An Analysis on Political Mobilization and Identity Politics of OBC in Karnataka Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/ft8f5k95Keywords:
Political, mobilization, politics, OBC, Karnataka, regionAbstract
The term "political mobilization" refers to the steps used to get people to take a stand on a particular political issue. Each country's youth, including those who were unhappy with autocratic regimes and wanted more democratic leadership, formed a separate organization. Members of unions, who were also a distinct category, were under continual attack in these nations. The younger generation and union members who are fighting for political representation and identity recognition are both seen as part of the movement to bring about change within the context of this conversation. Major consequences for political science are associated with political identity, which stands for people's core values, objectives, and ambitions. Furthermore, while assessing the factors that lead to conflicts, it is crucial to consider this element. With a politically homogenous population, it could be simpler to pass laws and enact policies that reflect the values held by the people living in that state. They were able to use their neighborhood connections to their political advantage. They also did a lot of door-to-door canvassing and recruited neighbors to join their political parties. Their enthusiasm for democratic philosophy and political politics was evident. When it came to protecting their communities' interests, they trusted their political parties. Minority political figures are rising to prominence in the Hyderabad Karnataka Region. The OBCs in the Hyderabad, Karnataka region were politically mobilized due to the influence of previous community leaders.
Downloads
References
1. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, communication & society, 15(5), 739-768.
2. Bernstein, M. (2005). Identity politics. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 31, 47-74.
3. Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford University Press.
4. Conway, M. M. (2021). Political parties and political mobilization. American Review of Politics, 14, 549-563.
5. Dinas, E., & Rori, L. (2013). The 2012 Greek parliamentary elections: Fear and loathing in the polls. West European Politics, 36(1), 270-282.
6. Grabarek, M. A. (2011). Mobilization and political participation: Who is asked to play in the game (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan).
7. Gunther, R. (2005). Parties and electoral behavior in Southern Europe. Comparative politics, 253-275.
8. Hutter, S. X. (2011). Protest Politics and the Right-populist Turn: A Comaparative Study of Six West European Countries, 1975-2005 (Doctoral dissertation).
9. Jafferlote Christopher (2003), India‘s Silent Revolution: The Rise of Low Castes in North Indian Politics, Permanent Black: Delhi
10. Kriesi, H. (2014). The political consequences of the economic crises in Europe: Electoral punishment and popular protest.
11. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921-956.
12. Powell, E. N., & Tucker, J. A. (2014). Revisiting electoral volatility in post-communist countries: New data, new results and new approaches. British Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 123-147.
This work is licensed under a 