Corporate Governance in the Indian
Banking Sector: An Empirical and Conceptual Analysis at the Aggregate Sector Level
Dr. Prashant Kumar1*,
Dr. Bejender Kumar Agarwal2
1 Assistant
Professor, Christ Church College, Kanpur, U.P., India
economicsdeep1766@gmail.
2 Assistant
Professor, Christ Church College, Kanpur, U.P., India
Keywords: Corporate Governance; Indian Banking Sector;
Public Sector Banks; RBI Regulations; Non-Performing Assets;
Financial Performance; Transparency; Governance Reforms.
Corporate governance represents the framework through which organizations are directed and controlled,
balancing the interests of stakeholders including shareholders, management,
customers, regulators, and society. In India, the corporate governance landscape
of the banking industry has transformed significantly since the liberalization reforms of the early 1990s.
The Reserve Bank of India
(RBI), SEBI, and the Ministry of Finance have strengthened governance standards
through guidelines, fit-and-proper norms, and the introduction
of the Banking Codes and Standards Board of India (BCSBI). The Indian banking
sector, particularly public
sector banks (PSBs),
plays a vital role
in supporting economic growth and financial inclusion. However, recurring governance
lapses and the high incidence of non-performing assets (NPAs) in the early 2010s prompted major
reforms. The P. J. Nayak Committee (2014) recommended depoliticizing bank
boards and enhancing autonomy to strengthen corporate governance. This paper integrates both conceptual and empirical analyses to assess how
governance practices have evolved at the aggregate sector level and how they correlate with financial outcomes between FY 2019–20 and FY
2023–24.
Global research
(Macey & O’Hara,
2003; Caprio et al., 2007;
Adams & Mehran, 2012) highlights that sound
corporate governance in banks reduces systemic risk and promotes
accountability. In India, the Narasimha Committee (1998) and the Nayak
Committee (2014) were pivotal in redefining governance architecture. Ghosh
(2020) observed that enhanced disclosure and independent audit mechanisms significantly improved profitability and stability. Kumar & Sharma
(2022) confirmed that robust governance structures improved efficiency among Indian PSBs. However,
there remains limited literature on sector-level governance performance after 2020, especially post- COVID-19, when banking operations faced stress yet showed
remarkable resilience. This paper addresses this research gap by combining conceptual
understanding and empirical sector-level analysis based
on recent data (2019–
2024).
The
study is descriptive and empirical in nature, relying on secondary data sourced from the RBI’s
Financial Stability Reports
(2019–2024), Public Sector Banks’ Annual Reports, and the
Department of Financial Services (DFS). The analysis covers aggregate sector-level indicators, including: - Net Profit ( - Gross Non-Performing Asset (NPA) Ratio (%) - Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio (CRAR,
%) - Provision Coverage Ratio (%) The study employs trend analysis
and ratio comparison methods to explore the relationship between governance
reforms and financial performance.
Empirical data reveal that PSBs’ net profits grew from 31,820
crore in FY 2019–
20 to 1.41 lakh crore
in FY 2023–24. The Gross NPA ratio
declined sharply from 8.96% to 3.12%, reflecting improved
asset quality. The CRAR improved from 13.0% to 14.83%,
while the Provision Coverage Ratio rose to 93.87%.
These improvements align with governance reforms introduced during
this period — such as strengthened board oversight,
the implementation of risk-based supervision,
and enhanced transparency under RBI’s revised
governance framework (2022).
This evidence demonstrates that governance reforms
have played a critical
role in improving financial soundness and public trust in PSBs.
Corporate governance reforms have effectively improved operational discipline, accountability, and regulatory compliance. Yet, challenges remain, such as limited independence of government-appointed board members and dual regulation between the Ministry
of Finance and RBI. The post-2020 digitalization drive and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives are expected
to redefine governance mechanisms further, making
banks more resilient and
socially responsible. There is also a need for continuous director training to
strengthen ethical and strategic oversight.
Corporate governance reforms have substantially enhanced the resilience and profitability of India’s public sector banks. The empirical findings confirm that
governance quality and financial performance are positively correlated at the
aggregate sector level. Policy recommendations include: 1. Establishing a National Institute of Banking Governance for leadership training.
2. Increasing board
independence and representation of professionals. 3. Integrating ESG principles
into governance frameworks. 4. Strengthening accountability through digital
audit trails. These measures will align Indian banking governance practices with international standards and ensure long- term sectoral sustainability.
1.
Adams, R., &
Mehran, H. (2012).
Bank board structure
and performance: Evidence for
large bank holding companies. Journal of Financial
2.
Intermediation, 21(2), 243–267. Balasubramanian, N. (2017). Corporate governance and stewardship in
India. Oxford University Press.
3.
Caprio,
G., Laeven, L., & Levine,
R. (2007). Governance and bank valuation.
Journal of Financial
Intermediation, 16(4), 584–617.
4.
Ghosh,
S. (2020). Corporate
governance reforms and performance of Indian
banks Economic and Political Weekly,
55(32), 45–53.
5.
Kumar, R., & Sharma, P. (2022).
Corporate governance mechanisms and banking efficiency: Evidence
from India. Asian Economic Review,
64(2), 201– 225.
6.
Macey, J. R., & O’Hara,
M. (2003). The corporate governance of banks. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy
Review, 9(1), 91–107.
7.
OECD. (2023). Principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing. Reserve Bank of India. (2019–2024).
Financial Stability Reports. RBI, Mumbai