Digital surveillance in POCSO investigations: Balancing efficiency and procedural fairness–a study with special reference to shekhawati region of rajasthan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/hmd2hg90Keywords:
Digital Surveillance, POCSO, Procedural Fairness, Right to Privacy, Digital Personal Data ProtectionAbstract
Now a days CCTV footage, mobile location data, Call Detail Records (CDR) and internet logs are a major part of criminal investigation in India especially under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 with the use of digital surveillance tools. The paper discusses the link between these technological tools and constitutional procedural fairness in the semi-urban and rural terrain of the Shekhawati region (Sikar, Jhunjhunu and Churu districts) of Rajasthan.
The study, based on data from the NCRB, CAG Performance Audit reports, and landmark judicial precedents, assesses the extent to which digital evidence accelerates investigations. However, systemic challenges continue to undermine procedural fairness, including severe forensic delays, infrastructural and skill deficiencies in rural policing, the stringent certificate requirements under Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (formerly Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act), and concerns about digital privacy. The paper advocates a rights-based framework, technologically upgraded, and proposes the establishment of regional forensic facilities, mandatory digital training of officers at the grid level and adherence to the proportionality standard to ensure that technology consolidates, rather than destroys, the delivery of justice.
Downloads
References
1. Agarwal, A. (2022). Digital evidence and criminal justice administration in India. In-dian Journal of Law and Technology, 18(2), 45–63.
2. Bansal, R., & Sharma, P. (2021). Cyber forensics and child protection laws in India: Emerging challenges under the POCSO Act. Journal of Criminal Law and Justice, 9(1), 78–92.
3. Bhattacharya, S. (2020). Procedural fairness and electronic surveillance in criminal in-vestigations. International Journal of Legal Studies, 14(3), 101–118.
4. Chawla, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence and digital policing in India: Legal and ethi-cal dimensions. Indian Police Journal, 70(1), 55–71.
5. Crime in India Report 2023. (2024). National Crime Records Bureau. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.
6. Das, R., & Meena, V. (2022). Protection of child rights and technological intervention under POCSO legislation. Journal of Child Rights and Development, 11(2), 66–84.
7. Government of India. (2012). Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Ministry of Law and Justice.
8. Government of India. (2021). Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.
9. Gupta, N. (2021). Digital surveillance and privacy concerns in criminal justice systems. Indian Journal of Constitutional Law, 15(1), 88–109.
10. Jain, P. (2020). Admissibility of electronic evidence in India after the Evidence Act amendments. Journal of Indian Law Institute, 62(4), 430–448.
11. Kaur, H., & Singh, M. (2023). Technology-enabled investigation mechanisms in child abuse cases. Asian Journal of Criminology, 18(2), 210–226.
12. Kumar, A. (2022). Balancing state surveillance and fundamental rights in India. Con-stitutional Law Review, 8(3), 120–139.
13. Mehra, V. (2021). Procedural safeguards in digital investigations involving minors. Journal of Human Rights and Social Justice, 13(2), 94–113.
14. Mishra, S., & Khan, F. (2024). Use of CCTV, mobile tracking, and cyber tools in POCSO investigations: A socio-legal analysis. Indian Journal of Criminology, 52(1), 32–51.
15. Narayan, R. (2020). Privacy jurisprudence in India after K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India. Supreme Court Cases Journal, 7(2), 55–70.
16. Patel, D. (2023). Child-friendly justice system and digital evidence management in India. Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, 6(1), 89–107.
17. Rajasthan Police Department. (2023). Annual report on cybercrime and digital investi-gations in Rajasthan. Government of Rajasthan.
18. Sharma, V. (2022). Electronic surveillance, constitutional morality, and due process in India. Legal Research Review, 17(4), 145–162.
19. Singh, R., & Yadav, S. (2021). Challenges in implementation of the POCSO Act in rural India. Journal of Rural and Social Justice, 10(3), 201–219.
20. United Nations Children’s Fund. (2021). Child online protection and digital safety: Global perspectives and policy recommendations. UNICEF Publications.






