Ethylene Effect on Soybean Root Infection By Soybean Cyst Nematodes

Exploring the Role of Ethylene in Soybean Root Infection by Soybean Cyst Nematodes

by Dharmendra Singh*,

- Published in Journal of Advances in Science and Technology, E-ISSN: 2230-9659

Volume 4, Issue No. 7, Nov 2012, Pages 0 - 0 (0)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

Nematodes, specifically cyst nematodes, are themost damaging pest to US soybean production (Wratherand Koenning, 2006). With an increasing number of acres planted withsoybean and new varieties being developed to geographicallybroaden profitable cultivation of soybean in the USand across the world, the continued study of this devastatingpest is of the utmost importance. Soybean cystnematodes (SCN) are obligate parasites that can alter rootcell development to support its nutritional and reproductive needs(Williamson and Gleason, 2003; Davis et al., 2004). The localizedcommandeering of plant developmental processes by thenematode requires interactions with the host that involve changesin host gene expression. A number of studies have demonstratedthat both root knot and cyst nematodes may alter thebalance of plant hormones to achieve the cellular conditionsneeded for development of the feeding structure. In particular,auxin and ethylene may play important roles in the formationof the nematode feeding structure (Goverse et al.,2000; Wubben et al.,2001). Alteration in the localized balance ofthese two hormones would be expected to have a marked impact ongene expression, irrespective of any other factors that mightalso affect gene expression.

KEYWORD

ethylene, soybean root infection, soybean cyst nematodes, nematodes, cyst nematodes, US soybean production, soybean cultivation, nutritional and reproductive needs, plant developmental processes, host gene expression

INTRODUCTION

Nematodes, specifically cyst nematodes, are the most damaging pest to US soybean production (Wrather and Koenning, 2006). With an increasing number of acres planted with soybean and new varieties being developed to geographically broaden profitable cultivation of soybean in the US and across the world, the continued study of this devastating pest is of the utmost importance. Soybean cyst nematodes (SCN) are obligate parasites that can alter root cell development to support its nutritional and reproductive needs (Williamson and Gleason, 2003; Davis et al., 2004). The localized commandeering of plant developmental processes by the nematode requires interactions with the host that involve changes in host gene expression. A number of studies have demonstrated that both root knot and cyst nematodes may alter the balance of plant hormones to achieve the cellular conditions needed for development of the feeding structure. In particular, auxin and ethylene may play important roles in the formation of the

nematode feeding structure (Goverse et al., 2000; Wubben et al., 2001). Alteration in the localized balance of these two hormones would be expected to have a marked impact on gene expression, irrespective of any other factors that might also affect gene expression.

How the nematode brings about changes in plant hormone levels and developmentally regulated processes in the host is of great interest. The nematode oesophageal glands are a potential source for pathogenicity factors secreted from the nematode. The oesophageal glands have been successfully targeted for preparation of organ-specific cDNA libraries and many transcripts identified have the potential to be pathogenicity factors (Gao et al., 2003; Huang et al., 2003). Currently a few of the oesophageal gland proteins have a demonstrated

potential to alter plant development when expressed in transgenic plants (Doyle and Lambert, 2003; Wang et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2006). In addition to the characterization of pathogenicity factors of nematode origin, cataloguing changes in susceptible host gene expression in response to SCN infection will identify developmental and mechanistic

processes associated with SCN colonization of soybean roots and distinguish host targets for controlling nematode pathogenicity of soybean. To achieve this objective, soybean roots were inoculated with SCN and after 8, 12, and 16 d small pieces of the root that had multiple swollen female nematodes protruding from the root were dissected out. Elimination of root material not directly associated with actively growing nematodes greatly enhances our ability to detect changes in gene expression associated with SCN infection. The RNA from these root pieces was hybridized to Affymetrix soybean GeneChips and statistical analysis of the microarray hybridization signals identified 1404 transcripts that increase >2-fold in SCN-colonized root pieces and 739 that decreased >2-fold in the same root pieces.

LYSOBACTER

The genus Lysobacter belongs to the family Xanthomonadaceae within the gamma proteobacteria and includes thirteen named species: Lysobacter enzymogenes, L. antibioticus, L. gummosus, L. brunescens, L. defluvii, L. niabensis, L. niastensis, L. daejeonensis, L. yangpyeongensis, L. koreensis, L. concretionis, L. spongiicola and L. capsici. Lysobacter spp. were originally grouped with myxobacteria because they shared the distinctive trait of gliding motility, but they uniquely display a number of traits that distinguish them from other taxonomically and ecologically related microbes including high genomic G+C content (typically ranging between the 65-72%) and the lack of flagella. The feature of gliding motility alone has piqued the interest of many, since the role of gliding bacteria in soil ecology is poorly understood. In addition, while a number of different mechanisms have been proposed for gliding motility among a wide range of bacterial species, the genetic mechanism in Lysobacter remains unknown. Members of the Lysobacter group have gained broad interest for production of extracellular enzymes. The group is also regarded as a rich source for production of novel antibiotics, such as β-lactams containing substituted side chains, macrocyclic lactams and macrocyclic peptide or depsipeptide antibiotics like the katanosins

2

Lysobacter spp. have been described as ubiquitous inhabitants of soil and water. Their presence has been largely ignored, since members often are minor components in sample screenings when using conventional isolation procedures. However, because of improved molecular methods of identification and better descriptions for the genus, their agricultural relevance is becoming increasingly evident especially as members of ecologically significant microbial communities associated with soil and plants. Recent evidence suggests that Lysobacter spp. may occupy a wide range of ecological niches beyond those associated with plants, including a broad range of ‘extreme’ environments. For example, 16S rDNA phylogenetic analyses show Lysobacter clades that include sequences obtained from hydrothermal vents, isolates from Mt. Pinatubo mud flows and upflow anaerobic blanket sludge reactors, and an iron-oxidizing, microaerophilic lithotroph.

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL

The potential of Lysobacter species as biological control agents for plant diseases has been recognized recently. Among L. enzymogenes strains, C3 is the most thoroughly characterized strain at both the molecular and biological levels. The ecological versatility of the strain is reflected by the range of diseases it is able to control, as well as the various plant hosts and plant parts it is capable of colonizing. For example, L. enzymogenes strain C3 (erroneously identified as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) has been reported to control foliar diseases such as leaf spot of tall fescue caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana, bean rust caused by Uromyces appendiculatus and Fusarium head blight of wheat . L. enzymogenes strain C3 also has been reported to suppress soilborne diseases, such as brown patch in turfgrass caused by Rhizoctonia solani, the seedling disease Pythium damping-off of sugarbeet and summer patch disease of Kentucky bluegrass caused by the root-infecting Magnaporthe poae.

DISEASE SUPPRESSIVE SOILS

Lysobacter species have also been isolated from soils suppressive to Rhizoctonia solani. Clay soils with natural suppressiveness against Rhizoctonia contained higher numbers of antagonistic isolates of L. gummosus, L. antibioticus and/or L. capsici. Although the mechanism behind this phenomenon is not yet understood, it appeared that growing grass/clover increased the number of these Lysobacter species as well as the Rhizoctonia suppressiveness.

MECHANISMS OF ANTAGONISM

Originally characterized as a biological control agent for plant diseases, L. enzymogenes strain C3 is unique in that it expresses a wide range of mechanisms The strain produces numerous extracellular enzymes that contribute to biocontrol activity, including multiple forms of β-1,3-glucanases and chitinases. The strain also has been demonstrated to induce systemic resistance in certain plants, protecting them from pathogen infection. In addition, recent studies have indicated important roles for secondary metabolites with antibiotic activity and biosurfactant activity in fungal antagonism . Several of these traits are globally controlled by a regulator encoded by the clp gene. Mutations in clp are intriguing for two reasons. First, the mutant phenotype implies that a broad range of genes is involved in secreted antimicrobials associated with the clp regulon, many of which remain unidentified. The second is that mutations in clp result in significant loss of extracellular enzyme activities and antimicrobial activity displayed by L. enzymogenes strain C3. These activities normally are phenotypically overwhelming and often lead to masking of other phenotypes in standard assays, making mutation effects of non-related genes difficult or nearly impossible to evaluate. However, strains harboring clp gene mutations provide a means to separate clp-regulated phenotypes from others (such as that describe below), thus making their evaluation feasible.

LYSOBACTER GENETICS

L. enzymogenes strain C3 is a genetically tractable strain allowing for easy construction of gene knockouts, supporting its use as a model genetic system for unraveling the molecular basis of pathogenicity, as well as identifying mechanisms of microbial antagonism and biological control. Indeed, a number of derivative strains of L. enzymogenes strain C3 already have been constructed, including mutants affected in structural genes encoding enzyme activities, the regulatory clp gene and various combinations thereof.

REFERENCES

1. Aloni R, Aloni E, Langhans M, Ullrich CI. Role of cytokinin and auxin in shaping root architecture: regulating vascular differentiation, lateral root initiation, root apical dominance and root gravitropism. Annals of Botany (2006) 97:883–893. 2. Bent AF, Hoffman TK, Schmidt JS, Hartman GL, Hoffman DD, Xue P, Tucker ML. Disease- and performance-related traits of ethylene-insensitive soybean. Crop Sciences (2006) 46:893–901. 3. Broekaert WF, Delaure SL, De Bolle MF, Cammue BP. The role of ethylene in host–pathogen interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology (2006) 44:393–416.

Dharmendra Singh

tissue for detection of nematodes. Journal of Nematology (1983) 15:142–143. 5. Chiang DY, Brown PO, Eisen MB. Visualizing associations between genome sequences and gene expression data using genome-mean expression profiles. Bioinformatics (2001) 17(Suppl. 1):S49–S55. 6. Clark DG, Gubrium EK, Barrett JE, Nell TA, Klee HJ. Root formation in ethylene-insensitive plants. Plant Physiology (1999) 121:53–60. 7. Davis EL, Hussey RS, Baum TJ. Getting to the roots of parasitism by nematodes. Trends in Parasitology (2004) 20:134–141. 8. de Almeida Engler J, De Vleesschauwer V, Burssens S, Celenza JL Jr, Inzé D, Van Montagu M, Engler G, Gheysen G. Molecular markers and cell cycle inhibitors show the importance of cell cycle progression in nematode-induced galls and syncytia. The Plant Cell (1999) 11:793–808. 9. de Almeida Engler J, Van Poucke K, Karimi M, De Groodt R, Gheysen G, Engler G. Dynamic cytoskeleton rearrangements in giant cells and syncytia of nematode-infected roots. The Plant Journal (2004) 38:12–26. 10. DeYoung BJ, Innes RW. Plant NBS-LRR proteins in pathogen sensing and host defense. Nature Immunology (2006) 7:1243–1249.