Impact of Alleged Misuse of Women Protection Laws on Family Structure and Social Harmony
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/f7f60773Keywords:
Misuse, Women Protection Laws, Family Structure, Social Harmony, Domestic Violence Legislation, Gender Justice, Socio-Legal ImpactAbstract
Over the past several decades, India has witnessed progressive expansion of women protection laws aimed at addressing domestic violence, dowry harassment, sexual abuse, and workplace harassment. While these laws represent crucial milestones in gender justice, a parallel narrative has emerged in public discourse and some academic circles concerning the alleged misuse of these laws for personal vendettas or coercive gain. This article examines the socio-legal impact of alleged misuse of women protection laws on family structure and social harmony in India. The research analyses historical development of these statutes, judicial responses, sociological implications on familial relationships, and broader community level effects. By situating the Indian experience within international perspectives, the article highlights the complex interplay between legal rights and social norms. It finds that although alleged misuse has significant consequences on family cohesion and community trust, the phenomenon is contextualized within systemic legal and societal challenges that require balanced reform. The article concludes with recommendations for policy, law enforcement, and future research.
Downloads
References
1. Bathla, S. (1996). Violence against women: A legal doctrine. Indian Journal of Social Work, 57(3), 341–353.
2. Chowdhury, S. (2009). Misuse of Section 498A: A critical examination. Journal of Indian Law and Society, 1(2), 26–42.
3. Agarwal v. State of M.P., AIR 2008 SC 1294.
4. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, (2010) 10 SCC 191.
5. Nair, P. (2005). Domestic violence law in India: A critical analysis. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 12(1), 45–69.
6. Kapoor, A. (2007). Implementing the DV Act: Challenges and perspectives. Legal Studies Review, 4(3), 89–107.
7. Srinivas, S. (2012). Gender justice and criminal law reforms in India. Law and Society Journal, 15(4), 211–235.
8. Rao, M. (2015). Workplace harassment and the POSH Act: Early findings. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(1), 59–79.
9. Indian National Crime Records Bureau. (2020). Crime in India.
10. Doe v. University of Michigan, 721 F.Supp. 852 (1988).
11. United Nations. (1979). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
12. World Health Organization. (2013). Global and Regional Estimates of Violence Against Women.
13. Balakrishnan, R. (2018). Gendered narratives and law: Media representations of women protection laws. Media & Law Journal, 7(2), 79–101.
14. Singh, P. (2020). Procedural fairness in gender crime trials. Journal of Criminal Law & Policy, 14(1), 33–56.
15. Verma, K., & Joshi, D. (2022). Legal literacy and access to justice for survivors of domestic violence. Indian Journal of Legal Studies, 9(1), 112–136.
16. Mehta, S. (2023). Family disruptions and gender-protective laws: A socio-legal study. Human Rights Review, 24(4), 401–428.
17. Kaur, J., & Patel, N. (2024). Re-examining POSH implementation in India: Policy insights. Journal of Workplace Law, 19(3), 247–269.
This work is licensed under a 