Internal Autobiographical Mapping and Behavioral Persistence: A Neuroscience-Informed Psychological Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/wpzwb802Keywords:
Internal Autobiographical Map, automatic mechanisms, perception, autobiographical memory theory, human behavioral patternsAbstract
This paper introduces the Internal Autobiographical Map (IAM) as a structural psychological concept of explaining repetitive human behavioral patterns. It states that behavior is not largely motivated by conscious choice or external circumstances, but is more of well-founded internal processes established by autobiographical experience and especially at an early age. Such experiences are understood by people and slowly converted to inner beliefs, rules of behavior, and identity roles that determine perception, emotional reactions, and decisions throughout life. Based on the ideas of autobiographical memory theory, neuroscience of behavioral prediction, and psychological identity formation, the research clarifies how memory functions as a predictive system that strengthens the already familiar behavioral responses, despite them being maladaptive. The study emphasizes that habitual patterns are maintained by automatic mechanisms and emotional stimulation that is associated with previous experiences. It also highlights how structural awareness and restructuring of these internal structures would be necessary to bring about meaningful behavioral change as opposed to depending on motivation alone. IAM model offers a methodical manner of detecting these patterns and getting to know their cause hence a basis of long-term behavioral change and self-improvement.
Downloads
References
1. E. Welch, V. Schelkun, C. Gasser, K. Lockwood, and L. Davachi, “Rich autobiographical memory benefits from both novelty and similarity to other daily experiences,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-29036-9.
2. B. Guerin, “The Forces that Shape Human Behavior: Combining the Behavior Analysis Approach with Social Science Knowledge for a More Exhaustive Framework to Analyze and Change Human Behavior,” Psychol. Rec., vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 355–371, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40732-025-00654-z.
3. E. Donarelli, C. Civilotti, G. Di Fini, G. Gandino, and A. Celeghin, “Autobiographical Memory: A Scoping Meta-Review of Neuroimaging Data Enlightens the Inconsistencies Between Theory and Experimentation,” Brain Sci., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1–20, 2025, doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050515.
4. L. Petiot, H. Sauzeon, and P. Dragicevic, “The Effect of Augmented Reality on Involuntary Autobiographical Memory,” Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. , no. March, 2025, doi: 10.1145/3706598.3713922.
5. C. M. Fang et al., “How AI and Human Behaviors Shape Psychosocial Effects of Extended Chatbot Use: A Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Study,” 2025, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17473
6. F. Hutmacher, M. Appel, and S. Schwan, “Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model,” Psychol. Inq., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 83–105, 2024, doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2024.2384125.
7. R. D. I. van Genugten and D. L. Schacter, “Automated scoring of the autobiographical interview with natural language processing,” Behav. Res. Methods, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 2243–2259, 2024, doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02145-x.
8. T. J. Prescott and P. F. Dominey, “Synthesizing the temporal self: Robotic models of episodic and autobiographical memory,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., vol. 379, no. 1913, 2024, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0415.
9. M. Monzel et al., “Hippocampal-occipital connectivity reflects autobiographical memory deficits in aphantasia,” Elife, vol. 13, pp. 1–20, 2024, doi: 10.7554/elife.94916.3.
10. Peters, N. F. Kemper, F. Schmiedek, and T. Habermas, “Individual differences in revising the life story Personality and event characteristics influence change in the autobiographical meaning of life events,” J. Pers., vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1207–1222, 2023, doi: 10.1111/jopy.12793.
11. J. S. Park, J. O’Brien, C. J. Cai, M. R. Morris, P. Liang, and M. S. Bernstein, “Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior,” UIST 2023 - Proc. 36th Annu. ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol., no. March, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3586183.3606763.
12. A. Clark, S. Mohammadi, M. F. Callaghan, and E. A. Maguire, “Conduction velocity along a key white matter tract is associated with autobiographical memory recall ability,” Elife, vol. 11, pp. 1–44, 2022, doi: 10.7554/eLife.79303.
13. Y. Pang, Q. Ke, H. Rahmani, J. Bailey, and J. Liu, “IGFormer: Interaction Graph Transformer for Skeleton-Based Human Interaction Recognition,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 13685 LNCS, pp. 605–622, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-19806-9_35.
14. V. Mazzia, S. Angarano, F. Salvetti, F. Angelini, and M. Chiaberge, “Action Transformer: A self-attention model for short-time pose-based human action recognition,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 124, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108487.
15. V. Wardell, C. L. Esposito, C. R. Madan, and D. J. Palombo, “Semi-automated transcription and scoring of autobiographical memory narratives,” Behav. Res. Methods, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 507–517, 2021, doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01437-w.
16. A. Wank, J. R. Andrews-Hanna, and M. D. Grilli, “Searching for the past: Exploring the dynamics of direct and generative autobiographical memory reconstruction among young and cognitively normal older adults,” Mem. Cogn., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 422–437, 2021, doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01098-2.
17. T. J. Barry, D. J. Hallford, and K. Takano, “Autobiographical Memory Impairments as a Transdiagnostic Feature of Mental Illness: A Meta-Analytic Review of Investigations Into Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Overgenerality Among People With Psychiatric Diagnoses,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 147, no. 10, pp. 1054–1074, 2021, doi: 10.1037/bul0000345.
18. W. Gilmore et al., “Evidence supporting a time-limited hippocampal role in retrieving autobiographical memories,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 118, no. 12, 2021, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023069118.
19. M. Descamps, O. Boucher, D. K. Nguyen, and I. Rouleau, “Emotional autobiographical memory associated with insular resection in epileptic patients: A comparison with temporal lobe resection,” Brain Sci., vol. 11, no. 10, 2021, doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101316.
20. B. Hong, M. A. Tran, H. Cheng, B. Arenas Rodriguez, K. E. Li, and M. D. Barense, “The influence of event similarity on the detailed recall of autobiographical memories,” Memory, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 100–112, 2025, doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2406307.
21. M. Agron, A. Martin, and A. W. Gilmore, “Scene construction and autobiographical memory retrieval in autism spectrum disorder,” Autism Res., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 204–214, 2024, doi: 10.1002/aur.3066.
22. L. A. E. M. van Houtum et al., “Aberrant neural network activation during reliving of autobiographical memories in adolescent depression,” Cortex, vol. 168, pp. 14–26, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.021.
This work is licensed under a 