To Calculate the Validity of Alternate Formula for Production Rate to Design for Un-Paced Production Line When Unbalancing the Workloads
Evaluating the Accuracy of an Alternate Formula for Production Rate on Un-Paced Production Lines
by Mohammad Tarique Jamali*, Prof. Dr. Abhijit Chakraborty,
- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540
Volume 16, Issue No. 1, Jan 2019, Pages 24 - 27 (4)
Published by: Ignited Minds Journals
ABSTRACT
In this study we find out the validity of Alternate formula for production rate. We check how much Error occur from actual Production rate to alternate formula rate Say the correction factor (CF). If we apply the Correction Factor (CF) added subtract from Alternate Formula we Found the near about actual Production Rate. After this we apply the formula for computing the large (more than 5 station un-paced production) un-paced production line easily. There for we check the variation from mean values of correction factor to correction Factor (Σ CFn-CFi)and also found the Standard deviation From actual production rate (R) to Alternate Formula Production rate( AFR) i.e. Correction Factor.
KEYWORD
validity, alternate formula, production rate, un-paced production line, workloads, error, correction factor, computing, large un-paced production, mean values, standard deviation
INTRODUCTION
In the Industry, Now a day Utilize the Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) or flexible Manufacturing System. Therefore we required to design that type of System a production line which production rate is high or suitability of work. This production line is Design according to work (different interval of time) of on each Machine (say work station) in Un-paced line or forced to work for Equal interval of time in Paced production line. In this strategy we use Un-paced production line where the Interval of time for each work station are different. We set time to each work station according to these strategies and find out the production rate. We find the production rate (Jamali, 2015) for 5- work station then we calculate the Alternate formula for Production Rate5 which is simple for designer to calculate the production rate without use of computer. Now we see how much this formula is valid. We check it through correction factor (CF), variance with mean value of Correction Factor and standard deviation. Here we found that our formula is correct if we add the correction factor in this formula for production rate.
THEORY
Here we Know the interval of time From previously we find out the actual production rate Stretegies (Jamali, 2015. Hiller and So, 1993. Jamali, 2016. Jamali & Suhail, 2016. Jamali, 2002). Know we calculate the Correction Factor, variance with mean value of Correction Factor (Σ CF/n-CFi), standard deviation σ. We define here each function. Here D= Highest work load (Time) distribution in work station – Lowest work load (time) distribution in work station Correction Factor = Production Rate (R) - Alternate formula for Production Rate (AFR) Alternate formula Rate = (μ1 + μ 5)/ total time in production line Here μ1, μ2, μ3, μ4, μ5 is work load (time) distribution on work station (Jamali, 2015. Hiller and So, 1993. Jamali, 2016. Jamali & Suhail, 2016. Jamali, 2002) Mean value of Correction Factor = Σ CF/n
For example , for S. No.1, 3 ,………..30,35…………………………………… 59, 60 means Σ CF/n – CF1, Σ CF/n – CF3, Σ CF/n – CF5……., Σ CF/n – CF30, Σ CF/n – CF35……………….. Σ CF/n – CF55, Σ CF/n – CF60 Where standard deviation σ = Sqrt (Σ (Σ CF/n- CFi)2)/n Here i indicate that S. No. and n =total S.No.= 14 For example, for S. No.1, 3, ………. 30, 35 …………………………………… 59, 60 means Sum (S) =(Σ CF/n- CF1)2 + (Σ CF/n- CF3)2 +………………………+(Σ CF/n- CF30 )2+(Σ CF/n- CF35 )2+………………….(Σ CF/n- CF59 )2+(Σ CF/n- CF60 )2 From these formula we calculated the Alternate formula Production Rate, Correction Factor, Variance with Mean vale Of Correction Factor, Standard deviation and found the graph of each values of variance to S. No. and analyze that our study is correct or not. These values are given in tabulated form given below.
Tables and graph- Table 1. Alternate formula rate, Production Rate when work load distribution linear are D= 1.8
Table2 Alternate formula rate, Production Rate when work load distribution linear are D=1.2 Table 4. Alternate formula rate, Production Rate when work load distribution linear are D= 0.1 Table 5Alternate formula rate, Production Rate when work load distribution random are D= 1.9
*value of last station and first station are very low therefore the AFR are very low
Variance with Mean vale of Correction Factor (Σ CF/n-CFi) VS S. No. When D= 1.8 linear Variance with Mean vale of Correction Factor (ΣCF/n-CFi) VS S. No. When D= 1.2 linear Variance with Mean vale of Correction Factor (ΣCF/n-CFi) VS S. No. When D= 0.3 linear Variance with Mean vale of Correction Factor (ΣCF/n-CFi) VS S. No. When D= 0.1 linear Variance with Mean vale of Correction Factor (ΣCF/n-CFi) VS S. No. When D= 1.9 Random Variance with Mean vale Of Correction Factor (ΣCF/n-CFi) VS S. No. When D= 0.4 Random
RESULTS
When we analyze the Result From Graph and Table we see that, Variance with Mean vale Of Correction Factor (ΣCF/n-CFi) and standard deviation σ is D=1.8 linear (+0.2397, -0.234) σ=0.0393, D= 1.2 linear(+0.133, -0.116) σ=0.0204, D=0.3linear (+0.037, -0.036) σ=0.0461, D= 0.1linear (+0.011, -0.0134) σ 0.00224, D= 1.9 Random (+0.3914, -0.298) σ = 0.0647 D= 0.4 Random (+0.0256, -0.036) σ=0.0077 When we see the graph of each table, we say that the trends of correction factor to mean value is
the formula is valid and the revised formula is Adding CF to the AFR. Therefore we say that Actual production rate (R) = AFR + CF for Calculation of CF for bigger production line we develop CF= Constant X Standard Deviation
CONCLUSION
After finding out these results we conclude that 1. Alternate Production Rate formula (AFR) is easy to calculate the production rate for developing the un-paced production line for Industrial Engineer. And the formula is vlaid for 5- Station production rate. 2. They also set the machine in a proper way in Production line when the Emphasis given on best production rate or worst production rate or the according to preference given to the work (load) in production line. 3. We say that these formulas are valid even for calculating higher work station production rate.
FUTURE SCOPE
This formula is also 1. Useful for Long Un-paced production line like more than 5- station or more like 7-work station. 2. To calculate the exact formulas for Production rate with have very less error from actual production rate. 3. Useful when the set up and operation time we know then we calculate the how much product is produced in assembly line when jobs designs are change.
REFERENCES
1. M.T. Jamali, Mohd Ziaulhaq, Dr. A. Suhail, Mohammad Khalid (Jan- Feb. 2015). ―The Effect of Imbalance on the Performance of Un-paced Production Line – A Mathematical Modeling Approach‖, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), PP 14-19, Volume 12, Issue 1 Ver. I, www.iosrjournals.org 2. Hiller, F.S. and K.C. So (1993). Some data for applying the bowel phenomenon to large production line system ―int. J.prod. res., 31, p. 811. bowel known‖ www. academia.com‖ 4. M. T. Jamali, Prof. Arif Suhail (2016). ―THE EFFECT OF IMBALANCE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF UN-PACED PRODUCTION LINE WHEN THE OPTIMAL BOWL UNKNOWN‖ International journal of core Engineering and management (ISSN 2348-9510, vol. 3, issue 8, Nov 2016), www.ijcem.in 5. Mohammad Tarique Jamali (2002). ―To find the alternate formula for production rate trends to design for un-paced production line when unbalancing the workloads.‖ Send to IMA chief academic officer 6. Kunter S. Akbay (1996). ―Using simulation optimization to find the best solution‖, Ind. Engg. Solution 28 No. 5 7. H. A. Beg (1996). ―A study of performance of Production line.‖ M.Tech. Dissertation, AMU Aligarh 8. Mohammad Tarique Jamali (2002). ―The effect of performance of imbalance on the performance of Unpaced production line‖ M.Tech dissertation, AMU Aligarh, India
Corresponding Author Mohammad Tarique Jamali*
Research Scholar, Young Scientist University, USA (IMA-INT-17-19 ADC-271051) and Faculty, Department of Industrial Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia