Assessing the Pragmatic Competence of English Language Learners: A case study approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/dz00pw41Keywords:
Pragmatic competence, English language learners, speech acts, politeness strategiesAbstract
While good pragmatic competence is essential for all language users, it is often significantly neglected in the context of English language learners (ELLs). To be able to utilise language successfully in a variety of social and cultural contexts, it is necessary to have an understanding of speech acts, ways of politeness, and hidden meanings. In this research, a case study approach is used to assess the pragmatic ability of English Language Learners (ELLs) by analysing their spoken and written interactions in real-world situations. According to the findings of the study, some of the most significant challenges are the transfer of pragmatics from native languages, sociocultural misunderstandings, and the challenge of conforming to the norms of English-speaking societies. Discourse analysis, interviews, and observations were some of the qualitative methods that were used in the process of identification of these difficulties. According to the findings, a significant number of pupils may have trouble being indirect, adhering to principles of civility, and understanding when it is appropriate to engage in appropriate behaviour. It's possible that this may lead to misunderstandings and accidental rudeness. The findings of this study give more evidence that traditional language programs put a greater emphasis on grammatical accuracy than they do on the students' capacity to communicate successfully.
References
Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57-64.
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49(4), 677-713.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Mahan-Taylor, R. (Eds.). (2003). Teaching pragmatics. Washington, DC: Office of Language Programs of the U.S. Department of State.
Beebe, L.M. & Waring, H.Z. (2005). Pragmatic development in responding to rudeness. In J. Frodesen & C. Holten (Eds.), The power of context in language teaching and learning (pp. 67-80). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle/Thomson Learning.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. Cedar, P. (2006). Thai and American responses to compliments in English. The Linguistic Journal, 1(2), 6-28.
Cohen, A.D. (2004). The interface between interlanguage pragmatics and assessment. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual JALT Pan-SIG Conference, Tokyo, Japan.
Cohen, A.D., & Shively, R.L. (2002/2003). Measuring speech acts with multiple rejoinder DCT‟s. Language Testing Update, 32, 39-42.
Fasold, R.W. (1990). The sociolinguistics of language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Fujioka, M. (2003). Raising pragmatic consciousness in the Japanese EFL classroom? JALT Journal.
Garcia, P. (2004). Pragmatic comprehension of high and low level language learners. TESL-EJ, 8(2), 1-15.
Hoffman-Hicks, S. (1992). Linguistic and pragmatic competence: Their relationship in the overall competence of the language learner. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 3, 66-80.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Intachakra, S. (2004). Contrastive pragmatics and language teaching: Apologies and thanks in English and Thai. Regional Language Centre Journal, 35, 37-62.
Jenkins, J. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching World Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 157-181.
Kachru, B.B., & Nelson, C.L. (1996). World Englishes. In S.L. McKay & N.H. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 71-102). Cambridge University Press.
Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
Li, R. (2007). The relationship between linguistic proficiency and pragmatic ability. US-China Foreign Language, 5(1), 13-17.
Lin, M.X. (2008). Pragmatic failure in intercultural communication and English teaching in China. China Media Research, 4(3), 43-52.
Modehiran, P. (2005). Correction making among Thais and Americans: A study of cross- cultural and interlanguage pragmatics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chulalongkorn University.
This work is licensed under a 