Misuse Versus Underuse: A Socio-Legal analysis of Women Protection Laws in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/97jsk847Keywords:
Women Protection Laws, Misuse, Underuse, Socio-Legal Analysis, Gender Justice, Domestic Violence, Sexual Harassment, Judicial InterventionAbstract
The discourse surrounding women protection laws in India has evolved from a focus on affirmative protection to debates over alleged misuse and underuse. While legislative efforts since the 1980s have aimed at safeguarding women against domestic violence, sexual harassment, and dowry-related offenses, public narratives increasingly question the implementation, fairness, and societal impact of these statutes. This article undertakes a socio-legal analysis of the competing claims of misuse and underuse of women protection laws in India, exploring legal frameworks, judicial attitudes, data trends, and socio-cultural realities. The research contends that both misuse and underuse co-exist due to systemic gaps in enforcement, lack of gender-sensitive adjudication, and social stigma that deters reporting. International comparisons reveal parallel challenges in balancing women’s protection with procedural fairness. The article concludes by arguing for nuanced reforms grounded in empirical evidence, judicial guidance, and social education, while foreseeing future research avenues in gender justice.
Downloads
References
1. Baxi, U. (1986). The crisis of the Indian legal system: Public law and legal theory. Vikas Publishing House.
2. Bathla, S. (1996). Violence against women: A legal doctrine. Indian Journal of Social Work, 57(3), 341–353.
3. Chowdhury, S. (2009). Misuse of 498A: A critical examination. Journal of Indian Law and Society, 1(2), 26–42.
4. Agarwal v. State of M.P., AIR 2008 SC 1294.
5. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, (2010) 10 SCC 191.
6. Nair, P. (2005). Domestic violence law in India: A critical analysis. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 12(1), 45–69.
7. Kapoor, A. (2007). Implementing the DV Act: Challenges and perspectives. Legal Studies Review, 4(3), 89–107.
8. Srinivas, S. (2012). Gender justice and criminal law reforms in India. Law and Society Journal, 15(4), 211–235.
9. Rao, M. (2015). Workplace harassment and the POSH Act: Early findings. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(1), 59–79.
10. Indian National Crime Records Bureau. (2020). Crime in India.
11. Doe v. University of Michigan, 721 F.Supp. 852 (1988).
12. United Nations. (1979). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
13. World Health Organization. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women.
14. Balakrishnan, R. (2018). Gendered narratives and law: Media representations of women protection laws. Media & Law Journal, 7(2), 79–101.
15. Singh, P. (2020). Procedural fairness in gender crime trials. Journal of Criminal Law & Policy, 14(1), 33–56.
16. Verma, K., & Joshi, D. (2022). Legal literacy and access to justice for survivors of domestic violence. Indian Journal of Legal Studies, 9(1), 112–136.
17. Mehta, S. (2023). Under-reporting of gender-based violence: A socio-legal inquiry. Human Rights Review, 24(4), 401–428.
18. Kaur, J., & Patel, N. (2024). Re-examining POSH implementation in India: Policy insights. Journal of Workplace Law, 19(3), 247–269.
This work is licensed under a 