To Synthesize Multilayered Nanowires for Selective Device Application

INTRODUCTION

Nanotechnology is enchanted to have this assortment on all parts of nanowires. In the previous decade, semiconductor nanowires have been widely researched for the up and coming age of gadgets as well as photo detectors, photo catalysis, photo voltaic, thermo electrics, and quantum information processing, among other applications [1]. Nanowires are rods or mainstays of semiconductor material with one measurement (the nano wire breadth) on the request for 10 nm to a couple hundred nanometers, and length that have more noteworthy than the distance across (on the request for microns or more). The novel parts of nanowires, for example, enormous surface region, quantum restriction, and viable strain unwinding, guarantee improved execution contrasted with traditional mass or slim film innovation. All nano wire scientists are welcome to contribute your unique examine results or survey style article on test, hypothetical and innovative parts of semiconductor nanowires. Kept frameworks of nanometer measurements speak to one of the significant wildernesses in cutting edge materials look into on the grounds that they show novel physical properties and have opened up another region of essential explore just as potential applications in nano gadgets [2]. One rising innovation is spintronics, a wonder that adventures both the characteristic turn of the electron (turn up and turn down) and its related attractive moment[3]. An exceptional case of such wonders is the mammoth magnet obstruction impact [4], characterized as the adjustment in the electrical opposition of a material upon the utilization of an outside attractive field[5-6]. As of late, examine around there has concentrated on the advancement of attractive metal multilayered nanowire clusters (for example Co–Cu, Ni–Fe–Cu or Ni–Cu [7]) whenever contrasted with either multilayers or granular movies [8] in light of the fact that the physical parameters being unequivocal for the magnet transport properties are incompletely unique for the two sorts of attractive nanostructures, prompting fascinating results[9]. In this work, a detailed study of the morphology, structure and magnet transport properties of Co–Ag/Ag multilayered nanowires prepared by electro deposition is shown. The intrigue is centered around the Co–Ag framework in light of the high GMR values estimated in meager movies [10,11] and the absence of any report on the magnet obstruction of Co–Ag/Ag multilayered nanowires. An electro affidavit system was utilized in light of the fact that it permits getting excellent materials. A chloride-based electrolyte has been chosen due to the intriguing outcomes appeared in past considers [12,13]. A hypothetical examination of the field reliance of the magnet obstruction is additionally detailed.

The scaling down of optoelectronic gadgets is fundamental for the proceeded with achievement of photonic advances. Nanowires have been Semiconductor nanowires with high optical addition offer promising answers for lasers with little impressions and low power utilization. Because the primary exhibition of nanowire lasers in 2001, optically pumped coherent laser emission has been accomplished in nanowires. These nanowires act as both waveguides for optical cavities and gain media for light amplification. Most of the nanowire lasers that have been reported were implemented with simple single-nanowire cavities. In these cavities, high optical gain can be obtained because of the large overlap between the photonic mode and the semiconductor gain media. However, low reflectivity at the end-facets (acting as mirrors of the laser cavities) of nanowires induces considerable losses to the cavities, which prevents shorter wires from lasing. There has also been some effort toward more efficient lasing cavities, such as GaN ring resonators. Because of the little quantity of substance (as meager as a couple of cubic micrometers) utilized in nanowire lasers, the influence mandatory for nanowires to lase is very low contrasted with naturally visible lasers. Electrically determined nanowire lasers were accounted for to reach lasing edge with simply a pair of small scale amps flow. By setting these nanowires in outer holes, for example, photonic gem or disseminated Bragg reflectors with high reflectivity, further reduction of their lasing threshold is likely, even for lower power consumption.

Parallel and adaptable reconciliation of nanowire gadgets over huge territories can be executed utilizing the LB technique to compose nanowires with controlled arrangement and dispersing, and using photolithography to define interconnects. Centimetre scale clusters containing a great many single SiNW field-impact transistors can be promptly created along these lines with exceptional reproducibility and versatility to at any rate the 100 nm level. This idea is delineated in Fig. 1 with the manufacture of enormous varieties of nanowire FETs in which every dynamic gadget comprises of a solitary p-type SiNW when all is said in done, the nanowire clusters are made on 1–10 cm2 substrates, and afterward in the last metal cathode affidavit step, the photolithography veil is adjusted distinctly to the situation of the rehashing nanowire exhibits. Optical and electron microscopy pictures exhibit the key highlights and chain of importance of configuration, as well as (1) FET associate array by 1 mm cluster pitch rehashed over the whole substrate (Fig. 1 a), (2) focal terminal exhibits on a 3-μm cathode pitch (Fig. 1 b) and (3) singular 20 nm distance across SiNWs associated between the finger cathodes and the regular anode (Fig. 1 c). Utilizing this technique, around 80% of the 3000 potential anode associations accessible on a run of the mill test chip could be connected by nanowires when the dispersing of the adjusted nanowires was Figure 1. (a) Optical micrograph of included metal electrode arrays deposit on peak of patterned parallel nanowire arrays distinct through photolithography. Scale bar, 1 μm. (b) SEM picture of the middle dynamic area of a duplicate component of the electrode array exposed in part (a). Scale bar, 40 μm. (c) SEM picture of three nanowire device associated among the ordinary and finger electrodes. Scale bar, 3 μm. (d, e) SEM imagery of higher-density nanowire devices distinct through electron beam lithography. Scale bars, 300 nm. This technique is versatile and it can be utilized to deliver gadgets in the nanometre volume system over huge regions. Since the normal nanowire dividing can be prohibited along to the nanometre scale through the LB pressure a lot littler gadget size and a higher thickness of gadget incorporation can be promptly accomplished when existing high-goals parallel lithography strategies, for example, submicron photolithography, extreme UV lithography or nanoimprint lithography, are applied to define electrodes following this interconnection strategy. This main point of scaling is reveal using electron beam lithography to define regular nanometre-scale contact electrodes without enrolling them to individual nanowires. Outstandingly, electron microscopy pictures show unmistakably that individual nanowires are associated in high return for terminals with 300 nm (Fig. 1 d) and 150 nm (Fig. 1 e) pitch. There are likewise nanowires that fall between the anodes, true to form measurably, despite the fact that these are not expected to influence the interconnected dynamic gadgets.

In general, various synthesis methods are employed to controllably produce 1D metal-oxide NWs. They can be briefly categorized into two major methods: (1) physical deposition and (2) chemical deposition.

deposition methods include chemical vapor deposition (CVD), hot-filament metal-oxide vapor deposition, thermal oxidation, and solvothermal and sol–gel syntheses. The main difference between these two types of synthesis techniques is that chemical deposition involves chemical reactions during the synthesis of 1D metal-oxide NWs, while physical deposition methods do not. In contrast, physical deposition methods are especially useful for controllable ‗‗topdown‘‘ growth processes, whereas chemical deposition methods are usually used in ‗‗bottom-up‘‘ growth processes. In any case, the purity and concentration of oxygen in the growth environment plays an important role in the synthesis of high-quality 1D metal-oxide NWs. For commercial and large-scale production considerations, chemical deposition methods are always preferred for the synthesis of 1D metal-oxide NWs because there are many more potential industrial manufacturing methods for practical applications.

In the semiconductor industry, various CVD techniques are employed for the fabrication of active device materials because of the superior controllability of the quality of the obtained materials compared to those achieved by physical vapor deposition methods. The conventional CVD techniques include metal– organic CVD, laser-ablation CVD, and plasma-enhanced CVD. Specifically, Fig. 1a shows a typical schematic of a tube furnace system employed for CVD synthesis.[14] Basically, all CVD methods are governed by two standard growth mechanisms, namely the vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) or vapor–solid–solid (VSS) mode and the vapor–solid (VS) mode. VLS growth has been widely regarded as the fundamental synthesis mechanism for various types of 1D metal-oxide nanostructures since it was reported for the growth of silicon whiskers in 1964.[15] Fig. 2 b demonstrates a schematic of the VLS growth mechanism. Explicitly, the substrate is always deposited first with a metal film with dimensions on the nanometer scale. Later, during the growth, as the temperature increases, the metal film melts and yields metallic droplets that act as catalyst particles. With the continuous feeding of gaseous precursors, the metallic droplet and reactive precursor vapor next form a eutectic alloy in the liquid phase at a certain temperature. In other words, the reactive vapors act as the solutes dissolving into the metallic particles. As the dissolution continues, the liquid eutectic alloy gradually becomes saturated and then precipitates to form crystalline solid phases with specific growth orientations. In this case, 1D nanostructures can be grown by carefully maintaining the precursor supply and process temperature for an extended period of time. Because the entire process involves a precursor vapor, liquid eutectic alloy as the catalyst and a solid size of the metallic droplets are effective ways to reliably manipulate the sizes, shapes and surface morphologies of the obtained 1D nanostructures.[16-17] In some cases, when the catalytic alloy has an eutectic temperature higher than the NW growth temperature, a solid catalyst tip will form to yield the VSS growth mechanism shown here.[18-20] In contrast, the main difference between the VS and VLS growth mechanisms is that catalytic particles are not required for the growth of 1D metal-oxide nanostructures via the VS growth mode.[21-22] Therefore, the VS mechanism is considered to be a self-catalytic process because only the precursor vapor and solid phase are involved in the growth process. In this scheme, the nanostructures usually grow along a preferential axis in which the crystal plane has the lowest energy and forms the 1D morphology. There are two main processes involved in the VS growth mechanism for the synthesis of 1D metal-oxide nanostructures: (1) The metal solid is first evaporated at high temperature to form the metal precursor vapor. Then, the metal vapor reacts with oxygen in the surrounding environment to yield the metal–oxygen vapor. For some metals with high boiling points, carbon powder is often required to function as a reducer to decrease the reaction temperature required to form the metal–oxygen vapor.[23] (2) Once the metal–oxygen vapor comes in contact with the substrate, it condenses into nanoscale droplets. Eventually, these small droplets grow into 1D crystalline nanostructures. Because no catalyst is involved in the growth process, the 1D crystalline nanostructures obtained via this VS mechanism are usually observed to have uncontrollable diameters or unfavorable morphologies (e.g. zig-zag patterns, nanocrystal chains and networks), abundant crystal defects on their surfaces, uneven radial NW growth, etc.[24-27] However, even though CVD techniques are highly regarded as competitive methods for low-cost and large-scale industrial production, several restrictions still remain; these include slow deposition rates, ease of chemical contamination, lack of ability to deposit multicomponent materials by precursors with different vaporization rates and temperatures simultaneously, high required deposition temperatures, difficulty of controlling the doping type and concentration, etc. It has been noted that the high deposition temperature of the CVD process can ensure good crystallinity and good thermal and chemical stability of the obtained 1D nanostructured semiconductors; however, at the same time, it limits their applications to integrated circuits because high temperatures can cause permanent damage to many properties of the underlying substrate. Furthermore, CVD-grown 1D nanostructured semiconductors always exhibit non-conventional intrinsic properties due to the uncontrollable growth intrinsic defects formed during the growth process.[28-30] Although p-type conduction was reported for ZnO NW arrays grown using P2O5 as a dopant, this p-type conduction was very unstable and readily changed to n-type conducting behavior after 2 months of storage in air.[31] Stable p-type doping of ZnO nanostructures is very difficult to obtain and has rarely been achieved in a reliable and controllable manner.

The rational plan and synthesis of SiNW is basic to work coordinated towards understanding major properties, making nano organized materials and creating nanotechnologies.To explore the diverse and exciting potential of one dimensional (1D) SiNWs, it is essential to be able to control and systematically vary their diameter, length and electronic properties. To meet these prerequisites we have concentrated our endeavors on building up a general and prescient manufactured methodology, much as sub-atomic pillar epitaxial has filled in as a universally handy strategy for the development of two-dimensional (2D) structures.

SiNWs are single crystalline nanostructures with uniform widths. Investigations of the parts of the bargains illustrate which are frequently end with gold nano particles (Fig. 3), accordingly giving solid proof to proposed VLS development component [34]. Furthermore, the crystallographic development headings of SiNWs have likewise been explored utilizing HRTEM, and deliberate estimations uncover that development tomahawks of SiNWs are identified with their distances across Figure 3(a) HRTEM picture of the gold catalyst/nanowire edge of a SiNW through a_111_ growth axis. Scale bar, 20 nm. (b) HRTEM picture of a gold catalyst/nanowire edge of a SiNW by _110_ enlargement axis. Scale bar, 5 nm.

The crossed nanowire (cNW) engineering is an amazing procedure for both creation and coordination of nano gadgets [35-38]. Nanowires inside a crossed cluster fill a double need, for example they can work as both dynamic gadgets and interconnects to the gadgets. Critically, all key nanoscale measurements are characterized during combination and ensuing get together, and subsequently it is a genuine base up approach. What's more, the cNW engineering gives characteristic scaling without extra intricacy, just as the potential for joining at the most noteworthy densities since the dynamic gadget size is generally

crossed SiNW p–n intersection collected from 20 nm measurement p-and n-type SiNWs is appeared in Fig. 4 an and b [39]. Current versus voltage (I–V) information data on the entity p-and n-type SiNWs are direct and demonstrate which metal–SiNW associates are ohmic, and along these lines won't make a noteworthy commitment to the nonlinear I–V conduct of the intersections. Fundamentally, I–V estimations made on the p–n intersection shaped at the nanowire–nanowire cross show current correction, displaying comparative conduct to mass semiconductor p–n intersections. Instances of crossed SiNW FETs are additionally appeared in Fig. 4 c and d. For this situation, a SiO2 shell, which can be set up by testimony promptly following nanowire development or by warm oxidation, fills in as a vital entryway dielectric with controlled thickness [40]? Agent electrical vehicle information recorded on a solitary cNW–FET shows great entryway reaction. For consumption mode gadgets made beside these lines, the limit voltage is likewise entirely reproducible with estimation of 5.4 0.8V. (a) (b)

Figure 4 (a) Representation and SEM illustration of a crossed SiNW p–n junction. Scale bar, 2 μm. (b) I–V behaviour of p–n, p–p and n–n junctions, correspondingly. I–V manners of entity p- and n-type SiNWs, and junctions are illustrate; the current values are multiplied by 10.The solid line correspond to voltage drop evaluate among leads 3 and 4, and the dash line to voltage among 3 and 2. (c) Graphic and SEM illustration of a crossed SiNW FET device. Scale bar, 1 μm. (d) Conductance opposed to gate voltage of a solitary cNW–FET. Inset: Histogram of the threshold voltages for 30 cNW–FETs

Electroplating [41] depends on the decrease of metallic particles from an electrolyte, normally a fluid, constrained by an outer wellspring of electrons through a power supply. A typical plating cell comprises of at any rate two terminals. Statement happens at the cathode (contrarily one-sided anode, working terminal), while a reciprocal redox oxidation estimated concerning a third, reference terminal. This empowers a superior characterized move of electrochemical potential, which can be misused for testimony of various materials from an answer containing numerous animal types (e.g., Co and Cu for multi-sectioned wires). Electrodeposition is ordinarily finished with a DC current controlled in either galvanostatic mode (fixed current), or potentiostatic mode (fixed potential). The steady potential mode gives command over crystallography and for the most part arrangement in composites and divided structures. The steady present mode empowers a simpler tuning of the length of nanostructures. Surely the development rate is better controlled, as the measure of material is legitimately relative to the passed electric charge. Likewise, the galvanostatic statement arrangement is easier, requiring just two terminals. Beside DC current, AC or pulsed (- switched) affidavit [42] can be utilized. It might give an increasingly homogeneous sythesis if there should be an occurrence of composites or different stores with co-testimony of a few components (43), just as near 100 % filling of the pores

For deposition of wires or cylinders, one uses regularly nanoporous layouts (alu mina, polycarbonate – electrical protectors) with a metallic layer (for example Au) covering the pores on one side and along these lines filling in as the terminal where testimony is started [structures develop from the pore base, (Fig. 5a)]. The terminal ought to be presented to the plating arrangement just through the pores, to stay away from undesirable statements and diminished yield of nanostructures. The external breadth of saved nanostructures is set by the layout (pore measurement) and the length is ordinarily corresponding to the affidavit time (and constrained by the format thickness – pore length). Nanowires with sub-10nm widths can be set up as exhibited by 5-nm-distance across nanowires from and Ni, Co, and Fe. So as to get empty nanotubes rather than strong wires inside the pores, various conditions and statement parameters ought to be utilized. Systems to get tubes incorporate beginning from a permeable working [44], altered layout pore dividers or other specific conditions (pH, current thickness, over-potential). Cylinder divider (shell) thickness can be somewhat tuned too. In any case, such control is when all is said in done poor contrasted with nuclear layer statement and electroless plating examined beneath. Electroplating can yield tubes with distances across as little as 25 nm be adequate to support development of a strong wire, specifically on account of littler distances across. This can be overwhelmed by utilizing a layout with rounded nanoholes arranged, e.g., by statement and controlled contracting of polymeric NWs inside permeable alumina as indicated [45]. Be that as it may, the angle proportion of cylinders arranged along these lines is restricted.

Like electroplating, electroless plating, additionally alluded to as an autocatalytic statement, depends on the decrease of metallic particles from a fluid electrolyte [46]. Not at all like electroplating, no outside current source is required as electrons for the decrease are given by a synthetic substance, supposed diminishing operator, included into the arrangement. In this manner, rather basic recepticle science is adequate for the affidavit. Further, practically any surface can be covered, despite the fact that a few (for example non-conductive ones) may must be artificially altered – utilizing supposed sharpening and initiation techniques, bringing about inclusion of the surface with appropriate impetus particles (Pt, Pd, Ag, . . . ). The plating is conformal like on account of nuclear layer statement, and high-angle proportion structures can be secured with the store [also profound pores where the development continues spiral way, (Fig. 5b)]. A huge assortment of materials can be kept: metals, combinations, metalloids, oxides. . . The decision of the diminishing operator relies upon the material to be plated, just as on the concoction opposition of the format/substrate. Many lessening operators contain boron (e.g., dimethylamino borane) or phosphorous (sodium hypophosphite). From not many up to several percent of these components might be fused in the store. Material properties, (for example, grain size, electrical conductivity, mechanical hardness)

ALD [47] is an exceptional system of synthetic fume testimony, which is self-constraining and restricted to the surface. Testimony continues in cycles, with the example consecutively presented to a forerunner gas, frequently an organometallic compound, and afterward to a subsequent reactant, for example, water fume, oxygen, hydrogen . . . The response chamber is cleansed by a latent gas, for example, nitrogen or argon in the middle of compositions, to expel the abundance forerunner. Along these lines the response is self-constraining, the two forerunners respond just at the outside of the example, and adequate time can be accommodated dispersion. Along these lines, ALD gives a conformal covering of high viewpoint proportion pores without stopping up their inlet[48]Thus it is truly reasonable for nanotube creation (Fig. 3b). The system gives phenomenal power over the NT shell thickness

ALD regularly yields oxides, e.g., Fe2O3.

Attractive NTs and NWs can be readied by means of sol-gel statement, utilizing formats. Sol-gel combination is worried about arrangement of colloidal arrangement with nm-sized particles (sol) and its transformation to gel lastly to a strong material. Dissimilar to a straightforward planning of fluid arrangement, readiness of the sol frequently requires a few stages with blending various synthetic compounds. Frequently, an alcaline salt of a metal to be saved is blended in with a liquor and added substances so as to acquire alkoxides that fill in as a forerunner for the gel. Precipitation of colloidal particles and later dissolvable evacuation for gelation is frequently helped by warming. The affidavit procedure yields for the most part oxides [e.g. CoFe2O4] or other complex mixes with some of them showing multiferroic properties [BiFeO3] as well as antiferromagnetic requesting [FeTiO3]. Postprocessing, for example, strengthening and decrease in a hydrogen environment, gives metallic nanostructures, for example, Fe, Ni or CoFe . Sol-gel is likewise being utilized in the electrospinning strategy.

Tube like structures can be acquired by means of letting stressed bilayered meager sheets move without anyone else's input. The strain decides the range of ebb and flow, while the length and number of multilayers in the roll are characterized through lithography [49]. Such structures have rather micrometric measurements. The bit of leeway is the promptly combination at exact areas on a surface. A drawback is their restricted scope of sweep and the way that they structure "Swiss-rolls" as opposed to splendidly associated tubes.

Stage partition of materials shaping various stages, some of the time immiscible, is a standard course for creating materials. It tends to be applied to shape wires, where the course request is given through a meager film development process. [50] arranged varieties of single precious stone Fe NWs inside an oxide lattice by warm decay and stage division in a source perovskite dainty film. Attractive sections (nanowires) with distances across beneath 5 nm have been set up by stage detachment in epitaxially developed grids, e.g., Co in CeO2, or Mn-rich GeMn in Mn-poor network of GeMn. Bifunctional materials, for example, fake multiferroics can likewise be made.

In this section, we have checked on late research progress on synthetically blended SiNWs and nanowire heterostructures. Moreover, the cNW design gives characteristic scaling without extra intricacy, just as the potential for combination at the most elevated densities since the dynamic gadget size is generally the nanowire intersection size. Diodes and transistors, two significant components for rationale, can be manufactured dependent on cNW structures. In conclusion, by focusing on the fundamentals of nanoscience, we accept there is the possibility to reform the absolute most significant innovations we know today and in all probability open surprising regions later on.

1. Zwanenburg F.A., Van der Mast D.W., Heersche H.B., Kouwenhoven L.P. (2009). Nano Letters 2009;9(7): pp. 2704. 2. Whitney T.M., Jiang J.S., Searson P.C., Chien C.L. (1993). Science; 261: pp. 1316. 3. Baibich M.N., Broto J.M., Fert A., Nguyen Van Dau F., Petroff F., Eitenne P., et. al. (1988). Physical Review Letters; 61: pp. 2472. 4. Binasch G., Grünberg P., Saurenbach F., Zinn W. (1989). Physical Review B.; 39: pp. 4828. 5. Piraux L., George J.M., Despres J.F., Leroy C., Ferain E., Legras R., et. al. (1994). Applied Physics Letters; 65: pp. 2484. 6. Dubois S., Marchal C., Beuken J.M., Piraux L., Duvail J.L., Fert A., et. al. (1997). Applied Physics Letters; 70: pp. 396. 8. Fert A., Piraux L. (1999). Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials; 200: pp. 338. 9. Evan P.R., Yi G., Schwarzacher W. (2000). Applied Physics Letters; 76: pp. 481. 10. Wang J.Q., Xiao G. (1994). Physical Review B.;49: pp. 3982. 11. Parkin S.S.P., Farrow R.F.C., Rabedeau T.A., Marks R.F., Harp G.R., Lam Q.H., et. al. (1993). Euro physics Letters; 22: pp. 455. 12. Garcia-Torres J., Valles E., Gomez E. (2010). Journal of Physical Chemistry C.; 114 (28): pp. 12346. 13. Garcia-Torres J., Valles E., Gomez E. (2010). Journal of Physical Chemistry C.; 114 (19): pp. 9146 14. Y. Cui, L.J. Lauhon, M.S. Gudiksen, J. Wang and C.M. Lieber (2001). Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, pp. 2214. 15. Z. W. Pan, Z. R. Dai and Z. L. Wang (2001). Science, 291, pp. 1947 16. R. S. Wagner and W. C. Ellis (1964). Appl. Phys. Lett., 4, pp. 89–90. 17. B. Wang, Y. Yang, N. Xu and G. Yang (2006). Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 74, pp. 235-305. 18. Y. Yan, L. Zhou, J. Zhang, H. Zeng, Y. Zhang and L. Zhang (2008). J. Phys. Chem. C., 112, pp. 10412–10417. 19. H. Han, Y. Wang, Z. Yang, S. P. Yip, Z. Wang, D. Li, T. F. Hung, F. Y. Wang, Y. Chen and J. C. Ho (2017). J. Mater. Chem. C, 5, pp. 4393–4399. 20. Yang, L. Liu, S. P. Yip, D. Li, L. Shen, Z. Zhou, N. Han, T. F. Hung, E. Y. B. Pun, X. Wu, A. Song and J. C. Ho (2017). ACS Nano, 11, pp. 4237–4246. 21. N. Han, F. Y. Wang, A. T. Hui, J. J. Hou, G. C. Shan, X. Fei, T. F. Hung and J. C. Ho (2011). Nanotechnology, 22, pp. 285607. 22. Umar, S. Kim, Y.S. Lee, K. Nahm and Y. Hahn (2005). J. Cryst. Growth, 282, pp. 131–136. Review Journal of Materials Chemistry C Published on 07 November 2017. Downloaded on 1/12/2016 7:44: 24. Y.R. Ma, C.M. Lin, C.L. Yeh and R.T. Huang (2005). J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct.–Process., Meas., Phenom., 23, pp. 2141–2145. 25. J. Zhang, X. Qing, F. Jiang and Z. Dai (2003). Chem. Phys. Lett., 371, pp. 311–316. 26. J. Lao, J. Huang, D. Wang and Z. Ren (2004). Adv. Mater., 16, pp. 65–69. 27. Y. Yan, Y. Zhang, H. Zeng, J. Zhang, X. Cao and L. Zhang (2007). Nanotechnology, 18, pp. 175601. 28. K. C. Kam, F. Deepak, A. Cheetham and C. Rao (2004). Chem. Phys. Lett., 397, pp. 329–334. 29. D. Chen, Z. Liu, B. Liang, X. Wang and G. Shen (2012). Nanoscale, 4, pp. 3001–3012. 30. C. H. Park, S. B. Zhang and S.H. Wei (2002). Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 66, pp. 073202. 31. X. Li, Y. Yan, T. A. Gessert, C. L. Perkins, D. Young, C. DeHart, M. Young and T. J. Coutts (2003). J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A, 21, pp. 1342–1346. 32. B. Xiang, P. Wang, X. Zhang, S. A. Dayeh, D. P. R. Aplin, C. Soci, D. Yu and D. Wang (2007). Nano Lett., 7, pp. 323–328. 33. Y. Wu,Y. Cui, L. Huynh, C.J. Barrelet, D.C. Bell and C.M. Lieber (2004). Nano Lett. 4, pp. 433. 34. Y. Wu and P. Yang (2001). JACS 123, pp. 3165. 35. C. M. Lieber (2003). MRS Bull. 28, pp. 486. 36. Y. Huang, X. Duan, Y. Cui, L.J. Lauhon, K.H. Kim and C.M. Lieber (2001). Science 294, pp. 1313. 37. Y. Huang, X. Duan, Q. Wei and C.M. Lieber (2001). Science 291, pp. 630. 38. Z. Zhong, D. Wang, Y. Cui, M.W. Bockrath and C.M. Lieber (2003). Science 302, pp. 1377. 39. Y. Cui and C.M. Lieber (2001). Science 291, pp. 851.

41. L. J. Lauhon, M.S. Gudiksen, D. Wang and C.M. Lieber (2002). Nature 420, 57. 42. Schlesinger, M., Paunovic, M. (Eds.) (2010). Modern electroplating, 5th Edition. John Wiley & Sons 43. Chandra Sekhar, M., Liew, H. F., Purnama, I., Lew, W. S., Tran, M., Han, G. C. (2012). Helical domain walls in constricted cylindrical nife nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, pp. 152406. 44. Salem, M. S., Tejo, F., Zierold, R., Sergelius, P., Moreno, J. M. M., G¨orlitz, D., Nielsch, K., Escrig, J. (2017). Composition and diameter modulation of magnetic nanowire arrays fabricated by a novel approach. Nanotechnology 29, 065602. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 45. Atalay, F., Kaya, H., Yagmur, V., Tari, S., Atalay, S., Avsar, D. (2010). The effect of back electrode on the formation of electrodeposited CoNiFe magnetic nanotubes and nanowires. Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 (8), pp. 2414 – 2418. 46. Li, Y. L., Tang, S. L., Xie, R., Wang, Y., Yang, M., Gao, J. L., Xia, W. B., Du, Y. W. (2012). Fabrication and magnetic properties of free-standing Ni nanotube arrays with controllable wall thickness. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 (5), pp. 052402. 47. Zhang, B. (2015). Amorphous and Nano Alloys Electroless Depositions, 1st Edition. Elsevier. 48. George, S. M. (2010). Atomic layer deposition: An overview. Chem. Rev. 110 (1), pp. 111–131. 49. Daub, M., Knez, M., Goesele, U., Nielsch, K. (2007). Ferromagnetic nanotubes by atomic layer deposition in anodic alumina membranes. J. Appl. Phys. 101, pp. 09J111. 50. Streubel, R., Kronast, F., Fischer, P., Parkinson, D., Schmidt, O. G., Makarov, D. (2015a). Retrieving spin textures on curved magnetic thin films with full-field soft X-ray microscopies. Nat. Commun. 6. 51. Mohaddes-Ardabili, L., Zheng, H., Ogale, S., Hannoyer, B., Tian, W., Wang, J., Lofland, S., Shinde, S., Zhao, T., Jia, Y., et. al. (2004a). Self-assembled single-crystal ferromagnetic 52. Larin, V., Torcunov, A., Zhukov, A., Gonz´alez, J., Vazquez, M., Panina, L. (2002). Preparation and properties of glass-coated microwires. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 249 (1), pp. 39–45, international Workshop on Magnetic Wires. URL 53. Ov´ari, T.A., Chiriac, H. (May 2014). Intrinsic domain wall pinning in rapidly solidified ´ amorphous nanowires. J. Appl. Phys. 115 (17), pp. 17A329. 54. Vazquez, M. (Ed.) (2015). Magnetic Nano- and Microwires. Vol. 80 of Wood head Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials. Wood head publishing, Cambridge.

Research Scholar, OPJS University, Churu, Rajasthan