Role of Lok Adalats in Settlement of Motor Accident Claims in India

Authors

  • Rajendra Sharma Research Scholar, Jaipur School of Law, Maharaj Vinayak Global University Dhand, Amer, Rajasthan Author
  • Dr. Sandeep Bhardwaj Supervisor, Jaipur School of Law, Maharaj Vinayak Global University Dhand, Amer, Rajasthan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29070/5ht6ew87

Keywords:

Lok Adalat, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Compensation, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Legal Services Authorities Act, Motor Vehicles Act, Access to Justice, MACT, Conciliation, Social Justice

Abstract

The increasing number of road accidents in India has resulted in a substantial rise in motor accident compensation claims before Motor Accident Claims Tribunals (MACTs). Delayed adjudication, procedural complexities, pendency of cases, and the economic hardships faced by victims and their families have necessitated the adoption of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. In this context, Lok Adalats have emerged as an effective and people-oriented institution for expeditious settlement of motor accident claims in India. Established under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Lok Adalats provide inexpensive, speedy, and amicable settlement of disputes through conciliation and compromise. Their functioning aligns with the constitutional mandate of ensuring equal access to justice under Articles 14 and 39A of the Constitution of India.

Motor accident claim disputes constitute one of the largest categories of cases settled through National Lok Adalats across the country. These forums significantly reduce litigation costs, avoid prolonged court proceedings, and facilitate timely compensation to victims. The collaborative participation of insurance companies, claimants, legal aid authorities, and judicial officers has enhanced the efficiency of Lok Adalats in resolving compensation disputes. The paper critically examines the legal framework governing Lok Adalats and motor accident compensation claims, analyses judicial interpretations, evaluates the role of Legal Services Authorities, and highlights the practical challenges faced in settlement proceedings. The article further examines the impact of Lok Adalats in reducing pendency of MACT cases and promoting social justice.

The study concludes that Lok Adalats have become an indispensable mechanism in the Indian justice delivery system for settlement of motor accident claims. However, concerns regarding inadequate compensation, unequal bargaining power, lack of legal awareness, and pressure for compromise require systematic reforms. Strengthening institutional capacity, adopting digital mechanisms, enhancing awareness among accident victims, and ensuring fairness in compensation settlements are necessary for improving the effectiveness of Lok Adalats in motor accident claim adjudication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd., (2010) 8 SCC 24.

2. Government of India. (1987). Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. New Delhi: Government of India.

3. Government of India. (1988). Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. New Delhi: Government of India.

4. InterGlobe Aviation Ltd. v. N. Satchidanand, (2011) 7 SCC 463.

5. Jain, M. P. (2021). Indian constitutional law (9th ed.). LexisNexis.

6. Krishna Iyer, V. R. (1980). Law and the people. Deep & Deep Publications.

7. M.R. Krishna Murthi v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., (2019) 4 SCC 177.

8. National Legal Services Authority. (2024). Lok Adalat and access to justice in India. NALSA Publications.

9. Parmanand Singh. (2020). Motor vehicles laws in India. Central Law Publications.

10. Rao, P. C. (2018). Alternative dispute resolution in India: A critical analysis. Indian Bar Review, 45(2), 112–130.

11. Saharay, H. K. (2019). Textbook on motor vehicle accident claims and compensation. Eastern Law House.

12. Sharma, S. K. (2021). Role of Lok Adalats in settlement of accident compensation claims. Journal of Indian Law and Society, 12(1), 88–105.

13. State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh, (2008) 2 SCC 660.

14. The Constitution of India, 1950.

15. Tripathi, S. C. (2022). Legal aid and Lok Adalat in India. Allahabad Law Agency.

16. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sunil Kumar, (2017) 13 SCC 60.

17. Verma, R. (2020). Motor accident compensation and ADR mechanisms in India. International Journal of Legal Studies, 8(3), 67–81.

18. Yadav, K. (2023). Lok Adalats and speedy justice in India: An empirical study. Indian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies, 5(2), 145–162.

19. National Legal Services Authority. (2025). Annual report on National Lok Adalats. NALSA.

20. Deepal Girishbhai Soni v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., (2004) 5 SCC 385.

21. Legal Services Authorities Act overview and Lok Adalat framework.

22. Recent National Lok Adalat MACT settlement reports.

23. ADR mechanisms in motor accident compensation disputes.

24. Rajasthan Lok Adalat framework and legal structure.

25. Maharashtra Lok Adalat and MACT dispute settlement framework.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

[1]
“Role of Lok Adalats in Settlement of Motor Accident Claims in India”, JASRAE, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 700–714, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.29070/5ht6ew87.