Bioassay-Guided Separation and Cell Reinforcement Assessment of Flavonoid Compound from Aerial Parts of Lippia Nodiflora L.

Identification and Isolation of Active Antioxidant Compounds in Lippia Nodiflora

by Pragyan Paramita Biswal*, Dr. Kumud Sarin,

- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540

Volume 14, Issue No. 1, Oct 2017, Pages 66 - 70 (5)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

Lippia nodiflora is a vital restorative plant with various revealed pharmacological properties. It has been accounted for to contain real auxiliary metabolites, for example, nodifloretin, 6-hydroxyluteolin, nepetin, and batatifolin, hispidulin, and jaceosidin, stigmasterol and sitosterol, y-sitosterol and eupafolin, few of which have been appeared to apply in vitro cancer prevention agent impact. Consequently, these phytochemicals are thought to be responsible for the pharmacological properties of this plant. In spite of the way that, there is a proof for the cell reinforcement movement of methanol concentrate of L. nodiflora, the major antioxidative constituents exhibit in the elevated parts have not been widely researched. Subsequently, in light of the ethno-restorative and logical data so far accessible, the present part was engaged to recognize and disengage dynamic compound(s) in charge of the cell reinforcement property of L. nodiflora through bioassay-guided fractionation utilizing as a part of vitro DPPH test.

KEYWORD

Lippia nodiflora, flavonoid compound, bioassay-guided separation, cell reinforcement assessment, phytochemicals, in vitro antioxidant effect, methanol extract, ethno-medicinal, scientific data, DPPH test

INTRODUCTION

Responsive oxygen species (ROS) are constantly molded because of processing frameworks in oxygen expending living things and are moreover conveyed on prologue to tobacco smoke, ozone, radiations, regular solvents, and other environmental pollutions (Singh et al., 2009). ROS expect a basic part in various physiological methods, including; imperativeness age, phagocytosis, cell signal transduction, cell development, partition and apoptosis. On the other hand, extending evidence includes that overproduction of ROS can incite oxidative mischief to biomolecules (lipids, sugars, proteins, mixes, DNA and RNA) and goes about as a center individual of different issue like exacerbation, joint agony, diabetes, arteriosclerosis, development, genotoxicity, and neurological issue, for instance, et al., 2009b). Malignancy counteractive action specialists are amazingly essential for redirecting degenerative reactions made by free radicals and ROS, which have been worried about various infections and in sustenance debilitating and squander (Koleva et al., 2000). Cell fortifications may intervene their effect by direct responding with ROS, quenching them or, on the other hand chelating the synergist metal particles (Shukla et al., 1997). Regardless, the prosperity of a portion of the produced growth aversion specialists used as a piece of the sustenance business has been tended to, since later analyzes recalled that them as tumor causing administrators (Whysner et al., 1994). Along these lines, there is a creating excitement for ordinary malignancy counteractive action specialists, which may envision oxidative damage (Silva et al., 2005) and this has upheld the examination and depiction of potential blends from typical resources (Gheldof and Engeseth, 2002; Chang et al., 2007; Mohamed et al., 2013). Lippia nodiflora is a vital therapeutic plant with various revealed pharmacological properties. It has been accounted for to contain significant optional metabolites, for example, nodifloretin (Barua et al., 1969), 6-hydroxyluteolin, nepetin, and batatifolin (Barnabas et al., 1980), hispidulin, and jaceosidin (Tomas-Barberan et al., 1987), stigmasterol and - sitosterol (Siddiqui et al., 2009), - sitosterol (Balamurugan et al., 2011) and eupafolin (Ko et al., 2014), few of which have been appeared to apply in vitro cell reinforcement impact. Consequently, these phytochemicals are thought to be responsible for the pharmacological properties of this plant. In spite of the way that, there is a proof for the cell reinforcement action of methanol concentrate of L. nodiflora, the

accessible, the present section was engaged to recognize and separate dynamic compound(s) in charge of the cell reinforcement property of L. nodiflora through bioassay-guided fractionation utilizing as a part of vitro DPPH measure. The separated compound was in this way portrayed by using HPLC, NMR and MS and tried in natural tests in up and coming parts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

• Chemicals

The reagents, for example, 2-Deoxy-D-ribose, butylated hydroxyl toluene (BHT), 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), phenazine methosulphate (PMS), nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT), sodium nitroprusside and Griess reagent were gotten from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). 2, 4 ,6-tripyridyl-S-triazine (TPTZ), thiobarbituric corrosive (TBA), trichloroacetic corrosive (TCA), ethylene diaminetetraacetic corrosive (EDTA), ferric chloride (FeCl3), ferrous sulfate (FeSO4), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-diminished (NADH), HPLC review solvents and reagents utilized for the extraction and silica gel (0.075-0.15 mm) for section chromatography were acquired from M/s Sisco Exploration research centers, Mumbai, India. Every single other compound and reagents utilized as a part of this investigation were of explanatory review.

• Plant materials

The restorative plant L. nodiflora is chosen in the present examination with the reason to investigate their concoction constituents of antioxidative nature. The gathering and handling of plant material are depicted in materials and techniques area of Part I.

• Extraction, fractionation and confinement of bioactive compound(s) Arrangement of unrefined concentrate

The dissolvable for extraction was chosen in light of their yield from preparatory extraction and phytochemical screening contemplates as clarified in Part I. The powdered elevated parts of L. nodiflora (1.5 kg) were extricated with 90% methanol (4.5 L × 2) at room temperature. The blend was sifted through Whatman No. l channel paper and the solvents from the joined concentrate was concentrated utilizing a vacuum rotating evaporator (Superfit, India), at 60°C to bear the cost of 64.7 g of unrefined methanol extricate (CME, 4.31%).

Fractionation of unrefined methanol remove

The concentrate was broken up in 500 ml of warm water, and the subsequent fluid bit was divided with segment. The watery stage was then progressively parceled with n-butanol (3 × 200 ml), consequently acquiring n-butanol dissolvable part (BF) and water portion (WF). Every one of the parts were gathered independently and lessened utilizing a vacuum revolving evaporator to evacuate the dissolvable and the resultant fluid concentrate was lyophilized in vacuo. The examples were then tried for its cell reinforcement property utilizing DPPH measure. Since the yield and the cancer prevention agent property of the EAF are good, it was utilized for the segregation of bioactive constituent(s).

Disconnection of bioactive compound

The DPPH dynamic EAF (17.2 g) was stacked as a dried slurry of silica gel to segment chromatography (CC) (45 × 3.5 cm) and eluted with oil ether: EtOAc slope elution (100:0 - 0:100), in an expanding request of extremity. A sum of 92 divisions of 100 ml each were gathered and investigated by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and comparative parts were pooled to bear the cost of seven noteworthy portions (Fr. A: 1-13, Fr. B: 14-35, Fr. C: 36-48, Fr. D: 49-60, Fr. E: 61-70, Fr. F: 71-80, Fr. G: 81-92) in view of TLC investigation. These divisions were focused and tried for bioactivity utilizing DPPH spectrophotometric measure. For advance filtration, the exceedingly dynamic Fr. B (2.8 g) was chromatographed utilizing silica gel section, eluted with oil ether-EtOAc angles and the ethyl acetic acid derivation substance of the blend were expanded in a progression of 5% stages. The separate parts were gathered, pooled again in view of TLC investigation, focused and tested for DPPH movement. Absolutely five sub-parts were acquired and the latent and less dynamic demonstrated divisions were disposed of. At long last, the dynamic Fr.B2 eluted with oil ether-EtOAc dissolvable framework (85:15) yielded a solitary compound as a pale white undefined powder. The extraction strategy for the separation of dynamic compound was schematically appeared in Figure 2.1. The structure of disconnected compound was described by following ghostly examination and further tried for its cancer prevention agent impacts.

Thin layer chromatography

Silica gel 60 F254 plates (20 × 20 cm, 0.2 mm thick; E-Merck, Germany) were utilized for TLC investigation. The parts gathered amid detachment process were spotted onto silica gel TLC plates. The different dissolvable frameworks were utilized to examine the groups on TLC plates lastly the dissolvable framework chloroform: ethyl acetic acid derivation: formic corrosive (5:4:1) was utilized as the portable stage for TLC examination, in light of the best division. The plates were air-dried and the isolated groups were imagined utilizing iodine vapors and vanillin-sulphuric corrosive reagent (0.5g vanillin estimations of isolated groups in every portion were ascertained and pooled together to require advance partition.

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

The purity of the isolated bioactive compound was further established using HPLC. HPLC analysis was performed using a C-18 column (250 × 4 LC-8A chromatographic apparatus (Shimadzu Co., Japan). The mobile phase consisted of methanol: phosphoric acid (0.5% in water) (60:40, v/v) and the flow rate was held constant at 1 ml/min. The elution profile was detected at 280 nm, using variable wavelength UV detector.

• Characterization of bioactive compound by analytical methods UV-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy analysis

UV spectroscopy has become a major technique for the structural analysis of secondary metabolites. The UV-visible spectrum of the isolated bioactive compound (1 mg) in 10 ml of HPLC grade methanol was recorded using a Varian Cary 500 scan max -500 nm). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy analysis FT-IR is perhaps the most powerful tool for categorizing the types of chemical bonds (functional groups) present in compounds. The wavelength of light absorbed is characteristic of the chemical bond as can be seen in the annotated spectrum. By interpreting the infrared absorption spectrum, the chemical bonds in a molecule can be determined. The FT-IR spectrum was obtained using a Nicolet 380 (Thermo Scientific, USA) spectrometer at room temperature. The functional group was identified using potassium bromide (KBr) pellets and scanned in the range of 4000-400 cm-1.

Mass spectrometry analysis

Electrospray mass spectrometry approach is broadly used for the rapid characterization of natural products. The sample (1 mg) was prepared in methanol (1 ml) and the mass spectrum was obtained with a Thermo Scientific Exactive Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) fitted with an electron spray ionization (ESI) source. Mass spectra were recorded under electron impact ionisation at 60 eV energy and the mass was recorded in the range of 100-1000 m/z.

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) analysis

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra was recorded on BRUKER, Avance 400 MHz NMR instrument (Switzerland), operating at 400 MHz for 1 H and 100 MHz for 13C nuclei at room temperature and referenced to the residual solvent signal. The sample was dissolved in CDCl3 (J) values are reported in ppm H and 0-240 ppm for 13C was employed.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Isolation and structure determination of antioxidant compound

The phytochemical examinations have uncovered that the significant constituents of the aeronautical parts of L. nodiflora are flavonoids, polyphenols and steroids. In this examination, the methanol concentrate of L. nodiflora and its parts were at first screened by spectrophotometric DPPH examine and the outcomes are appeared in Table 2.1. The DPPH measure uncovered that the methanol extricate show the most elevated cancer prevention agent action (79.35 ± 0.34%) like that of standard BHT at test centralization of 50 µg/ml (86.42 ± 0.65%). To start the way toward distinguishing the dynamic compound(s) among the parts (EAF, BF and WF), each division was tried for cancer prevention agent action. Of these divisions, the ethyl acetic acid derivation part (EAF) had more grounded DPPH radical rummaging action than the BF and WF at both test fixations, and on the other hand, it demonstrated direct movement contrasted with BHT (Table 2.1). This might be because of the nearness of concoction natures and structures of the cancer prevention agent standards in EAF than different divisions and thus the distinction in strength between the portions in restraining DPPH radical was caused by the diverse mixes show in the plant. As the EAF indicated positive outcome, a bioassay guided fractionation was performed on EAF keeping in mind the end goal to separate the bioactive compound(s) adding to the most elevated DPPH searching impacts. After each fractionation procedure, the portions were tried for cancer prevention agent action. The aftereffects of the cell reinforcement viability of the parts. Of the seven noteworthy divisions gathered, Fr. B display the most elevated DPPH searching movement (51.4%) and it was in this way subjected to silica gel segment chromatography for assist cleaning. Five sub-portions (Fr.B1-Fr.B5) were pooled in view of TLC investigation and a compound of pale white undefined powder (yield: 117 mg, 0.68%), was gotten from the sub-division Fr.B2.

Table 2.1. DPPH radical scavenging activity of the crude extract and fractions of aerial parts of L. nodiflora. Sample Test Concentration Wml) DPPH radical scavenging activity (%)

Crude methanol extract (CME) 50 79.35 ± 0.34

n-butanol fraction (BF) 50 21.65 ± 0.87

25 13.27 ± 0.67

Water fraction (WF) 50 28.47 ± 0.21

25 17.24 ± 0.14

aButylated hydroxyl toluene (BHT) 50 86.42 ± 0.65

In vitro cancer prevention agent exercises of methanol separate and secluded compound HTMF

Past investigations revealed that the pharmacological impacts of L. nodiflora, for example, cancer prevention agent, diuretic, mitigating and antimicrobial exercises was perceived because of the nearness of the phenol and flavonoid mixes (Singh et al., 2002; Shukla et al., 2009a). Exogenous cell reinforcements from normal sources can advance the capacity of the endogenous cancer prevention agent framework which is at risk for counteracting free radicals in the body (Johnson, 2004). In the present examination, the segregated compound was distinguished as flavone, a kind of flavonoid and its cell reinforcement exercises were inspected by utilizing different in vitro cancer prevention agent models.

DPPH radical searching impact

In this examination, the methanol concentrate, HTMF and BHT demonstrated a focus subordinate (10-50 (rg/ml) against radical action by repressing DPPH radical. The aftereffects of DPPH searching action of all test. The most noteworthy DPPH searching movement for concentrate, HTMF and BHT was observed to be 79.35%, 72.66% and 86.09%, individually at 50 (rg/ml. It is to be noticed that the rummaging movement of HTMF was observed to be near the concentrate. The IC50 estimations of concentrate, HTMF and BHT for searching DPPH radical was observed to be 24.5, 27.2 and 19.3 gg/ml, individually. The outcome acquired in this was lower than the announced searching movement of methanol concentrate of L. nodiflora (12.03 gg/ml) (Durairaj et al., 2008a).

CONCLUSION

The present examination was anticipated to survey the cell reinforcement and free radical rummaging exercises of concentrate and portions from elevated parts of L. nodiflora by utilizing as a part of vitro cell reinforcement models. The outcomes demonstrated that among the considered parts, the ethyl acetic acid about the recognizable proof of the flavonoid compound to be specific, 5-hydroxy-3',4',7-trimethoxyflavone (HTMF). The estimation of cancer prevention agent movement of the segregated HTMF, by utilizing different in vitro cell reinforcement models, turned out to be a powerful cancer prevention agent compound. These outcomes imply that methanol extricate, ethyl acetic acid derivation parts and additionally detached compound showed intriguing cancer prevention agent properties and bear the cost of a fundamental reason for the utilization of L. nodiflora in the treatment of oxidative harms. The nearness of hydroxyl and electron-giving methoxy assemble in HTMF might be responsible to apply the cancer prevention agent nature and along these lines can possibly counteract ailment caused by the overproduction of radicals. This is the primary give an account of the detachment of HTMF from L. nodiflora and to account on its cancer prevention agent and free-radical rummaging properties. These discoveries hold incredible observation in the advancement of option cancer prevention agent operators, and still further work is justified to deal with and describe the dynamic standards from different parts, so as to set up their helpful viability and system of activity. Besides, the aftereffects of this work speak to an amazing reason for additionally investigation of the secluded compound towards its solid defensive part against oxidative maladies and conceivable use as a potential pharmaceutical application.

REFERENCES

Atoui AK, Mansouri A, Boskou G, Kefalas P. (2005). Tea and herbal infusions: their antioxidant activity and phenolic profile. Food Chem. 89: pp. 27-36. Ayissi Owona B, Njayou NF, Laufer S, Moundipa PF, Schluesener HJ. (2013). A fraction of stem bark extract of Entada africana suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in RAW 264.7 cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 149: pp. 162-168. Badmus JA, Adedosu TO, Fatoki JO, Adegbite VA, Adaramoye OA, Odunola OA. (2011). Lipid peroxidation inhibition and antiradical activities of some leaf fractions of Mangifera indica. Acta Pol Pharm. 68: pp. 23-29. Bahar I, Lezon TR, Yang LW, Eyal E. (2010). Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. Annu Rev Biophys. 39: pp. 23-42. Cathcart MK, Folcik VA. (2000) Lipoxygenases and atherosclerosis: protection versus

1726-1734.

Celej MS, Montich CG, Fidelio, GD. (2003) Protein stability induced by ligand binding correlates with changes in protein flexibility. Protein Sci. 12:1496-1506. Damien Dorman J, Deans SG, Noble RC, Surai P. (1995) Evaluation in vitro of plant essential oils as natural antioxidants. J Essent Oil Res. 7: pp. 645-651. Eichhorn T, Hiller C, Hirschfelder K, Frank M, Krauth-Siegel RL, Muller R,Mertens R, Efferth T. (2013) Identification by high-throughput in silico screening of radioprotecting compounds targeting the DNA-binding domain of the tumor suppressor p53. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 10:35-45. Elmore S. (2007) Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 35: pp. 495-516. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 136: pp. 359-386. Ghavami S, Hashemi M, Ande SR, Yeganeh B, Xiao W, Eshraghi M, Bus CJ, Kadkhoda K, Wiechec E, Halayko AJ, Los M. (2009) Apoptosis and cancer: mutations within caspase genes. J Med Genet. 46: pp. 497-510. Halliwell B, Cross CE. (1994) Oxygen-derived species: their relation to human disease and environmental stress. Environ Health Perspect. 102: pp. 5-12. Issa AY, Volate SR, Wargovich MJ. (2006) The role of phytochemicals in inhibition of cancer and inflammation: New directions and perspectives. J Food Compost Anal. 19: pp. 405-419. Khan AN, Perveen S, Malik A, Afza N, Iqbal L, Latif M, Saleem M. (2010). Conferin, potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory isoflavone from Caragana conferta Benth.J Enzym Inhib Med Chem. 25: pp. 440-444.

Corresponding Author Pragyan Paramita Biswal*

University-Pebble Hills University