Critical Study of the link between Intellectual property and competition Law, with a focus on the United States, Europe, and India

Authors

  • Sukesh Roy T Research Scholar, University of Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan
  • Dr. Dharamveer Singh Associate Professor, Department of Law, University of Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29070/t5xwbk58

Keywords:

Intellectual Property, Competition law, United States, Europe, India

Abstract

This transnational study focuses on the US, Europe, and India to provide a critical evaluation of the global nexus between intellectual property and competition policy. The study's purpose is to look at how these two areas of law interact in order to get a better understanding of how they affect innovation, market competitiveness, and consumer welfare. Intellectual property rights are highlighted for their role in fostering innovation and creativity by providing holders with exclusive rights and monetary incentives. It does, however, recognize that exercising intellectual property rights may result in anti-competitive behaviour, limiting market access and hampering competition. Competition law, on the other hand, is handled as a means of preventing anti-competitive behaviour and guaranteeing fair competition. The goal of competition law is to provide a level playing field for new businesses. However, since IP law and competition law sometimes intersect, the issue of how far IP rights may be exploited without unnecessarily restricting competition arises.

References

Aerni, P., & Bernauer, T. (2016). Stakeholder attitudes toward GMOs in the Philippines, Mexico, and South Africa: The issue of public trust. World Development, 34(3), 557–575.

Baldini, N., (2019). Implementing Bayh Dole-like laws: faculty problems and their impact on university patenting activity. Research Policy 38, 1217-1224.

Aernoudt, R., & Erikson, T. (2019). Business angel networks: A European perspective. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 10(03), 177-187.

Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2015). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS quarterly, 399- 426

Cardullo, M. W., & Sage, A. P. (2017). Information, knowledge and systems management approaches for a new global reserve currency. Information, Knowledge, Systems Management, 10(1), 427-444.

Barbolla, A. M. B., & Corredera, J. R. C. (2019). Critical factors for success in university– industry research projects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(5), 599-616.

Clarysse, B., Mosey, S., Lambecht, I., (2019). New trends in technology management education: a view from Europe. Academy of Management Learning and Education 8 (3), 427–443

Amit, R. Brander, J. and Zott, C. (2018), Why do venture capital firms exist? Theory and Canadian evidence, Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 441-466.

Cowan R. and Jonard N. (2018) Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28, 1557-1571

Eckhardt, J. T., S. Shane, & F. Delmar (2016)."Multistage selection and the financing of new ventures." Management Science 52(2): 220-232.

Billings, A. B. (2020). Are US tax incentives for corporate R&D likely to motivate American firms to perform research abroad? Tax Executive, 55(4), 291–315.

Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2017). Public procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the demand side. Research policy, 36(7), 949-963.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

[1]
“Critical Study of the link between Intellectual property and competition Law, with a focus on the United States, Europe, and India”, JASRAE, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 395–401, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.29070/t5xwbk58.

How to Cite

[1]
“Critical Study of the link between Intellectual property and competition Law, with a focus on the United States, Europe, and India”, JASRAE, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 395–401, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.29070/t5xwbk58.