A study on communication decision making and dispute resolution in the private sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/956n5p27Keywords:
Communication, Decision Making, Dispute Resolution, Private Sector, Organizational BehaviorAbstract
This study examining the application of communication, decision making and conflict management in the private sector with special reference to its efficiency. The study how communication tactics can affect decision-making and conflict-solving procedures in private businesses. This study adopted a survey and interview method to gather data from managers and employees from various industries. The study findings show that clear communication greatly improves the decisions making process and minimizes the chances of conflict. The study also shows how decision-making models and ADR methods like mediation and arbitration can be used to promote a positive working culture. The findings call for private sector organizations to enhance the communication and develop effective conflict resolution strategies that can be implemented in the organizations. This research adds to the body of knowledge in the area of organizational behavior by offering a way to enhance communication and conflict resolution to enhance corporate governance and productivity.
References
Okudan, O., & Çevikbaş, M. (2022). Alternative dispute resolution selection framework to settle disputes in public–private partnership projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(9), 04022086.
Oyeyoade, S. (2022). Developing dispute resolution policy for conflicts settlement in public-private partnership (PPP) projects in educational institutions. F1000Research, 11, 1400.
El Khatib, M., Al Mulla, A., & Al Ketbi, W. (2022). The role of blockchain in E-governance and decision-making in project and program management. Advances in Internet of Things, 12(3), 88-109.
Scott, T. A., & Carter, D. P. (2019). Collaborative governance or private policy making? When consultants matter more than participation in collaborative environmental planning. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(2), 153-173.
Bercovitch, J. (2019). Social conflicts and third parties: Strategies of conflict resolution. Routledge.
Engin, Z., & Treleaven, P. (2019). Algorithmic government: Automating public services and supporting civil servants in using data science technologies. The Computer Journal, 62(3), 448-460.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2018). Ethics in alternative dispute resolution: New issues, no answers from the adversary conception of lawyers’ responsibilities. In Mediation (pp. 429-476). Routledge.
Porter-Love, L., Kupfer-Schneider, A., & Moffitt, M. (2018). Dispute resolution: Beyond the adversarial model. Aspen Publishing.
Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269-297.
Lovan, W. R., Murray, M., & Shaffer, R. (2017). Participatory governance: planning, conflict mediation and public decision-making in civil society. Routledge.
Shamir, Y. (2016). Alternative dispute resolution approaches and their application.
Blake, S., Browne, J., & Sime, S. (2016). A practical approach to alternative dispute resolution. Oxford University Press.
Lan, Z. (2015). A conflict resolution approach to public administration. In Public Administration and Law (pp. 189-204). Routledge.
Katsh, E., & Rule, C. (2015). What we know and need to know about online dispute resolution. SCL Rev., 67, 329.
Blok, V., Hoffmans, L., & Wubben, E. F. (2015). Stakeholder engagement for responsible innovation in the private sector: Critical issues and management practices. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 15(2), 147-164.
This work is licensed under a 