A Study of Drainage Waste Water in Respect Pollution of Patna
Exploring Pathogens and Disposal Strategies in Drainage Waste Water Pollution
by Udesh Paswan*, Dr. Akhilesh Kumar,
- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540
Volume 3, Issue No. 5, Jan 2012, Pages 0 - 0 (0)
Published by: Ignited Minds Journals
ABSTRACT
The planet poses challenges with wastewater disposal as a consequence of large-scale industrialization and increased population densities and urbanized populations. Effluents generated daily from domestic and industrial activities are the major source of contamination in the receiving water supplies, which is a major burden on management of water quality. Pathogenic microorganisms, phosphorus and arsenic, hydrocarbons, heavy metals, endocrine disruptors and organic matter are some of these contaminants. The involvement of pathogenic microorganisms in water results in certain water-related diseases such as cholera, typhoid fever, diarrhea and others. The most important health risks correlated with contaminated waters involve diseases induced by microbes, viruses and protozoa. Human and livestock waste are the primary causes of these microbial toxins of wastewater. The existence of these excess quantities of phosphorus and nitrogen may also contribute to the eutrophication of bodies of water and establish environmental conditions that facilitate the development of cyanobacteria generating toxins. Chronic exposure to some of these species’ pollutants can contribute to several other diseases. Furthermore, the possibility of nonbiodegradable and recalcitrant toxins in water resides in their potential to survive for a long time in natural environments and their capacity in the biological food supply chain at successive stages. These detrimental consequences include a variety of procedures for the preparation before discharge into obtaining water sources with drainage effluent. Consequently, this study sought to offer an overview into the key pathogens and the different disposal strategies of waste water effluents.
KEYWORD
drainage waste water, pollution, water quality management, pathogenic microorganisms, health risks, eutrophication, cyanobacteria, nonbiodegradable toxins, recalcitrant toxins, disposal strategies
---------------------------♦---------------------------- INTRODUCTION
A number of chemicals in untreated or poorly handled wastewater effluents, including humans, are considered to be harmful to plants and animals and trigger detrimental environmental consequences. Nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), heavy metals, hydrocarbons, microbial matter, bacteria or endocrine disrupters are all significant toxins in wastewater and cause detrimental health and environmental impacts. In waste water, it provides a spawning place for several pathogenic species such as microbes, fungi, protozoa and viruses. In waste water, these species are generally liable for a number of water-related diseases and thus need to be handled before they are released into water sources. The production of nitrogen compounds at quantities above the necessary amount in drainage effluents is considered to be harmful to water sources obtained. Ammonia, typically in drainage in the primary type of nitrogen, is considered to be harmful in overly high concentration to marine species. Ingestion of water-containing nitrate could contribute to methemoglobinemia, often known in babies and other fragile people as the blue baby syndrome. Additionally, a variety of disruptors such as 17β-estradiol, estrone and testosterone have been documented to induce human and animal reproductive organ failure. Heavy metals such as zinc and mercury have also been documented to induce protein conformation and cancer. Additionally, a number of pathogenic microorganisms are known to grow in waste water. If microbial waste water is polluted into water sources, it is a significant danger to human and animal health. Wastewater effluents are one of the key contributors to multiple instances of water contamination. Many of these issues include metal toxicity, irritations and human and animal pathogenic diseases. Another big issue created by untreated drainage effluents is eutrophication, which may contribute to the development of algae development and raise water purification costs due to over-proliferation of nutrients. Such eutrophication implications include dissolved oxygen loss, functional shifts in obtaining water supplies, bioaccumulation and contaminant bio magnetization, the leakage of harmful compounds and the enrichment impact of nutrients. Much society 's understanding of the elimination of waterborne pathogens has provided greater focus to wastewater treatment. This is because wastewater management is a significant connexon in water-borne disease prevention and transmission. Achieving successful and reliable disposal discharge into receiving water bodies is required to reduce the harmful impacts of untreated and wrongly handled wastewater effluents. Drainage management implies the opportunity to enhance drainage production. Several approaches for eliminating toxins from drainage have been used. These procedures include physical remediation, chemical remediation, farm remediation and microbial repair. While these systems play a significant role in wastewater remediation, they have their drawbacks, and in certain situations involve a mixture of remediation processes. The goal of this thesis was therefore to investigate the main contaminants in wastewater and their effects on the atmosphere and health. The different application methods for wastewater treatment were also checked.
IMPACTS OF POLLUTANTS IN WASTEWATER
EFFLUENTS
The accumulation of toxins in drainage effluents is a primary hazard to marine life. Nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), hydrocarbons, heavy metals and pathogens are the main pollutants of wastewater. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus- Nitrogen and phosphorus are the two primary eutrophic resources in drainage effluents. More than 47% and 53% of streams have medium or large phosphorus and nitrogen amounts, respectively. Nitrogen is mainly contained in untreated wastewater as ammonia and organic nitrogen, while phosphorus may occur as soluble orthophosphate, organic phosphate or other formats of phosphorus / oxygen. A non-linear reduction in water quality was demonstrated by the occurrence of algal blooms in water. Eutrophication is identifiable by the emergence of algal blooms, which in turn results in the loss of dissolved oxygen content in the water sources. Low DO in water sources is notorious for the depletion of water life, muddy water and a significant decline of suitable fauna and flora. Moreover, poisonous algae, such as Microcystis, are also considered to inhibit large Cladocera’s in algae flora. Another result of eutrophication is the rise of chlorine needed for water bodies' disinfection, which might increase the risk of cancer. In addition, the excessive proliferation of nutrients in wastewater effluents can induce harmful microbes such as Pfiesteria. Pfiesteria is present in the water body to induce eye and respiratory
inflammation, headache and stomach symptoms. Further, the occurrence of extraordinarily elevated nitrate content above the maximum 1o mg / L in water is documented in children and other prone persons to methemoglobinemia (blue-baby disease). During childhood methemoglobinemia, nitrate in the digestive tract, which attacks hemoglobin, is converted to nitrate. Some studies indicate that the existence of nitrite may trigger chemical or enzyme reactions with amine that form cariogenic amines.
Effects of hydrocarbon- While petroleum hydrocarbons are harmful to all life form, their frequent usage and the resulting dumping and unintentional leaks render duet crude oil a reasonably popular source of environmental pollution. The existence of hydrocarbon toxins in waste water effluents is considered to have many health and environmental impacts that are quite concerned. Although petroleum is a major resource for energy and raw materials of the chemical industry, it may contribute to serious problems in interaction with obtaining water sources, including risks to ecosystems, underwater wildlife resources, human health and the degradation of the ecological balance that will take years or even decades to restore. As petroleum contains of extremely toxic compounds, its existence in water can inflict serious harm to bodies (liver and neuron) and structures such as nerve structures, nervous systems, circulatory systems, immune systems, reproductive systems and sensory systems. A number of other ailments and illnesses may also be induced by the existence of hydrocarbons in water for people and livestock. Interstitial cell degeneration and necrosis and interstitial exudation in rat tests were documented when exposed to petroleum. The sensitivity of rats to raw oil has also been shown to cause reproductive cytotoxicity that is restricted to the sperm differentiating compartment. Knox and Gilman have reported that compounds from petroleum are linked with childhood cancers. In the past, aspiration pneumonia in sheep was often found after exposure to gas condensate. The long-term research by the same cattle writers also documented a correlation between sour-gas flaring and an increased risk of still birth, and an improvement in the risk of calf mortality between cattle productivity and sensitivity to sour-gas pipeline leakage. Habitat selection studies have shown that species, including mule deer, appear to migrate away from areas of gas production. One such research suggested a 45% decrease in the deer population within one year and a decline in their gas production survival rates. Literature also included a variety of studies of petroleum hydrocarbon toxicity in humans, apes, ruminants, livestock, wildlife and dogs. Effects of Heavy metals- Industrial, chemical pollution and industrial processing are the most anthropogenic forms of heavy metals present in industrial. While some heavy metals, such as zinc, copper and iron, have been identified as critical in the aquatic environment due to their function in many biochemical processes, they are dangerous when they are present at high concentrations. The incorporation of heavy metals into food chains could lead to a level that affects their physiological condition in aquatic organisms. Since most heavy metals are known to be toxic and carcinogenic, the threat to human health and the flora and fauna of water bodies is serious. A variety of heavy metals such as zinc, copper, nickel and arsenic, even very low amounts, have been widely recognized for their toxicity. It is seen that heavy metals are able to bind to proteins and thus alter and inactivate their conformation, which usually contributes to health problems. Some tests have shown that zinc toxicity induces cramps of the stomach, skin irritations, fatigue, dehydration, anemia, impaired pancreas, digestion of proteins, arteriosclerosis, respiratory diseases and metal fever. Zinc has also been shown to pose a great danger to infants and unborn babies, particularly as their mothers ingest it at high concentrations during their pregnancies. Furthermore, the involvement of zinc in waste water is seen to raise the acidity of water, which can influence crop cultivation and yield. Further, in addition to being recognized as one of the sources of kidney injury, lead has seen to have impacts on hemoglobin production in humans and animals, which may contribute to anemia. Although some of the consequences of lead have shown to be permanent, prolonged exposure may induce a lifelong reduction of kidney function, which can contribute to renal failure. One of the most significant variables that influence the aquatic toxicity of plant is its free ionic content and distribution to animals, so water plants are unlikely to affect their levels in the general climate. When it comes to mercury, its organic shapes are more harmful than inorganic shapes for marine life. Although mercury is caused by aquatic plants at water concentrations approximating 1 mg / l for inorganic mercury, the impact is much higher in far lower organic mercury concentrations. The acute toxicity of cadmium to marine animals is also variable within closely associated species. This difference has to do with the free ionic metal concentration. It has been documented that cadmium correlates with the metabolism of calcium in animals. Cadmium has been reported to induce calcium deficiency in fish (hypocalcemia). Possibly via inhibition of the absorption of calcium from water, the long-term effects of cadmium exposure being larval mortality and a transient decrease in development. Moreover, even though chromium is required for insulin production and appropriate for livestock, it is considered to be harmful to species at high concentrations. Chromium has been known to induce skin inflammation and cancer in animals. Hexavalent chromium with a potential to induce inflammation and disease is more harmful to species in the ecosystem than trivalent chromium. Chromium is often suggested to allow fish more resistant. A large concentration of chromium, such as snails and worms, is often considered to inflict tissue damage. Effects of Microbes- It is known that the bulk of waterborne microorganisms that cause human diseases are faucal waste produced by human or animal diseases. Bacteria, viruses and protozoa are the most important health threats linked with the ingestion of unregulated drinking and leisure waters. Untreated water is a motor for many water-related disorders, such as typhoid fever, cholera, shigelloses, salmonellosis, campylobacteriosis, giardiasis, cryptos porosis and hepatitis A. Many of the pathogenic microorganisms have the potential to induce acute and persistent short-term and long-term disorders such as cardiac failure and intense stomach ulcers. Viruses are one of the biggest and most highly dangerous wastewater contaminants. They are slower to handle, more contagious, tougher to diagnose and need lower doses to induce infection. They are the most popular microbial toxins in wastewater with bacteria. They cause a large variety of diseases, including diarrhea, dysentery, skin and tissue. Giardia and Cryptosporidium are the most pathogenic protozoans associated with wastewater. In wastewater they are more widespread than in any other environmental stream.
TREATEMENT PROCESSES OF WASTEWATER EFFLUENTS
The appropriate management of drainage effluents until they are released to water sources is necessary for the safety of the atmosphere and public health. The drainage systems are classified into the following categories: phytoremediation, chemical remediation, physical remediation processes.
PHYTOREMEDIATION PROCESSES
Phytoremediation is a plant-based treatment method. Contaminants are either eliminated or converted into innocuous and often beneficial materials during phytoremediation. Diverse plants are used in the method to remove, remove, produce or immobilize soil and water contaminants. Phytoremediation has been taken into account over the years and is generally listed as a clean and cheap process, but its weaknesses are: • In order for remediation to take effect, a communication between the root of the plant and the contaminant is required, either the plant should be able to spread its roots to the contaminant or the polluted media should be transported within the area of the plant. • The procedure is based on the development of a plant, so the remediation takes longer. Given the duration of time required, the procedure might not be the remediation strategy of choice for pollutants that pose immediate threats for humans and other ecological receptors. • Although the procedure might effectively be used when the root zone's concentration of pollutants is low or mild, at large concentrations of contaminants, plant growth or death could be impaired, thus reducing its efficacy in conditions when contaminants are heavy.
CHEMICAL REMEDIATION PROCESSES
In the handling of toxins, environmental remediation is the usage of chemical products. These involve electron-beam irradiation, chemical extraction, radiocolloid application, organo-oxide sorption. Electron-beam irradiation- The theory that an electron-beam irradiation will generate free radicals (H+ and OH-) when the water is irradiated with the electron-beams. Free radicals can respond to the release of hazardous chemical entities such as CO2, H2O, salt and other compounds with organic pollutants including trichloroethylene and tetrachloride. The usage of electron beam technique has been demonstrated to be effective in the processing, at maximum scale service, of up to 99.99 percent of waste water contaminants. While it has been demonstrated that the usage of high electron dose rates is less successful than using low dose rates, studies have also indicated that high energy radiation from electron beams is a powerful and inexpensive way to eliminate dangerous organic compounds from water. Chemical extraction- The usage of chemical products to eliminate contaminants is known as chemical extraction, also known as solvent extraction. This method is primarily used in heavy metal removal. The procedure requires the application of organic solutions including extractors to transfer extracted metals from one aqueous solution to another. The metals are isolated, refined and extracted whenever this occurs. Organic compounds of molecular mass 200–450 are the most popular extractants. In water (5–50 ppm) they are nearly insoluble and selectively remove metals from aqueous solutions. The efficiency of removal is based on extraction conditions, such as the extractant form, aqueous phase anions and ph. Other technology, such as solidification / stabilization, precipitation and electro-gaining, are popular usage in chemical extraction. In the handling of sewage, waste water is combined with organic solvent producing a reagent. The metal of concern in the waste water interacts with the reagent to the creation of a chemical substance that is more organically soluble than the aqueous solution. The material of concern is then passed to the organic solution. Radiocolloid treatment- Radiocolloids are classified as solutions of mediums containing small radioactive contaminants, such as water. Concentration, mineralogy and radioactivity typically describe the inorganic colloids. There are also radiocolloids, such as plutonium and americium colloids, which can result in an elevated degree of radiation in waste water that can be carcinogenic in interaction with humans. Polyelectrolyte capture is one method for extracting radiocolloids in liquids. A polyelectrolyte capture method requires an attachment to a radiocolloid medium of a polyelectrolyte solution. The purpose of applying the electrolyte solution is to connect the positively charged radiocolloids. In laboratory column experiments, polyelectrolyte polymer treatment of colloids has been shown to be effective. Removal by sorption to organo-oxides- A synthetic sorbent is an organo-oxide that gives an organic step that can bind a non-ionic organic material. Synthetic sorbents of organo-oxide arise when an anionic surfactant adores in acidic conditions on oxides. This only arises when the oxide is charged positively. The positive charge is obtained only at pH below the zero point of charge, i.e. the pH at which rigid surface charges from all sources are zero. The sorting of anionic surfactant into an oxide is inversely proportional to ph. Organo-oxide sorbents are said to be less effective than other technologies in terms of the volume of water handled. While inefficient, comparison with other technology they have the benefits of producing on-site selectively the elimination of such pollutants while utilizing a special surfactant that can consume a particular pollutant and, if so needed, the solution extracted from the water.
PHYSICAL REMEDIATION PROCESSES
In modern wastewater treatment systems, physical remediation techniques are always used in combination with other treatment processes. Some physical remediation processes are screening, sedimentation, comminution, flow equalization and precipitation. Screening and Flow Equalization- Screening of every wastewater treatment facility is the first activity. During screening, large nonbiodegradable and floating solids, such as rags, documents, plastics, tins, conveyors and wood, are also extracted from a wastewater plant. The removal of these materials can protect the treatment plant and machinery from future injury, excessive wear and tear, piping blockages, and the accumulating of excess content that may hinder the required processes of waste water treatment. Screening is usually graded as coarse or good. Ground panels are typically employed as key safety equipment and generally have 10 mm or broader gaps. Fine screens are used to eliminate materials that can trigger operational and maintenance problems in treatment processes, particularly in non-primary treatment systems. The fine displays are between 3 to 10 mm in height. Flow equalization is the method of regulating hydraulic velocity or flow rate in drainage systems. The device stops massive input amounts (surges) from driving solids and organic content out of the solution in the shortest practicable period. It therefore regulates the flow at each level of the treatment method and thus provides ample time for the human, biological and chemical processes. Flow equalization is usually used to eliminate differences in the flow speeds and structure of water and wastewater. This is because the presence of large fluid variations over time may degrade the process output and efficiency of the treatment device. Comminution and Sedimentation- A traditional comminutor, which serves as a cutter and a mirror, primarily aims at grinding and crushing large solids, such as agricultural waste water contaminants. These big solids, such as rags and garbage, are split into tiny particles in interaction with the rotary tool. Communications do not kill the particles, but rather reduce them as drainage flows into them. The division of floating items that are larger than water is sedimentation or deposition. The mechanism is focused on the gravitational power of the particle-fluid density variations. The settling solids are extracted as sludge during sedimentation while the floating solids are extracted as scum. The efficiency or output of a sedimentation phase is influenced by the time, temperature, tank size and equipment state of the detention. In the treatment of wastewater, coagulation and flocculation adopt the most widespread type of sedimentation and precede filtration. This method of sedimentation includes chemical inclusion in the phase of coagulation or flocculation to extract floc. At this point, the sedimentation of the traditional waste water treatment method would eliminate up to 90% of the suspended objects, including bacteria, from the water. Precipitation- Precipitation is the most effective way of eliminating dissolved liquid contaminants. A reagent is applied to the mixture after precipitation such that the liquid metals are transformed into stable particles. The existence of the reagent causes a chemical reaction that creates strong particles of dissolved contaminants. Filtration will then eliminate the strong particles. Precipitation quality depends on the existence and concentration of contaminants to be extracted and the form of reagent used. Precipitation can in certain situations require a phase of chemical coagulation. During
chemical coagulation, pollution contaminants are destabilized and collect during chemical flocculation. This method destabilizes these particles by adding positively charged coagulants to reduce the charge of the negative particles.
CONCLUSION
One of the toxins in collecting water supplies is untreated liquid effluent which is not properly handled. Waste water effluents have the potential to deposit contaminants including eutrophic nutrients, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, pathogenic bacteria, endocrine disruptors and organic matter in interaction with receiving water systems. The existence of these compounds in water interrupts the eco-equilibrium of water activity and presents a danger to human life. Eutrophication, metal toxicity, discomfort, and some water-related diseases are amongst these issues. In order to protect habitat and environmental health, drainage effluents must be handled before release. Different processes such as phytoremediation, chemical remediation, physical processes will remediate the wastewater. While these treatment systems play an important role in the remediation of wastewater, their shortcomings use a mixture of certain systems in the remediation processes of most of the wastewater treatment plants.
REFERENCES
1. Abha, S. & Singh, C. S. (2011). Hydrocarbon pollution: effects on living organisms, remediation of contaminated environments, and effects of heavy metals co-contamination on bioremediation. In L. Romero-Zerón (Ed.), Introduction to Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Processes and Bioremediation of OilContaminated Site (pp. 186-206). Croatia: INTECH press. 2. Ajayi, T. O. & Ogunbayo, A. O. (2010). Achieving environmental sustainability in wastewater treatment by phytoremediation with water hyacinth (Eichhornia Crassipes). Sustainable Development, 7, pp. 80-90 3. Akpor, O. B., Momba, M. N. B. & Okonkwo, J. (2008). Effect of nutrient/carbon supplement on biological phosphate and nitrate uptake by protozoa isolates. Applied Sciences, 8, pp. 489-495. 4. Collado, S., Quero, D., Laca, A. & Díaz, M. (2010). Efficiency and sensitivity of the wet oxidation/ biological steps in coupled pharmaceutical wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering, 239, pp. 212-217. 5. Coulibaly, L., Gourene, G. & Agathos, N. S. (2003). Utilization of fungi for biotreatment of raw wastewaters. Biotechnology, 12, pp. 620-630 6. Danilović, B., Savić, D. & Veljković, V. (2009). Cultivation of microalgae in wastewater for the biofuels production. Reporting for Sustainability. 7. Davies, P. S. (2005). The biological basis of wastewater treatment. West of Scotland: Strathkelvin instruments Ltd. 8. Dilshad, G. A. & Ahmed, I. K. (2010). Phytoremediation of wastewater using some of aquatic macrophytes as biological purifiers for irrigation purposes. Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 42, pp. 552-575 9. Dhokpande, S. R., Kaware, J. P. (2008). Biological methods for heavy metal removal-a review. Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, 2, pp. 304-309 10. Environmental Protection Agency 2007. Health risks of human exposure to wastewater. EPA Research and Development Fact Sheet, pp. 2-3 11. Environmental Protection Agency (2010b). Constructed wetlands treatment of municipal wastewaters, Office of Research and Development, Ohio, 1-80 12. Frank, D., Lawrence, K. W., Shoou-Yuh, C. & Yung-Tse, H. (2005). Screening and comminution. Environmental Engineering, 3, pp. 1-19 13. Gaber, S. E., Rizk, M. S. & Yehia, M. M. 2011. Extraction of certain heavy metals from sewage sludge using different types of acids. Biokemistri, 23, pp. 41-48 14. Galadima, A. & Garba, Z. N. (2009). Heavy metals pollution in Nigeria: causes and consequences. Pollution, 45, pp. 7919-7922 15. Hanna, S. M. (2008). Examples of radiation wastewater treatment implemented in various countries. Twelfth International Water Technology Conference, Alexandria, pp. 1-7
Corresponding Author Udesh Paswan*
Department of Zoology, A. N. College Patna, Magadh University