Workflow Gaps in Blood Banking and Transfusion Automation: A Narrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/xsbdvy90Keywords:
Blood Banking, Transfusion Automation, Patient Safety, Human Factors, Health Information Systems, Workflow GapsAbstract
Automation in blood banking and transfusion services has improved workflow efficiency and safety, but several gaps continue to affect transfusion practices. This narrative review examines workflow gaps in blood banking and transfusion automation using secondary evidence from clinical, technological, and health systems literature. The review covers pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical stages, including patient and sample identification, analyser–information system connectivity, bedside verification, and post-transfusion documentation. The review found that incomplete technology integration, poor system interoperability, inconsistent workflow practices, and human-factor issues remain major challenges. These gaps may contribute to transfusion errors, delays, reduced traceability, and operational inefficiencies. The review concludes that automation alone is insufficient to ensure transfusion safety. Integrated digital systems, continuous staff training, and strong organisational support are essential for improving workflow efficiency and patient safety.
Downloads
References
1. Adochiei, F. C., Țoi, F. A., Adochiei, I. R., Argatu, F. C., Serițan, G., & Petroiu, G. G. (2025). HL7 FHIR-Based Open-Source Framework for Real-Time Biomedical Signal Acquisition and IoMT Interoperability. Applied Sciences, 15(23), 12803.
2. Carayon, P., Wetterneck, T. B., Rivera-Rodriguez, A. J., Hundt, A. S., Hoonakker, P., Holden, R., & Gurses, A. P. (2014). Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety. Applied Ergonomics, 45(1), 14–25.
3. Elhaj, S. A., Odeh, Y., Tbaishat, D., Rjoop, A., Mansour, A., & Odeh, M. (2024). Informing the state of process modeling and automation of blood banking and transfusion services through a systematic mapping study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 17, 473–489.
4. Frankel, A., Haraden, C., Federico, F., & Lenoci-Edwards, J. (2017). A framework for safe, reliable, and effective care. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
5. Fung, M. K., Eder, A. F., & Spitalnik, S. L. (Eds.). (2017). Technical Manual (19th ed.). Bethesda, MD: AABB.
6. Goodnough, L. T., Levy, J. H., & Murphy, M. F. (2013). Concepts of blood transfusion in adults. The Lancet, 381(9880), 1845–1854.
7. Imamoglu, G., Topcu, Y. I., & Aydin, N. (2023). A systematic literature review of the blood supply chain through bibliometric analysis and taxonomy. Systems, 11(3), 124.
8. Joint Commission. (2015). Sentinel event data: Root causes by event type. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission.
9. Kaufman, R. M., Djulbegovic, B., Gernsheimer, T., Kleinman, S., Tinmouth, A. T., Capocelli, K. E., … Tobian, A. A. (2015). Platelet transfusion: A clinical practice guideline from the AABB. Annals of Internal Medicine, 162(3), 205–213.
10. Kruse, C. S., Frederick, B., Jacobson, T., & Monticone, D. K. (2017). Cybersecurity in healthcare: A systematic review of modern threats and trends. Technology and Health Care, 25(1), 1–10.
11. Lescoutra-Etchegaray, N., Sumian, C., Culeux, A., Durand, V., Gurgel, P. V., Deslys, J. P., & Comoy, E. E. (2014). Removal of exogenous prion infectivity in leukoreduced red blood cell units by a specific filter designed for human transfusion. Transfusion, 54(4), 1037–1045.
12. Narayan, S., Poles, D., Bellamy, M., Spinks, C., Mistry, H., & Carter-Graham, S. (2019). The 2018 Annual SHOT Report. Manchester: Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT).
13. Pérez-Aliaga, A. I., Ayerra, I., Sánchez-Guillén, J., Lopez, F. J., Puente, F., Aranda, A., … Garcés, C. (2024). Routine results of an algorithm for managing the production of blood components. Vox Sanguinis, 119(6), 541–547.
14. Randall, D. A., Patterson, J. A., Gallimore, F., Morris, J. M., Simpson, J. M., McGee, T. M., … Obstetric Transfusion Steering Group. (2019). Haemoglobin trajectories during pregnancy and associated outcomes using pooled maternity and hospitalization data from two tertiary hospitals. Vox Sanguinis, 114(8), 842–852.
15. Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2010). A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. BMJ Quality & Safety, 19(Suppl. 3), i68–i74.
16. Varghese, A., Thilak, K., & Thomas, S. M. (2024). Technological advancements, digital transformation, and future trends in blood transfusion services. International Journal of Advances in Medicine, 11(2), 147–152.
17. Waters, J. H., Dyga, R. M., Waters, J. F., & Yazer, M. H. (2011). The volume of returned red blood cells in a large blood salvage program: Where does it all go? Transfusion, 51(10), 2126–2132.
18. World Health Organization. (2017). Global status report on blood safety and availability 2016. Geneva: WHO.
19. World Health Organization. (2021). Educational modules on clinical use of blood. Geneva: WHO.
This work is licensed under a 