Modeling Temperature Control System with Sensor Response Time using Differential Difference Equations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/e7ytw693Keywords:
Temperature control systems, Sensor response time, Differential difference equations, Numerical methods, Euler's Method, Improved Euler's Method, Runge-Kutta Method, Scipy's solve_ivp function, ModelingAbstract
In this experiment, differential difference equations are used to model temperature control systems with sensor response times. It contrasts the Runge-Kutta Method (Order 4), the Improved Euler's Method (Heun's Method), and Scipy's solve_ivp function, four numerical techniques. The study emphasizes how crucial it is to characterize sensor response time because it serves as the basis for precise simulations and control schemes. The Euler's Method is renowned for its speedy computations but has mediocre accuracy and stability. The Runge-Kutta Method (Order 4) offers excellent accuracy and stability at the expense of a higher computing cost, while the Improved Euler's Method strikes a balance between simplicity and accuracy.
The solve_ivp function in Scipy provides a high-level user interface with sophisticated capabilities, although it might have a little more processing overhead. For realistic simulations and efficient control techniques, accurate modeling of temperature control systems with sensor response time is essential.
Downloads
References
1. Luo, Jie, et al. "Battery thermal management systems (BTMs) based on phase change material (PCM): A comprehensive review." Chemical Engineering Journal 430 (2022): 132741.
2. Saqib, Muhammad, Ilyas Khan, and Sharidan Shafie. "Application of fractional differential equations to heat transfer in hybrid nanofluid: modeling and solution via integral transforms." Advances in Difference Equations 2019.1 (2019): 1-18.
3. Singh, Harendra, Devendra Kumar, and Dumitru Baleanu, eds. Methods of mathematical modelling: fractional differential equations. CRC Press, 2019.
4. Ijaz Khan, M., et al. "Mathematical and numerical model for the malaria transmission: Euler method scheme for a malarial model." International Journal of Modern Physics B 37.16 (2023): 2350158.
5. Simangunsong, Laurent, and Sudi Mungkasi. "Fourth order Runge-Kutta method for solving a mathematical model of the spread of HIV-AIDS." AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2353. No. 1. AIP Publishing, 2021.
6. Freer, Robert, and Anthony V. Powell. "Realising the potential of thermoelectric technology: A Roadmap." Journal of Materials Chemistry C 8.2 (2020): 441-463.
7. Kumar, Ashish, et al. "Efficient stochastic model for operational availability optimization of cooling tower using metaheuristic algorithms." IEEE Access 10 (2022): 24659-24677.
8. Babanezhad, Meisam, et al. "Developing intelligent algorithm as a machine learning overview over the big data generated by Euler–Euler method to simulate bubble column reactor hydrodynamics." ACS omega 5.32 (2020): 20558-20566.
9. Mohanty, Jyoti Ranjan. "Temperature Dependent Magnetic Properties of Crystallographically Amorphous Tbco: An Atomistic Simulation Study."
10. Uçak, Kemal. "A novel model predictive Runge–Kutta neural network controller for nonlinear MIMO systems." Neural Processing Letters 51.2 (2020): 1789-1833.
11. Lin, Jiayuan, et al. "A review on recent progress, challenges and perspective of battery thermal management system." International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 167 (2021): 120834.
12. ODE, A. Single First-Order. "Appendix C SciPy’s odeint Ordinary Differential Equation Solver."
13. Arora, Geeta, Varun Joshi, and Isa Sani Garki. "Developments in Runge–Kutta Method to Solve Ordinary Differential Equations." Recent Advances in Mathematics for Engineering (2020): 193-202.
This work is licensed under a 