Visualizing the relationship between caste, gender, and political representation in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/g6xy7s22Keywords:
Caste, Gender, Political Representation, Intersectionality, Democracy, India, Social InequalityAbstract
In the current paper, the relationship between caste, gender, and political representation in India is critically examined through a combination of the visual and the political science approach. It transcends a purely data-driven approach in its attempt to comprehend how the existing social orders, institutional structures and cultural practices dictate who gains access to political power. Within the framework of intersectionality, the research points to the fact that persons being at the cross-section of marginalized caste identities and gender face both additional and structurally entrenched obstacles to participation and leadership. Although affirmative action policies, such as reservations, have enhanced descriptive representation in different political institutions, it has not always been accompanied by substantive empowerment or policy impact. The paper also highlights the drawbacks of depending only on quantitative visualization in the sense that it should engage more analytically with the issue of power relations, agency, and democratic inclusion. The study highlights the importance of more inclusive, intersectional, and institutionally responsive methodologies by locating the empirical patterns in the larger socio-political contexts. Finally, it demands a reconsideration of the nature of representation in the context of equity, voice, and meaningful representation to enhance democratic legitimacy in India.
Downloads
References
1. Ambedkar, B. R. (2022). Annihilation of Caste: Dr. BR Ambedkar’s Revolutionary Call for Social Justice: A Groundbreaking Critique of the Hindu Caste System & a Vision for Equality [Caste system in India, BR Ambedkar's writings, Social justice movements, Dalit rights, Indian reformers]. Prabhat Prakashan.
2. Banerjee, S., & Ghosh, N. (2019). Caste and gender in contemporary India (pp. 59-65). Routledge India.
3. Beteille, A. (2020). Society and politics in India: Essays in a comparative perspective. Routledge.
4. Chandra, K. (2007). Why ethnic parties succeed: Patronage and ethnic head counts in India. Cambridge University Press.
5. Chhibber, P., & Kollman, K. (2009). The formation of national party systems: Federalism and party competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. In The Formation of National Party Systems. Princeton University Press.
6. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Standford Law Review 43: 1241–1299.
7. Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine (pp. 139–168). In University of Chicago legal forum (Vol. 1).
8. Duflo, E. (2005). Why political reservations?. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2-3), 668-678.
9. Jaffrelot, C. (2003). India's silent revolution: the rise of the lower castes in North India. Orient Blackswan.
10. Jayal, N. (2006). Representing India: Ethnic diversity and the governance of public institutions. Springer.
11. Kabeer, N. (2003). Resources, agency, achievements. Discussing Women’s Empowerment, 17.
12. Kumar, D. P. (2017). Participation of women in politics: Worldwide experience. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 22(12), 77-88.
13. Paik, S. (2014). Dalit women's education in modern India: double discrimination. Routledge.
14. Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Clarendon Press.
15. Rege, S. (1998). Dalit women talk differently: A critique of'difference'and towards a Dalit feminist standpoint position. Economic and Political Weekly, WS39-WS46.
16. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
17. Vaghela, P., Mothilal, R. K., Romero, D., & Pal, J. (2022). Caste capital on twitter: A formal network analysis of caste relations among indian politicians. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW1), 1-29.
18. Young, I. M. (2016). Inclusion and democracy. Readings in planning theory, 4.






