Risk-Based Maritime Regulation in Developing Economies: The Convergence of Law and Insurance

Authors

  • Dinesh Sharma Research Scholar, Faculty of Law, Maharishi Arvind University, Jaipur, Rajasthan Author
  • Dr. Bhawna Chauhan Supervisor, Faculty of Law, Maharishi Arvind University, Jaipur, Rajasthan Author
  • Prof. (Dr.) Jai Shankar Ojha Co-supervisor, Faculty of Law, Maharishi Arvind University, Jaipur, Rajasthan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29070/g0tp2s95

Keywords:

Risk-Based Regulation, Maritime Law, Developing Economies, Marine Insurance, Port State Control, IMO, Risk Assessment, Liability, Compliance, Regulatory Convergence, Shipping Safety, Environmental Protection

Abstract

In an increasingly interconnected global economy, maritime transport remains the backbone of international trade, accounting for over 80% of global cargo movement (Stopford, 2009). For developing economies, maritime governance is not merely a matter of compliance with international norms but a core determinant of national economic growth, security, and environmental sustainability. Yet these states often grapple with limited institutional capacity, regulatory fragmentation, and rising exposure to maritime risks such as piracy, environmental disasters, and supply chain disruptions. This article examines the evolution, rationale, and practice of risk-based maritime regulation an approach that prioritizes the assessment and mitigation of risk over reactive and prescriptive rule enforcement. The paper articulates how legal frameworks and marine insurance mechanisms converge in developing economies to manage risk, allocate liability, enhance compliance, and mobilize financial resilience. Drawing on historical development, international perspectives, case examples, and theoretical insights, our study underscores the need for harmonized, adaptive, and collaborative frameworks that align legal standards with risk-informed regulatory strategies. The analysis concludes with recommendations for policymakers, insurers, and maritime stakeholders to bridge capacity gaps, integrate risk assessment tools, and foster resilient maritime sectors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Rhodian Sea Law. (800–600 BCE). Early maritime code principles.

2. Consolato del Mare. (14th Century). Mediterranean maritime customs.

3. United Nations. (1948). Convention on the International Maritime Organization.

4. International Maritime Organization. (1969). International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (CLC).

5. International Maritime Organization. (1973/78). MARPOL Convention.

6. International Maritime Organization. (1974). International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS).

7. International Maritime Organization. (1978). STCW Convention.

8. Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press.

9. International Maritime Organization. (1993). International Safety Management (ISM) Code.

10. Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime Economics (3rd ed.). Routledge.

11. Black, J., & Baldwin, R. (2010). Really responsive risk-based regulation. Law & Policy, 32(2), 181–213.

12. OECD. (2013). Risk and Regulatory Policy: Improving the Governance of Risk.

13. European Maritime Safety Agency. (2015). Annual Report on Port State Control.

14. UNCTAD. (2019). Review of Maritime Transport.

15. International Group of P&I Clubs. (2021). Annual Review.

16. World Bank. (2022). The Blue Economy for Resilient Africa.

17. IMO. (2023). Global Integrated Shipping Information System (GISIS) Data Review.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

[1]
“Risk-Based Maritime Regulation in Developing Economies: The Convergence of Law and Insurance”, JASRAE, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 570–580, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.29070/g0tp2s95.