Psycho-Social Correlates of Loneliness among Adolescents – A Study in the City Chandigarh
Examining the psycho-social aspects of loneliness among adolescents in Chandigarh
by Suman Kumari*, Dr. Mukta Singhvi,
- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540
Volume 2, Issue No. 2, Oct 2011, Pages 0 - 0 (0)
Published by: Ignited Minds Journals
ABSTRACT
Social relationships are at the core of human life. Satisfying social relationships are vital for good mental and physical health. As humans we possess a need to belong, which constitutes a fundamental motivation – driving our thoughts, emotions and interpersonal behaviour. This need to belong comprises a pervasive desire to form and maintain atleast a minimum quantity of lasting positive and significant interpersonal relationships. The phenomenon of loneliness is difficult to define, yet it is one of most important dimensions of human behavior. To date, the experts have not agreed upon a definition. Further, there are neither defined theoretical frameworks which explain loneliness nor is there any consensus regarding the causes and consequences. In the present paper an attempt has been made to study the Psycho-social correlates of Loneliness among adolescents in Chandigarh. In view of high prevalence of loneliness among adolescents the study identified the psychological predictors of loneliness by including in its purview depression, hopelessness, negative automatic thoughts, social support (quantitative), social support (qualitative), ten dimensions of family environment, five dimensions of Cattell’s second-order anxiety factor, and locus of control.
KEYWORD
Psycho-social correlates, Loneliness, Adolescents, Chandigarh, Social relationships, Mental health, Physical health, Need to belong, Interpersonal relationships, Definition, Theoretical frameworks, Causes, Consequences, Psychological predictors, Depression, Hopelessness, Negative automatic thoughts, Social support, Family environment, Anxiety factor, Locus of control
INTRODUCTION
In the social sciences, the oldest publication about loneliness is Über die Einsamkeit (Zimmermann, 1785–1786). The attention to the concept of loneliness began in the 1950s and 1960s; with publications by Fromm Reichmann (1959). Several studies suggest that loneliness is a meaningful psychological construct. But what is the nature of this construct? Researchers interested in the problem of loneliness have generally agreed on two characteristics of the loneliness experience. First, loneliness is an aversive experience, similar to other negative affective states such as depression or anxiety. Secondly, research has shown that loneliness is distinct from social isolation and reflects an individual's subjective perception of deficiencies in his or her network of social relationships. These deficiencies may be quantitative (e.g., not enough friends) or they may be qualitative (e.g., lack of intimacy with others). Perlman and Peplau formulated a definition of loneliness as “the unpleasant experience that occurs when a person‟s network of social relationships is deficient in some important way, either quantitatively or qualitatively”. Larose, Guay, & Boivin defined loneliness as a subjective, distressing and unpleasant state in which individual perceives deficiencies in their social world. Loneliness is a subjective experience that can be related to but is not synonymous with social isolation. It has been described as a sad subjective state resulting from dissatisfaction with one‟s social experiences. Loneliness as a complex set of feelings and cognitions reflects the distressing and negative emotional experience emanating from the individual‟s perceived deficiencies in intimate and social relationships. Generally the term “loneliness” tends to evoke thoughts of an elderly person isolated and alone or someone who is cut off from the mainstream of society. However, the experience of loneliness transcends the whole spectrum of human life and is felt by both young and old. Constant reminders of the pervasiveness of loneliness are expressed through popular songs, poetry, advice to the lovelorn columns, and news media coverage of everyday social issues.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1. It attempts to study loneliness at adolescence; 2. Keeping in view gender differences in loneliness, it is not desirable to pool data of males and females. The present study lays emphasis on sex-differences in the predictors of loneliness during adolescence; 3. Keeping in view the multiplicity of factors involved in loneliness, the present study make use of stepwise multiple regression analysis for determining salient predictors of loneliness. The previous investigations have computed only correlations between loneliness measures and several other measures of interest.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Sample
The sample consisted of adolescents who were attending Secondary and Senior Secondary Public Schools in Chandigarh (India). The final sample comprised of 110 males and 110 females between the ages of 15 and 17 years. All participants were staying with their families. Majority of the participants belonged to middle socio-economic status. The variables of marital status, educational status, employment status and place of residence were controlled in the sense that adolescents were unmarried, unemployed, and belonged to urban area. It is significant to emphasize that in addition to the advantage of homogeneity which resulted from this type of control, there is also an increased danger of bias. However, this type of control is appropriate from the viewpoint of the focal theme of the present study. The participants to be included in this study were also required to be showing: a) No evidence of drug addiction or alcoholism, and b) Not currently in treatment for diagnosed psychiatric disorder.
Measures
The following measures were employed to test various hypotheses:
(A) Measures of Loneliness
a) Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (Russell, Peplau, & Cutrona, 1980).
(B) Measures of Cognitive Dysfunction
a) Hopelessness Scale (Beck, Weissman, Lester, & Trexler,1974). b) Automatic Thoughts Questionaire (Hollon & Kendall, 1980).
(C) Measures of Depressive Symptoms
a) Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (Zung, 1965).
(D) Measures of Social Support
Social Support Questionnaire (Sarason, Levine, Basham, & Sarason,1983)
(E) Measure of Family Environment
Family Environment Scale (Moos & Moos, 1994)
(F) Measures of Locus of Control
Internal – External Scale (Rotter, 1966)
(G) Measure of Anxiety
IPAT Anxiety Scale Questionnaire (Cattell & Scheier, 1963)
Administration of Tests
The following tests were administered in „random‟ order, requiring six different sessions: 1. Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. 2. Hopelessness Scale. 3. Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. 4. Zung Self-rating Depression Scale 5. Social Support Questionnaire 6. Family Environment Scale 7. Internal – External Scale 8. IPAT Anxiety Scale Questionnaire. The tests were administered in small groups of 8 to 12 participants. The doubts of the participants were removed before permitting them to fill out different questionnaires. The general testing conditions were satisfactory. Since efforts were made to establish rapport with the participants in order to elicit reliable and authentic information. Participants were told that the information was being collected purely for research purpose. They were also assured that the information to be collected would remain strictly confidential and presented only in a form in which no person could be identified. The promise of privacy appears to have gone a long way in establishing psychological rapport because a large number of participants contacted the investigator later on and enquired about their performance on different measures. Cooperation of principals and teachers of different schools also helped in eliciting reliable information from the participants. Despite the tedious nature of task involving test administration, participants showed keen interest in filling out different questionnaires.
Scoring of the Tests
The tests were scored by the following procedures suggested by authors of different tests; • The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale was scored for one measure of global loneliness. • Hopelessness Scale and Automatic Thought Questionnaire were scored for two measures pertaining to hopelessness and negative automatic thoughts. • The measures of depressive symptoms were obtained by scoring Zung Self-rating Depression scale. • Social Support Questionnaire yielded two scores: (a) perceived availability of the number of persons listed (b) satisfaction with the available support. • The measure of Locus of Control was obtained by scoring Rotter‟s Internal-External Scale. • The Family Environment scale was scored for the ten measures referring to cohesion, expressiveness, conflict, independence, achievement-orientation, intellectual-cultural orientation, active – recreational orientation, moral-religious emphasis, organization, control. • The IPAT Anxiety Scale Questionnaire was scored for five components of anxiety. Thus, as a result of scoring different tests, the following measures were obtained: a) One measure of global loneliness obtained from the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. b) One measure each of hopelessness, negative automatic thoughts and depressive tendencies. c) Two measures of social support: perceived availability of number of supportive persons and satisfaction with available support d) Ten measures of family environment: Cohesion, expressiveness, conflict, independence, achievement - orientation, intellectual-cultural orientation, active – recreational orientation, moral - religious emphasis, organization, control. e) One measure of locus of control f) Five measures of anxiety
Analysis
The following analyses were done: 1. To examine the nature of frequency distributions of different measures, the following statistical measures were obtained: (I) Mean, (II) Median, (III) Standard Deviation, (IV) Skewness, and (V) Kurtosis. (b) Step wise regression equation involving one measure of global loneliness, one measure of depression ,one measure of locus of control, one measure each of hopelessness and negative automatic thoughts, two measures of social support, ten measures of family environment and five measures of anxiety was formulated to identify the salient predictors of loneliness.
Table 1: Multiple R and R2 Change for Different Variables
Males Variables R R2 - Change F-Value Level of Significance Depression .562 - - 0.000 Locus of Control .647 .103 18.935 0.000 Factor C (-) .688 .055 11.084 0.001 Females Variables R R2 - Change F-Value Level of Significance Factor C (-) .506 - - .000 Negative Automatic Thoughts
.598 .102 16.879 .000
Expressiveness .640 .052 9.434 .003 Depression .673 .043 8.272 .005 Active Recreational Orientation
.702 .040 8.250 .005
Table 2: Regression weights for different variables
Variables β t p Males Loneliness (DV) Depression .562 7.059 0.000 Locus of Control .348 4.351 0.000 Factor C (-) .238 3.329 0.001 Females Loneliness (DV) Factor C (-) .506 6.102 .000 Negative Automatic Thoughts
.323 4.108 .000
Expressiveness -.232 -3.057 .003 Depression .217 2.876 .005 Active Recreational Orientation .217 2.872 .005
An examination of tables 1 to 2 reveal that for males, with loneliness as the criterion measure, the significant predictors were depression [t = 7.059, p<0.000, β = .562], locus of control [t = 4.351, p <0.000, β = .348], factor C (-) [t = 3.329, p<0.001, β = .238]. For females the picture was somewhat different: loneliness was predicted by depression [t = 2.876, p<.005, β = .217], factor C (-) [t = 6.102, p<.000, β = .506], negative automatic thoughts [t= 4.108, p<.000, β = .323], expressiveness [t = -3.057, p<.003, β = -.232], and active recreation [t = 2.872, p<.005, β= .217].
RESULTS
The current study reveals the following important findings: ► Male adolescents scored significantly high on loneliness than female adolescents. ► For male adolescents depression (+)contributed to loneliness as significant predictors. ► For male adolescents locus of control (+)contributed to loneliness as significant predictors. ► For male adolescents factor C -(+) contributed to loneliness as significant predictors. ► For female adolescents depression (+)contributed to loneliness as significant predictors. ► For female adolescents negative automatic thoughts(+) contributed to loneliness as significant predictors. ► For female adolescents expressiveness (-)contributed to loneliness as significant predictors. ► For female adolescents active recreation (+) contributed as significant predictors of loneliness.
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
► The study was limited to only adolescents in the age range of 15 to 17 years. ► The study was limited to adolescents belonging to urban area. ► The adolescents belong to intact families. ► In the current study correlation design was used. It may not allow to infer cause and effect relationship
REFERENCES
Abramowitz,S.I.(1969).Locus of control and self-reported depression among college students. Psychological Reports, 25, pp. 149-150. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale J. D. (1978) Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, pp. 49-74 Allen, N. B., & Badcock, P. B. T. (2003). The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: Evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, pp. 887-913. Alpass, F. M., & Neville, S. (2003). Loneliness, health and depression in older males. Aging & Mental Health, 7, pp. 212–216. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: Author. Barrera, M., Sandler, I.N., & Ramsay, T.B.(1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support; studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology,9, pp. 435-447. Barrera,M., Ainlay,S.L.(1983). The structure of social support : A conceptual analysis . Journal of Community Psychology,11, pp. 133-143. Bar-Tal, D. and Bar-Zohar, Y., (1977). The relationship between perception of locus of control and academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2, pp. 181–199. Beigel, D.C. (1991). Social phobia and overanxious disorder in school-age children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, pp. 545-552 Cacioppo, J. T., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M. H., McClintock, M. K., Malarkey, W. B., & Hawkley, L. C. (2000). Lonely traits and concomitant physiological processes: The MacArthur social neuroscience studies. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 35, pp. 143−154. Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Crawford, E., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M. H., & Kowalewski, R. B. (2002). Loneliness and health: Potential mechanisms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, pp. 407−417. Campbell, W. K., Rudich, E. A., & Sedikides, C. (2002). Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: Two portraits of self-love. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, pp. 358–368. Canavan, M.M.(1989). The family environment and individual mental health status (Doctoral dissertation, Texas Woman‟s University, Denton, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 2922B. Cantwell, D., & Baker, L. (1989). Stability and natural history of DSM-III childhood diagnoses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, pp. 691-700. Carroll, B.J., Fielding, J.M., & Blashki, T.G.(1973). Depression rating scales: A critical review. Archives of General Psychiatry, 28, pp. 301-366. Cutrona, C. E. (1982). Transition to college: Loneliness and the process of social adjustment. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 291−309). New York: Wiley. Dalgard, O. S., Bjork, S., & Tambs, K. (1995). Social support, negative life events and mental health. British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, pp. 29–34. Davey, M., Eaker, D.G., & Walters, L.H. (2003). Resilience processes in adolescents: Personality profiles, self-worth, and coping. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, pp. 347-362. Davis, M. H., & Franzoi, S. L. (1986). Adolescent loneliness, self-disclosure, and private self-consciousness: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, pp. 595−608. Davis, S. F., Hanson, H., Edson, R., & Ziegler, C. (1992). The relationship between optimism–pessimism, loneliness, and level of self-esteem in college students. College Student Journal, 26, pp. 244−247. Davitz, J. R. (1969) The language of emotion. New York: Academic Press. De Jong Gierveld, J. (1984) .Loneliness: A plural research project. Deventer the Netherlands: Van loghum slaterus. De Jong Gierveld, J. (1986).Developing and testing a model of loneliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, pp. 119-128. Ebata, A., Petersen, A., & Conger, J. (1990). The development of psychopathology in adolescence. In J.E. Rolf, A.S. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K.H. Nuechterlein & S. Weintraub (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology (pp. 308-333). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Eccles, J., Midgley, C., & Adler, T. (1984). Grade-related changes in the school environment: Effects on achievement motivation. In J.G. Nicholls (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 283-331). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Eccles, J., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., & Buchanan, C. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents‟ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, pp. 90-101. Eder, D., & Hallinan, M.T. (1978). Sex differences in children‟s friendship. American Sociological Review,43, pp. 237-250. Farby, J.J.(1980). Depression . In R.H. Woody (Eds.) Encyclopaedia of clinical assessment: II San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, pp. 588-601. Farrell, A., Sullivan, T., Kliewer, W., Allison, K., Erwin, E., & Meyer, A., (2006). Peer and school problems in the lives of urban adolescents: Frequency, difficulty, and relation to adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 44, pp. 169-190. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. (2004). Older Americans 2004: Key indicators of well-being. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Feldman, S.S., & Rosenthal. (1991). Age expectations of behavioural autonomy in Hong Kong, Australia and American Youth: The influence of family variables and adolescent values. International Journal of Psychology, 26, pp. 1-23. Feningstein, A., Scheier, M.F., & Buss, A,H.(1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, pp. 522-528. Fergusson, D., Horwood, L., & Lynskey, M. (1993). Prevalence and comorbidity of DSM-IIIR diagnoses in a birth cohort of 15 year olds. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, pp. 1127-1134. Gabrys, J.B., & Peters, K.(1985). Reliability, discriminant and predictive validity of the Zung Self Rating Depression Scale. Psychological Reports, 57, pp. 1091-1096. Gaev, D.M.(1976). The Psychology of loneliness. Chicago : Adams Press. Garfinkle, A.S.(1982). Genetic and environmental influences on the development of Piagetian logico-mathematical concepts and other specific cognitive abilities:A twin study. Acta Geneticae Medicae Gemellologiae,31, pp. 10-61. Gil, K.M., Keefe, F.J., Sapson, H.A., McCaskill, C.C., Rodin, J., & Crisson, J.E.(1987). The relation of stress and family environment to atopic dermatitis symptoms in children. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 31, pp. 673-684. Hagerty, B. M., & Williams, R. A. (1999). The effects of sense of belonging, social support, conflict and loneliness on depression. Nursing Research. Hamilton, H.(1969). Standardised assessment and recording of depressive Harold, G. T.,& Conger, R. D. (1997). Marital conflict and adolescent distress: The role of adolescent awareness. Child Development, 68, pp. 333-350. Harrell, T.H., & Ryan, N.B.(1983). Cognitive - behavioral assessment of depression: Clinical validation of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, pp. 721-725. Harrow, M,, & Ferranti, A.(1969). Locus of control on psychiatric patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,33, pp. 582-589. Harter, S. (1988). Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver. Jackson, J., & Cochran, S. D. (1990). Loneliness and psychological distress. The Journal of Psychology, 125, pp. 257−262. Jackson, T., Soderlind, A., & Weiss, K. E. (2000). Personality traits and quality of relationships as predictors of future loneliness among American college students. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, pp. 463−470. Jerisald, A.J.(1963). The psychology of adolescence (2nd ed.) .New York : McMillan. Joern, J.B.(1973). Loneliness among low-income single-parent mothers. Unpublished Master‟s Thesis. University of Nebraska Lincoln. Kalliopuska, M., & Laitinen, M. (1991). Loneliness related to self-concept. Psychological Reports, 69, pp. 27−34. Kamath, M., & Kanekar, S. (1993). Loneliness, shyness, self-esteem, and extraversion. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, pp. 855-857. LaGreca, A., & Stone, W. (1993). Social anxiety scale for children _ revised: Factor structure and concurrent validity. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, pp. 17-27. Larson, R., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Graef, R. (1982). Time alone in daily experience: Loneliness or renewal? In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 40−53). New York: Wiley. Larsone, S., Guay, F., & Boivin, M. (2002). Attachment, social support, and loneliness in young adulthood: A test of two models. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, pp. 684-693. Maccoby, E. (1990). Gender and relationships. American Psychology, 45, pp. 513-520. Mahon, N.E., Yarcheski, A., & Yarcheski, T.J.(2004). Social Support and Positive Health Practices in Early Adolescents: A Test of Mediating Variables,Clinical Nursing Research ,13, pp. 213-236. Marangoni, C., & Ickes, W. (1989). Loneliness: A theoretical review with implications for measurement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, pp. 93−128. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Nelson, G. (1984). The relationship between dimensions of classroom and family environment and the self-concept, satisfaction and achievement of grade 7 and 8 students. Journal of Community Psychology,12, pp. 276-287. Oliver, J.M., Handal, P.J., Enos, D.M., & May, M.J.(1988). Factor structure of the Family Environment Scale: Factors based on items and subscales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, pp. 469-477. Oliver, J.M., May, M.J., & Handal, P.J.(1988). The factor structure of the Family Environment Scale. : Factors derived from subscales. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, pp. 723-727. Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C.W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being and the quality of life. In L. A. Peplau, & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 224−237). New York: Wiley. Papini, D., & Roggman, L. (1992). Adolescent perceived attachment to parents in relation to competence, depression, and anxiety: A longitudinal study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 12, pp. 420-440. Qualter, P., & Munn, P. (2002). The separateness of social and emotional loneliness in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 43, pp. 233−244. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, pp. 385–401. Reinherz, M. Z., Stewart-Berghauer, G., Pakiz, B., Frost, A. K.,&Moeykens, B. A. (1989). The relationship of early risk and current mediators to depressive symptomology in adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, pp. 134-142. Sarason, I.G., Levine, H.M., Basham, R.B., & Sarason, B.R.(1983). Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44(1), pp. 127-139. Schaefer, A., Brown, J., Warson, C.G., Plemol, D., Demotta, J., Howard, M.T., Petrik, N., Balleweg, J.B.(1985). Brief reports: Comparison of the validities of the Beck, Zung and MMPI Depression Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,533, pp. 415-418. Schaefer, C., Coyne, J.C., & Lazarus, R.S.(1981). The health – related functions of social support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine,4, pp. 381-406. Sullivan, H.S.(1953). The interpersonal theory of Psychiatry. New York : Norton. Swanson, W.S.(1971). Loneliness related to never married person. Unpublished Master‟s Thesis. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Syme, S.L.(1990). Control and health : An epidemiological perspective. In J., Rhodin , C.Schooler,K.W.Schaie (Eds.), self- direction: Cause and effects throughout the life course (pp.213-229).Hillsdale ,NJ : Erlbaum. Tanner, I.J.(1973). Loneliness : The fear of love : New York : Harper & Row. Tennen, H., & Herzberger, S. (1987). Depression, self-esteem, and the absence of self-protective attributional biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, pp. 72–80. Tornstam, L. (1992). Loneliness in marriage. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 9, pp. 197–217. Upmanyu, S., Upmanyu,S., & Bhardwaj,S.(1994). Loneliness sex role identity and depression. Journal of Indian Education,20, pp. 35-41. Upmanyu, V.V., Upmanyu, S., & Dhingra, M. (1993). Loneliness among adolescence in relation to personality and cognitive measures. In A.K. Shrivastava (Eds.) Research in Child and Adolescent Psychology, NCERT, New Delhi. Van Baarsen, B., Snijders, T.A.B., Smit, J.H., & van Duijn, M.A.J. (2001). Lonely but not alone: Emotional isolation and social isolation as two distinct dimensions of loneliness in older people. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(1), pp. 119–135. Visser, M.J.(1971). Loneliness among housewives-Unpublished Master‟s Thesis. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Waldron, R.J., Sabatelli, R.M., & Anderson, S.F.(1990). An examination of the factor structure of the Family Environment Scale. American Journal of Family Therapy,18, pp. 257-272. Wason, P., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1972). The psychology of reasoning: Structure and Watson, P. J., & Biderman, M. D. (1993). Narcissistic Personality Inventory factors, splitting and self- consciousness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, pp. 41–57. Yang, B., & Clum, G. A. (1994). Life stress, social support, and problem-solving skills predictive of depressive symptoms, hopelessness, and suicide ideation in an Asian student population: A test of a model. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 24, pp. 127−139. Yarcheski, A., & Mahon, N. (1989). A causal model of positive health practices: The relationship between approach and replication. Nursing Research, 38, pp. 88-93. Zabel, J.R.(1970). Loneliness and divorce. .Unpublished Master‟s Thesis. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Zimmerman, M.A., Ramirez-Valles, J., Zapert, K.M., & Maton, K.I. (2000). A longitudinal study of stress-buffering effects for urban African-American male adolescent problem behaviors and mental health. Journal of Community Psychology, 28, pp. 17-33. Zimmermann, J.G. (1785/6). Über die Einsamkeit. Frankfurt, Germany: Troppau. Zung, W.W.K. (1965).A Self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, pp. 63-70.
Corresponding Author Suman Kumari*
Research Scholar, Dept. of Psychology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur E-Mail –