A Comparative Study of Non-Cognitive Factors Influencing Second Language Acquisition of Learner
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/0b123w34Keywords:
Non-cognitive, Language acquisition, Second languageAbstract
This research aimed to explore the non-cognitive factors influencing second language acquisition (SLA), with a particular focus on intrinsic motivation, anxiety, social interaction, and environmental influences. Through the analysis of survey data, the study highlights the profound impact these non-cognitive variables have on students’ ability to acquire a second language effectively.
It also helps the teachers to improve the performance of learners by using non-cognitive strategies in their teaching learning process. Teachers will implement these non-cognitive strategies and improve the performance of learners by language acquisition.
The study used a qualitative semi structured interview and questionnaire method to find out non-cognitive factor effecting second language acquisition .in total 110 participants there are 100 students and 10 English language teachers. The semi-structured interview data reveals insightful information about the learners' experiences, motivations, and perceptions regarding second language acquisition.
References
Kautz.T, J. Heckman.J, Diris.R, Weel.B.T & Borghans.L (2014):Fostering and measuring skills: improving cognitive and non-cognitive skills to promote lifetime success, OECD Education Working Papers No. 110EDU/WKP.
Sara,S. , Sharifullah, K. & Muhammad, A Abbas(2017):Predicting performance of electrical engineering students using cognitive and non-cognitive features for identification of potential dropouts, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 2017, Vol. 54(2) 105–118 The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0020720916688484 journals.sagepub.com/home/ij
Martin, R. W., Matthew, A. K., Amy, S. F, Rebecca, E. M., Angela L. D, Christopher F. O. G.& John D. E. G. (2016): Promise and Paradox: Measuring Students’ Non-Cognitive Skills and the Impact of Schooling Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis March 2016, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 148–170 DOI: 10.3102/0162373715597298
Yuxin,J(2022): The Influence of Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Factors on the Second Language Learning and Suggestions for Teaching, Journal of Advanced ResearchinEducation.Vol.1.ISSN2709-3980www.pioneerpublisher.com/jare DOI:10.56397/JARE.2022.12.03
Alanna Bjorklund (2016). Young What do we Know About Developing Students’ Non-Cognitive Skills,Institute for Education policy vol.7(1)pp.7.
Brumwell, S. & Brumwell, M.(2017):A study of measurement matters: the learning outcome approach-case study form Canada journal of higher education in Africa vol.15,No.1,pp.5-22.
Chen,y. (2018).Education and Non-cognitive Skills Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy National University of Singapore vol.1 pp15.
Davis, C. D., Kaufman, J. C., & McClure, F. H. (2011). Non-cognitive constructs and self-reported creativity by domain. Journal of Creative Behavior, vol .45, 188-202.
Frank,L. (2020). School-Based Practices for the 21st Century: Noncognitive Foustring Student Learning and Psychosocial Outcomes sage journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences Vol. 7(1) 44– 51.DOI: 10.1177/2372732219898703.
G, García. (2013). What we learn in school: Cognitive and non-cognitive skills in the educational production function college( the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia university).vol,pp.12-355.
García,M.E.(2013).What we learn in school: Cognitive and non-cognitive skills in the educational production function ,Columbia University, Vol. 1 PP.355.
Leslie. M,G. & Ingrid S, (2013): A synthesis of causal evidence linking non-cognitive skills to later outcomes for children and adolescents . UCL Institute of Education Endowment Fund (EEF) and the Cabinet Office.(pp.1-51).
Mc Lanahan (2004). Heckman (2008) for American data and OECD (2011) for evidence around the world.
Nagaoka,J., Farrington,C.A,Roderick,M.,(2013). Readiness for College: The Role of Noncognitive Factors and Context, Annenberg Institute for School Reform vol.7.pp53.
Shrivastava,P. & Shrivastava, S. (2016-17). A Study of Primary and Middle School Students of Raipur & Gariaband District of Chhattisgarh research journal for slow learner identification studies, Vol .14(1).
Thaham,M.(2018).A study of improving the learning outcome of e-learners using self-intelligent learning style classifier college( Anna university) vol .1 (88).
This work is licensed under a 