Anxiety, Depression and Stress among Undergraduate Students: A Comparative Study of Mathematics and Engineering Students

Examining the Impact of Faculty and Gender on Anxiety, Depression, and Stress Levels among Undergraduate Students

by Mohammad Parvez*, Md. Nehajul S. K., Manish Agrawal,

- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540

Volume 15, Issue No. 7, Sep 2018, Pages 192 - 197 (6)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

Anxiety, depression and stress have been pervasive and severe disorders. The utterance of any of these ailments in human life reflects the prevalence of hurdles. These not only obstruct the physical and mental health of young minds but also hamper other prospects in their lives such as academic success, personal contacts, social relations and family bonds. The present study was conducted on a sample of 201 undergraduate students. A standardised tool was employed to collect data which were computed using Pearson product moment correlation coefficient (r) and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). In this throat cutting competitive era, most learners get suffered from anxiety, depression and stress which cause unrest, dropouts and even suicide attempts. An apparent height of such cases in academic institutions has led the researchers to explore these constructs. Thus, the present research is an earnest attempt to find out the difference in anxiety, depression and stress of undergraduate students in terms of faculty and gender. It also examined the association between anxiety, depression and stress. The results uncovered that there was a significant relationship between anxiety, depression and stress of undergraduate students. There was a significant multivariate main effect of faculty on the combined dependent variables anxiety, depression and stress. There was a significant univariate main effect of faculty on anxiety. Science students had a higher anxiety level than engineering students. There was a significant univariate main effect of faculty on depression. Engineering students had a higher depression level than science students. There was a non-significant univariate main effect of faculty on stress, but engineering students had a bit higher level of stress than science students. There was a significant multivariate main effect of gender on the combined dependent variables anxiety, depression and stress. There was a significant univariate main effect of gender on anxiety and depression. Females had higher scores on anxiety and depression than males. There was a non-significant univariate main effect of gender on stress, but female students scored a bit higher on stress than male students. There was a non-significant multivariate interaction effect of faculty and gender on the combined dependent variables anxiety, depression and stress.

KEYWORD

anxiety, depression, stress, undergraduate students, mathematics, engineering, academic success, multivariate analysis, gender, faculty

INTRODUCTION

―Anxiety and depression cause difficulties across social, occupational, and everyday functioning (Castle, Kulkarni, & Abel, 2006) and have been linked with physical disease, relationship difficulties, and reduced concentration (Nutt, 2004), thus significantly contributing to decrements in sufferers‘ performance (as cited in Bitsika, Sharpley, & Melhem, 2010)‖. Anxiety and depression affect respiratory symptoms (Leander et al., 2014). The financial and other issues enhance students‘ level of anxiety and depression which can disturb academic performance (Andrews & Wilding, 2004). There existed a connection between depression, anxiety and academic achievement. Low scorers had a higher level of anxiety and depression than high achievers. The stress did not affect academic achievement (P & Basha, 2017). Low-achieving students indicated more scores on depression, anxiety and stress than high-achieving students (Yasin & Dzulkifli, 2011). Anxiety, depression and stress are grave concerns which can damage health, creativity, and productivity. These syndromes may cause mental illness.

Venkatarao, 2015). School dropouts showed a higher level of stress, depression and anxiety than school-attending adolescents (Singh, Junnarkar, & Sharma, 2015). In student life, it is vital to be healthy physically and mentally to improve social conscience. Thus, it is indispensable to observe each learner to identify any symptom of maladjustment. There was a significant positive association between depression, anxiety and stress of undergraduate nursing students (Rathnayake & Ekanayaka, 2016). Female respondents exhibited more depression, anxiety and stress (DAS) than male participants (Singh, Goel, Sharma, & Bakshi, 2017). Arts students revealed a higher level of depression, anxiety and stress than commerce and science students (Baviskar, Phalke, & Phalke, 2013). Females had high scores on stress, anxiety and depression than males. Science students exhibited a more elevated level of stress, anxiety and depression than arts students (Wani et al., 2016). Those mothers who exercised a few times per week were less prone to psychological distress, depression, anxiety and stress than those who did not exercise (Lovell, Huntsman, & Hedley-Ward, 2015). Maladaptive strategies emerged as outcomes of depression, anxiety and stress (Mahmoud, Staten, Hall, & Lennie, 2012).

RATIONALE OF THE STUDY

It is rightly said that the future of a nation is being shaped in classrooms, but the products of that classroom must be healthy physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually. The present era is a time of throat cutting competition and specialisation, so each person faces vivid challenges and struggles in different ways. In that way, an individual may get suffered from anxiety, depression or stress. In this study, the researcher intended to find out the difference in anxiety, depression and stress of undergraduate students in terms of faculty and gender and also examined the association between anxiety, depression and stress. Detection of these symptoms in students at an early stage is advantageous to counsel well and to cure them quickly. Thus, they must have confidence, adaptability and mental poise. In this way, the learner can maintain health as well as academic success.

ANXIETY, DEPRESSION AND STRESS

The American Psychological Association defines anxiety, depression and stress in these words: ―Anxiety is an emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts and physical changes like increased blood pressure‖. gain, insomnia or excessive sleeping, lack of energy, inability to concentrate, feelings of worthlessness or excessive guilt and recurrent thoughts of death or suicide‖. ―Stress can be a reaction to a short-lived situation, such as being stuck in traffic. Or it can last a long time if you're dealing with relationship problems, a spouse's death or other serious situations. Stress becomes dangerous when it interferes with your ability to live a normal life over an extended period. You may feel tired, unable to concentrate or irritable. Stress can also damage your physical health‖.

VARIABLES IN THE PRESENT STUDY

Dependent Variables: Anxiety, Depression, Stress. Independent Variables: Faculty (science & engineering), Gender (male & female).

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The present study is based on the following objectives: 1. To study the relationship between anxiety, depression and stress of undergraduate students.

2. To find out the difference in anxiety, depression and stress of undergraduate students in terms of faculty and gender.

HYPOTHESES

H01. There will be no significant relationship between anxiety, depression and stress of undergraduate students. H02. There will be no significant difference in anxiety, depression and stress of undergraduate students in terms of faculty and gender.

DELIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

These followings delimit this study: 1. The present study is bound to final year undergraduate students of Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, U.P. 2. The present study is restricted to gender (male and female).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This present study was piloted at Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. It was planned to compare anxiety, depression and stress level of final year undergraduate students in respect of faculty and gender; it was also intended to study the relationship between anxiety, depression and stress. The investigator carried out this research as a quantitative investigation. This study is also characterised as correlation research as the investigator studied associations between anxiety, depression and stress (Geramian, Mashayekhi, & Ninggal, 2012).

PARTICIPANTS

In the present study, the population comprised of undergraduate students from Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh. This study was conducted on a sample of 201 undergraduate students (103 science students & 98 engineering students; 102 male students & 99 female students) studying in the graduation final year at Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India. The sample was drawn on a random basis. In this study, total male and female undergraduate students were taken into consideration.

PROCEDURE

The researcher personally visited the departments and Women‘s college at Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh after getting permission from the respective chairpersons and principal. The objectives of the study were clarified to students. A respectable bond was established to obtain accurate responses from the participants through a short dialogue. They were assured that their information will be used only for research purpose and will be kept in confidence. They were instructed to fill out the questionnaire as it was elucidated in the manual of the tool itself.

MEASURES

The revised scale (ADSS; BSPSA, 2018) was used to measure anxiety, depression and stress. It comprised of 48 items divided into 3 subscales, anxiety subscale (19 items), depression subscale (15 items) and stress subscale (14 items) scored on a 2-point scale 1 (yes) and 0 (no). Endorsement percentage in 45 questions (out of 48 items) was above 25%. Hence all 48 items were retained. Reliability of the scale as measured by Cronbach‘s alpha and Spearman-Brown coefficient is 0.81 and 0.89. anxiety, depression and stress of undergraduate final year students. It was also planned to compare anxiety, depression and stress level of students in terms of faculty and gender. SPSS software version 20.0 was used to analyse the findings. Pearson product moment correlation (r) and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were employed to compute data.

RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

Table 1: Correlation matrix of anxiety, depression and stress

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) It is clear from the table 1 that there exists a significant relationship between anxiety and depression (r=.431, p< 0.01), anxiety and stress (r= .490, p< 0.01) and depression and stress (r= .539, p< 0.01) so, H01 is rejected, it means that there is a significant positive relationship between the said groups.

Table 2: To find out the difference in anxiety, depression and stress of undergraduate students in terms of faculty and gender

A two-way MANOVA revealed a significant multivariate main effect of faculty on the combined dependent variables anxiety, depression and stress, Wilks‘ λ = .910, F(3, 195) = 6.417, p = .000, partial 2 = .090. There was a significant multivariate main effect of gender on the combined dependent variables anxiety, depression and stress, Wilks‘ λ = .926, F(3, 195) = 5.193, p = .002, partial 2 = .074. There was a non-significant multivariate interaction effect of faculty and gender on the combined dependent variables anxiety,

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Estimated Marginal Means

There was a significant multivariate main effect of faculty on the combined dependent variables anxiety, depression and stress, Wilks‘ λ = .910, F(3, 195) = 6.417, p = .000, partial 2 = .090. Further a separate ANOVA was conducted for each dependent variable, there was a significant univariate main effect of faculty on anxiety, F(1, 197) = 4.30, p = .039, partial 2 = .021 with science students (M = 6.216) having a greater anxiety level than engineering students (M = 5.406). There was a significant univariate main effect of faculty on depression, F(1, 197) = 6.617, p = .011, partial 2 = .032, with engineering students (M = 6.490) having a higher depression level than science students (M = 5.401). There was a non-significant univariate main effect of faculty on stress, F(1, 197) = .211, p = .647, partial 2 = .001. But engineering students (M = 6.582) had a bit higher stress level than science students (M = 6.378). There was a significant multivariate main effect of gender on the combined dependent variables anxiety, depression and stress, Wilks‘ λ = .926, F(3, 195) = 5.193, p = .002, partial 2 = .074. Follow-up univariate ANOVAs indicated that there was a significant univariate main effect of gender on anxiety, F(1, 197) = 9.288, p = .003, partial 2 = .045, with females (M = 6.406) having a higher anxiety level than males (M = 5.216). There was a significant univariate main effect of gender on depression level than males (M = 5.235). There was a non-significant univariate main effect of gender on stress, F(1, 197) = 1.860, p = .174, partial 2 = .009. But females (M = 6.783) scored a bit higher on stress than males (M = 6.176). There was a non-significant multivariate interaction effect of faculty and gender on the combined dependent variables anxiety, depression and stress

Wilks‘ λ = .986, F(3, 195) = .920, p = .432, partial 2

= .014. However, the multivariate interaction effect is not statistically significant, one can look at univariate tests of main effects but should not examine univariate interaction effects (Leech, Barrett & Morgan, 2015).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The present research is an earnest attempt to find out the difference in anxiety, depression and stress of undergraduate students in terms of faculty and gender. The results of the present study showed that there was a significant association between anxiety, depression and stress of undergraduate students. There was a significant multivariate main effect of faculty on the combined dependent variables anxiety, depression and stress. There was a significant univariate main effect of faculty on anxiety. Science students had a higher anxiety level than engineering students. It may be because of less security in job opportunities among science students. There was a significant univariate main effect of faculty on depression. Engineering students had a higher depression level than science students. It may be as a result of a long phase of workload among engineering students. There was a non-significant univariate main effect of faculty on stress, but engineering students had a bit higher level of stress than science students. There was a significant multivariate main effect of gender on the combined dependent variables anxiety, depression and stress. There was a significant univariate main effect of gender on anxiety and depression. Females had higher scores on anxiety and depression than males. It may be caused by their keen perception of trauma, hurt, risk, sexual harassment and child abuse. There was a non-significant univariate main effect of gender on stress, but females scored a bit higher on stress than males. There was a non-significant multivariate interaction effect of faculty and gender on the combined dependent variables anxiety, depression and stress. The results are almost similar to other studies; there was a positive association between anxiety, depression and stress (Rathnayake & Ekanayaka, 2016). Females exhibited more anxiety, depression and stress level (Singh, Goel, Sharma, & Bakshi, 2017; Wani et al., 2016; Apóstolo, Figueiredo, Mendes, & Rodrigues,

Foa, 2006). Females had a greater threat for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), due to their stronger perceptions of threat and loss of control (Olff, Langeland, Draijer, & Gersons, 2007). The pleasant and progressive environment should be provided to both science and engineering undergraduate students irrespective of gender so they may be guided and assisted regularly. They must have access to counselling with no trouble. Preference should be given to female students because they have a higher risk for these syndromes. It is desirable that teachers and guardians must observe the students to motivate and energise them to cope up with life challenges in the perspiring era.

REFERENCES

Andrews, B., & Wilding, J. M. (2004). The relation of depression and anxiety to life-stress and achievement in students. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), pp. 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369802 Apóstolo, J. L. A., Figueiredo, M. H., Mendes, A. C., & Rodrigues, M. A. (2011). Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Primary Health Care Users. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem, 19(2), pp. 348–353. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/58fa/177398ad63da936d51009ef132242acc271f.pdf Baviskar, M. P., Phalke, V. D., & Phalke, D. B. (2013). Depression, Anxiety and stress : A comparative study in Arts, Science and Commerce students from a Rural area of India. GJRA - GLOBAL Journal of Research Analysis, 2(11), pp. 183–185. Retrieved from https://www.worldwidejournals.com/global-journal-for-research-analysis-GJRA/file.php?val=November_2013_1384608588_56085_65.pdf Bhatnagar, P., Singh, M., Pandey, M., Sandhya, & Amitabh (2018). Revised Manual for Anxiety, Depression and Stress Scale (ADSS). Agra: National Psychological Corporation. Bitsika, V., Sharpley, C. F., & Melhem, T. C. (2010). Gender Differences in Factor Scores of Anxiety and Depression among Australian University Students: Implications for Counselling Interventions. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 44(1), pp. 51–64. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7dde/243bfcdaccd9040f0dde4297b969d27370ab.pdf Geramian, S. M., Mashayekhi, S., & Ninggal, M. T. B. H. (2012). The relationship between 4374–4379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.257 Iqbal, S., Gupta, S., & Venkatarao, E. (2015). Stress, anxiety & depression among medical undergraduate students & their socio-demographic correlates. Indian J Med Res, 141(3), pp. 354–357. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.156571 Leander, M., Lampa, E., Rask-Andersen, A., Franklin, K., Gislason, T., Oudin, A., … Janson, C. (2014). Impact of anxiety and depression on respiratory symptoms. Respiratory Medicine, 108(11), pp. 1594–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2014.09.007 Leech, N.L., Barrett, K.C., & Morgan, G.A. (2015). SPSS for intermediate statistics: use and interpretation (5th ed.). New York: Routledge. Lovell, G. P., Huntsman, A., & Hedley-Ward, J. (2015). Psychological distress, depression, anxiety, stress, and exercise in Australian and New Zealand mothers: A cross-sectional survey. Nursing & Health Sciences, 17(1), pp. 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12128 Mahmoud, J. S. R., Staten, R. T., Hall, L. A., & Lennie, T. A. (2012). The relationship among young adult college students‘ depression, anxiety, stress, demographics, life satisfaction, and coping styles. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 33(3), pp. 149–156. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2011.632708 Olff, M., Langeland, W., Draijer, N., & Gersons, B. P. R. (2007). Gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), pp. 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.183 P, S., & Basha, S. A. (2017). Impact of Depression, Anxiety and Stress on Academic Achievement among Engineering Students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 5(1), pp. 202–208. Retrieved from https://www.ijip.in/Archive/v5i1/18.01.058.20170501.pdf Rathnayake, S., & Ekanayaka, J. (2016). Depression, Anxiety and Stress among Undergraduate Nursing Students in a

http://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/31_rathnayaky_originial_9_3.pdf Singh, K., Junnarkar, M., & Sharma, S. (2015). Anxiety, stress, depression, and psychosocial functioning of Indian adolescents. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 57(4), pp. 367–374. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.171841 Singh, M., Goel, N. K., Sharma, M. K., & Bakshi, R. K. (2017). Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety and Stress among Students of Punjab University, Chandigarh. National Journal of Community Medicine, 8(11), pp. 666–671. Retrieved from http://njcmindia.org/uploads/8-11_666-671.pdf Tolin, D. F., & Foa, E. B. (2006). Sex Differences in Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Quantitative Review of 25 Years of Research. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), pp. 959–992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.959 Wani, M. A., Sankar, R., P, R., A.L.S, N., C.E, S., & L.D.B, M. (2016). Stress Anxiety and Depression Among Science and Arts Students. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR), 5(3), pp. 48–52. Retrieved from http://ijepr.org/doc/V5_Is3_Sep16/ij10.pdf Yasin, M. A. S. M., & Dzulkifli, M. A. (2011). Differences in Depression, Anxiety and Stress between low-and high achieving students. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 6(1), pp. 169–178. Retrieved from http://jssm.umt.edu.my/files/2012/01/19.June11.pdf

WEB PAGES

http://www.apa.org/topics/anxiety/ http://www.apa.org/topics/depression/index.aspx http://www.apa.org/topics/stress/index.aspx

Mohammad Parvez*

Professor, Department of Education, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India

mparvez9@yahoo.co.in