Mhd Couette Flow Through Porous Medium With Transpiration Cooling
Effects of Injection/Suction Velocity and Magnetic Field on MHD Couette Flow Through Porous Medium with Transpiration Cooling
by Satish Kumar*, Bhagawat Swarup Yadav, Keshav Dev, Sanjeev Sakiya,
- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540
Volume 1, Issue No. 1, Jan 2011, Pages 0 - 0 (0)
Published by: Ignited Minds Journals
ABSTRACT
In this paper we consist the problem of Couette flow between two horizontal parallel porous flat plates of an electrically conducting viscous incompressible fluid. The stationary plate is subjected to a transverse sinusoidal injection of the fluid and its corresponding removal by the constant suction through the other plate, in uniform motion and because of injection velocity the flow becomes three-dimensional. A magnetic field of uniform strength is applied normal to the planes of the plates. The effect of injection/suction velocity and the magnetic field on the flow field, skin friction and heat transfer are reported and discussed in detail.
KEYWORD
MHD, Couette flow, porous medium, transpiration cooling, electrically conducting viscous fluid, injection velocity, magnetic field, skin friction, heat transfer
Introduction
The problem of MHD flow through porous medium has very important in recent year particularly in the field of agricultural engineering to study the underground water resources, seepage of water river beds, in chemical engineering for filtration purification process; in petroleum technology to study the movement of natural gas, oil and water through the oil reservoirs. The purpose of the present paper is to study the hydromantic effects of electrically conducting three-dimensional flow of viscous incompressible fluid through a porous medium, which is bounded by an infinite vertical porous plate with constant temperature. The purpose of the present paper is to study the hydro magnetic effects of electrically conducting fluid through a porous medium, which is bounded by an infinite porous plate. Ahamadi et all (1971) discussed the Study of unsteady MHD flow of conducting fluid through porous medium. Raptis (1983) discussed about the unsteady flow through a porous medium bounded by an infinite porous plate subjected to a constant suction variable temperature. Dutta (1985) discussed the Temperature field in the flow over stretching surface with uniform heat flux. Massoudi (1992) used a perturbation technique to solve the stagnation point flow and heat transfer of a non-Newtonian fluid of second grade. Tokis (1986) discussed Un study MHD free convective flows in a rotating fluid. Yong (2000) study the Unstudy MHD convective heat transfer past a semi-infinite vertical porous moving plate with variable suction. Yang et all (2001) discussed Numerical solution of thermal fluid instability between two horizontal parallel plates. Ahamad et all (2003) discussed the MHD effects on free convection and mass transfer flow through porous media between vertical wavy wall and a parallel flat wall. Attia (2003) study the Hydro magnetic stagnation point flow with heat transfer over a permeable surface. Muhammad (2005) discussed the Effects of Hall current and heat transfer on flow due to a pull of eccentric rotating.
Basic equation
In this modal we consider 3-D flow viscous incompressible fluid through a porous medium, which is bounded by a vertical infinite porous plates. A coordinates system with plate lying vertically on x-z plane such that x-axis is taken along the plate in the direction of flow and y-axis perpendicular to the plane of the plate and direction in to the fluid which is flowing with free stream velocity U and lower plate is to have a transverse sinusoidal injection
velocity of the form
a
ZVZVcos1
… (1)
Where is a positive constant quantity (<<1). The distance a between the plates is taken equal to the wavelength of the injection velocity. The lower
and upper plates are assumed to at constant temperatures T0 and T1,
respectively, with T1 > T0. The problem is governed by the following non-dimensional equations:
0z w y
v
(2)
The momentum equations are
uM z u y u z uwy
u2 2 2 2
21v
(3)
vkz v y v y p z v y
v/2 2 2
211w v
(4)
wM z w y w z p z w y
w2 2 2 2
21wv
(5)
And the energy equation is
2 2 2
21vz T y T pz Twy T
r
(6)
Where equation (2) is because of conservation of mass, equation (3), (4) and (5) is because of conservation of momentum (i.e. Navier-stokes equation of motion) while equation (6) is because of energy conservation. Here the non- dimensional variables are:
(7)
The boundary conditions to this problem in dimensionless form are as:
.1,1 0,w1,v 1,u .0,0T 0,w,cos1 0,u
yforT
yforzzv
(8)
vk akTT TT v Ppv wwv vvU uua zza
yy,,,,,,,01 0,2
Mathematical Analysis: As we know that the amplitude of injection velocity is very smalls therefore we can assume the following form the solutions ..........),(),()(),(2210zyfzyfyfzyf (9) Where f stands for any of u, v, w, p, and T function. When =0, the problem reduced to two-dimensional with constant injection and suction at both the plates in presence of transverse uniform magnetic field. The solution of two- dimensional problem is
,0,)(21
21
0wee
eeyuss ysys
(10)
yttyttytyttteeeeeeyv12212121)(1)(0 (11)
1
1)(0r r
P yP
e
eyT (12) Where
k
kkktMs2
4,4
2222
When0, then equation (9) becomes in forms,
),()(),( ),()(),( ),()(),( ),()(),( ),()(),(
10 10 10 10 10
zyTyTzyT zypypzyp zywywzyw zyvyvzyv zyuyuzyu
(13)
Substituting the equation (13) in to the equation (2) to (6) and comparing the coefficient of identical power of , and neglecting the coefficient 2,3 etc. the following first order equations obtained:
011
z w y
v
(14)
The momentum equations are
1 2
212
2121011vuM z u y u z uwy
u
(15)
1/212
2121111 vkz v y v y p y
v
(16)
1 2
212
212111wM z w y w z p y
w
(17)
And the energy equation is
212
2121011vz T y T py T y T
r
(18)
The corresponding boundary conditions are:
.1,1 0,w1,v 1,u .0,0T 0,w,cos 0,u
1111 1111
yforT
yforzv (19)
Cross Flow solution:
For the cross flow solution we assume the following form of v1,w1 and p1:
zypzyp zyvzyw zyvzyv
cos)(),( sin)(1),( cos)(),(
1 1 1
(20)
Where denote the differentiation with respect to y. substituting equation (20) in equations (16) and (17). We get the following ordinary differential equations: pvvv2 (21) pvMvv222)( (22) Now using the transformed boundary conditions the equations (21) and (22) obtained in the following form
zeDDzyvi
yriicos1),(
4
11 (23)
zerDDzywi
yriiisin1),(
4
11 (24)
zerMrrDDzyp
i
yriiiiicos1),(
4 1
222321 (25)
Where
))()(())()(( ))()(( ,42 1,42
1
,42 1,42
1
42134132 3121
13424123 3112 2222422223 2211222111
rrrrrrrr rrrr
eerrrreerrrr eerrrrD pprppr pprppr
k errrerrrerrrD errrerrrerrrD errrerrrerrrD errrerrrerrrD
rrrrrr rrrrrr rrrrrr rrrrrr
22
2434323213 1244122413 2141434322 1344233121
424332 124142 214143 134231
)()()( )()()( )()()( )()()(
Main flow solution:
We consider the equations of the main flow component u1(y,z) and temperature field T1(y,z), in the following form: zyuzyucos)(),(1 (26) zyTzyTcos)(),(1 (27) Substituting these equations in equations (15) and (18) respectively. We obtain the ordinary differential equations in the following form: 022)(uvuMuu (28) 02TvpTTpTrr (29) The corresponding boundary conditions are:
.1,0,0 .0,0,0
yforTu
yforTu (30) Using the boundary condition (30) and equation (26) and (27) in the equations (28) and (29), we get
zmr eDm r eD r eD mr eDm eeDeKzyu
iiii yrmi i yrmi i yrmi ii yrmimmi yni
iii ii
cos)3(
)3()(),(
4 3 2 1 4 32
)(2)()(
2 11
)(12
11
221
1
21 (31)
zpmr eD pmr eD eD
peNzyTiri yrpi iri yrpipr i ysi
irir
ricos)()()1(),(
4 32
)(2
11
)(222
11
(32)
4 32
)(22
1 )( 4 3
)(2
11
)(11
)3( )3(
2222 1212
ii rmni ii rmni ii rmni ii rmni
mr eemD r eeD r eeD mr eemDAK
ii ii
4 32
)(22
1 )( 4 3
)(2
11
)(12
)3( )3(
2121 1111
ii rmni ii rmni ii rmni ii rmni
mr eemD r eeD r eeD mr eemDAK
ii ii
4 32
)(2
11
)(11
4 32
)(2
11
)(11
)()( )()(
11 22
iri rpsi iri rpsi iri rpsi iri rpsi
pmr eeD pmr eemDBN pmr eeD pmr eemDBN
irir irir
Where
,42 1,42
1
,)(42 1,)(42
1
,))(1(,))((
22222221 22212221
22
2122121
rrrr ssprnnmm
ppspps MnMn eeeD
pBeeeeDAr
Results and discussion:
We may now obtain the expression for the skin-friction components zxand is the main flow and transverse direction respectively, as
4 3 2 1 4 32
)(2)()(
2 11
)(12
1 21 00 0/
)3( )3()(
cos
221
1
2121
iiii yrmi i yrmi i yrmi ii yrmimmiiimm yy xx
mr eDm r eD r eD mr eDm eeDnKee mm zdy du dy du U a
iii i
(33)
zrDDdy dw V a
iiiy
zzsin
4 1 2 0 1/
(34)
We may calculate the heat transfer coefficient in terms of the Nusselt number
zpmr rpD pmr rpD eD psNe p zdy dT dy dT TTk aqNu
iiiri iri ri iripriipr yy
rrcos)( )( )( )(
)1(1
cos)(
2 1 2 1 4
321
22 00 0
01
(35)
The From figure-1 it is clear that the main flow velocity decreases with increases Hartmann number M, and injection parameter . Cross flow velocity component w due to the transfer sinusoidal injection velocity distribution applied through out the porous plate at rest. The cross flow velocity profile is shown through the figure-2. Here it is observed from this figure that while increasing the Hartmann number (M) or the injection parameter (), the velocity component w first decreasing up to the middle of channel and increasing thereafter.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5 12345678910
fig-1. Main flow velocity profile for z=0 u
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
1234567891011121314
fig-2. cross flow velocity profile for z=0 w
0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 1234567
fig-3 main flow and trasvers components of skin friction for z=0 and z=.5 skin friction
The skin-friction components zxand in the main flow and transverse direction, respectively, are presented through the figure-3. This figure shows that zxand decrease with increasing . It is also noticed that with increasing Hartman number (M), the skin-friction component xdecrease, however, zincreasing.
0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 123456789
fig-4 Nusselt number Nu for z=0 and z=.5 Nu