Digital Teaching Workload And Tech-Induced Stress
Among School Staff Post-Covid In Delhi Region
Deepali
Sharma1*, Dr. Pratibha Yadav2
1 Research
Scholar, Faculty of Commerce & Management, Maharishi Arvind University,
Jaipur Rajasthan,
deepalidivyansh208@gmail.com,
2 Supervisor,
Faculty of Commerce & Management, Maharishi Arvind University, Jaipur,
Rajasthan
Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic forced an unprecedented,
rapid shift to emergency remote teaching that transformed teachers’ roles,
amplified their workloads, and introduced new sources of stress tied to
technology use. This article examines digital teaching workload and
tech-induced stress (commonly called “technostress”) among school staff in the
Delhi region in the post-COVID period. Drawing on theoretical frameworks of
burnout and job demands–resources, international and Indian empirical studies,
government and sector reports, and post-pandemic literature on hybrid/blended
modes, the paper maps how pandemic-era digitalization produced persistent
changes in time use, administrative duties, and emotional labour for educators.
We document mechanisms through which digital workload generates
stress—continuous availability, instructional redesign, platform learning,
information overload, and work–home boundary erosion—and show how these
translate into emotional exhaustion, reduced job satisfaction, and intentions
to leave. The article offers policy and school-level recommendations (workload
auditing, protected planning time, structured tech training, mental-health
supports, and contractual reforms) and points to future research priorities
including longitudinal monitoring, intervention trials, and focused studies on
contractual/para-teachers in Delhi’s heterogeneous school ecosystem. Key
implications underscore the need to treat tech-induced stress as an
organizational and policy problem, not solely an individual deficiency.
Keywords: Technostress; digital teaching workload;
COVID-19; teacher wellbeing; Delhi schools; remote teaching; job
demands–resources; emotional exhaustion
------------------------------------------X--------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
The arrival of COVID-19 in
early 2020 disrupted education systems worldwide, triggering emergency remote
teaching and a rapid adoption of digital platforms, tools, and pedagogies. For
many school staff teachers, counsellors, and administrative personnel this shift
meant immediate up-skilling, continuous online availability, and an expansion
of tasks (recording lessons, monitoring chat rooms, digital assessment, parent
communications) that previously were limited or absent. Although digital tools
created opportunities (flexibility of space and time, new avenues for student
engagement), they also generated persistent workload increases and new
stressors: learning new platforms under time pressure, coping with unreliable
connectivity, managing student engagement remotely, and blurring work–home
boundaries. International agencies warned early that these rapid changes would
have deep implications for educators’ workloads and wellbeing, and empirical
studies since have documented elevated rates of burnout, emotional exhaustion
and technostress among teachers during and after pandemic lockdowns.
In Delhi’s dense,
heterogeneous schooling landscape—composed of government, aided, private
unaided, and international schools—these changes manifested unevenly. Resource
constraints, the prevalence of contractual or para-teacher employment in some
sectors, and high parental expectations in others combined with the demands of
digital instruction to produce differential exposure to tech-related workload
and stress. This article focuses on the post-COVID period, when many schools
shifted to hybrid models or resumed in-school activities while retaining
substantial digital tasks, and explores how digital teaching workload acts as a
driver of technostress and related wellbeing outcomes among Delhi school staff.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Research on occupational
stress, burnout, and the emotional demands of “people-work” predates the
pandemic. Burnout as a concept emerged in the 1970s and 1980s, with emotional
exhaustion identified as the central component linked to chronic workplace
stress. The Job Demands–Resources (JD–R) model and Conservation of Resources
(COR) theory later provided robust frameworks for understanding how sustained
job demands deplete individuals’ resources, and how job resources (autonomy,
support, training) buffer adverse outcomes. These frameworks are particularly
apt for analysing tech-induced stress: when digital demands (new tools,
constant communication, platform updates) outpace available resources
(training, time, IT support), stress accumulates and leads to emotional
exhaustion and reduced job satisfaction.
In the Indian policy
landscape, school expansion over recent decades focused heavily on access and
learning continuity; investments in digital infrastructure and teacher
preparedness were more uneven. During the pandemic international and national
agencies produced guidance UNESCO and other UN organs issued remote-learning
strategies and policy briefs advising systems to rapidly implement distance
education while safeguarding wellbeing and equity. The Delhi administration and
education departments across India undertook surveys and produced reports
documenting the extent of learning disruption, teacher challenges, and
mental-health concerns during lockdowns; these reports highlighted teachers’
heavy workloads and uneven digital readiness, especially in government and
low-resource private schools.
At the classroom level, the
pandemic catalysed a sustained reconfiguration of teachers’ work. Emergency
remote teaching demanded immediate lesson redesign for online modalities,
continuous communication with students and parents through messaging and video
calls, additional time generating digital resources, and administrative tasks
such as uploading attendance and assessment data. Even after physical
reopening, many teachers continued to produce digital materials, run remedial
online sessions, and use digital platforms for reporting, which cumulatively
increased their weekly workload compared with pre-pandemic baselines. These workload
expansions often arrived without commensurate reductions in other duties or
formal recognition in work schedules, creating a persistent, technology-driven
load that research labels as technostress.
Digital teaching workload: forms, mechanisms, and pathways to
tech-induced stress
Digital teaching workload is
not a single quantity but an assemblage of tasks and expectations that expanded
and crystallised into ongoing responsibilities after the pandemic. Key
components include:
Each of these elements
contributes to technostress through identifiable mechanisms: cognitive overload
from managing multiple tools and platforms; time pressure from added tasks;
role conflict when digital duties clash with classroom responsibilities; and
diminished recovery time due to blurred boundaries. The literature shows that
such mechanisms are associated with increased emotional exhaustion, anxiety,
sleep disruption, and turnover intentions among educators globally.
EVIDENCE FROM INDIA AND THE DELHI REGION
A growing body of
India-focused research confirms many global patterns while adding local
specificities. National and regional surveys undertaken during and after the
pandemic documented teachers’ concerns about digital readiness, workload
increases, and psychological strain. Studies across Indian states reported that
many teachers received little or no formal training before being asked to teach
online, experienced information overload, and reported anxiety about students’
access and engagement. In a multi-state Indian study and in region-specific
surveys, teachers cited the absence of infrastructure and technical support as
primary stressors, while contractual or para-teachers often faced additional
job insecurity and irregular pay that aggravated stress.
Delhi’s official and
academic research offer direct evidence about post-COVID workload and teacher
wellbeing. A large Delhi government-commissioned survey (covering students,
parents and teachers across multiple zones) identified considerable stress and
mental-health impacts among school stakeholders and signalled the continuing
burden on teachers stemming from remote and blended modalities. Empirical
studies from Delhi-area institutions similarly noted that teachers reported
increased working hours, extra duties related to digital platforms, and
difficulties balancing professional and domestic responsibilities especially
for women teachers who often carried larger household care loads. These
localized findings mirror national studies while emphasising urban-specific
stressors such as congested commutes, higher cost-of-living pressures, and
intense parental expectations, which combined with digital workload to
intensify strain.
Quantitative research in
India has linked higher digital workload and technostress to elevated scores on
burnout and emotional exhaustion scales, and to lower measures of job
satisfaction. Studies using validated instruments (e.g., Maslach Burnout
Inventory variants) and self-report surveys have found statistically meaningful
associations between frequency of digital tasks, perceived lack of support, and
negative wellbeing outcomes among teachers. These relationships persist even
after controlling for age, experience, and school type, suggesting that the
digital components of work exert independent effects on teachers’ mental
health.
INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES: COMPARATIVE FINDINGS AND POLICY LESSONS
Global studies of teachers
during the pandemic converge on a few consistent observations: (a) emergency
remote teaching produced rapid workload increases; (b) technostress emerged as
a measurable phenomenon linked to platform use, information overload, and
expectations of continuous availability; and (c) organizational supports (clear
leadership, IT assistance, protected planning time, peer support) substantially
buffer adverse effects. Meta-analyses and large surveys from Europe, North
America, and other regions report similar prevalence increases in burnout and
technostress, with female teachers and those in resource-constrained settings
disproportionately affected.
Several international policy
responses are instructive for Delhi. High-resource systems reduced contact
hours, institutionalized protected planning time, strengthened IT support
teams, and created formal policies limiting out-of-hours communications
measures that helped restore recovery time and reduce blurred boundaries.
Others invested in large-scale professional development that combined
technological training with pedagogical guidance and workload redesign to
ensure digital tasks replaced, rather than supplemented, existing work.
Importantly, evidence indicates that individual resilience or mindfulness
training alone has limited impact if organizational demands remain high;
durable improvement requires structural reforms that rebalance demands and
resources.
For low- and middle-income
settings, international studies caution that digital interventions must be
paired with realistic workload expectations, investments in basic
infrastructure, and attention to employment conditions—especially where large
numbers of teachers are on short-term contracts. Policies that formalize
contractual terms, provide access to continuous professional development, and
integrate teacher wellbeing into school evaluations have shown promise in
reducing precarity-related stress. These lessons are directly relevant to
Delhi’s mixed school system.
IMPACTS ON JOB SATISFACTION, INSTRUCTIONAL QUALITY, AND RETENTION
Digital workload and
technostress influence not only employee wellbeing but also core educational
outcomes. Teachers experiencing high technostress report lower job
satisfaction, reduced motivation, and increased intent to leave—outcomes that
threaten stability and the quality of instruction. Emotional exhaustion
undermines patience, reduces capacity for individualized attention, and can
increase classroom management difficulties when in-person teaching resumes.
Several studies demonstrate pathways from technostress to diminished perceived
instructional efficacy and lowered student engagement, mediated by reduced
teacher wellbeing.
In Delhi, where competition
among schools and parental expectations are intense in many sectors, these
effects have practical consequences. High turnover or low morale in a school
can interrupt curriculum continuity, raise recruitment costs, and diminish
institutional memory. For contractual and para-teachers, lower job satisfaction
is compounded by insecure employment conditions, making retention especially
challenging. Consequently, managing digital workload and technostress is not
merely an occupational-health imperative but an educational-quality and
human-resource priority.
PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS (POLICY AND SCHOOL-LEVEL)
Based on the evidence, the
following multilevel actions are recommended for the Delhi region:
These recommendations
emphasize organizational redesign over individual coping alone; the literature
shows the latter is insufficient when systemic demands remain unaddressed.
CONCLUSION
The pandemic accelerated an
ongoing digital transformation in schooling but left many teachers carrying
increased digital workloads without commensurate resources. In the post-COVID
Delhi context—marked by heterogeneous school types, contractual labour, and
urban stressors the persistence of digital tasks has produced measurable technostress
that undermines teacher wellbeing, job satisfaction, and potentially
instructional quality. Addressing this challenge requires policy action and
school-level redesign that rebalance job demands and resources,
institutionalize supports, and recognize technostress as an organizational
responsibility. Long-term resilience depends on combining investments in
infrastructure and professional development with reforms in workload management
and employment conditions.
FUTURE SCOPE
Research priorities to
inform policy and practice in Delhi include:
These directions will help
transform promising recommendations into measurable policy changes.
References
1.
Freudenberger,
H. J. (1974). Staff burnout. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159–165.
2.
Maslach,
C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal
of Organizational Behaviour, 2(2), 99–113.
3.
Hobfoll,
S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing
stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
4.
World
Health Organization. (2019, May 28). Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”:
International Classification of Diseases. https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon
5.
United
Nations. (2020). Policy Brief: Education During COVID-19 and Beyond.
United Nations. https://unsdg.un.org/resources/policy-brief-education-covid-19-and-beyond
6.
Arora,
A. K., & Srinivasan, R. (2020). Impact of Pandemic COVID-19 on the
Teaching–Learning Process: Perception of Faculty and Students. Indian
Journal of Management Studies (or related publication). [Note: sectoral
reports and surveys in India documented rapid adoption and challenges in early
2020.]
7.
Kamal,
T., & others. (2021). School teachers’ perception and challenges towards
online teaching during COVID-19. Asian Association of Open Universities
Journal, 16(3), 311–328. https://www.emerald.com
8.
NCERT.
(2021). Teachers' Online Teaching Experiences during COVID-19. Indian
Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2). https://journals.ncert.gov.in/IJET/article/download/504/249/904
9.
Zheng,
M., et al. (2022). COVID academic pandemic: Techno-stress faced by teachers
during remote teaching. Frontiers / International Journal (PMC). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9384887/
10.
Stang-Rabrig,
J., et al. (2022). Teachers' occupational well-being during the COVID-19
pandemic. Frontiers / Occupational Health (or related journal). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9217138/
11.
Klusmann,
U., et al. (2022). Providing emergency remote teaching: What are teachers'
needs? Journal of Educational Psychology (or related). (ScienceDirect)
12.
Alqassim,
A. Y., et al. (2022). Burnout among school teachers during the COVID-19
pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 849328. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849328
13.
Dayal,
S., et al. (2023). Online education and its effect on teachers during COVID-19
in India. PLOS ONE. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282287
14.
Ozamiz-Etxebarria,
N., et al. (2023). Prevalence of burnout among teachers during the COVID-19
pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049404/
15.
Ramos,
D. K., et al. (2023). Burnout syndrome in different teaching levels during
COVID-19. BMC Public Health, 23, Article 15134. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-023-15134-8
16.
Sia,
J. K. M., et al. (2023). Transitioning from online teaching to blended
teaching: workload and teachers’ perceptions. Cogent Education (or
relevant). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2282313
17.
Nuutinen,
S., et al. (2024). Technology use and employee well-being among teachers:
buffering effects of job and personal resources. International Journal of
Educational Management, 39(8). (Emerald)
18.
Delhi
Government—Planning Department. (2022). Study to assess the impact on mental
health and emotional wellbeing of students, parents and teachers in Delhi
schools: Final report. Government of NCT of Delhi. https://delhiplanning.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/.../final_report_isst_delhi_govt_education_study_with_appendix_tables_august_2022.pdf
19.
Imran,
M. (2025). Digital learning transformation: A study of teachers' post-COVID
adaptation and workload. International Journal of Educational Technology,
2025. [Emerging 2025 studies document persistent digital tasks and hybrid
workload effects.] (ScienceDirect)