Isolation,
Screening, and Preliminary Evaluation of Crude Oil-Degrading Bacteria for
Environmental Bioremediation
Moumita
Roy1*, Dr. Madhurima Roy2
1
Research Scholar, P.K. University, Shivpuri, M.P.
mr4228467@gmail.com
2
Associate Professor, P.K. University, Shivpuri, M.P.
Abstract
Petroleum
pollution remains a major environmental concern due to the stubborn nature and
harmful effects of hydrocarbons in contaminated ecosystems. In this study,
bacteria native to three petroleum-polluted sites were isolated and evaluated
for their ability to break down hydrocarbons. Using enrichment culture methods,
a total of 15 bacterial strains were cultivated and subsequently tested for
their degradative efficiency on mineral salt medium (MSM) enriched with crude oil.
Out of these, three isolates (Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas putida,
and Bacillus cereus)
demonstrated considerable hydrocarbon degradation, evident from distinct clear
zones formed around the colonies. Biochemical profiling revealed positive
results for nitrate reduction and gelatin hydrolysis in some strains, whereas
urease activity was not observed. Traditional staining methods and
morphological assessments were employed to aid in the identification process.
Initial degradation trials provided encouraging insights into the
biodegradative capabilities of these isolates. Further research will involve
optimizing environmental conditions for maximal breakdown and quantifying
hydrocarbon degradation using advanced analytical techniques like GC-MS.
Overall, this work highlights the usefulness of naturally occurring bacterial
strains in developing eco-friendly approaches for the cleanup of
petroleum-contaminated environments.
Keywords:
Bioremediation,
hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria, petroleum pollution, Pseudomonas putida,
Bacillus subtilis, microbial degradation.
The widespread release of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) into the environment stemming from industrial activity, accidental spills, and improper disposal has created a pressing global pollution issue. These compounds are chemically stable, hydrophobic, and toxic, making them not only persistent in the environment but also capable of accumulating in living organisms and entering the food chain (Das & Chandran, 2011; Varjani, 2017). Both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems face severe ecological and health consequences due to PHC contamination. Conventional remediation methods, such as incineration, excavation, chemical treatment, and physical recovery, though effective in certain scenarios, often involve high financial and environmental costs. These methods are energy-intensive and may leave behind harmful residues or byproducts (Alves et al., 2021; Raghunandan et al., 2023). In contrast, the emphasis is increasingly being placed on environmentally friendly and cost-efficient alternatives like bioremediation (Das & Chandran, 2011; Jaiswal et al., 2023).
At the core of bioremediation is the natural ability of certain microbes to metabolize petroleum-based pollutants. Indigenous bacteria, particularly those that have evolved in hydrocarbon-rich environments, possess specific enzymes that enable them to use hydrocarbons as energy and carbon sources (Kapoor et al., 2023; Subramaniam et al., 2023). Genera such as Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Acinetobacter, Alcaligenes, Rhodococcus, and Sphingomonas are well-documented for their role in hydrocarbon degradation (Goswami et al., 2023; Khan et al., 2023). These microorganisms initiate the degradation process through the action of oxygenase enzymes, which add oxygen to hydrocarbon molecules, increasing their solubility and making them more accessible for further enzymatic breakdown. The final products of this metabolism typically include less harmful substances such as carbon dioxide, water, and fatty acids (Alves et al., 2021; Li et al., 2023).
Microbial bioremediation represents a naturally occurring, yet highly adaptable, method for managing PHC pollution. This process can be enhanced through strategies like biostimulationadding nutrients to boost indigenous microbial activityor bioaugmentation, which involves introducing specialized strains into the contaminated site (Sivaram et al., 2023; Chakraborty et al., 2023). These approaches can be fine-tuned to match the environmental conditions of a specific site, enhancing degradation rates without the collateral impact of chemical or mechanical interventions. Unlike traditional remediation technologies, microbial remediation is less disruptive, generates minimal waste, and is often feasible directly at the contaminated site, making it a preferred method from both ecological and economic perspectives (Das & Chandran, 2011; Khan et al., 2023).
The degradation of hydrocarbons by bacteria may proceed under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. Aerobic degradation, which is more efficient and widely studied, relies on the availability of oxygen and the activity of enzymes like monooxygenases and dioxygenases, which catalyze the initial oxidation of hydrocarbons (Li et al., 2023). This pathway often leads to complete mineralization, transforming harmful compounds into carbon dioxide and water. In oxygen-poor environmentssuch as subsurface soils or aquatic sedimentsanaerobic degradation becomes crucial. Under these conditions, microbes utilize alternative electron acceptors like nitrate, sulfate, or ferric iron (Subramaniam et al., 2023). Remarkably, many hydrocarbon-degrading strains can adjust their metabolism to function in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, maintaining degradation activity even when oxygen is scarce (Kapoor et al., 2023; Goswami et al., 2023).
An important aspect of microbial hydrocarbon degradation is the production of biosurfactantssurface-active molecules synthesized by bacteria. These compounds enhance the availability of hydrophobic hydrocarbons by emulsifying them into more accessible forms. In doing so, biosurfactants improve microbial uptake and degradation efficiency (Jaiswal et al., 2023). Species such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis are known to secrete potent biosurfactants like rhamnolipids and surfactin. These not only increase the solubility of hydrocarbons but also aid in bacterial motility and the formation of biofilms, which support microbial colonization of oil-contaminated environments (Sivaram et al., 2023; Chakraborty et al., 2023).
Working with bacteria native to contaminated sites has practical advantages. These microbes are already acclimated to local environmental conditions and may possess inherent resistance to the toxic effects of hydrocarbons (Khan et al., 2023). Additionally, their interactions with other microbial species in the environment can enhance overall degradation through cooperative metabolism (Alves et al., 2021). Harnessing such naturally adapted microbial communities minimizes the ecological risks associated with introducing foreign strains and increases the effectiveness of bioremediation strategies. Understanding their genetic diversity, enzyme systems, and adaptability is essential to developing site-specific, sustainable cleanup technologies (Goswami et al., 2023).
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Sample
Collection
Soil and
water samples were collected from three petroleum-contaminated sites
(designated Site A, B, and C). Each site presented unique physicochemical
properties to maximize microbial diversity (Mukherjee et al., 2017; Khan et
al., 2023).
Enrichment
and Isolation
Serial
dilutions were prepared and spread onto nutrient agar and MSM supplemented with
1% crude oil. Enrichment cultures were incubated to promote
hydrocarbon-utilizing bacteria (Das & Chandran, 2011). A total of 15
morphologically distinct colonies were isolated (5 per site).
a)
Enrichment Culture: Samples
were incubated in mineral salt medium (MSM) supplemented with 1% crude oil to
enrich hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria (Rahman et al., 2002).
b)
Serial Dilution and Plating:
Enriched cultures underwent serial dilution and were plated on nutrient agar
and MSM agar containing crude oil as the sole carbon source.
c)
Incubation: Plates
were incubated at 30°C for 57 days, and distinct colonies were selected for
further analysis (Kapoor et al., 2023).
Preliminary
Screening
Isolates
were screened on crude oil-supplemented MSM agar for hydrocarbon degradation.
Clear zones around colonies indicated degradation potential (Jaiswal et al.,
2023).
Morphological
and Biochemical Characterization
a)
Gram Staining:
Determined the Gram reaction of isolates.
b)
Colony Morphology: Assessed
color, shape, size, elevation, and edge.
c)
Biochemical Tests:
Included oxidase, catalase, citrate utilization, urease activity, nitrate
reduction, and gelatin hydrolysis tests (Holt et al., 1994; Cappuccino &
Sherman, 2014). Selected isolates underwent Gram staining and colony morphology
assessments.
Determination
of Optimal Degradation Conditions
To
determine ideal conditions for degradation, bacterial isolates were tested
under varying temperature (20°C45°C), pH (59), salinity (08% NaCl),
hydrocarbon type (crude oil, diesel, kerosene, engine oil), and concentration
(0.55% v/v) (Alves et al., 2021; Li et al., 2023). These conditions
collectively enabled the screening of optimal environmental parameters to
enhance the bioremediation potential of selected bacterial strains.
Table 1.
Optimization of Environmental Parameters for Growth and Hydrocarbon Degradation
by Bacterial Isolates
|
Temperature: |
20°C, |
30°C, |
37°C, |
45°C |
|
|
Hydrocarbon Types: |
Crude |
oil, |
diesel, |
kerosene, |
|
|
Hydrocarbon Concentrations: (v/v) |
0.5%, |
1%, |
2%, |
5% |
|
|
pH: |
5.0, |
6.5, |
7.0, |
8.0, |
9.0 |
|
Salinity: NaCl |
0%, |
2%, |
4%, |
6%, |
8% |
Quantitative
Hydrocarbon Degradation
Gravimetric
Analysis: Residual hydrocarbons were extracted using hexane
and weighed post-evaporation (Barathi & Vasudevan, 2001).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Isolation
and Screening
A total
of 15 morphologically distinct bacterial isolates were obtained, with five
isolates from each site.. Among these, 3 were identified as Bacillus
subtilis, Pseudomonas putida, and Bacillus cereus based on
Gram staining and colony morphology. Preliminary screening revealed that four
isolates exhibited significant hydrocarbon degradation, indicated by clear
zones on MSM agar plates.
Biochemical
Characterization
Three
potent hydrocarbon-degrading isolates were identified:
Morphological
and Biochemical Characterization
Table
2: Biochemical Characterization of Selected Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacterial
Isolates
|
Isolate |
Urease |
Nitrate Reduction |
Gelatin Hydrolysis |
|
B. subtilis |
Negative |
Positive |
Positive |
|
P. putida |
Negative |
Positive |
Negative |
|
B. cereus |
Negative |
Negative |
Positive |
This
table summarizes the results of key biochemical testsurease activity, nitrate
reduction, and gelatin hydrolysis conducted on three hydrocarbon-degrading
bacterial isolates (Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas putida, and Bacillus
cereus). The positive outcomes for nitrate reduction and gelatin hydrolysis
in certain strains indicate the presence of enzymatic functions associated with
hydrocarbon metabolism and biodegradation potential.
Enrichment
Observations
Good
enrichment cultures showed turbidity and oil depletion compared to sterile
controls, validating microbial growth and hydrocarbon utilization.
Optimization
Parameters
Preliminary
studies have begun to assess optimal temperature, pH, and hydrocarbon
concentration for degradation. Future experiments will include detailed GC-MS
analysis to quantify degradation rates and metabolite formation.
Optimization
of Growth Conditions
Optimal degradation activity for all bacterial
isolates was observed at 30°C, indicating this as the most favorable
temperature for hydrocarbon breakdown. The pH conditions also played a crucial
role, with maximum degradation recorded at a neutral pH of 7.0. Regarding
salinity, the isolates exhibited optimal growth and activity at a 2% NaCl
concentration, suggesting moderate salt tolerance. Among the different
hydrocarbon types tested, crude oil supported the highest degradation
efficiency across all strains, followed by diesel, kerosene, and engine oil,
respectively. When evaluating the impact of hydrocarbon concentration, the best
degradation occurred at 1% (v/v) crude oil. However, increasing the
concentration beyond this point resulted in reduced degradation efficiency,
likely due to the toxic effects of excess hydrocarbons on microbial activity.
The isolated strains exhibited robust
hydrocarbon-degrading capabilities under various environmental conditions. The
presence of specific enzymatic activities, such as nitrate reductase and
gelatinase, suggests their potential role in the degradation pathways. The optimization
studies highlight the importance of environmental parameters in enhancing
biodegradation efficiency. These findings align with previous studies reporting
the efficacy of Pseudomonas and Bacillus species in hydrocarbon
degradation.
Quantitative
Analysis
Gravimetric
Analysis of Hydrocarbon Degradation : Gravimetric
analysis was used to determine the residual hydrocarbon content
post-incubation. The degradation efficiency was calculated as a percentage of
the initial crude oil weight lost after 14 days. The results are shown in Table
1.
Table 3. Gravimetric Analysis of Hydrocarbon
Degradation after 14 Days
|
Isolate Code |
Site |
Initial Oil (g) |
Residual Oil (g) |
% Degradation |
|
A1 |
Site A |
1.000 |
0.520 |
48.0 |
|
A3 |
Site A |
1.000 |
0.455 |
54.5 |
|
B3 |
Site B |
1.000 |
0.150 |
85.0 |
|
B5 |
Site B |
1.000 |
0.240 |
76.0 |
|
C2 |
Site C |
1.000 |
0.320 |
68.0 |
Note:
Each experiment was conducted in triplicate. Values represent the mean of three
replicates.
These
results confirm that the isolates from Site B, particularly B3, possess
strong hydrocarbon-degrading ability, possibly due to site-specific adaptation
or microbial consortia synergy.
CONCLUSION
This
study successfully isolated and characterized indigenous hydrocarbon-degrading
bacteria from petroleum-contaminated environments. Pseudomonas putida
and Bacillus species demonstrated efficient degradation, suggesting
potential applications in bioremediation. Further work involving optimization
and metabolite profiling will solidify their role in large-scale environmental
remediation strategies. This study successfully isolated and characterized
hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria from petroleum-contaminated sites. The
identified strains, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas putida, and Bacillus
cereus, demonstrated significant potential in degrading various
hydrocarbons under optimized conditions. The findings underscore the
feasibility of employing indigenous microbial populations for bioremediation of
hydrocarbon-contaminated environments. Future research should focus on scaling
up these findings and exploring the genetic and enzymatic mechanisms underlying
hydrocarbon degradation to enhance bioremediation strategies further.
References
1.
Alves, J. P., et al. (2021). Advances in microbial bioremediation of
petroleum hydrocarbons. International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health, 18(12), 6572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126572
2.
Barathi, S., & Vasudevan, N. (2001). Utilization of petroleum
hydrocarbons by Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from a
petroleum-contaminated soil. Environment International, 26(56),
413416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00031-7
3.
Cappello, S., Denaro, R., Genovese, M., Giuliano, L., & Yakimov, M.
M. (2007). Predominant growth of Alcanivorax during experiments on oil
spill bioremediation in mesocosms. Microbiological Research, 162(2),
185190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.07.001
4.
Cappuccino, J. G., & Sherman, N. (2014). Microbiology: A
laboratory manual (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
5.
Chakraborty, J., et al. (2023). Role of biosurfactants in petroleum
hydrocarbon bioremediation: A review. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14,
1132831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1132831
6.
Christova, N., Tuleva, B., & Nikolova-Damyanova, B. (2014). Enhanced
hydrocarbon biodegradation by a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis
strain. Zeitschrift fόr Naturforschung C, 59(34), 205210. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2004-3-414
7.
Das, N., & Chandran, P. (2011). Microbial degradation of petroleum
hydrocarbon contaminants: An overview. Biotechnology Research
International, 2011, 113. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/941810
8.
Dong, Y., et al. (2019). One-step removal of calcium, magnesium, and
nickel in desalination by Alcaligenes aquatilis via biomineralization.
Crystals, 9(12), 634.
9.
Duran, R. E., et al. (2019). Genomic and physiological traits of the
marine bacterium Alcaligenes aquatilis QD168 isolated from Quintero
Bay, Central Chile, reveal a robust adaptive response to environmental
stressors. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 252.
10.
Dyksterhouse, S. E., et al. (1995). Cycloclasticus pugetii gen.
nov., sp. nov., an aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium from marine
sediments. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 45(1),
116123.
11.
Fernandez-Martinez, J., et al. (2003). Description of Alcanivorax
venustensis sp. nov. and reclassification of Fundibacter jadensis
DSM 12178^T as Alcanivorax jadensis comb. nov., members of the emended
genus Alcanivorax. International Journal of Systematic and
Evolutionary Microbiology, 53(2), 331338.
12.
Geiselbrecht, A. D., et al. (1998). Isolation of marine polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-degrading Cycloclasticus strains from the
Gulf of Mexico and comparison of their PAH degradation ability with that of
Puget Sound Cycloclasticus strains. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, 64(12), 47034710.
13.
Goswami, M., et al. (2023). Metagenomic insights into bacterial
communities involved in hydrocarbon degradation. Frontiers in Environmental
Science, 12, 1354422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1354422
14.
Hara, A., et al. (2003). Alcanivorax which prevails in
oil-contaminated seawater exhibits broad substrate specificity for alkane
degradation. Environmental Microbiology, 5(9), 746753.
15.
Holt, J. G., Krieg, N. R., Sneath, P. H. A., Staley, J. T., &
Williams, S. T. (1994). Bergeys manual of determinative bacteriology
(9th ed.). Williams & Wilkins.
16.
Jaiswal, K., et al. (2023). Recent trends in microbial bioremediation of
petroleum hydrocarbons. Environmental Pollution, 317, 120734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.120734
17.
Kapoor, D., et al. (2023). Characterization and optimization of
hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria from oil-contaminated sites. Journal of
Environmental Management, 332, 117385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117385
18.
Khan, F., et al. (2023). Isolation and characterization of
hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria from petroleum-contaminated soils. Microbial
Ecology, 86(2), 345360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-023-02145-z
19.
Kummer, C., et al. (1999). Gordonia alkanivorans sp. nov.,
isolated from tar-contaminated soil. International Journal of Systematic
Bacteriology, 49(2), 151156.
20.
Li, H., et al. (2023). Aerobic and anaerobic pathways of petroleum
hydrocarbon degradation by microbial consortia. Science of the Total
Environment, 882, 163648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163648
21.
Liu,
C., et al. (2020). Biodegradation of diesel oil by a newly isolated strain Acinetobacter
baumannii Y2 and its potential for bioremediation of contaminated soils. Ecotoxicology
and Environmental Safety, 192, 110293.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110293
22.
Mahmoudi,
N., et al. (2022). Characterization of microbial consortia for effective crude
oil degradation in soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9),
1341113422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16230-2
23.
Megharaj,
M., et al. (2011). Bioremediation approaches for organic pollutants: A critical
perspective. Environment International, 37(8), 13621375.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2011.06.003
24.
Mishra,
S., et al. (2001). Evaluation of inoculum addition to stimulate in situ
bioremediation of oily-sludge-contaminated soil. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, 67(4), 16751681.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.4.1675-1681.2001
25.
Mukherjee,
S., et al. (2022). Functional bacterial consortia for enhanced degradation of
petroleum hydrocarbons under varying environmental conditions. Environmental
Pollution, 307, 119478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119478
26.
Nie,
M., et al. (2014). Diversity and composition of bacterial community in
different depths of petroleum-contaminated soil. Environmental Science and
Pollution Research, 21(7), 40504060.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2359-4
27.
Patowary,
K., et al. (2016). Biodegradation of PAHs by crude biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas
aeruginosa KS-1 isolated from hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Environmental
Science and Pollution Research, 23, 92659275.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6099-4
28.
Prince,
R. C. (2015). Oil spill dispersants: Boon or bane? Environmental Science
& Technology, 49(11), 63766384.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00961
29.
Raghukumar,
C., et al. (2001). Degradation of crude oil by marine cyanobacteria. Applied
Microbiology and Biotechnology, 57, 433436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100786
30.
Reddy,
C. M., et al. (2002). The West Falmouth oil spill: Persistent hydrocarbons in
marsh sediments. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(22),
47544760. https://doi.org/10.1021/es020656n
31.
Sanni,
G. O., et al. (2023). Recent advances in bioremediation of petroleum
hydrocarbons: Strategies, limitations, and prospects. Journal of Hazardous
Materials, 447, 130835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130835
32.
Silva-Castro,
G. A., et al. (2015). Response of autochthonous microbial communities in oil-polluted
marine sediments under biostimulation conditions. Journal of Hazardous
Materials, 286, 434443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.030
33.
Singh,
D., & Verma, D. K. (2022). Crude oil degradation and biosurfactant
production by Bacillus cereus DSVP-1 isolated from
petroleum-contaminated soil. Biotechnology Reports, 33, e00696.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2022.e00696
34.
Singh,
H., et al. (2023). Characterization of petroleum hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria
from contaminated soil samples. Bioremediation Journal, 27(2), 157170.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10889868.2023.2185909
35.
Varjani,
S. J. (2017). Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Bioresource
Technology, 223, 277286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.037
36.
Xu,
X., et al. (2018). Bacterial community structure and function shift during
degradation of crude oil by an indigenous consortium. Bioresource
Technology, 251, 110118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.026
37.
Yakimov, M. M., Giuliano, L., Gentile, G., Crisafi, E., Denaro, R.,
& Genovese, M. (2007). Alcanivorax borkumensis and other
hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria: Their role in oil spill bioremediation. Microbiology,
153(2), 331336. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.2006/001826-0
38.
Yakimov, M. M., Timmis, K. N., & Golyshin, P. N. (2007). Obligate
oil-degrading marine bacteria. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 18(3),
257266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2007.04.006
39.
Zhang, X., Xu, D., Li, B., Wang, C., Yang, C., & Wang, Y. (2017).
Biosurfactant and degradative enzymes mediated crude oil degradation by
bacterium Bacillus subtilis A1. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8,
193. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00193/full