The Uneven Web: Digital Literacy, Access, and Exclusion in Marginalized India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/y2ymrv20Keywords:
Digital Literacy, Marginalized Groups, Digital Divide, Social Inclusion, Access Disparities, Inclusive Education, Socio-economic Empowerment, ICT Infrastructure, Digital Equity, Policy InterventionAbstract
Digital literacy is essential for social inclusion, economic advancement, and democratic engagement in contemporary society. Marginalised groups those hindered by poverty, location, gender, caste, handicap, or ethnicity continue to be disproportionately excluded from digital ecosystems. This research analyses digital literacy levels across marginalised areas, finds significant obstacles to digital inclusion, and evaluates current programs designed to close this gap. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating a structured survey (n=400) with qualitative interviews and focus groups (n=50), revealing that digital exclusion is influenced by intersecting factors: economic limitations, infrastructural deficiencies, educational disparities, and gendered cultural norms. Despite the constraints of internet access, particularly among rural and low-income demographics, the lack of localised training and material is a significant impediment. The research underscores the significance of intersectional, community-oriented interventions and recommends particular governmental initiatives, such as investing in infrastructure, creating culturally appropriate training frameworks, and incorporating digital competencies into conventional schooling. Ultimately, digital literacy for marginalised populations is not a charitable endeavour but a structural need for fairness and inclusion in the digital age.
References
Rillera Marzo R. Bridging the Gap: Understanding and Fostering Intergenerational Communication in the Digital Age. In: Intechopen; 2024.
Rana DK. Quality Education for Underrepresented Groups: Bridging the Gap. IJELS. 2024;9(1):212-219.
Adeleye O, Eden C, Adeniyi I. Educational technology and the digital divide: A conceptual framework for technical literacy inclusion. Int J Sci Res Arch. 2024;12(1):150-156.
Uddin E. Enhancing the School Environment for Underprivileged Minority Children through Social Identity, Cultural Capital, and Preparedness. In: Igi Global; 2023:182-195.
Mishra V, Almohtadi A, Seyedzenouzi G, et al. Health Inequalities During COVID-19 and Their Effects on Morbidity and Mortality. JHL. 2021;13(10232):19-26.
Mistry SK, Shaw M, Raffan F, et al. Inequity in Access and Delivery of Virtual Care Interventions: A Scoping Review. IJERPH. 2022;19(15):9411.
Junaedi AT, Yovita I, Veronica K, Panjaitan HP, Jahrizal J, Renaldo N. Advancing Digital and Technology Literacy through Qualitative Studies to Bridging the Skills Gap in the Digital Age. JABT. 2024;5(2):123-133.
Kärnä E, Aavikko L, Rohner R, et al. A Multilevel Model of Older Adults’ Appropriation of ICT and Acquisition of Digital Literacy. IJERPH. 2022;19(23):15714.
Eden C, Adeniyi I, Chisom O. promoting digital literacy and social equity in education: lessons from successful initiatives. Int j manag entrep res. 2024;6(3):687-696.
Fujii DEM. Developing a cultural context for conducting a neuropsychological evaluation with a culturally diverse client: the ECLECTIC framework. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2018;32(8):1356-1392.
Chetty K, Gcora N, Josie J, Mishra V, Aneja U. Bridging the digital divide in the G20: skills for the new age. Economics. 2018;12(1). doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-24
Cheshmehzangi A, Zou T, Su Z, Tang T. The growing digital divide in education among primary and secondary children during the COVID-19 pandemic: An overview of social exclusion and education equality issues. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 2022;33(3):434-449.
Wang K, Chen XS, Gu D, Smith BD, Dong Y, Peet JZ. Examining First- and Second-Level Digital Divide at the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Socioeconomic Status: An Analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. The Gerontologist. 2024;64(9). doi:10.1093/geront/gnae079
Singh S. Digital Divide in India. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy. 2010;1(2):1-24.
Mishra D, Kandpal V, Agarwal N, Srivastava B. Financial Inclusion and Its Ripple Effects on Socio-Economic Development: A Comprehensive Review. JRFM. 2024;17(3):105.
Junaedi AT, Yovita I, Veronica K, Panjaitan HP, Jahrizal J, Renaldo N. Advancing Digital and Technology Literacy through Qualitative Studies to Bridging the Skills Gap in the Digital Age. JABT. 2024;5(2):123-133.
Bansal N, Choudhary H. Fostering digital equity: evaluating impact of digital literacy training on internet outcomes in rural marginalised communities in India. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2024;43(5):473-493.
Prasastiningtyas, Y., Raharjo, W., & Setiawan, A. (2024). Enhancing inclusion through digital literacy: Impact and challenges among underserved communities. Journal of Socio-Digital Studies, 16(1), 21–39.
Johnson, A., Taylor, R., & Gomez, P. (2024). Digital literacy and social inclusion: Bridging gaps among excluded communities. Journal of Digital Society Studies, 15(2), 55–78.
Liotta, S. (2023). Digitalization and social inclusion: Assessing access for underprivileged communities. International Journal of Digital Development, 9(1), 25–46.
Sharma, R., Singh, V., & Arora, T. (2022). Digital inclusion in India: Analyzing physical and skill-based access across marginalized communities. Indian Journal of Digital Equity, 8(4), 45–67.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
Park, S. (2017). Digital inequalities in rural India: A gendered perspective. Information Technologies & International Development, 13, 1–15.
Reisdorf, B. C., & Groselj, D. (2017). Internet use and social capital: A cross-cultural comparison. Information, Communication & Society, 20(4), 540–556.
Robinson, L., Cotton, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., ... & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582.
Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362.
Sharma, R., Singh, V., & Arora, T. (2022). Digital inclusion in India: Analyzing physical and skill-based access across marginalized communities. Indian Journal of Digital Equity, 8(4), 45–67.
Singh, S., & Dey, D. (2021). Gender and digital divide in India: A socio-economic perspective. Social Change, 51(3), 339–356.
Srivastava, R. (2019). ICT and rural development in India: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 4(2), 145–165.
Subramanian, A. (2020). Bridging the digital divide in South Asia: Education, infrastructure, and inclusion. South Asian Journal of Policy and Development, 6(1), 23–40.
Tella, A., & Mutula, S. M. (2008). Digital literacy and academic performance: A study of students in Botswana. Information Development, 24(1), 26–34.
Unesco. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526.
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225.
Wei, L., & Hindman, D. B. (2011). Does the digital divide matter more? Comparing the effects of new media and old media use on the education-based knowledge gap. Mass Communication and Society, 14(2), 216–235.
Wilson, M. (2006). Digital literacy and the digital society. Information Society, 22(1), 1–8.
World Bank. (2021). Digital development report: Inclusion and transformation. https://www.worldbank.org
Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific types of Internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–291.
This work is licensed under a 