goods and Services Tax (GST), Women Entrepreneurs, Financial Independence, Tax Compliance, Economic Empowerment

1. INTRODUCTION

The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India marked a significant shift in the country’s tax landscape. Designed to replace a myriad of indirect taxes, GST aims to create a unified tax structure that is simpler and more transparent (Coleman, 2007). For women entrepreneurs, who often face unique challenges in business, the impact of GST is particularly noteworthy. The GST framework promises to enhance financial independence by simplifying tax procedures, increasing market access, and improving overall business efficiency (Colombier, 2008). This paper investigates how GST has affected women entrepreneurs in terms of financial stability and business growth, providing insights into the benefits and limitations of the tax system from their perspective.

A. Research Objectives

  1. To evaluate the impact of GST on the financial operations of women-owned businesses.
  2. To identify the challenges faced by women entrepreneurs in adapting to GST and propose potential policy improvements.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

A. Concept of GST

Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a unified indirect tax system that consolidates various existing taxes into a single tax on goods and services (OECD, 2022). It aims to streamline tax processes by replacing multiple indirect taxes such as sales tax, VAT, and excise duties, thereby reducing complexity and enhancing compliance (Cooper, 1997).
GST operates on the value-added principle, where tax is levied on the increase in value at each stage of production and distribution. This approach mitigates the cascading effect of taxation, where tax is levied on tax, and promotes transparency in tax calculations (Cowling, 2010). Key features include the input tax credit system, which allows businesses to offset the tax paid on inputs against the tax collected on outputs, reducing the final tax burden on consumers (Coy et al., 2011).
Compared to traditional sales tax systems, GST is designed to prevent tax cascading and improve efficiency by applying a single tax rate or harmonized rates across goods and services (Delmar, 1997). While VAT systems may share similarities, GST aims for a more uniform approach across regions and sectors (Dhahri, 2021). Despite its benefits, GST faces challenges such as implementation complexity and potential regressivity, affecting lower-income households disproportionately if not managed with compensatory measures (Dong, 2021).

B. Impact of GST on Businesses

The implementation of GST has significant implications for businesses, impacting their operations, compliance costs, and financial management. GST simplifies the tax structure by eliminating multiple indirect taxes and reducing administrative burdens (OECD, 2022). Businesses benefit from the ability to claim input tax credits, which helps manage cash flow and reduces the overall tax burden (Dunn, 2000).
Studies have shown that GST can lead to improved efficiency in tax administration and compliance. For example, a study by Ebrill et al. (2001) highlights that GST’s input tax credit mechanism reduces the effective tax rate on goods and services, fostering a more efficient tax system. Additionally, GST promotes fair competition by applying a uniform tax rate across all sectors, reducing tax-induced distortions in the market (Fafchamps, 2005).
However, businesses may also face challenges under GST, such as increased complexity in tax compliance and the need for system upgrades to handle GST transactions (Gimeno, 1997). Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), in particular, may encounter difficulties adapting to the new system due to limited resources and expertise (Field et al., 2010).

C. Women Entrepreneurs and Financial Independence

Women entrepreneurs often face unique challenges in achieving financial independence, including limited access to capital, market entry barriers, and regulatory hurdles (Gu, 2021). Financial independence for women entrepreneurs involves not only achieving profitability but also gaining control over financial resources and decision-making processes.
Research indicates that access to finance is a critical factor in the success of women-led businesses. Women entrepreneurs frequently encounter difficulties in securing funding due to biases in the financial sector and lack of collateral (Haley et al., 2021). Additionally, market barriers and unequal access to networks and resources further impede their financial independence (Hamilton, 2000).
Strategies to enhance financial independence for women entrepreneurs include providing targeted financial support, improving access to business networks, and offering mentorship programs. These interventions can help women overcome barriers and achieve greater control over their business operations and financial outcomes (Jennings., 2013).

D. GST and Women Entrepreneurs

The impact of GST on women entrepreneurs is multifaceted, encompassing both potential benefits and challenges. On the positive side, GST’s simplified tax structure and input tax credit system can reduce compliance costs and improve financial stability for women-led businesses (OECD, 2022). By streamlining tax processes, GST can alleviate some administrative burdens, allowing women entrepreneurs to focus more on their core business activities (Jonsson, 2017).
However, GST implementation can also present challenges for women entrepreneurs. Regulatory complexity and the need for compliance can be particularly burdensome for SMEs, which often include women-led businesses (Kala et al., 2010). Furthermore, the effectiveness of GST in promoting financial independence is influenced by the availability of support mechanisms and resources tailored to women entrepreneurs.
Comparative studies show that while GST can offer significant benefits, its impact varies depending on the effectiveness of its implementation and the support systems in place. For instance, in regions where women entrepreneurs receive targeted support and resources, GST can be a powerful tool for enhancing financial independence. Conversely, in environments where support is lacking, the challenges of GST compliance may outweigh its benefits (Karnani, 2007).

3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This study utilizes secondary data analysis to explore the role of GST in promoting financial independence among women entrepreneurs. The methodology involves reviewing and synthesizing existing literature, government reports, industry studies, and organizational data.
Data Sources:

4. IMPACT OF GST ON FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE FOR WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS

A. Simplification of Tax Processes

The implementation of GST aims to simplify tax processes by replacing multiple indirect taxes with a single, unified tax system. This has significant implications for women entrepreneurs, who often face greater challenges in navigating complex tax regulations due to limited resources and expertise (Keen, 2013).
GST consolidates various taxes such as VAT, sales tax, and service tax into a single framework, reducing the administrative burden associated with multiple tax filings (Ebrill et al., 2001). This simplification is particularly beneficial for women entrepreneurs running small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), as it minimizes the time and effort required for compliance (OECD, 2022).
A streamlined tax process can enhance financial independence by allowing women entrepreneurs to allocate more time and resources to their core business activities rather than tax compliance. This shift can lead to increased productivity and growth opportunities (Morrison, 2010). Additionally, the transparency and predictability of GST reduce the risk of unexpected tax liabilities, enabling better financial planning and stability (Australian Government, 2023).
However, the transition to GST also presents challenges, such as the need to understand new regulations and update accounting systems. For some women entrepreneurs, especially those with limited access to professional tax advice, the initial adaptation period can be challenging (Smith et al., 2020). Despite these hurdles, the long-term benefits of a simplified tax system outweigh the initial difficulties.

B. Access to Financial Incentives

One of the significant advantages of GST is the availability of input tax credits, which can improve cash flow and financial stability for businesses, including those led by women entrepreneurs. The input tax credit mechanism allows businesses to claim a credit for the GST paid on inputs, reducing the effective tax burden on final products and services (Ebrill et al., 2001).
For women entrepreneurs, access to input tax credits can lead to several financial benefits. First, it improves liquidity by allowing businesses to offset the GST paid on purchases against the GST collected on sales, thus reducing working capital requirements (Boadway & Keen, 2003). This is particularly important for SMEs, where cash flow management is critical for survival and growth (Brush et al., 2009).
Second, the ability to claim input tax credits can lower the cost of production, making goods and services more competitive in the market (Agha & Haughton, 1996). This competitiveness can open new market opportunities and drive business expansion, contributing to the financial independence of women entrepreneurs (World Bank, 2021).
However, the benefits of input tax credits depend on the efficiency of the GST refund process. Delays in refunds can negatively impact cash flow, especially for small businesses with limited financial reserves (Deloitte, 2021). Ensuring timely refunds and providing adequate support to women entrepreneurs in navigating the input tax credit system are essential for maximizing these benefits.

C. Operational Efficiency

GST can significantly enhance operational efficiency by creating a uniform tax structure across states and sectors, reducing tax-induced distortions and promoting a more efficient allocation of resources (OECD, 2022). For women entrepreneurs, this uniformity simplifies interstate transactions and reduces the compliance burden associated with different state tax laws (Keen & Smith, 2006).
Operational efficiency is further improved through the digitalization of tax processes under GST. The mandatory use of electronic filing and digital record-keeping reduces paperwork and enhances accuracy in tax reporting (Australian Government, 2023). For women entrepreneurs, especially those managing small businesses with limited staff, digitalization can save time and reduce errors, leading to better compliance and fewer disputes with tax authorities (Morrison, 2010).
Moreover, GST promotes transparency in business transactions, which can build trust with suppliers and customers. This transparency can be a competitive advantage for women entrepreneurs, helping them to establish credibility in the market (IFC, 2022). Enhanced operational efficiency, coupled with the simplified tax structure and access to financial incentives, can collectively support the financial independence of women entrepreneurs by fostering a conducive business environment (Smith et al., 2020).
However, the benefits of operational efficiency are contingent on the successful implementation and management of GST. Ensuring that women entrepreneurs have access to necessary resources, training, and support systems is crucial for leveraging the full potential of GST to enhance their financial independence (World Bank, 2021).

5. CHALLENGES FACED BY WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS UNDER GST

A. Regulatory Complexity

One of the primary challenges faced by women entrepreneurs under GST is the regulatory complexity associated with the tax system. While GST aims to simplify the tax structure by consolidating multiple indirect taxes, the transition to a new tax regime can be daunting, particularly for small businesses with limited resources (Keen & Smith, 2006). The need to understand and comply with new regulations, maintain accurate records, and file timely returns can impose significant administrative burdens on women entrepreneurs (Smith et al., 2020).
Studies have shown that regulatory complexity can disproportionately affect women entrepreneurs, who often juggle multiple responsibilities and may lack access to professional tax advisory services (Brush et al., 2009). For instance, the requirement to transition from old tax systems to GST, understand various tax rates, and comply with periodic filing requirements can be overwhelming for those without specialized knowledge or support (OECD, 2022).
The introduction of the GST e-way bill system, which mandates the electronic generation of movement documentation for goods, adds another layer of complexity. Compliance with e-way bill requirements necessitates digital literacy and infrastructure, which may not be readily available to all women entrepreneurs, particularly those in rural areas (Deloitte, 2021).

B. Unequal Access to Resources

Another significant challenge for women entrepreneurs under GST is unequal access to resources. Access to financial resources, technology, and professional networks is crucial for effective GST compliance and leveraging the benefits of the tax system. However, women entrepreneurs often face barriers in accessing these resources due to systemic gender biases and socio-economic constraints (World Bank, 2021).
For example, access to finance is a critical issue. Women entrepreneurs frequently encounter difficulties in securing loans and credit facilities, which are essential for managing cash flow and investing in necessary technological upgrades for GST compliance (Robb & Coleman, 2010). The lack of collateral and perceived higher risk associated with women-led businesses further exacerbates this issue (Carter et al., 2015).
Furthermore, technology plays a vital role in GST compliance, from maintaining digital records to filing returns online. Women entrepreneurs, particularly those in smaller towns and rural areas, may face challenges in accessing reliable internet services and affordable technological solutions (IFC, 2022). This digital divide can hinder their ability to comply with GST regulations efficiently and benefit from input tax credits (Smith et al., 2020).
Professional networks and advisory services are equally important for navigating the complexities of GST. Women entrepreneurs often lack access to these networks, which can provide valuable support and guidance in tax compliance and business management (Brush et al., 2009). The absence of mentorship and peer support can further isolate women entrepreneurs and limit their ability to effectively manage GST-related challenges (World Bank, 2021).

C. Implementation Issues

The implementation of GST has been accompanied by various challenges that affect all businesses, but women entrepreneurs face unique obstacles. The initial phase of GST implementation saw frequent changes in tax rates, compliance requirements, and filing deadlines, creating uncertainty and confusion among taxpayers (Keen, 2013). For women entrepreneurs, who may already be managing limited resources, adapting to these changes can be particularly difficult.
The complexity of GST compliance processes, such as the reconciliation of input tax credits, filing of multiple returns, and adherence to anti-profiteering regulations, requires significant time and effort. Small businesses, including many women-led enterprises, may not have dedicated teams to handle these tasks, leading to increased stress and potential non-compliance (Smith et al., 2020).
Additionally, delays in GST refunds have been a persistent issue, affecting the cash flow of businesses. Women entrepreneurs, who often operate with tighter margins and less financial cushion, are disproportionately impacted by these delays (Deloitte, 2021). Timely refunds are crucial for maintaining liquidity and ensuring smooth business operations.
The uneven implementation of GST across different states and sectors also poses challenges. Variations in compliance requirements and enforcement can create disparities and increase the burden on women entrepreneurs who operate in multiple states or deal with interstate transactions (Keen & Smith, 2006). These inconsistencies can lead to confusion and additional administrative work, further straining limited resources (OECD, 2022).
6. CONCLUSION
The introduction of GST has had a mixed impact on the financial independence of women entrepreneurs. On the positive side, GST has streamlined tax compliance, reduced the cascading effect of multiple taxes, and improved market access through a unified tax system. These changes have contributed to better financial management and enhanced business growth opportunities for women entrepreneurs.
However, the transition to GST has not been without challenges. Women entrepreneurs have faced difficulties in understanding and adhering to the new tax regime, including issues related to complex filing procedures and initial compliance costs. Despite the government’s efforts to facilitate smooth implementation, these challenges continue to affect the financial stability and independence of women-led businesses.
To support women entrepreneurs more effectively, policymakers should consider simplifying GST compliance processes, providing targeted training and resources, and offering financial incentives to ease the transition. By addressing these issues, the government can enhance the positive impacts of GST and further promote financial independence among women entrepreneurs.

REFERENCES

  1. Coleman S. (2007). The role of human and financial capital in the profitability and growth of women-owned small firms. J. Small Bus. Manag. 45, 303–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2007.00214.x
  2. Colombier N., Masclet D. (2008). Intergenerational correlation in self employment: some further evidence from French ECHP data. Small Bus. Econ. 30, 423–437. doi: 10.1007/s11187-007-9059-9
  3. Cooper A., Ramachandran M., Schoorman D. (1997). Time allocation patterns of craftsmen and administrative entrepreneurs: implications for financial performance. Entrep. Theory Pract. 22, 123–136. doi: 10.1177/104225879802200209
  4. Cowling M., Taylor M. (2001). Entrepreneurial women and men: two different species? Small Bus. Econ. 16, 167–175. doi: 10.1023/A:1011195516912
  5. Coy S. P., Margaret F. S., Khursheed O., Rao N. A. K. (2011). Factors contributory to success: a study of Pakistan’s small business owners. J. Dev. Entrep. 12, 181–198. doi: 10.1142/s1084946707000617
  6. Delmar F., Gunnsson J.. (1997). Predicting Group Membership among Entrepreneurship, Nascent Entrepreneurs and Non –Entrepreneurs Using Psychological Data and Network Activities, IAREP Conference (Valencia, Spain: Promolibro; ).
  7. Dhahri S., Slimani S., Omri A. (2021). Behavioral entrepreneurship for achieving the sustainable development goals. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 165:120561. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120561, PMID:
  8. Dong J., Xu W., Cha J. (2021). Rural entrepreneurship and job creation: the hybrid identity of village-cadre-entrepreneurs. China Econ. Rev. 70:101704. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101704
  9. Dunn T., Holtz-Eakin D. (2000). Financial capital, human capital and the transition to selfemployment: evidence from intergenerational links. J. Labor Econ. 18, 282–305. doi: 10.1086/209959
  10. Fafchamps M., Quisumbing A. (2005). Assets at marriage in rural Ethiopia. J. Dev. Econ. 77, 1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.02.003
  11. Field E., Jayachandran S., Pande R. (2010). Do traditional institutions constrain female entrepreneurship? A field experiment on business training in India. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 125–129. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.2.125
  12. Fu Q., Abbas J. (2021). Reset the industry redux through corporate social responsibility: The COVID-19 tourism impact on hospitality firms through business model innovation. Front. Psychol. 12:6686.
  13. Gimeno J., Folta T. B., Cooper A. C., Woo C. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 42, 750–783. doi: 10.2307/2393656
  14. Gu R., and Nie, F.-y. (2021). Does empowering women benefit poverty reduction? Evidence from a multi-component program in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China. J. Integr. Agric. 20, 1092-1106. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63436-0
  15. Haley C., Marsh R. (2021). Income generation and empowerment pathways for rural women of Jagusi Parish, Uganda: A double-sided sword. Soc, Sci. Humanities Open 4:100225. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100225
  16. Hamilton B. H. (2000). Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. J. Polit. Econ. 108, 604–631. doi: 10.1086/262131
  17. Hashemi S. M., Schuler S. R., Riler A. P. (1996). Rural credit programs and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. World Dev. 24, 635–653. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00159-A
  18. Helms M. (1997). Women and entrepreneurship: the appealing alternative. Bus. Perspect. 10, 16–19.
  19. Hisrich R. D., Reters M. P. (2004). Entrepreneurship. 5th Edn. (Boston: McGraw-Hill; ).
  20. Hussain T., Abbas J., Wei Z., Ahmad S., Xuehao B., Gaoli Z. (2021). Impact of Urban Village Disamenity on neighboring residential properties: empirical evidence from Nanjing through hedonic pricing model appraisal. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 147:4020055. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000645
  21. Jennings J. E., Brush C. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? Acad. Manag. Ann. 7, 663–715. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2013.782190
  22. Jonsson P. (2017). On the term “entrepreneur” and the conceptualization of entrepreneurship in the literature of classical economics. Inter. J. Eng. Ling. 7, 8716–8703. doi: 10.5539/ijel.v7n6p16
  23. Kala S. S., Guanghua W. (2010). Firm location choice in cities: evidence from China, India, and Brazil. China Econ. Rev. 21, 113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2009.11.003
  24. Karnani A. (2007). The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: how the private sector can help alleviate poverty. Calif. Manag. Rev. 49, 90–111. doi: 10.2307/41166407