Shubhali Chandra1*, Dr. Ashutesh Anand
1 Research Scholar, Department of Law, IIMT
University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh
ka222210@gmail.com
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Law, IIMT
University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh
Abstract:
Within the context of modern legal, medical, ethical, and human rights debate,
abortion continues to be one of the most delicate and contentious subjects under
discussion. A difficult balance must be struck between women's reproductive autonomy,
constitutional rights, medical ethics, concerns about public health, and the preservation
of foetal life when it comes to the control of abortion legislation. This article
takes a look at the legal framework that governs abortion in both India and the
United States, with a specific focus on reproductive rights, constitutional protection,
and current advances in the legal system. In addition, the paper discusses important
obstacles that are associated with abortion regulations. These issues include societal
stigma, poor healthcare facilities, legal uncertainty, political disputes, and uneven
access to safe abortion services.
A spouse's permission is not necessary for abortions performed in India up
to the 20th week of a pregnancy when the procedure is conducted. When asked why
they had an abortion, most married women said they wanted to have a smaller family.
One of the main issues that affects the use of contraception is incomplete understanding.
Men are less likely to use condoms than women are, even though most women think
they are the safest way to prevent pregnancy. It is clear that couples and their
extended families in some research regions chose abortion to limit the size of their
family and ensure that the children have the desired sex composition, even though
most studies did not directly address the topic of sex-selective abortion. This
is the case even though the majority of investigations did not directly address
the topic. Even after abortion was declared legal in India, morbidity and mortality
continue to be serious concerns for the majority of women who choose to have abortions.
When it comes to designing successful programs, policymakers, administrators, and
advocates for women's health encounter problems owing to a number of variables.
These issues include a scarcity of reliable information, major regional and rural-urban
discrepancies, and a limited scientific basis.
The subject of abortion has always been and will continue to be one that
garners a lot of legal attention. whether or not carrying out an abortion is mandated
by law, and if it is, under what conditions is it required? In the second place,
what is the legal interpretation of the human rights of an unborn child? The pro-choice
and pro-life sides of mankind are becoming more apart from one another as a result
of this occurrence. It is possible to consider India to be a pro-life country due
to the fact that the MTP Act, 1971 restricted the conditions under which a pregnancy
might be terminated. Sharma and Sangwai (2021) argue that pregnant women should
not be granted legal status since doing so violates both their "reproductive
autonomy" and the "right of life" of the unborn child.
In spite of the fact that differing perspectives on abortion existed throughout
different civilisations, there was a common tendency. The ancient cultures that
existed at the time had both legitimate and immoral grounds for this preference.
In times past, there was no such thing as pregnancy testing, nor were there any
devices that were necessary to carry out early abortions. As a result of this, during
that period of time, an abortion was carried out by delivering the baby prematurely
while it was still alive, and the process was then carried out by putting the child
to death. In later times, a number of different methods were used in order to terminate
pregnancies. These methods included exerting pressure to the abdomen region, making
use of sharp items, providing herbs that were abortifacient, and other methods (Octavian, et al., 2018).
The passionate pro-choice stance, on the other hand, contends that the rights
of a pregnant woman take precedence over the birthright of the conceptus until the
moment of delivery, and that until that time, a genuine human being does not exist
with full worth and rights. Because it puts a significant focus on a woman's freedom
of choice and her right to make decisions about her body, which take priority over
the rights of the foetus until it is born, this viewpoint is often referred to as
the liberal theory of abortion (Kanstrup, et al., 2018). When it comes to abortion,
this perspective is frequently referred to as the liberal theory of abortion.
A discussion of reproduction and related terminology is necessary before
moving on to the many forms of abortion and the common understanding of what abortion
is. There are two main ways to categorise people: by their gender. While additional
genders have just lately gained social and legal recognition, this study only considers
two of them. Both of these things have major effects on the reproductive process.
Pregnancy and childbirth result from the interplay of the male and female reproductive
systems. The two systems' interplay caused this to happen. The reproductive process
typically starts with copulation and lasts for nine months, during which the mother
bears the baby until delivery.
Under common law, abortions were legal until 1803, when Lord Ellenborough's
Act made it clear that they could only be legal if the mother's life was in imminent
danger. This effectively legalised abortion during the whole gestational period.
The argument over whether or not a pregnant woman should have the choice to terminate
her pregnancy has reached a dead end, with proponents of the idea that a baby has
a human right to life and the law should protect it on that basis. Because of this,
we find ourselves conflicted. The subject remains very visible to the general public,
despite the fact that there are advocates for both viewpoints. Abortion advocates
have stated their conviction that certain restrictions should be put in place to
safeguard the health of the mother. Traditional medicine had not progressed very
far at the time. Common belief is that these regulations were put in place to shield
women from potentially dangerous surgical procedures that may lead to serious illness,
permanent harm, or even death. Feminists argue that these first regulations sought
to restrict women's rights (Darney et al., 2019).
An important piece of Indian law pertaining to abortion is the Medical Termination
of Pregnancy Act, 1971. Prior to the enactment of this law, abortion was deemed
a criminal violation under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, with the exception of cases
when it was performed to save the life of the pregnant lady. The government of India
passed the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act in response to the rising number
of maternal fatalities caused by unsafe abortions. The act's stated goal is to make
abortion services legal, safe, and performed under controlled conditions (National
Academies of Sciences, et al., 2018).
The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act permits abortion in certain cases.
Considered to be among these cases are those in which the mother's physical or mental
health is jeopardised, those in which the pregnancy is the outcome of rape, those
in which the method of birth control fails, and those in which serious birth defects
are found. Abortions performed under the supervision of a medical expert were initially
legal under the Act up to twenty weeks into the pregnancy. In light of new medical
knowledge and shifting social norms, the government has introduced the Medical Termination
of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021. Victims of incest, women under the age of 18,
people with disabilities, and those who had survived rape were among the categories
whose maximum gestational age was increased to 24 weeks under the change. As part
of the update, the term "married woman" was replaced with "any woman,"
and the upgrade also strengthened protections against the exposure of sensitive
information and expanded access for single women.
The safeguarding of reproductive rights has received substantial support
from Indian courts. Case law from Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration
established that reproductive choice is a part of individual liberty under Article
21 of the Indian Constitution. In a related matter, the Indian Supreme Court stressed
in X v. Union of India that women who are not married have the same rights to reproductive
autonomy and access to safe abortion treatments as married women.
To argue that a single national statute has had less of an impact on the
development of abortion law in the US would be an understatement. Abolition of abortion
was recognised as a constitutionally protected right in the historic Roe v. Wade
decision, which was framed within the context of the Fourteenth Amendment's right
to privacy. The decision allowed women to terminate pregnancies in their early stages
while also protecting them from excessive government interference.
Afterwards, the Supreme Court upheld the right to abortion in Planned Parenthood
v. Casey, but it also allowed states to impose some limitations on abortion, so
long as they didn't create a "undue burden" on women seeking them.
However, the laws around abortion in America changed significantly after
the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization judgement. The highest court in
the land overturned Roe v. Wade, ruling that abortion is not protected by the constitution.
Each state now has the authority to regulate its own abortion policies. In addition,
this has led to a disparity in abortion legislation among states, with some places
maintaining complete legal protections for the procedure and others imposing severe
limitations (Kanstrup, et al., 2018).
Abortion laws continue to confront several problems all around the globe,
despite the fact that legal improvements have occurred. A significant problem is
the tension that exists between the freedom to reproduce and the moral or religious
views of individuals. From an ethical standpoint, many religious organisations are
opposed to abortion because they believe it results in the death of an unborn child.
As a result, there is hostility to liberal abortion legislation on both the legislative
and social levels.
Uneven access to medical services is still another significant obstacle that
must be overcome. It is common for women who live in economically disadvantaged
or rural locations to have limited access to skilled medical experts and abortion
treatments that are without risk. As a result of restrictive legislation and delays
in the procedure, women are often forced to seek abortions that are dangerous, putting
their lives and health in jeopardy.
Another big impediment is the social stigma that still exists. When women
seek abortions, they are often subjected to social prejudice, mental hardship, and
pressure from their families in many nations. Women who are not married and women
who have survived rape have additional challenges when it comes to gaining access
to reproductive healthcare without the stigma of being judged or harassed.
Access to abortion is made even more difficult by the presence of procedural
obstacles and legal uncertainty. For women in India who are carrying pregnancies
that are over the statutory limitations, obtaining legal clearance is often necessary,
which may result in delays and psychological hardship. There is a great deal of
confusion around reproductive rights and access to healthcare in the United States
as a result of the Dobbs judgement, which resulted in many states passing different
legislation.
In modern constitutional law, the idea of reproductive rights is increasingly
acknowledged as an essential part of human dignity, privacy, equality, and freedom.
Women should have complete autonomy over reproductive decisions that may have far-reaching
effects for their health and well-being, as has been stressed by courts in many
countries.
Reproductive autonomy in India was strengthened by the Justice K.S. Puttaswamy
v. Union of India case. The right to privacy's acknowledgement caused this to happen.
Similarly, the provision of safe and legal abortion services is advocated for by
international human rights groups such as the United Nations and the World Health
Organization. They consider this an important issue related to human rights and
public health (Octavian, et al., 2018).
The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act was passed by the Indian government
in 1971. The goal of this legislation was to provide clear guidelines for abortion
services and to ensure that pregnant women may legally and safely terminate their
pregnancies under certain circumstances. The majority of India's abortion-related
legislation originated in the Indian Penal Code, which came into effect in 1860.
The bulk of these rules were not modified when this law was approved. This law made
it illegal to intentionally cause a miscarriage unless the pregnant woman's life
was in imminent danger, in which case it might be justified. Many women have done
unsafe and illegal abortions since there aren't enough medical facilities or clear
legal guidelines. This has led to serious health issues and even fatalities among
mothers. In 1964, the goal of establishing the Shantilal Shah Committee was to investigate
the problem of abortion legislation and provide recommendations for changes. In
order to resolve the concerns voiced, this was done. In 1971, after being passed
into law, the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act was first put into effect the
following year. We were able to do this by carefully considering the committee's
suggestions (Eschenbach, 2015). The major goal of the law was to decrease the incidence
of maternal deaths caused by unsafe abortions by making sure that women could legally
obtain safe abortion services that were provided under controlled medical circumstances.
Under the Act, registered medical practitioners are able to terminate pregnancies
when the mother's life or physical or mental health is in danger, or when there
is a high probability that the child, should they be born, would have severe mental
or physical defects. When a kid is born with a severe mental or physical disability
also falls into this group. Pregnancies caused by rape or the ineffectiveness of
a method of contraception are also recognised as valid reasons for medical termination
of pregnancy under the Act. Originally, the Act allowed for abortions up to twenty
weeks into the pregnancy as long as certain medical requirements were met. But that
was conditional on other things being in place. It was crucial to seek the advice
of a single qualified physician for pregnancies up to 12 weeks along. Contrarily,
abortions that occurred between twelve and twenty weeks of pregnancy often required
the consent of two doctors. at order to ensure safety and medical supervision, the
Act also stipulated that termination may only take place at licensed medical facilities
or government hospitals. The end goal of the Act necessitated this action.
Over time, it has become more and more clear that abortion restrictions need
to be revised. This has come to light as a result of a number of factors, including
expanded understanding of reproductive rights, changes in societal norms, and developments
in medical expertise. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021
aimed to modernise abortion laws by making them more accessible, inclusive, and
progressive. In an effort to make abortion laws more accessible, this was done.
According to Ross (2017), the objective of the 2021 Amendment was to increase women's
healthcare rights and reproductive autonomy while also greatly increasing the spectrum
of services that may be lawfully used for abortion-related operations in India.
An rise in the maximum gestational age at which abortions may be performed was one
of the most significant changes brought about by the 2021 Amendment, among many
others. According to the new rule, a single qualified medical professional may now
recommend an abortion up to twenty weeks into the pregnancy. A maximum of twenty-four
weeks of gestation was allowed for certain groups of women. Women who were dealing
with humanitarian or crisis circumstances, women who were children, women with diverse
abilities, and women who had endured incest or rape all fall under these categories.
That being stated, this extension could only be approved with the stamp of approval
from two licensed medical professionals. The update brought attention to the fact
that, because of their circumstances, low-income women face obstacles while trying
to get medical help quickly.
In addition, the amendment contains measures that may be used in cases when
major foetal anomalies are discovered after 24 weeks of pregnancy. The change encompassed
these statutes. The state government may have established a Medical Board to hear
cases like this and make recommendations on whether or not to approve termination.
The Medical Board often includes experts in maternal health and foetal abnormalities
who review cases before making recommendations. Gynaecologists, paediatricians,
radiologists, and other subject-matter experts make up this group of specialists.
It is also the job of these experts to give recommendations. The Amendment also
substantially improved things by ensuring that women seeking abortions may remain
anonymous and secret during the procedure. Women seeking a medical abortion have
their names and personal information protected under Section 5A of the revised Act,
with the exception of those persons permitted by law. Women who want to have an
abortion via medical procedures are covered by this law. The purpose of implementing
this clause was to lessen the social stigma associated with abortion while also
safeguarding the person's dignity, privacy, and secrecy (Bhujel, 2022). The 2021
Amendment also expanded the definition of "any woman or her partner" from
"married woman or her husband" to include additional scenarios when a
method of birth control failed. This shift mirrored a more modern and all-encompassing
view of reproductive rights and interpersonal interactions. Furthermore, it led
to an expansion of abortion services available to unmarried women. The judicial
system acknowledged the constitutional concepts of equality, dignity, and privacy,
and it brought abortion legislation into conformity with these principles.
Even though these forward-thinking changes are in place, there are still
several obstacles to the MTP Act's implementation. Safe abortion services are still
difficult to get in many regions of India due to a number of factors. Some of these
challenges include not enough people knowing about them, not enough qualified doctors,
societal stigma, not enough healthcare facilities in remote regions, and long wait
times for medical and judicial approvals. It is not uncommon for the court system
to get involved in cases involving pregnancies that beyond the limits set by statute.
For victims of rape or those born with severe birth defects, this is a more pressing
concern (Sharma, & Sangwai, 2021).
When the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 and the 2021 Amendment
were approved in 1971, it was a major step toward recognising reproductive healthcare
as a fundamental part of women's rights and public health. The increasing stance
that Indian law adopts toward reproductive autonomy, respect, privacy, and safe
motherhood is shown by the passing of this legislation. As a result of the new legislation,
reproductive justice and the right to healthcare for women are more secure in India.
This is because the law has addressed humanitarian and constitutional issues while
also expanding access to safe abortion services.
Constitutional rights, medical ethics, societal values, and women's reproductive
independence are all delicately balanced by the laws that regulate abortion. Several
countries have, throughout time, sought to enact more lenient abortion legislation
based in fundamental human rights in an attempt to protect women's health and dignity.
Both the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act and its 2021 Amendment have helped
to increase access to safe and dependable abortion services in India and to expand
reproductive rights generally. The Dobbs ruling, on the other hand, has had a profound
impact on American abortion legislation, leading to variations from state to state.
While reproductive rights have been strengthened via legal improvements,
there are still barriers that prevent the effective implementation of abortion laws.
Some of these challenges include political unrest, legal hurdles, healthcare access
concerns, and social stigma. Therefore, to provide reproductive justice and safe
healthcare for all women, there must be consistent calls for public awareness, accessible
healthcare facilities, well-balanced legal reforms, and the protection of women's
dignity and autonomy.
1.
Bhujel, P. R. (2022). Right
to Abortion as a Right to Privacy: A Human Rights Perspective (Doctoral dissertation).
2.
Eschenbach, D. A. (2015). Treating
spontaneous and induced septic abortions. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 125(5),
1042-1048.
3.
Garrow, D. J. (2015). Liberty
and sexuality: The right to privacy and the making of Roe v. Wade. Open Road
Media.
4.
Kanstrup, C., Mäkelä, M., &
Hauskov Graungaard, A. (2018). Women’s reasons for choosing abortion method: a systematic
literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 46(8), 835-845.
5.
Kapp, N., Eckersberger, E., Lavelanet,
A., & Rodriguez, M. I. (2019). Medical abortion in the late first trimester:
a systematic review. Contraception, 99(2), 77-86.
6.
National Academies of Sciences,
Medicine Division, Board on Health Care Services, Board on Population Health, Public
Health Practice, Committee on Reproductive Health Services, ... & Quality of
Abortion Care in the US. (2018). The safety and quality of abortion care in the
United States.
7.
Octavian, O. G., Ionescu, C.,
Lesnic, A., Filipescu, G. A., & Ples, L. (2018). Ethical and medico-legal aspects
of the therapeutic abortion-our experience. Roman J Legal Med, 26(1),
82-5.
8.
Ross, L. J. (2017). Reproductive
justice as intersectional feminist activism. Souls, 19(3), 286-314.
9.
Sharma, A., & Sangwai, S.
(2021). Rights of an Unborn vis-a-vis Rights of Women. Issue 4 Int'l JL Mgmt.
& Human., 4, 2553.
10.
WHO, Abortion Key Facts, available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion
(Visited on June 21, 2021).
11.
WHO, Clinical practice handbook for safe abortion
- world health organization Available at https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/unsafe_abortion/clinical-practice-safeabortion/en/
(Visited on February 29, 2021).