Regulatory Challenges and Clinical Implications of Biosimilar Drugs

Authors

  • Yousef Fahad Alanazi Pharmacist, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh
  • Basil Naser Mubarak Alamri Pharmacist, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29070/kny2k179

Keywords:

Clinical, Implications, Biosimilar, Drugs, regulatory, challenges

Abstract

Medications that are biosimilar are very similar to biologics that have been authorised by the FDA. When it comes to speciality treatment areas like immunology, endocrinology, and cancer, biosimilar medications might be helpful since the sponsors of premarket applications specify the product's intended clinical use. Clinical therapies for individuals with potentially fatal disorders such cardiac myopathies, carcinoma, sarcoma, and lymphoma rely heavily on the newly authorised biosimilar drugs from the FDA. The pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies sought to supplant biologic medications that did not involve innovation with biologic pharmaceuticals that were comparable but did not. These pharmaceuticals are part of a new class called biosimilars, and their goal is to be exactly like the reference drug in terms of safety and effectiveness. Nocebo effects may restrict treatment adherence and induce unfavourable expectations, therefore it's important for doctors and patients to be aware of this and work together to overcome it. The study's intended participants were medical doctors, pharmacists, nurses, consultants, care managers, and oncologists, rheumatologists, endocrinologists, gastroenterologists, dermatologists, nephrologists, and hematologists, among other specialties.

References

Giuliani (2016) Biotechnology and drug discovery: From bench to bedside. South Med J 96: 1174-1186.

Teeple (2017) Biosimilars of biological drug therapies: Regulatory, clinical and commercial considerations. Drugs 71: 1527-1536.

Cook et.al. (2019) Shifting paradigms: Biopharmaceuticals versus low molecular weight drugs. Int J Pharm 266: 3-16.

Ismailov and Khasanova (2018) Binocrit: assessment of quality, safety and efficacy of biopharmaceuticals. Ejhp Practice 15: 34-40.

Sarnola et al (2019 ) When biotech proteins go off-patent. Trends Biotechnol 22: 406-410.

Rathore N, Rajan RS (2008) Current perspectives on stability of protein drug products during formulation, fills and finishes operations. Biotechnol Prog 24: 504-514.

Höglund M (1998) Glycosylated and non-glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF)--what is the difference? Med Oncol 15: 229-233.

Hooker A, James D (1998) The glycosylation heterogeneity of recombinant human IFN-gamma. J Interferon Cytokine Res 18: 287-295.

Locatelli F, Del Vecchio L, Pozzoni P (2007) Pure red-cell aplasia “epidemic”-- mystery completely revealed? Perit Dial Int 27 Suppl 2: S303-307.

Schellekens H (2004) How similar do ‘biosimilars’ need to be? Nat Biotechnol 22: 1357-1359.

Keithi-Reddy SR, Kandasamy S, Singh AK (2008) Pure red cell aplasia due to follow-on epoetin. Kidney Int 74: 1617-1622.

Yang J, Joo KW, Kim YS, Ahn C, Han JS, et al. (2005) Two cases of pure redcell aplasia due to anti-erythropoietin antibodies. J Nephrol 18: 102-105.

Crommelin D, Bermejo T, Bissig M, Damiaans J, Krämer I, et al. (2005) Biosimilars, generic versions of the first generation of therapeutic proteins: do they exist? Contrib Nephrol 149: 287-294.

Seidl A, Hainzl O, Richter M, Fischer R, Böhm S, et al. (2012) Tungsten-Induced Denaturation and Aggregation of Epoetin Alfa During Primary Packaging as a Cause of Immunogenicity. Pharm Res 29: 1454-1467.

Pani L, Montilla S, Pimpinella G, Bertini Malgarini R (2013) Biosimilars: The paradox of sharing the same pharmacological action without full chemical identity. Expert Opin Biol Ther 13: 1343-1346.

Lewis RM, Cosenza ME (2010) Summary of DIA Workshop: Comparability Challenges: Regulatory and Scientific Issues in the Assessment of Biopharmaceuticals. Drug Information Journal 44: 485-504.

Putnam WS, Prabhu S, Zheng Y, Subramanyam M, Wang YM (2010) Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and immunogenicity comparability assessment strategies for monoclonal antibodies. Trends Biotechnol 28: 509-516

Kessler M, Goldsmith D, Schellekens H (2006) Immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21 Suppl 5: v9-v12.

Porter S (2001) Human immune response to recombinant human proteins. J Pharm Sci 90: 1-11. 20. Ryff JC, Schellekens H (2002) Immunogenicity of rDNA-derived pharmaceuticals. Trends Pharmacol Sci 23: 254-256.

Schellekens H (2005) Immunologic mechanisms of EPO-associated pure red cell aplasia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 18: 473-480.

Schellekens H (2005) Factors influencing the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20 Suppl 6: vi3-9.

Schellekens H (2005) Follow-on biologics: Challenges of the “next generation”. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20 Suppl 4: iv31-36.

Locatelli F, Roger S (2006) Comparative testing and pharmacovigilance of biosimilars. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21 Suppl 5: v13-v16.

World Health Organization. Trade, foreign policy, diplomacy and health - Generic Drugs.

Vanrenterghem Y, Bárány P, Mann JF, Kerr PG, Wilson J, et al. (2002) Randomized trial of darbepoetin alfa for treatment of renal anemia at a reduced dose frequency compared with rHuEPO in dialysis patients. Kidney Int 62: 2167-2175.

Dellanna F, Winkler RE, Bozkurt F, Schettler V, Graf S, et al. (2011) Dosing strategies for conversion of haemodialysis patients from short-acting erythropoiesis stimulating agents to once-monthly C.E.R.A.: Experience from the MIRACEL study. Int J Clin Pract 65: 64-72.

Ebbers HC, Muenzberg M, Schellekens H (2012) The safety of switching between therapeutic proteins. Expert Opin Biol Ther 12: 1473-1485.

Weise M, Bielsky MC, Smet KD, Ehmann F, Ekman N, et al. (2011) Biosimilarswhy terminology matters. Nat Biotechnol 29: 690-693.

World Health Organization (2013) International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for biological and biotechnological substances.

Food and Drug Administration (2015) Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product: Guidance for Industry.

Declerck PJ (2012) Biologicals and biosimilars: A review of the science and its implications. Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal Journal 1: 4.

Blackstone EA, Joseph PF (2013) The economics of biosimilars. Am Health Drug Benefits 6: 469-478.

Amgen Inc (2014) Biologics and biosimilars: An overview.

European Medicines Agency (2005) Guideline on similar biological medicinal products. 36. European Medicines Agency (2014) News: Facilitating global development of biosimilars.

European Medicines Agency (2014) Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: quality issues (revision 1).

European Medicines Agency (2014) Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: nonclinical and clinical issues.

lvmueller (2014) An Overview of Biosimilars in the Russian Federation.

Castañeda-Hernández G, Szekanecz Z, Mysler E, Azevedo VF, Guzman R, et al. (2014) Biopharmaceuticals for rheumatic diseases in Latin America, Europe, Russia, and India: Innovators, biosimilars, and intended copies. Joint Bone Spine 81: 471-477.

Elena M (2013) Development vector of regulatory procedures of biological medicines in Russia.

Smits L.J.T., Grelack A., Derikx L.A.A.P., de Jong D.J., van Esch A.A.J., Boshuizen R.S., Drenth J.P.H., Hoentjen F. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Switching from Remicade® to Biosimilar CT-P13 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2017;62:3117–3122. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4661-4.

Park W., Suh C.H., Shim S.C., Molina F.F.C., Jeka S., Medina-Rodriguez F.G., Hrycaj P., Wiland P., Lee E.Y., Shesternya P., et al. Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Innovator Rituximab to Biosimilar CT-P10 Compared with Continued Treatment with CT-P10: Results of a 56-Week Open-Label Study in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. BioDrugs. 2017;31:369–377. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0233-6.

López-Siguero J.P., Palla García M., Martínez Busto E., Rebollo F.J., Pombo M. Ten years experience with the first approved biosimilar recombinant human growth hormone drug in normal clinical practice. An. Pediatr. 2018;88:209–215. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2017.03.007.

Belleudi V., Trotta F., Addis A., Ingrasciotta Y., Ientile V., Tari M., Gini R., Pastorello M., Scondotto S., Cananzi P., et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Switching Originator and Biosimilar Epoetins in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in a Large-Scale Italian Cohort Study. Drug Saf. 2019;42:1437–1447. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00845-y.

.Strowitzki T., Kuczynski W., Mueller A., Bias P. Safety and efficacy of Ovaleap® (recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone) for up to 3 cycles in infertile women using assisted reproductive technology: A phase 3 open-label follow-up to Main Study. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2016;14:31. doi: 10.1186/s12958-016-0164-y.

Biosimilars: Where Do We Go From Here? Eur. Pharm. Law Rev. 2018;2:149–154. doi: 10.21552/eplr/2018/3/6.

Walsh G., Jefferis R. Post-translational modifications in the context of therapeutic proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006;24:1241–1252. doi: 10.1038/nbt1252.

Manzi A.E., Ultee M.E. Biosimilars Drug Substance Development and Manufacturing: Effective CMC Strategy. Biosimilars. 2018;34:173–186.

.European Medicines Agency (EMA) Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products Containing Biotechnology-Derived Proteins as Active Substance: Non-Clinical and Clinical Issues Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products Containing Biotechnology-Derived Proteins as Active Subs. (CHMP/BMWP/42832/2005 Rev 1) [(accessed on 15 June 2020)]; Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-similar-biological-medicinal-products-containing-biotechnology-derived-proteins-active_en-2.pdf.

Food and Drug Administration Quality Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity of a Therapeutic Protein Product to a Reference Product. [(accessed on 15 June 2020)]; Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/135612/download.

Vandekerckhove K., Seidl A., Gutka H., Kumar M., Gratzl G., Keire D., Coffey T., Kuehne H. Rational Selection, Criticality Assessment, and Tiering of Quality Attributes and Test Methods for Analytical Similarity Evaluation of Biosimilars. AAPS J. 2018;20:68. doi: 10.1208/s12248-018-0230-9.

Kirchhoff C.F., Wang X.Z.M., Conlon H.D., Anderson S., Ryan A.M., Bose A. Biosimilars: Key regulatory considerations and similarity assessment tools. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114:2696–2705. doi: 10.1002/bit.26438.

O’Callaghan J., Barry S.P., Bermingham M., Morris J.M., Griffin B.T. Regulation of biosimilar medicines and current perspectives on interchangeability and policy. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018;75:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2542-1.

Rugo H.S., Rifkin R.M., Declerck P., Bair A.H., Morgan G. Demystifying biosimilars: Development, regulation and clinical use. Futur. Oncol. 2019;15:777–790. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0680.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Considerations in Demonstrating Interchangeability With a Reference Product-Guidance for Industry. [(accessed on 15 June 2020)]; Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/124907/download.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D. On FDA’s Steps on Naming of Biological Medicines to Balance Competition and Safety for Patients Receiving These Products. [(accessed on 27 May 2020)]; Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/statement-fda-commissioner-scott-gottlieb-md-fdas-steps-naming-biological-medicines-balance.

Liu P.M., Zou L., Sadhu C., Shen W.D., Nock S. Comparative immunogenicity assessment: A critical consideration for biosimilar development. Bioanalysis. 2015;7:373–381. doi: 10.4155/bio.14.311.

Farhat F., Torres A., Park W., de Lima Lopes G., Mudad R., Ikpeazu C., Aad S.A. The Concept of Biosimilars: From Characterization to Evolution—A Narrative Review. Oncologist. 2017;23:346–352. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0126.

Gascon P., Krendyukov A., Mathieson N., Natek M., Aapro M. Extrapolation in Practice: Lessons from 10 Years with Biosimilar Filgrastim. BioDrugs. 2019;33:635–645. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00373-2.

Thill M., Thatcher N., Hanes V., Lyman G.H. Biosimilars: What the oncologist should know. Futur. Oncol. 2019;15:1147–1165. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0728.

Cazap E., Jacobs I., McBride A., Popovian R., Sikora K. Global Acceptance of Biosimilars: Importance of Regulatory Consistency, Education, and Trust. Oncologist. 2018;23:1188–1198. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0671.

Oza B., Radhakrishna S., Pipalava P., Jose V. Pharmacovigilance of biosimilars—Why is it different from generics and innovator biologics? J. Postgrad. Med. 2019;65:227–232. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_109_19.

World Health Organisation (WHO) INN for Biosimilars. [(accessed on 25 June 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/medicines/services/inn/inn_bio_sim/en/

Kesik-Brodacka, M. Progress in biopharmaceutical development. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2018, 65, 306–322.

Cazap, E.; Jacobs, I.; McBride, A.; Popovian, R.; Sikora, K. Global Acceptance of Biosimilars: Importance of Regulatory Consistency, Education, and Trust. Oncologist 2018, 23, 1188–1198.

Christl, L. FDA’s Overview of the Regulatory Guidance for the Development and Approval of Biosimilar Products in the US; US Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2016.

Singh, A.; Kalaivani, M.; Srivastava, S.; Goyal, R.K.; Gupta, S.K. Postmarketing Safety of Biosimilars: Current Status, Challenges, and Opportunities in the Spontaneous Reporting System. Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci. 2020, 54, 667–680

Kabir, E.R.; Moreino, S.S.; Sharif Siam, M.K. The Breakthrough of Biosimilars: A Twist in the Narrative of Biological Therapy. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 410.

Ascef, B.O.; Lopes, A.C.F.; de Soarez, P.C. Health technology assessment of biosimilars worldwide: A scoping review. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2020, 18, 95.

Konstantinidou, S.; Papaspiliou, A.; Kokkotou, E. Current and future roles of biosimilars in oncology practice. Oncol. Lett. 2020, 19, 45–51

Tkaczuk, K.H.R.; Jacobs, I.A. Biosimilars in oncology: From development to clinical practice. Semin. Oncol. 2014, 41, S3–S12.

Lyman, G.H.; Balaban, E.; Diaz, M.; Ferris, A.; Tsao, A.; Voest, E.; Zon, R.; Francisco, M.; Green, S.; Sherwood, S.; et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: Biosimilars in Oncology. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 1260–1265.

Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Lonnfors, S.; Roblin, X.; Danese, S.; Avedano, L. Patient Perspectives on Biosimilars: A Survey by the European Federation of Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis Associations. J. Crohns Colitis 2017, 11, 128–133.

Planes, S.; Villier, C.; Mallaret, M. The nocebo effect of drugs. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2016, 4, e00208.

Rezk, M.F.; Pieper, B. Treatment Outcomes with Biosimilars: Be Aware of the Nocebo Effect. Rheumatol. Ther. 2017, 4, 209–218.

Ghil, J.; Niebrzydowski, J.; Zielińska, A.; Lee, Y. FRI0198 Usability and safety of SB5 (an adalimumab biosimilar) pre-filled syringe and pre-filled pen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 556.

Kijanka, M.; Dorresteijn, B.; Oliveira, S.; van Bergen en Henegouwen, P.M. Nanobody-based cancer therapy of solid tumors. Nanomedicine 2015, 10, 161–174.

Aladul M.I., Fitzpatrick R.W., Chapman S.R. Healthcare professionals’ perceptions and perspectives on biosimilar medicines and the barriers and facilitators to their prescribing in UK: A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:11 e023603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023603

Giuliani R., Tabernero J., Cardoso F., McGregor K.H., Vyas M., De Vries E.G.E. Knowledge and use of biosimilars in oncology: A survey by the European Society for Medical Oncology. ESMO Open. 2019;4:e000460. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000460

Leonard E., Wascovich M., Oskouei S., Gurz P., Carpenter D. Factors affecting health care provider knowledge and acceptance of biosimilar medicines: A systematic review. J. Manag. Care Spec. Pharm. 2019;25:102–112. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.1.102.

Castañeda-Hernández G., Sandoval H., Coindreau J., Rodriguez-Davison L.F., Pineda C. Barriers towards effective pharmacovigilance systems of biosimilars in rheumatology: A Latin American survey. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2019;28:1035–1044. doi: 10.1002/pds.4785.

Karateev D., Belokoneva N. Evaluation of physicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards biosimilars in Russia and issues associated with their prescribing. Biomolecules. 2019;9:57. doi: 10.3390/biom9020057.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

[1]
“Regulatory Challenges and Clinical Implications of Biosimilar Drugs”, JASRAE, vol. 22, no. 01, pp. 94–110, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.29070/kny2k179.

How to Cite

[1]
“Regulatory Challenges and Clinical Implications of Biosimilar Drugs”, JASRAE, vol. 22, no. 01, pp. 94–110, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.29070/kny2k179.