After the maximum amount of time for operation, reliability modeling with environmental failure and particulate matter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/hjhs4n80Keywords:
Reliability modeling, environmental failure, particulate matter, predictive maintenanceAbstract
Reliability modeling plays a crucial role in assessing the performance and lifespan of industrial systems, especially when subjected to environmental factors such as particulate matter and operational time constraints. This study examines the impact of prolonged operational periods on system reliability, integrating environmental degradation factors into predictive maintenance strategies. Traditional reliability models often overlook the influence of environmental stressors, leading to inaccurate failure predictions and inefficient maintenance schedules. This research incorporates environmental failure parameters, including particulate contamination and temperature fluctuations, into reliability modeling to enhance accuracy in failure forecasting. By integrating data-driven approaches and statistical failure models, the study proposes a framework that improves predictive maintenance strategies, minimizes unplanned downtimes, and optimizes system performance. The findings emphasize the necessity of accounting for environmental conditions in reliability analysis, ensuring a more comprehensive assessment of manufacturing and industrial equipment reliability. The study contributes to advancing maintenance decision-making processes, reducing operational risks, and increasing the efficiency of industrial systems operating under challenging environmental conditions.
References
Abbott, W. (1974). Effects of industrial air pollution on electronic equipment. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, IA-10(5), 666–671.
ASHRAE. (2011). Thermal guidelines for data processing environments (3rd ed.). American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
Becker, P., & Flick, T. (2020). Predictive maintenance: Artificial intelligence in industrial applications. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 50, 10–21.
Bengtsson, M., & Lundström, J. (2018). Condition-based maintenance in the manufacturing industry: The role of digitalization. Procedia CIRP, 72, 1194–1199.
Bousdekis, A., Magoutas, B., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2015). Review, analysis and synthesis of prognostic-based decision support methods for condition-based maintenance. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26(3), 307–331.
Carvalho, T. P., Soares, F. A. A. M. N., Vita, R., Francisco, R. P., Basto, J. P., & Alcalá, S. G. (2019). A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, 106024.
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1–58.
Cheng, S., Azarian, M. H., & Pecht, M. (2010). Sensor systems for prognostics and health management. Sensors, 10(6), 5774–5797.
Ding, S., Jia, M., & Ding, E. (2014). Research on fault diagnosis for modern rotating machinery: A review. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 27(1), 1–15.
Goyal, D., & Pabla, B. S. (2015). Condition based maintenance of machine tools—A review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 10, 24–35.
Guo, L., Li, N., Jia, F., Lei, Y., & Lin, J. (2017). A recurrent neural network based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings. Neurocomputing, 240, 98–109.
Heng, A., Zhang, S., Tan, A. C. C., & Mathew, J. (2009). Rotating machinery prognostics: State of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 23(3), 724–739.
Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7), 1483–1510.
Jia, X., Lei, Y., Lin, J., Zhou, X., & Lu, N. (2018). Deep neural networks: A promising tool for fault characteristic mining and intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery with massive data. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 72–73, 303–315.
Khan, S., Yairi, T., & Takei, Y. (2018). A review on the application of deep learning in system health management. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 107, 241–265.
Kumar, S., & Kumar, R. (2019). Predictive maintenance of industrial machinery using machine learning: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 18, 3281–3290.
Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018). Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 104, 799–834.
Li, X., Ding, Q., & Sun, J. Q. (2018). Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 172, 1–11.
Liu, R., Yang, B., Zio, E., & Chen, X. (2018). Artificial intelligence for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: A review. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 108, 33–47.
Mobley, R. K. (2002). An introduction to predictive maintenance (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Peng, Y., Dong, M., & Zuo, M. J. (2010). Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: A review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 50(1–4), 297–313.
Qin, S. J. (2014). Process data analytics in the era of big data. AIChE Journal, 60(9), 3092–3100.
Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C.-H., & Zhou, D.-H. (2011). Remaining useful life estimation A review on the statistical data-driven approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(1), 1–14.
Vachtsevanos, G., Lewis, F., Roemer, M., Hess, A., & Wu, B. (2006). Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems. Wiley.
This work is licensed under a 