Perceptive Transformations in Consumer Payment Behaviors – Do Arming With Online Technology Attracts Consumers?

Exploring the Impact of Online Technology on Consumer Payment Behaviors in India

by Ms. Anita Verma*,

- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540

Volume 12, Issue No. 23, Oct 2016, Pages 460 - 466 (7)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

Advancement of technology and innovation made huge development and opened a door of opportunities for digital payment in India and the digital wallet, organizations profited the opening such doors. Digital payment has revolutionized retailing by making consumers buying different products from all over the world. In the last decade, India has witnessed huge growth in the use of mobile phones in the digital India era. This expanding utilization of the web, versatile use of mobile phones, and government endeavors combined with the widespread use of digital payment modes, for example, Google Pay, Paytm, etc. have shifted the consumer base towards the use of more and more digital modes.

KEYWORD

perceptive transformations, consumer payment behaviors, arming with online technology, consumers, advancement of technology, digital payment, digital wallet, organizations, retailing, mobile phones, digital India era, web, government endeavors, digital payment modes, Google Pay, Paytm

INTRODUCTION

There are several facilitators which have paved the way to the development of digital payment mechanism and the occurrence of the change from the cash economy to a less-cash economy. These facilitators include the use of internet connectivity on smartphones and other institutions facilitating digital payment, one-touch payment, etc. These are the factors promoting the positive growth of digital payment in India. Digital Technology is reshaping the payment methodology. Technological progression is a continuous process and over the years it has been evolving. Technological advancement has provided an effective payment mode devoid of cash which is known popularly as digital payment. Digital payment is a type of E-commerce transaction to include electronic payment for buying products and services like Paytm, Free charge, Google pay, Mobikwik, etc. As technology is developing, the devices used for transacting electronically are rapidly increasing. Digital India acts as a catalyst that prompts exponential development in the digital payment sector. The customer view of digital payment has a critical and positive effect on the adoption of the different modes of digital payment. With the preceding challenges, the objective of this paper, therefore, is to review opportunities and challenges laid down by digital payment. This paper will examine the factors affecting the adoption of digital payment methods and a change in the culture of media consumption by consumers. The complete adoption of digital payment in developed economies is showing its ripple effect in developing economies as well. In the USA, for example, the use of bank cheques have decreased from 85% in 1979 to 59% in 2002

ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS:

There are a couple of techniques for the virtual and modernized portion available in India. These are: 1. Online Wallets: This is a virtual portion system. One need not waste time with a charge card, Visa, or web banking mystery state for making portion using an adaptable wallet. It requires a move of money in the wallet by methods for IMPS and uses it moving. You can download a compact wallet application from the play store.

2. Plastic Cards: Much equivalent to platinum cards anyway it is dynamically similar to a blessing voucher; can be restored like some other restore like DTH, Mobile, etc up to a prescribed cutoff. 3. Debit Cards: A debit card is a plastic card used as an alternative of cash when making purchases. These are associated with an individual's record. India had 48.9M charge cards, 824.9 M platinum cards in May 2019.

4. Aadhaar Enabled Payment System: This System uses the 12-digit exceptional

with different virtual portion procedures. 5. UPI Unified Payments Interface (UPI): UPI is a flexible portion system that empowers one to do diverse budgetary trades on Smartphone. UPI empowers one to send or get money using a virtual portion address without entering bank information. Shippers can choose with banks to recognize portions. Forex SBI Pay, ICICI Pocket, etc.

6. E-Wallets: An E-wallet can be used to purchase things stretching out from essential nourishment thing to transporter tickets. To use E-wallets customers and dealers, both require a mobile phone with a dynamic web affiliation. The most conspicuous instance of E-wallet is PayPal. Besides PayPal, one can in like manner use Pioneer, Transfer quick, Skrill, and PayZa.In the wake of enrolling for E-wallet, you need to associate your Mastercard or check card with E-Wallet Id. One can use an e-wallet to help move or web shopping. 7. Gift Card -The accompanying virtual portion procedure is a blessing voucher. 8. Online Transfer Using Neft Or RTGS -This system for virtual trade is online trade using NEFT or RTGS. To do online money move, one needs a web banking office. Online trade using NEFT or RTGS is moderately snappier than check or DD. Online trade should be conceivable from wherever using web office The point of convergence of the present examination is to discover and perceive how respondents are enduring or getting related to cutting edge portions.

LITERATURE REVIEW:

The literature review comprises of the following studies: Davis (1986) advocated one of the famous models associated with the adoption of technology is the technology acceptance model (TAM). TAM explains the theoretical epicenter of the services to designate consumer behavior, concerning the adoption of technology. TAM is envisioned as a significant addendum of (TRA) - theory of reasoned action. Jain (2006) -―E-payments and e-banking‖ discussed that e- payments will be able to check black money. Annamalai, Muthu & Iiakkuvan (2008) in their article ―Retail transaction: Future bright for plastic money‖ anticipated the evolution of debit and credit cards in the merchandising settlements. Clifford (2009) in a study titled ―The problem regarding fake

Amin (2012) proposed changes in technology to be adopted, within variations in the economy virtual payment primes to some radical fluctuations. M. Taylor (2011) has tackled the issue of modes of payment as to in what way modes of payment effect consumer outlay behavior. These authors have also examined the inclination of users to apply existing indication that outlay for the credit card is greater as compared to cash outlay. Studies also revealed that credit cards promote an upsurge of not so required objects procurements (Soman, 2003). Many famous models relating to consumers' adoption of technology have been suggested in the past. Venkatesh (2012) in an analysis entitled "Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: expanding the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology" showed UTAUT as an influential structure. The proposition is vital for consumer behavior regarding the usage of technology in comparison with a condition that fluctuates allowing dynamics They also proposed a vital outcome on the behavior of consumers by technology usage in meeting a speckled condition that is effervescent.

KEY INFORMATION FROM GLOBAL DIGITAL REPORT 2019:

1. The number of internet operators globally in 2019 is 4.38 billion which is upward by 9.1 %. 2. The number of social media users worldwide in 2019 is 3.484 billion upward by 9 %. 3. The number of mobile phone users in 2019 is 5.112 billion, upward by 2 %. 4. Social media can be expanded for socialization to remain in touch with others, to share views, to share pics and videos, and to congregate new people. 5. Social media can be utilized for entertainment substances, to fill extra time, and to play favorite music. 6. Research indicates that the position of social media in campaigns has augmented enormously over the years in contrast to others. Social Media can be expended to collect information, remain apprised with current, discussion forums, gather responses by surveys and polls, and educators notify the parents about the diverse events steered and made a sagacity of society. valuable marketing station for trades of all dimensions. The influence of social media has been abundant these days, it‘s infrequent to discover a company that does not influence its spectators through a social media stage. 8. Companies have originated in their awareness of social media as an instrument for communication among consumers to contemplate it as significant for determining virtual companies and creating income. Digital Industries have banked upon the obligation for individuals to continually pursue and segment data have a quota of knowledge which is used to make perceptions and create digital product offerings at the targeted level.

PAYBACKS OF VIRTUAL PAYMENTS:

1. Custom: Mobile wallets embrace the expanse in the by electronic means encoded system to comfort the payment procedure where users can designate online e- payments by not piercing the user card particulars. 2. Advanced practices: It permits the user to connect the wallet and pay so that the users face no issues to deal through the transaction in very less time and this encourages modernization, 3. Conviction: When someone has to make payments through online merchants the wallet does not permit the card details to the other party. 4. E-base: It eliminates the requirement to carry currency in the wallet with a variety of notes and coins to give exact change. 5. Saving milieu: Due to widespread global warming with virtual modes, there is a saving of the environment. 6. Attractive incentives: One can avail discounts that are accessible by users as the majority of the industries in the payment sector offer discounts.

EMERGENCE OF INDIA AS DIGITAL ECONOMY:

The digitalization of the Indian economy is to authorize individuals exploiting the internet by bringing e-governance, teaching, and healthiness amenities in distant areas too. It purposes to link the It is realized that the developed economies are already incorporating digital technology due to its visible impact on the global economy. India has launched its ambitious project ‗Digital India‘ with a mission. The Govt. of India has launched the Digital India program as a flagship program to renovate India into a digitally vested society. To recognize Indian society as a knowledge economy with the main objects of affording e-learning, healthiness, and e-governance facilities. India also objects on giving e-learning, healthiness, e-governance amenities as its central ideas. The Digital India sequencer hurled in 2015 objects to bridge the gap by the promotion of investment of funds in infrastructure aiming to improve literacy and progressively giving internet facilities. India‘s accomplishment in the relations to giving internet facilities and permitting e-contribution has been in contour with the developed countries, is worth mentioning. As per Thomas Mesenbourg (2001) the parts of the digital economy are: 1. E-Business Infrastructure: It comprises of hardware, software, telecommunications networks, human assets for usage in digital trade. 2. E-Business: A process conducted over computer-mediated networks by a business enterprise. 3. E-Commerce: It is transferring goods and services between the buyer and seller online. As per ranking conducted by World Economic Forum, 2016, Singapore has been at the top-ranking and is deriving the best benefits of information technology and is making exemplary usage of digital technology in delivering basic and government services also ensure that its institutions are smoothly connected. The other nine countries including Finland, Sweden, Norway, the US, Netherlands, Switzerland, UK, Luxembourg, Japan also have fine access to advance technology making their venture capital and business network highly connected. These countries have an extremely favorable business and innovative atmosphere which has created one of the most buoyant and digitized economic centers in the world. To analyze and measure the digital depth of various countries, the World Economic Forum has prepared a Networked Readiness Index, a crucial barometer for determining how countries are performing in the digital world. It reckons how well

The World Economic Forum observed that India slipped down two positions to an overall rank of 91 because other countries are moving at higher speeds compared to India. After cash crunch in the economy and common people started making digital transactions and thus involved themselves in the digital economy on a massive scale but subsequent remonetization again reduced the quantum of digital transactions. The value of AEPS digital transactions, as per NPCI, has shot up from Rs. 1.9 billion to Rs. 12 billion by May 2017 (a growth of 532%). At the time of publication of the Networked Readiness Index 2016, India did not make any remarkable progress. The common people started making digital transactions and this involved themselves in the digital economy on a massive scale but subsequent remonetization again reduced the quantum of digital transactions. Digital payments rose 55% in 2016-17 against a 28% growth during the five years ending the year 2016. According to RBI data, debit card usage at the point of sale more than doubled to 400 million-plus transactions at the height of cash crunch in December from 140 million in October, reduced in February to 250 million, and has stabilized around 268 million in April. RuPay card transactions have grown 316% at 16 lakh from 3.85 lakh on 8th November, while the value has been up 503% at Rs. 236 cr from Rs. 39 cr in November. Similarly, with more than 10 billion subscribers of Jio Telecom Services and competitive measures of other Telecom Service operators now a large part of the Indian Population is using internet-enabled services like digital payments, e-commerce, e-learning, telemedicine, and e-governance, etc. According to a Report, of India‘s 1.2 billion population, an estimated 485 million in urban and 180 million in rural areas, as of June 2017, are using the Internet and further among them, it has 410-420 million mobile internet users with 245-250 million As of 31st March 2017, in urban and 165-170 million in rural areas.

Evolution of E-Wallets and Digital Currencies:

The digital economy is much more about conducting online transactions, from economic innovations to transforming how the business is done to allowing entry of new digital currencies and payment processes.

Blockchain Technology:

Blockchain Technology is a protocol for replacing worth over the internet without the involvement of an intermediary, like Reserve Bank. the principal advanced monetary forms. By taking care of one such issue about 12-and-a-half bitcoins are produced. Its beginning can be followed back to 2009 when an obscure gathering of codes (under the nom de plume 'Satoshi Nakamoto') acquainted Bitcoin with the world as a shared ('P2P') open-source programming that works to make and keep up a dispersed open record. Bitcoin depends on basic 'blockchain innovation' which is similar to a database that keeps up the record of all progressions made to it since its creation through the common agreement of its clients. The principle qualities of bitcoin are: i) Regionalization: Unlike customary cash, there is no focal position to direct its stockpile. ii) Cryptographical Architecture: Bitcoin exchanges are approved on a P2P premise in a decentralized way. iii) No Intermediary: Unlike prior variant of computerized monetary forms, Bitcoin need not bother with the confided in an outsider to approve transactions. iv) Safety: Trading in bitcoin is protected to an extent that the giver's and collector's personality isn't revealed henceforth limiting the degree of hacking the framework. Bitcoin has become a lot of mainstream simply after the Prime Minister Narendra Modi propelled the demonetization and that its cost came to $102018 at some point which was $757, and somewhere in the range of $866 and $896 at the beginning of 2017. On 27th May 2017, the market cost of bitcoin in India came to $2096.68. There has been a reasonable flood in bitcoin exchanges after 2017. The advanced economy was well what's to come. Exchanges through bitcoins have been legitimized in the US, EU, Japan, and Singapore, yet there is sufficient exertion being made to control the bitcoin economy. In this specific circumstance, there is no law yet in India.

ARMING WITH DIGITAL MODES AND PROSPECTS FOR INDIA:

The Computerized India program, as conceived by the government, will help India in beating difficulties, giving residents access to a better framework and personal satisfaction. India has an enormous chance to line up with the government's Digital India activity that can change the beneficial encounters of 1.2 billion Indians. Advanced become the greatest business challenge in the following 30-40 years. Goldman Sachs predicts that India could be the second-biggest economy by 2030. The main advantages of India's open part are expanded income; decreased costs; higher representative profitability; improved wellbeing and security; improved condition; upgraded resident experience, and better wellbeing and prosperity. The neo-liberal financial strategies since the most recent decade have just satisfied every one of these measures, with the most recent expansion of the Aadhar Card. Presently the stage is all-around set for the remarkable digitization of the economy. India appears to be prepared for the change to an advanced economy and Mckinsey recognized three conditions, for example across the board versatile network and possession; a national advanced installment infrastructure, and a well-spread individual ID framework with chips or biometric ID for India to guarantee a smooth computerized change.

REFERENCES:

Bourne, RHL & Szmigin, I. (1999). ―Electronic Cash: A Qualitative Assessment of its Adoption‖, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17, pp. 192-202. Brown, S.A, and Venkatesh, V. (2005). ―Model of adoption of technology in households: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle‖, MIS Quarterly 29 (3), pp. 399–426. Calder, B.J., (1977). ―Focus groups and the nature of qualitative marketing research‖. Journal of Marketing Research XIV, pp. 353–364. Chartterjee, P., & Rose, R. (2012). ―Do Payment Mechanisms Change the Way Consumers Perceive Products?‖ Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), pp. 1129–1139. Chida, E., Mambo, M., & Shizuya, H. (2001). ―Digital Money – A survey. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences,‘‘ 7(2), pp. 135–165. Constantinou, I.D et. al. (2006). ―Exploring perceptions and use of mobile services: user deference in an advancing market‖. International Journal of Mobile Communications 4 (3), pp. 231–247. Davis, F.D. (1989). ―Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology‘‘. MIS Quarterly, 13(3 (September)). pp. 319–340. Willingness to Pay‖, Springer, volume 12, pp. 5–12. Eastin M.S. (2002). "Diffusion of e-commerce: an analysis of the adoption of four-e-commerce activities", Department of Telecommunication, Michigan State University, 19(3), pp. 251-267. Economides N. (1996). ―The economics of networks‖. International Journal of Industrial Organization 14 (6), pp. 673– 699. Feinberg Richard A. (1986). ―Credit Cards as Spending Facilitating Stimuli: A Conditioning Interpretation,‖ Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (December), pp. 348–356. Hirschman Elizabeth C. (1979), ―Differences in Consumer Purchase Behavior by Credit Card Payment,‖ Journal of Consumer Research, 6 (June), pp. 58–66. Grabner Krauter, and S. Kaluscha, E.A. (2003). ―Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment‖. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58 (6), pp. 783–812. Hirschman E.C. (1982) ―Situational perception of product prototypes within the product class of consumer payment systems‖. Journal of General Psychology 106, pp. 123–140. Hultman (2005). ―One digital leap, or a step-by-step approach? An empirical study of e-commerce development among Swedish.‖ International Journal of Electronic Business 3(5): pp. 447-460. Kim, H.-W., et.al. (2007). ―Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems‖ 43 (1), pp. 111–126. Lee, I., Kim, J., Kim, J., et.al. (2005). ―Use contexts for the mobile internet: a longitudinal study monitoring the actual use of mobile internet services‖. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 18 (3), pp. 269–292. Mallat N. (2004). ― Mobile banking services. Communications of the ACM‖ 47 (5), pp 42– 46. Moon, J.W. and Kim, Y.G. (2001). ―Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management‖

Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I., (1991). ―Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation‖. Information Systems Research 2 (3), pp. 192–223. Nina Mallat (2007). ―Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments -A qualitative study‖ Journal of Strategic Information Systems pp. 413-432. Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P.E., Thorbjørnsen, H., et. al. (2005). ― Intentions to use mobile services: antecedents and cross-service comparisons‖. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 33(3), pp. 330–346. Prelec, Drazen, and Duncan Simester (2001). ―Always Leave Home Without It: A Further Investigation of the Credit-Card Effect on Willingness to Pay,‖ Marketing Letters, 12 (1), pp. 5–12. Rogers, E.M. (1995). ―Discussion of Innovations‖, fourth ed. Free Press, New York. Siau, K., Sheng, H., Nah, F., Davis, S., et. al. (2004). ―A qualitative investigation of consumer trust in mobile commerce.‖ International Journal of Electronic Business 2 (3), pp. 283–300. Snelders, H. M. J. J., Lea, S. E. G., Webley, P., & Hussein, G. (1992). The polymorphous concept of money. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, pp. 71-92. Snellman, K. (2006). Mobile services market in Finland (2005). Ministry of Transport and Communications. Stewart, D.W., Shamdasani, P.N., 1990. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications, Newbury Park. Szmigin, I., Bourne, H. (1999). Electronic cash: a qualitative assessment of its adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing 17 (4), pp. 192–202. Soman, Dilip (2001). ―Effects of Payment Mechanism on Spending Behavior: The Role of Rehearsal and Immediacy of Payments,‖ Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (March), pp. 460–74. Soman, Dilip and Amar Cheema et. al. (2002). ―The Effect of Credit on Spending Decisions: The Role of the Credit Limit and Credibility,‖ Marketing Science, 21 (Winter), pp. 32–53. Letters, 14 (3), pp. 173-183. Srivastava, J. & Raghubir, P. (2008). Monopoly Money: ―the effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior‖. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 14(3), pp. 213–225. Taylor, S., Todd, P.A. (1995). ―Understanding information technology usage – a test of competing models‖. Information Systems Research 6 (2), pp. 144–176. Teo, T.S.H., Pok, S.H. (2003). ―Adoption of WAP-enabled mobile phones among internet users.‖ Omega 31 (6), pp. 483–498. Thaler, R. H. (1980). ―Towards a positive theory of consumer choice‖ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, pp. 39-60. Thompson S. H. Teo and Siau Heong Pok (2003). ―Adoption of the Internet and WAP-enabled phones in Singapore Department of Decision Sciences‖, Behaviour & Information Technology, VOL. 22, NO. 4, pp. 281–289. Tomi Dahlberg (2007). ―Understanding changes in consumer payment habits-Do Mobile Payments and Electronic Invoices Attract Consumers?‖ Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference. Tornatzky, L.G., Klein, K.J. (1982). ―Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: a meta-analysis of findings.‖ IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 29 (1), pp. 28–44. Van Hove, L. (1999). ―Electronic money and the network externalities theory: lessons for real life‖. Netnomics 1 (2), pp. 137–171. Van Hove, L. (2001). ―The New York City smart card trial in perspective: a research note.‖ International Journal of Electronic Commerce, pp. 119–131. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD et. al. (2003). ―User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view‖, MIS Quarterly, pp. 425- 478. Wells, W., Gubar, G. (1966). ―Life cycle concept in marketing research‖. Journal of Marketing Research, pp. 355–363. Wu, J.H., Wang, S.-C. (2005). ―What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model‖. Information & Management 42 (5), pp. 719–729. Xu, G., Gutierrez, J.A. (2006). ―An exploratory study of killer applications and critical success factors in M-commerce‖. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations 4 (3), pp. 63–79.

Corresponding Author Ms. Anita Verma*

Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce