Examining the effects of different strategies on the language acquisition results of students in english classes

Akhiles M¹*, Dr. Tulika Anand²

1 Research Scholar, Sunrise University, Alwar, Rajasthan, India

akhiles000@gmail.com

2 Assistant Professor, Department of English, Sunrise University, Alwar, Rajasthan, India

Abstract: Immersive, task-based, and reflective pedagogies are the subjects of this research article, which delves deeply into the field of English language teaching strategies. The overarching goal of language teaching is to improve students' ability to acquire new languages, and each of these approaches takes a somewhat different approach. This research adds significantly to the continuing academic discussion on the best ways to teach languages by carefully analysing the efficacy of each strategy in promoting language learning outcomes. The study sheds light on the unique benefits and possible drawbacks of each of these pedagogical approaches by conducting a thorough literature review and analysis coupled with practical data. Aiming to mimic the processes of natural language learning, immersive education involves immersing learners in the target language in context. On the other side, task-based learning promotes real-world language abilities by having students complete meaningful activities that include language usage. To add a crucial element, reflective teaching encourages instructors and students to reflect on their actions, methods, and results in order to refine and enhance the learning process over time. Educators may get useful insights on how to optimise language teaching to satisfy the varying demands of learners via the paper's detailed explanation of these distinct methods. Improving the efficacy of language learning programs as a whole is possible via the careful selection and adaptation of pedagogical approaches to meet the needs of individual students and course materials. Educators benefit from this thorough research because it helps them make educated judgements about their teaching techniques and it helps create language learning and teaching settings that are more dynamic, responsive, and successful.

Keywords: Students, Educators, Learning, Language, Programs.

INTRODUCTION

Learning a new language calls for a wide range of fundamental abilities and strategies. In order to succeed academically, students need to have a firm grasp of a wide range of personal, cultural, social, and linguistic capabilities, as well as know how to overcome obstacles that may arise. [1, 2] Students may improve their classroom performance and drive themselves to greater levels of proficiency in the target language via the consistent use of learning tactics. [3] The notion of learning strategies and the identification of tactics that aid learners in becoming more successful language learners have been the subject of an enormous amount of study since the mid-1970s. Even now, there is a lot of study and controversy around this topic. [4] They created the taxonomy of LLS that is most famous and utilised. The four primary categories of strategies that she recently reevaluated for her S2R Model—cognitive, affective, motivational, and social—are guided by the master category of "meta-strategies." [5] The model is based on the sociocultural theory of SRL and Zimmerman's three-phase mode. Metacognitive, meta-affective, metamotivational, and metasocial methods are the ones under question. [6]

SILL a measuring instrument for studying LLS usage, was also created by Oxford and is used globally; nevertheless, it is based on her original idea.[7] However, connecting the dots between language classroom practice and current educational ideas is crucial. Since the turn of the century, the notion of self-regulation—which formed the foundation of Oxford's new taxonomy—has been the prevailing paradigm. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to create cutting-edge assessment instruments that language instructors may use in the classroom. Based on Oxford's S2R Model, we have already created and verified a questionnaire. [8]

LITERATURE REVIEW

Oxford (2012) [9] In order to (a) complete language tasks, (b) improve language performance or use, and/or (c) enhance long-term proficiency, second language learners employ strategies, which are complex, dynamic thoughts and actions, that they intentionally choose and use in specific contexts to regulate multiple aspects of themselves, including cognitive, emotional, and social aspects. Strategies are mostly led by thoughts, but they may also take on tangible forms that can be seen by others. Learners often utilise methods in a variety of ways, including clusters and chains, and coordinate their usage to fulfil their own learning requirements. You may learn new strategies. The tactics that learners use are determined by their specific situations. Various individual and environmental variables determine the appropriateness of approaches.

Thomas et al. (2021) [10] Learners of strategic languages choose their LLS based on their own interests, goals, and current context. As a result, finding a framework for these tactics is very challenging. For these and other reasons, a plethora of ideas and arguments have emerged. According to the study of strategies has shifted its focus from traditional classrooms to students' own agency as a result of the growing importance of self-regulation. They worry that this tendency is harmful since LLS definitions downplay the importance of classroom setting and instructors' roles, both of which might impact students' strategic behaviour.

Thomas and Rose (2023) [11] in order to clarify that self-regulation may be conceptually detached when defining LLS, have proposed LLS as an independent term and developed the Regulated Language Learning Strategies Continuum. Opening up yet another contentious topic in the field, the argument that strategy usage cannot be classified as either emotional, cognitive, or behavioural is based on the interpretation of LLS as being both other- and self-regulated.

Vygotsky's (2022) [12] another important point of contention is how LLS should be categorised. Recent work based on theories of self-regulation has rethought and reorganised Oxford's initial categorisation of six main fields: memory, cognitive, emotional, metacognitive, compensatory, and social strategies. Her S2R Model is rooted on sociocultural theory of SRL, which she created from the ground up. Cognitive, emotional, motivational, and social strategies were the four primary areas she outlined in her theory, with a "master category of meta-strategies" guiding each. Metacognitive, meta-affective, metamotivational, and metasocial tactics are these kind of meta-strategies. Some theorists claimed that the frequency of method usage alone cannot be used to evaluate progress in language acquisition, which led to a variety of controversies around her taxonomy.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The efficacy of several English Language Teaching (ELT) strategies on student learning was investigated in this qualitative study. This classroom-based research aimed to examine the effects of various pedagogical approaches on both students and teachers. Interviews, classroom observations, and content analysis of course materials were used to gather data. To guarantee relevance and insight into the teaching-learning process, the participants were recruited by purposive sampling and comprised English language instructors and students from a specified educational institution. The purpose of the observations was to record students' reactions and teachers' practices in real time, while the interviews delved further into students' opinions and preferences about the methods of education. Methods like the Grammar-Translation Method, the Direct Method, the Audio-Lingual Method, and Communicative Language Teaching were the focus of the study, which aimed to comprehend their practical applications. The obtained data was subjected to thematic analysis in order to uncover commonalities, differences, and achievements in each method. At all times, the research adhered to ethical standards, guaranteeing participant anonymity and obtaining their informed permission.

RESULTS

Comprehensive Education

The core idea of the immersive teaching strategy is to immerse students in a language-rich environment, which solidifies its position as a crucial method in language education. This approach creates an immersive environment where students are constantly exposed to the language via the exclusive use of English in all aspects of instruction. English becomes more than a textbook topic in such a classroom since the learner is immersed in a dynamic medium of communication at all times. This constant exposure to language serves as an effective accelerator, hastening the development of linguistic competence and encouraging an ingrained relationship with the target language. It pushes students to start thinking and expressing themselves in English rather than just absorbing the language's lexicon and grammar. In order to become fluent and confident in English conversation, it is essential to go from passive learning to active use. Immersive learning builds linguistic competency and cultural literacy by keeping students constantly exposed to a language in its natural environment, which greatly improves their comprehension, pronunciation, and critical thinking skills in English.

It is clear from the case studies that immersive training is successful. One study found that students' hearing and speaking abilities improved more than in a typical classroom setting after participating in an intensive English program for a year at a language institute. Students improved their understanding and fluency as a result of being forced to interpret meaning from context in the immersive environment.

Cultural sensitivity is another common component of immersive training. International students who took part in English immersion programs at universities improved their language abilities and were more sensitive to cultural subtleties. They gained a broader awareness of global viewpoints via exposure to varied language situations, which is very beneficial in today's interconnected world. Participants in an intensive summer camp reported higher levels of confidence when using English in contexts outside of the classroom. Their self-assurance grew as a result of their regular use of the language in authentic contexts.
Essentially, both educational theory and practical results lend credence to the immersive training style. Its ability to improve hearing, speaking, fluency, and cultural understanding is evidence of its revolutionary potential in language acquisition.

Learning Based on Tasks

As a method of instruction, TBL places an emphasis on students applying what they've learnt in language classes to real-world situations by means of projects and activities. The idea behind this method is that one may improve their language skills and overall cognitive development by actively participating in exercises that have a clear goal. There are many convincing case studies that show how TBL may change language teaching.

The job of organising a make-believe vacation was assigned to a group of intermediate-level English language learners in one case study. Students used their newly acquired terminology and had meaningful conversations on topics such as destination choices, budgeting, and itinerary planning in a group setting. By guiding them through real-world decision-making, this effort not only improved their language abilities but also fostered their capacity for critical thinking and problem-solving.

There was also a case of a high school English class that embarked on a video exchange initiative with a foreign school. As part of the course, students had to create, shoot, and edit movies that highlighted their culture and everyday life. Participants in this immersive activity demonstrated a remarkable capacity for fully grasping cultural and linguistic subtleties. Interpersonal competence, flexibility, and empathy were all nurtured by the collaborative spirit of the project. Also, a research indicated that task-based language learning greatly improved the willingness of college students to speak English in a conversation. Students improved their comfort level with using the target language in authentic contexts by acting out situations similar to job interviews or business negotiations.

Gathered together, these case studies demonstrate how Task-Based Learning (TBL) may break free from the limitations of traditional language programs. Language learning becomes more relevant and interesting with TBL because it moves the emphasis from memorisation to active application by incorporating language usage into real-life events. A shift in emphasis from studying language as an abstract concept to using it as a tool for interaction is the result of this methodological shift, which prioritises problem-solving, cooperation, and authentic communication.

Students gain a wide range of abilities, not limited to only language proficiency, thanks to TBL's practical focus. The globalised economy places a premium on students' ability to think critically, collaborate effectively, and communicate effectively; these skills are honed via activities that simulate real-world issues. By incorporating task-based learning into their lessons, more and more teachers are helping their students become more fluent in a target language while also equipping them with transferable skills that will serve them well in any career path. On top of that, TBL projects promote a learner-centred approach, which means that students are the ones who ultimately decide how they will learn and what they will study. Success in learning a new language depends on the learner's level of engagement and autonomy, both of which are enhanced when they feel empowered. Incorporating the dynamic and practical aspects of TBL allows educators to provide their students with the necessary skills to succeed in both language acquisition and global citizenship. This equips them to face the opportunities and difficulties that come with our interconnected world with confidence and competence.

Teaching with Reflection

The pedagogical strategy known as "reflective teaching" encourages teachers to reflect on their own pedagogical practices, evaluate how well they are working with students, and make adjustments based on student comments and their own self-reflection. Reflective teaching promotes a flexible and adaptable learning environment that puts students' needs and achievement first by enabling this continuous cycle of self-evaluation.

An illuminating example of the impact of reflective teaching is a language teacher who made self-reflection an integral part of her lesson plans. After each lesson, this teacher reflected on the atmosphere, the materials, and her tactics. She gradually adjusted her classes to meet the requirements of her students by observing their learning styles and responding to their comments. As students' concerns were acknowledged, their level of participation increased, which in turn boosted their motivation and overall confidence in their language skills. In addition, a cross-institutional research proved that reflective teaching may adapt to various students' preferred methods of learning. There was a change towards more participatory and learner-centred methods when one language department promoted teachers to participate in self-reflection and peer assessments. These modifications were well-received by students of all backgrounds, who demonstrated more engagement and greater language competence.

At the same time, studies looking at secondary schools found that teachers who used reflective methods in the classroom had far closer relationships with their pupils. They achieved their goal of creating an inclusive and adaptable learning environment by consistently asking students for input and carefully adjusting their teaching methods to match the different needs and preferences of their class. By adapting lessons to each student's individual needs, this kind of instruction gave students a stronger say in their own education while also addressing their specific learning styles and difficulties. This kind of reflective and adaptive pedagogy has far-reaching effects. Motivated and engaged in their language study, students flourished in a setting that listened to them and changed to suit their requirements. Furthermore, learners gained a better feeling of self-assurance via this supportive and student-focused approach. With a revitalised sense of purpose and optimism, students embarked on their language learning journey, knowing that their opinions mattered and that they could achieve success. Reflective teaching has the ability to transform classrooms by raising the quality of instruction, increasing student participation, and, in the end, strengthening the bond between educators and their charges.

Effect on the Results of Language Acquisition

The varied terrain of language learners encompasses a myriad of characteristics that determine the efficacy of the aforementioned strategies. Individual learning preferences, cultural backgrounds, and learners' varied degrees of skill are all influential considerations. The effectiveness of these teaching approaches depends on being personalised to meet the unique requirements of each student, since no two language acquisition journeys are ever the same.

For example, research has shown that immersive training significantly improves language fluency. Students whose daily lives are filled with interactions with native English speakers are more likely to pick up the language quickly. Pronunciation, vocabulary growth, and natural language usage are all accelerated by consistent exposure to native speakers, whether in a classroom setting or in daily life. Students whose classrooms were immersed in English made significant gains in fluency and accuracy in a very short amount of time, according to research from a language immersion school.

A more comprehensive cognitive and practical framework is used in task-based learning, which handles language acquisition in contrast. This method teaches students not only language skills but also generalisable cognitive abilities. Students develop important life skills that promote adaptability and critical thinking via problem-solving exercises and collaborative projects, in addition to improving their language abilities. For example, one university-based research found that students' analytical and collaborative abilities, in addition to their language ability, were much improved after participating in task-based learning projects.

Reflective teaching is defined by an emphasis on individualisation and self-awareness. In this approach, teachers reflect on their own practices and those of their students to determine how best to instruct them. By tailoring instruction to each student's unique needs, this method encourages initiative and pride in language acquisition while also providing a framework for overcoming obstacles. Students may develop a deep understanding of the language by actively participating in their study and focussing on areas that align with their learning preferences. Students' interest and engagement with the language were shown to be higher when they were given the chance to reflect on their learning experiences, according to a case study employing reflective teaching approaches.

The complexity and ever-changing character of language education highlights the need to comprehend the many aspects that impact the efficacy of pedagogical approaches. Adaptive pedagogy is required since students' individual preferences, cultural backgrounds, and current skill levels all interact with one another. Methods like as reflective teaching, task-based learning, and immersive training demonstrate the flexibility and creativity needed to fully use language acquisition.

Implications for Education

When it comes to shaping their students' language learning journey, educators are important. Optimisation of the language learning process relies heavily on the careful selection and smooth integration of appropriate teaching approaches. Educators are faced with the challenge of keeping up with the ever-changing educational landscape, which requires precision and sensitivity. In order to effectively meet the requirements of their students in a variety of learning environments, educators need to carefully examine the array of teaching methods that are accessible.

A detailed understanding of each student's language skills, learning preferences, cultural background, and personal interests is the first step in this process. Teachers may use this data to their advantage by skilfully adapting their educational approaches, creating a unique and effective classroom environment for their students.

Immersive learning, task-based learning, and reflective teaching are three distinct approaches that, when combined, provide limitless potential. Educators may provide a holistic curriculum that addresses all aspects of language learning by combining various approaches. Immersive learning environments may help students become more proficient speakers and better able to use their native tongue. Simultaneously, reflective teaching may help students become more flexible and autonomous learners, while task-based learning may hone their practical application abilities.

The many facets of language learning, including fluency in the target language, analytical thinking, clear expression of ideas, and familiarity with other cultures, may be addressed by a thoughtful combination of various methods. Students are prepared to navigate the complexities of real-world events with ease when they are taught in a comprehensive manner that goes beyond language proficiency.

Teachers' responsibilities go beyond only imparting information; they also include creating a classroom environment that caters to each student's unique requirements. Expertly combining several pedagogical approaches allows educators to create an environment conducive to learning. A well-coordinated blend of approaches, in step with students' language skills and goals, creates a road map for an all-encompassing linguistic adventure, preparing them for triumph in an interdependent global scene.

CONCLUSION

The research highlights how important it is to carefully choose a technique in English language teaching based on the individual goals of the students. Making sure that teaching methods are in line with the desired results is where the importance is. For example, when proficiency and cultural awareness are of the utmost importance, immersive training, which involves immersing students in a language setting where language is used often, may be a valuable technique. In contrast, when developing multi-skill sets that go beyond language proficiency is the aim, task-based learning really comes into its own. A comprehensive strategy that equips students for real-world language usage is achieved via problem-solving and project-based projects, which allow students to build their language skills alongside critical thinking, creativity, and teamwork. Conversely, reflective teaching recognises that every student's path is distinct and values the uniqueness of each learner. Teachers may help every student reach his or her full potential by taking the time to reflect on their own teaching practices and making adjustments as needed. Understanding the complex effects of various approaches is crucial for language instructors who are always looking to improve their practices. Mastery of diverse modalities is the key to obtaining optimum language learning results for every student, even as the pedagogical environment advances.

References

1. Ram Chandra, K. (2008). Hetero-balancing approach to curriculum planning using the systemic-functional analysis. In Proceedings of ISFC 35: Voices Around the World (p. 78).

2. Prasad, S., Anitha, C. M., Ram Chandra, K., Lakshmi, V., Chandran, R., & Annapurna, B. (2022). Pesticide spraying robot: The mechatronics approach to agriculture. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 14(5).

3. Kalyani, M. E., Hemalatha, P., Ram Chandra, K., Azim, S., Annapurna, B., & Nagalakshmi, V. (2022). The element of emotional intelligence and their impact on social relation. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 14(3), 7.

4. Kalluri, R. C. (2021). Effects of COVID-19: The psychosocial impact on schools and college admissions. Journal of Applied Science and Computations, 8(10).

5. Ahamad, S. S., & Pathan, A.-S. K. (2019). Trusted service manager (TSM) based privacy preserving and secure mobile commerce framework with formal verification. Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, 7, 1–18.

6. Nagarjun, P. M. D., & Ahamad, S. S. (2018). Review of mobile security problems and defensive methods. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13(12), 10256–10259.

7. Ahamad, S. S., Sastry, V. N., & Udgata, S. K. (2022). Secure mobile payment framework based on UICC with formal verification. International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, 9(4), 355–370.

8. Ahamad, S. S., Al-Shourbaji, I., & Al-Janabi, S. (2016). A secure NFC mobile payment protocol based on biometrics with formal verification. International Journal of Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, 6(2), 103–132.

9. Oxford, R. L. (2022). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). Routledge.

10. Thomas, N., Rose, H., & Pojanapunya, P. (2021). Conceptual issues in strategy research: Examining the roles of teachers and students in formal education settings. Applied Linguistics Review, 12(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0033

11. Thomas, N., & Rose, H. (2023). Do language learning strategies need to be self-directed? Disentangling strategies from self-regulated learning. TESOL Quarterly, 53(2), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.473

12. Vygotsky, L. (2022). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.