Comparative analysis: Surrogacy regulation in India and global perspectives

Authors

  • Arshia Malhotra UG Student, BALLB (4th Sem), IILM University, Gurugram, Haryana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29070/e8js6z74

Keywords:

Surrogacy Regulation, India, Global Perspectives, Analysis

Abstract

This research paper examines the complex regulatory environment surrounding surrogacy in India, investigating its historical development and the intricate interplay of legal, ethical, and cultural factors. The paper examines the regulatory reforms that ensued after India became a prominent international hub for commercial surrogacy, with a specific emphasis on the intricate provisions of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021. It emphasizes the impact of the act and addresses any limitations that were previously present. This study investigates the constitutional and legal ramifications that arise from the criteria for eligibility, with a particular focus on the effects on the infant, surrogate mothers, and intended parents. With the assistance of a global comparative analysis, this paper provides a nuanced perspective on surrogacy laws in Ukraine, the United States, and the United Kingdom, among others. These three jurisdictions were selected due to the fact that their surrogacy legislations regulate the industry to varying degrees: Ukraine regulates commercial surrogacy, the United States has state-made legislation, and the United Kingdom's legislation is very similar to that of India. The core of the manuscript consists of ten recommendations that are specifically designed for the Indian context. These recommendations promote the following: comprehensive legislation, parental rights recognition, autonomy for surrogate mothers, and ethical guidelines. The aforementioned suggestions encompass public education initiatives, anti-discrimination protocols, and international surrogacy regulations. In conclusion, the paper proposes a legal structure that is congruent with the cultural heterogeneity of India, thereby cultivating an atmosphere for surrogacy arrangements that is ethical, inclusive, and transparent.

References

Tetsuya Ishii, Global Changes in the Regulation of Reproductive Medicine, in Encyclopedia of Reproduction (Second Edition) 380(MichaelK.Skinnered. 2018)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128012383649073.

Infertility, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility.

Baby Manji Yamada v. Union of India, 13 SCC 518 (2008).

Jan Balaz v. Anand Municipality, AIR 2010 Guj 21.

Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, 2018 AIR 4321 (2018)

Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration, 9 SCC 1 (2009).

United Nations, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations,

https://www.un.org/en/aboutus/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.

Parental Orders (Surrogacy), CAFCASS,

https://www.cafcass.gov.uk/parent-carer-or-family-member/applicationsparental-responsibility/parental-orders-surrogacy.

Surrogacy in the UK (UK law), NGA LAW,

https://www.ngalaw.co.uk/knowledge-centre/uk-surrogacy-law/.

Priyanka Vora, Russia’s Invasion Is Damaging Ukraine’s Booming Surrogacy Industry, QUARTZ (2022),

https://qz.com/2133797/russias-invasion-is-damaging-ukraines-booming-surrogacy-industry.

Imrie, Susan, Jadva, Vasanti. The long-term experiences of surrogates: relationships and contact with surrogacy families in genetic and gestational surrogacy arrangements. Reproductive BioMedicine Online29 (4): 424–435.

Merino, Faith (2010). Adoption and Surrogate Pregnancy. New York: Infobase Publishing annan, Shilpa. “Regulators Eye India’s Surrogacy Sector”. India Business Report, BBC World.

ShaikhAzizurRahman. Indian surrogate mothers suffer exploitation.

http://www.aljazeera.com/profile/shaikhazizur-rahman.html.

The Associated Press (2007-12-30) “India’s surrogate mother business raises questions of global ethics. Available from:

http:// www.nydailynews.com/news/world/india-surrogatemother- business-raises-questions-global-ethics-article1.276982

National guidelines for the accreditation supervision and regulation of ART clinics in India.

http://www.icmr.nic.in/art/ art_clinics.html

ART Regulation draft bill 2010. Available from:

http://icmr.nic. in/guide/ART%20REGULATION%20Draft%20Bill1.pdf.

Chinmayee Satpathy. Child welfare policies and programmes in India. Yojana, Nov 2012. [Available on

http://www.insightsonindia.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/09/child-welfare-policies-andprograms-in-india.pdf].

Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office and Queen’s Printer of Acts of Parliament.

Diane S. Hinson & Maureen McBrien, Surrogacy across America, FAMn-Y Advocate, fall 2011.

Samoylova VV. Surrogacy as a legal institution,

http://teoria practica.ru/rus/files/arhiv_zhurnala/2014/4/yurisprudentsiya/samoylova.pdf

Rozgon O. Surrogacy: problems of legal and contractual regulation. Small Encyclopedia of the Notary 2010; 3:120–140.

Khurtsilava LA. On the issue of surrogacy agreement. Actual Problems of Russian Law 2007; 2:155–161.

Rusanovova NE. Reproductive opportunities for demographic development. Moscow: Kompaniya Sputnik, 2008.

Chernysheva Y. A. Legal status of a child born during the implementation of the surrogacy program. Family and Housing Law 2012; 6:34–36.

Baiborosha NS. Harmonization of the CIS member states legislation in the field of surrogacy: theoretical aspects. Legal Journal 2009; 4:101–108.

Antsukh NS. Cross-border problems of surrogacy legal regulation. Minsk: Chetyre Chetverti, 2015.

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) of 16.12.1966.

Kohler K. Certain aspects of surrogacy in the judicial practice of European courts. Justice of Belarus, 2017. No 4. P. 69–74.

Kvit NM. Institute of Surrogate Motherhood: Problems of Collision Regulation. Almanac of International Law 2016; 14: 38–48.

Veres I. Ya. Problems of legal regulation of surrogate motherhood. Lawyer 2013; 3:27–31.

Kuznetsova NS, Onishchenko NN. The role of the legal initiative in the establishment of civil society. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 2018; 25:120–133.

Bychkova SS, Churpita V. Relationship between the rules of family law and the procedural form of non-recourse civil proceedings. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 2018; 25:174–188.

Podtserkovny OP. The experience of specialization of economic (commercial) jurisdiction in Ukraine and western countries. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 2018; 25:146–161.

Convention on the Adoption of Children (Revised) art. 5(6), Nov.27, 2008, C.E.T.S. No. 202.

Convention on the Legal Status of Children Born out of Wedlock art.2, Oct. 15, 1975, C.E.T.S. No. 85.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-03

How to Cite

[1]
“Comparative analysis: Surrogacy regulation in India and global perspectives”, JASRAE, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 188–194, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.29070/e8js6z74.

How to Cite

[1]
“Comparative analysis: Surrogacy regulation in India and global perspectives”, JASRAE, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 188–194, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.29070/e8js6z74.