Lifestyle implication among patients with
selected comorbidities post COVID-19
Ms. Jennifer Danieal
W.*
Assistant Professor, Medical Surgical Nursing, Tilak Maharashtra
Vidyapeeth Trust, INER, Pune, Maharashtra, India
jenny27june@gmail.com
Abstract: While the world was
running quickly for the sake of progress and monetary increase, the Novel human
Coronavirus has driven the world to stop due to its dangerous result. The
disease has shattered every corner of the world and destroyed many families. The
Novel Coronavirus has set a respite button on the world. The serious and deadly
outcome of the disease has swept many countries to shut their daily activities.
COVID-19 had a very piercing impact not only on health factors but also it
shattered economy and society, globally. Many countries in the world are
affected by the serious pandemic issue which has forced to advise lockdown in
order to prevent the transmission. These results have demonstrated the weakness
of global networks, severely affecting well-being, food supplies and job
stability. Many of the patients has overcome the battle with COVID-19 while
many are worst hit by the same. Patient with underlying comorbidity have
reportedly increased intensive care unit admissions during the hospital stay
for COVID-19. Compared to other patient hit by COVID-19 without any underlying
disease, the patient with one or more comorbidities have shown delayed and in
most cases no prognosis. Patients with comorbidities were worst hit by COVID-19
with highest rate of mortality. Considering all these severity of COVID-19 with
underlying comorbidity, particularly Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus, this
study aims to assess the lifestyle Implications among patients. Additionally
the study also focuses to find the association between the lifestyle
Implications withdetermined demographic variables and finds the correlation of
lifestyle implications with selected comorbidities.
Methodology: A research approach adopted for the study wasNon-Experimental
Descriptive approachto
assess the lifestyle implication among patients with selected comorbidities
post COVID-19 from Pune City. There were total 100 samples who met the
inclusion criteria of the study. All the samples accepted to participate in the
research and was selected using Non Probability Purposive Sampling Technique.
Result: The analysis depicts
that about 14% of total population have shown mild lifestyle implication,83% of
the population has shown moderate changes and 3% population have shown severe
implication in their lifestyle post COVID-19.
Conclusion: The
current study concludes that the patients with selected comorbidities (i.e.
Hypertension and Diabetes) post COVID-19 were found to have moderate Lifestyle
Implication in overall physical, psychological and socio-economic aspects.
Keyword: Assess, Lifestyle,
Implication, Comorbidity, COVID-19
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
As the Novel Coronavirus keeps on advancing,
there are as yet numerous impediments as far as anyone is concerned of who this
infection might hit fundamentally. Serious intense respiratory misery condition
infection Coronavirus one more from beta COVID is firmly connected with the COVID
that was accounted for in 2002. The first case was detected in December from
the Wuhan city of China. Older Adults and patients with underlying disease
condition are found to have worse prognosis. Given the nature of this virus,
there is still much to learn about this virus. We all know that the symptoms of
COVID-19 ranges from common cold to severe complications or diseases like
Bronchitis, Pneumonia, Multi-Organ failure and even Death. Patients with
comorbidity such as Diabetes and Hypertension are been linked to have more
admission rates in Intensive care Units.3 Reasons being the
underlying comorbidity that the patient is suffering from. It has been examined
that the patients with underlying comorbidity has severe impact from that of
the normal ones. Additionally, the impaired Immune system because of underlying
Diabetes Mellitus could be the contributing determinant for the susceptibility of COVID-19. Patients have shown
increased rates of Multi-organ failure and a slow prognosis as a result of the
underlying comorbidity. Comparatively patients have reported lifestyle
implication after the hospital stay than those of the normally affected
COVID-19 without any underlying comorbidity. Complaints such as weakness, pain,
breathlessness, etc, even after discharge. Thus, the current study focuses on
assessing the lifestyle implication among the patients with selected
comorbidity post COVID-19.
A systemic review and meta-analysison 69
publications and 61 studies was conducted to evaluate associations of
comorbidities factor with severity of COVID-19. The outcomes recommended the
guys had altogether higher sickness seriousness and more prognostic endpoints.
More seasoned age was viewed as fundamentally connected with the illness
seriousness and six prognostic endpoints. Persistent kidney sickness
contributed for the most part for death, constant obstructive pneumonic
infection (COPD) for illness seriousness, admission to emergency unit, the
composite endpoint, intrusive ventilation, and sickness movement,
cerebrovascular infection for intense respiratory pain disorder (ARDS),
coronary illness for heart anomaly. Our review featured that the male
orientation, more seasoned age and comorbidities possessed solid
epidemiological proof of relationship with the seriousness and forecast of
COVID-191.Also, Diabetes and
Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical research and review article was published in Elsevier
journal the results showed diabetes and poor glycemic control are related with
expanded seriousness and the rate of mortality in patients with COVID-19. A few
clinical situations about hyperglycemia and COVID-19 are distinguished and
every one of these requirements explicit administration methodologies.2A study that retrospectively analyzed 961 COVID-19
patients who had a definitive clinical outcome (either death or discharge) was
conducted. The prevalent comorbidities found were hypertension (32.8%),
diabetes (15.7%), and cardiovascular disease (9.9%). A total of 22 (2.3%)
patients reported having asthma, while 21 (2.2%) had COPD. There were no cases
of patients having both asthma and COPD simultaneously. Aligning with findings
from earlier studies, our group identified hypertension, diabetes, and
malignancies as the most common comorbidities present in COVID-19 patients,
while COPD and asthma were less frequently seen. Furthermore, consistent with
prior research, we observed that COPD was linked to more severe cases of COVID-19.
Conversely, asthma was more frequently associated with non-severe cases than
with severe cases. In comparison to patients with asthma, those with COPD
experienced higher mortality rates.4
Problem Statement:
A study to assess the lifestyle implication
among patients with selected comorbidities post COVID-19from selected areas of
Pune City.
OBJECTIVES
1.
To assess
the lifestyle implication among patients with selected comorbidities post
COVID-19.
2.
To find
out the association between the lifestyle implication with selected demographic
variables.
3.
To find
the correlation of lifestyle implications with selected comorbidities.
HYPOTHESIS
H1- There
will be correlation between lifestyle implication and comorbidities
H2- There
will be significant association between the lifestyle implications of
comorbidities with selected socio-demographic variables.
METHODOLOGY
Research Design:The
design adopted by the researcher for current study wasNon-Experimental Descriptive Survey.The
research was carriedon patients
with predetermined comorbidities post COVID-19.
Population: Patients
affected with COVID-19 with selected Comorbidities.
Sampling techniques:
Sampling technique used for the study wasNonProbabilityPurposive sampling technique
and the Patients were selected
with comorbidities post COVID-19
Sample Size: 100 samples who met the inclusion criteria of
the study. All the samples were pre-informed about the study objectives and
were willing to participate in the study.
Tools of data collection: The
tool was divided into two sections. Section I comprises 5 questions related to demographic variables of the study.
And section II Comprises of 25 questions to assess the lifestyle implications
of Physical, psychological and socio-economic aspects
Validity and Reliability of
tools: ResearchTool was
validated by the 9expertsfrom the field andthe test of Cronbach’s Alpha
coefficient was used to test the reliability, it was r=0.86 for assessment of
lifestyle implication among the patient with selected comorbidity Post COVID.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
According to Robson conceptual framework is
defined as the system of concepts assumptions, expectations, beliefs and
theories that support and informs your research is a key part of your design.
According to Polit and Beck, a study that has its roots in a specified
conceptual model is a conceptual framework. Conceptual frameworks or models are
worn to give guidance and direct research studies, nursing practice and
educational programs, but few researchers have described that the criteria used
for selecting a conceptual framework for guiding the design of an educational
intervention or intercession enlightenment. According to Bordage conceptual
framework represents way of thinking about a problem or a study or way of
representing how complex things are. As per Miles and Huberman ,conceptual
framework as communication and visual presentation that describes the main
things to be considered or studied in either graphically or story form- it
includes key factors, concepts, or variables and they assumed relationship
among them.
This study is pinned on the Imogene Kings the
Theory of Goal Attainment. The theory of goal attainment was developed by
Imogene king in the early 1960s. It describes a dynamic, interpersonal
relationship in which patient grows and develops to certain life goals. The
theory explain that factors which can affect the attainment of goals are roles,
stress, space and time. According to king a human being refers to a social
being WHO is rational and sentient. He or she has the ability to perceive,
think, feel, choose, set goals, select means to achieve goals and make
decisions. Imogene King’s hypothesis of Goal Attainment focuses on how
objectives of the customer are accomplished through the medical attendant
customer exchanges. Nursing objective is to achieve, keep up, and recapture a
solid state. Objectives are created through the correspondence and cooperation,
and inside a social framework, customer objectives are accomplished featured by
commonly set objectives among customers and nursing staff. Lord's model can be
utilized as a structure for surveying and keeping a sound social framework that
assists customers with accomplishing their expressed objectives (Parker, 2006).
The Theory of Goal Attainment gives a way to deal with achieve the objective of
access and personal satisfaction. The premise of The Theory of Goal Attainment
of Imogene King is her philosophical position, which is, established in General
Systems Theory, which manages the investigation of coordinated multifaceted
nature as entire frameworks. Consistent advances in innovation and media
transmission, and immense measure of data over-burden about the world occasions
makes one's life complex. King’s Conceptual Systems consists the following
elements that emphasis on Joint Goal Setting by Nurse and Client. In this study
the elements that emphasis the joint goal setting is the researcher with
adults.
|
Concept |
Definition |
Application |
|
Personal: Individual, understand the self-perception own
personal growth and development of client. |
It refers to affecting by particular
person. |
Personal-Here is researcher who is
conducting study to assess the Lifestyle Implication among patients with
selected comorbidities post COVID-19 |
|
Interpersonal: interaction between two or more person of
group. |
It refers to interaction between peoples. |
Interpersonal: researcher build an
professional interpersonal with Patients by conducting study by administering
structured questionnaire to assess the Lifestyle Implication among patients
post COVID 19 |
|
Perception: person’s representation of reality. |
It refers to an ability to see here and
become aware |
Researcher needs to assess the Lifestyle
Implication of patients with Hypertension and Diabetes post COVID-19 |
|
Judgment: opinions ,or conclusion |
It refers to someone’s opinion or
conclusion. |
Researcher decides to assess the Physical,
Psychological and Socio-Economic aspects of Lifestyle. |
|
Action : steps , activity |
It refers to process of doing something |
Researchers assess the lifestyle
Implication of the patients by administering structured questionnaire |
|
Reaction: done , reply,response |
It refers to an action taken in response to
something |
Researcher evaluate the Implications in the
lifestyle of patients with selected comorbidities |
|
Interaction: communication |
It refers to direct involvement with
someone or something |
Researcher communicates the findings |
|
Transaction: purposeful interaction |
It refers to purposeful interaction leading
to the goal attainment |
It refers to purposeful interaction leading
to the goal attainment |
FINDINGS
The result of the data composedto
assess lifestyle implications among the patients with selected comorbidities post COVID-19 was conductedunderstanding the aim of the study in
consideration.
1.
To assess
the lifestyle implication among patients with selected comorbidities post
COVID-19.
2. To find out the association between the
lifestyle implication with selected demographic variables.
3.
To find
the correlation of lifestyle implications with selected comorbidities.
The result was
divided in V Sections.
SectionI that
describesDetails ofDemographic Variables
Section II that describesMean, Median, Mode and Standard Deviation
Section IIIDescription
of Lifestyle implications in patients with comorbidity
Section IVShows Association of demographic variables with
lifestyle implications among patient with selected comorbidity post COVID-19.
Section VdescribesCorrelation
of lifestyle implications with selected comorbidities.
Section I: Demographic Details n=100
Table 1: Describes
demographic details related to assessment of Lifestyle Implications among
patients with comorbidity post COVID.
|
Sr. No |
Demographic
variables |
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
1. |
Age |
30-40 |
21 |
21% |
|
41-50 |
28 |
28% |
||
|
51-60 |
28 |
28% |
||
|
60-above |
23 |
23% |
||
|
2 |
Gender |
Male |
49 |
49% |
|
Female |
51 |
51% |
||
|
3 |
Education |
Uneducated |
36 |
36% |
|
Secondary School |
20 |
20% |
||
|
Higher Secondary Schooling |
16 |
16% |
||
|
Graduate Post Graduate |
28 |
28% |
||
|
4 |
Occupation |
Private Sector |
34 |
32% |
|
Government Sector |
22 |
22% |
||
|
Self-Employed |
22 |
22% |
||
|
Home Maker |
22 |
22% |
||
|
5 |
Comorbidity |
Hypertension |
26 |
26% |
|
Diabetes Mellitus |
42 |
42% |
||
|
Both |
32 |
32% |
||
|
6 |
Family History of Comorbidity |
Yes |
60 |
60% |
|
No |
40 |
40% |
||
|
7 |
Area of admission during COVID |
Ward |
63 |
63% |
|
ICU |
37 |
37% |
||
|
Quarantine Centre |
00 |
00 |
||
|
8 |
Post COVID period |
1 Week |
00 |
00 |
|
2 Week |
00 |
00 |
||
|
3 Week |
35 |
35% |
||
|
4 Week and Above |
65 |
65% |
Section II- Mean,
Median, Mode and Standard Deviation
|
|
N |
Range |
Maximum |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
|
Tool |
100 |
60 |
104 |
62.61 |
11.853 |
Section III-
Description of Lifestyle implications in patients with comorbidity
Figure 1: Show the statistical data related to the degree to which
lifestyle has been Implicated among the patients with comorbidity.
Section IV:Association of demographic variables with lifestyle
implications N=10
Table 2: Shows the
statistical data about association of demographic variables with lifestyle
implications among patient with selected comorbidity post COVID-19
|
Sr. No. |
Demographic Variables |
Calculated Value |
Tabulated Value |
Degree Of Freedom |
Significance |
|
1.
|
Age*Lifestyle Implication |
1.828 |
12.59 |
6 |
NS |
|
2.
|
Gender* Lifestyle Implication |
5.168 |
5.99 |
2 |
NS |
|
3.
|
Education* Lifestyle Implication |
8.837 |
12.59 |
6 |
NS |
|
4.
|
Occupation* Lifestyle Implication |
16.900 |
12.59 |
6 |
NS |
|
5.
|
Comorbidity* Lifestyle Implication |
5.715 |
9.49 |
4 |
NS |
|
6.
|
Family History of Comorbidity* Lifestyle
Implication |
0.195 |
5.99 |
2 |
NS |
|
7.
|
Area of admission* Lifestyle Implication |
2.803 |
5.99 |
2 |
NS |
|
8.
|
Post COVID Period* Lifestyle Implication |
2.071 |
5.99 |
2 |
NS |
Section V: Correlation
of lifestyle implications with selected comorbidities.
Table 3: Depicts the
data regarding Correlation of lifestyle implications with selected
comorbidities.
|
Variables |
Mean |
SD |
R Value |
P Value |
Remark |
|
Lifestyle |
62.61 |
11.853 |
-0.036 |
>00001 |
Strong Negative Correlation |
|
Comorbidity |
2.06 |
0.763 |
DISCUSSION
This study aimed to assess the Lifestyle
Implication among the patients with selected comorbidity post COVID from the
selected areas of Pune city. Thus, the data was collected from the participants
and investigation was done to find the result.
DescriptionofLifestyle Implication among the patients with comorbidity
post COVID.
Figure 1: Data describes the details related
to the degree to which lifestyle has been Implicated among the patients with
comorbidity. The parameters measured to assess the lifestyle Implication were:
Physical aspects- to understand the physical changes in the patient’s body
after recovery from COVID-19 particularly the patients with underlying
comorbidity, Psychological Aspects- to assess what are the issues that patient
has underwent personally and family vise post COVID, Socio-Economic Aspect- to
assess what were the challenges that patient faced after his/her recovery. The
analysis says that lifestyle implication towards the above points was mild in 14%
patient,moderate in 83% patients and severe in 3% of patients.
Descriptionof Association of
demographic variables with lifestyle implications among patient with
selected comorbidity post COVID-19
Table 2: Shows the facts and figures about
association of demographic variables with lifestyle implications among patient
with selected comorbidity post COVID-19. The tabulated value is greater than
that of the chi square value of all except Occupation. Hence, Lifestyle
Implication was found to have significant association with the occupation of
total population and the first hypothesis is accepted.
Findings
related toCorrelation of lifestyle implications with
selected comorbidities
Table 3: Depicts the data regarding correlation
of lifestyle implications with selected comorbidities. It indicates that there
is strong negative correlation between lifestyle implication and selected comorbidity.
Here, we reject the hypothesis of correlation.
CONCLUSION
The overall study result indicates that there
is aModerate changes in lifestyle of a patient after COVID-19 particularly in
the patients with selective comorbidity such Hypertension, Diabetes or both.
Most of the patient have reported to have increased sign and symptoms of
weakness that comparatively makes them incapacitate to perform the activity
than earlier. Additionally, patients have also reported socio-economic crisis
during and post COVID. The Current study recommends to build proactive measures
to overcome and prevent such implication Post COVID in the patients with
selective comorbidity.
Conflict of Interest:NA
Source of Funding:There
is no other financial support for the study.The study was fully funded by
author.
Ethical Clearance:Ethical permissions of the study taken from
Symbiosis College of Nursing ethical committee. Consent was taken from the Patients
from selected areas of Pune city. Details given to the participants regarding
the data collection procedure and the information was only used for study
purpose and the confidentiality was maintained.
References
1.
Chopra
S, Ranjan P, Singh V, Kumar S, Arora M, Hasan MS, Kasiraj R, Kaur D, Vikram NK,
Malhotra A, Kumari A. Impact of COVID-19 on lifestyle-related behaviours-a
cross-sectional audit of responses from nine hundred and ninety-five
participants from India. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research
& Reviews. 2020 Nov 1;14(6):2021-30.
2.
Fang
X, Li S, Yu H, Wang P, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Li Y, Cheng L, Li W, Jia H, Ma X.
Epidemiological, comorbidity factors with severity and prognosis of COVID-19: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Jul
15;12(13):12493.
3.
Sanyaolu
A, Okorie C, Marinkovic A, Patidar R, Younis K, Desai P, Hosein Z, Padda I,
Mangat J, Altaf M. Comorbidity and its impact on patients with COVID-19. SN
comprehensive clinical medicine. 2020 Jun 25:1-8.
4.
Song, J.,
Zeng, M., Wang, H., Qin, C., Hou, H. Y., Sun, Z. Y., ... & Liu, Z. (2021).
Distinct effects of asthma and COPD comorbidity on disease expression and
outcome in patients with COVID‐19. Allergy, 76(2), 483-496.