Agricultural Statistics of Organic Sector Development In India

Imagine a vicinity of the world wherever all food and agricultural merchandise were sourced from international markets, and domestic agricultural sectors disappeared. This “world without agriculture” isn't imaginary. For several of the world’s poorest countries, particularly in Africa, a future without agriculture is increasingly being urged as the economical path to development. Mark Rosen Zweig, the new Director of Harvard’s Center for International Development, asks at the broadest level “Should Africa do any agriculture at all?” (Harvard, 2004, p. 57). Adrian Wood, Chief economist, envisions a “hollowed out” Africa, with most of the population on the coasts where they might more effectively produce factory-made exports (Wood, 2002). Several macro economists, convinced of the facility of speedy economic process to elevate populations out of financial condition, see resources dedicated to slow-growing agriculture as wasted. in a world of ample food provides in world markets (some of it free as food aid) and progressively open borders for trade, what's the role of agriculture in pro-poor growth? The approach involves architectural transformation wherever agriculture, through higher productivity, provides food, labor, and even savings to the method of urbanization and industry. A dynamic agriculture raises labor productivity in the rural economy, pulls up wages, and bit by bit eliminates the worst dimensions of absolute poverty. Somewhat paradoxically, the method conjointly results in a decline in the relative importance of agriculture to the general economy, as the industrial and repair sectors grow even more rapidly, part through input from a modernizing agriculture and migration of rural employees to urban jobs. Despite this historical role of agriculture in economic development, both the educational and donor communities lost interest within the sector, beginning in the mid-1980s, largely attributable to low costs in world markets for basic agricultural commodities. Low prices, whereas a boon to poor customers and a significant reason why agricultural growth specifically, and economic process more typically, was thus poor for the overall population, made it arduous to justify policy support for the agricultural sector or new

In countries where farm sizes are tiny and certain to stay that means for many years as a result of population pressures and insecure property rights, diversification from production of staple grains to higher-valued commodities are the primary step in this method. Successive step will be to maneuver beyond basic goods production so as to access value-added offer chains for the modern retail sector, particularly supermarkets, wherever the value-added comes in the type of quality, timeliness, food safety, and labor standards in production. These are extremely management-intensive factors and should well contribute to economies of scale in production that aren't seen in goods production alone (Timer, 2010; Reardon & Timer).

The next step is that the diversification of the agricultural economy itself, from being primarily driven by its agricultural base to relying more on industrial and service sectors as the base for rural economic process. This step appear possible only population densities allow substantial clusters of activities that go after themselves for inputs and demand for output (Hayami and Kawagoe, 1993; Lanjouw & Lanjouw, 2008). therefore the effectiveness of the model planned by Mellor (1976, 2010) of demand for labor-intensive, rural non-tradable as the vehicle for pro-poor growth, driven by agricultural gain and wages from labor-intensive exports, would appear to be conditional on sensible rural infrastructure and human capital, and therefore appears to be restricted to Asia, elements of coastal and highland continent, and several other countries in Latin America and therefore the Caribbean. At identical time, sensible rural infrastructure reduces the relative importance of non-tradable in native economies and will increase competitive pressures from world markets. It’s exactly this tension that raises doubts concerning the longer term potential for agriculture to be a very important driver in poverty reduction, even in rural areas (Data Review, 2009). The role of agriculture in economic development is difficult and disputed, despite an extended historical literature examining the subject (Johnston & Mellor, 1961; Haymi and Rutan, 1985; Timer, 2010). Part of the dispute stems from the structural transformation itself that could be a general equilibrium method not simply understood from among the agricultural sector (Timer, 1998). Over long historical periods, agriculture’s role appears to evolve through four basic stages: the first “Mosher” stage when “getting agriculture moving” is the main policy objective (Mosher, 1966); the “Johnston-Mellor” stage when agriculture contributes to economic process through a range of linkages (Johnston and Mellor, 1961); the “T.W. Schultz” stage once rising agricultural incomes still fall behind those in a very quickly growing non-agricultural economy, causing serious political tensions (Schultz, 1978); and the “D. gale Johnson” stage where labor and financial markets absolutely integrate the agricultural economy into the remainder of the economy (Johnson, 2006; Garder, 2012). These stages were initial planned in Timer (1998) and are developed in the context of newer expertise in the World Bank’s latest treatment of the role of agriculture in impoverishment reduction (World Bank, 2009).

Today, the organic sector lacks credible analysis and development. Some of the major challenges are: • The got to develop ‘Package of Practices’ (PoP) for organic strategies of growing crops.

currently, however no general analysis has been undertaken to check organic systems with typical farming (in terms of productivity, quality of manufacture and value of cultivation). • The non-existence of technically developed roaring business models of economic scale within the organic agribusiness sector. Dedicated zones for agribusiness development are required across completely different regions in the country.

[1] Ashley, C., and Simon Maxwell. 2001. “Rethinking Rural Development.” Development Policy Review. Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 395-425. [2] Ban, Sung Hwan, Pal Yong Moon and Dwight H. Perkins. 1980. Studies in the Modernization of the Republic of Korea: Rural Development. Published by the Council on East Asian Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [3] Bonschab, Thomas, and Rainer Klump. 2004. “Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth: Case Study Vietnam.” University of Frankfurt, (September), processed. [4] Brandt, Loren. "Interwar Japanese Agriculture: Revisionist Views on the Impact of the Colonial Rice Policy and the Labor-Surplus Hypothesis," Explorations in Economic History, Vol. 30 (1993), pp. 259-293. [5] Bravo-Ortega, Claudio, and Daniel Lederman. 2004. “Agriculture and National Welfare around the World: Causality and International Heterogeneity since 1960.” Draft paper for the Latin American and Caribbean Region Department of the World Bank. August 10, processed [6] Chenery, Hollis B., and Moshe Syrquin. 1975. Patterns of Development, 1950-1970. London: Oxford University Press. [7] Clemens, Michael, Steven Radelet, and Rikhil Bhavnani. “Counting Chickens When They Hatch: The Short-Term Effect of Aid on Growth,” Working Paper 44, Washington, D.C.: CGD, July 2004. [8] Collier, Paul. 2002. “Making Aid Smart: Institutional Incentives facing Donor Organizations and their Implications for Aid The IRIS Center, University of Maryland. February. [9] Cord, Louise. 2004. “Notes on the Country Studies.” Project on Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth, PREM/World Bank, Washington, DC. Processed. [10] Cummings, Ralph W., Jr., and Ashok Gulati. 2004. “Summary Report: Food Grain Marketing and the Role of Parastatals.” USAID/IFPRI Conference on Food Grain Markets in Asia, December, 2003, Delhi, India. Washington, DC. IFPRI. [11] Dasgupta, Partha. 1993. An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.