A Study on Binomial Transform and Its Significance

Exploring the relationship between binomial and Euler transforms

by Parmod Kumar*,

- Published in Journal of Advances in Science and Technology, E-ISSN: 2230-9659

Volume 8, Issue No. 16, Feb 2015, Pages 0 - 0 (0)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

The binomial transform is a sequence transformation (i.e., atransform of a sequence) that computes its forward differences. It isclosely related to the Euler transform, which is the result of applyingthe binomial transform to the sequence associated with its ordinarygenerating function.

KEYWORD

binomial transform, sequence transformation, forward differences, Euler transform, ordinary generating function

INTRODUCTION

The binomial transform, T, of a sequence, {an}, is the sequence {sn} defined by Formally, one may write for the transformation, where T is an infinite-dimensional operator with matrix elements Tnk. The transform is an involution, that is, or, using index notation, where is the Kronecker delta. The original series can be regained by The binomial transform of a sequence is just the nth forward differences of the sequence, with odd differences carrying a negative sign, namely: where Δ is the forward difference operator. Some authors define the binomial transform with an extra sign, so that it is not self-inverse: whose inverse is Example Binomial transforms can be seen in difference tables. Consider the following: of the) binomial transform of the diagonal 0, 1, 8, 36, 128, 400,... (a sequence defined by n22n − 1). The binomial transform is the shift operator for the Bell numbers. That is, where the Bn are the Bell numbers.

ORDINARY GENERATING FUNCTION

The transform connects the generating functions associated with the series. For the ordinary generating function, let and then

EULER TRANSFORM

The relationship between the ordinary generating functions is sometimes called the Euler transform. It commonly makes its appearance in one of two different ways. In one form, it is used to accelerate the convergence of an alternating series. That is, one has the identity which is obtained by substituting x=1/2 into the last formula above. The terms on the right hand side typically become much smaller, much more rapidly, thus allowing rapid numerical summation. The Euler transform can be generalized (Borisov B. and Shkodrov V., 2007): , The Euler transform is also frequently applied to the Euler hyper-geometric integral . Here, the Euler transform takes the form: The binomial transform, and its variation as the Euler transform, is notable for its connection to the continued fraction representation of a number. Let have the continued fraction representation then and

EXPONENTIAL GENERATING FUNCTION

For the exponential generating function, let and then The Borel transform will convert the ordinary generating function to the exponential generating function.

INTEGRAL REPRESENTATION

When the sequence can be interpolated by a complex analytic function, then the binomial transform of the sequence can be represented by means of a Norlund–Rice integral on the interpolating function.

Prodinger gives a related, modular-like transformation: letting

Parmod Kumar

gives where U and B are the ordinary generating functions associated with the series and , respectively. The rising k-binomial transform is sometimes defined as The falling k-binomial transform is . Both are homomorphisms of the kernel of the Hankel transform of a series. In the case where the binomial transform is defined as Let this be equal to the function If a new forward difference table is made and the first elements from each row of this table are taken to form a new sequence , then the second binomial transform of the original sequence is, If the same process is repeated k times, then it follows that, Its inverse is, This can be generalized as, where is the shift operator. Its inverse is We restrict ourselves to the zero’th order modified Hankel transform, since we have shown in the previous section how higher order modified Hankel transforms can be reduced to the zero’th order transform. To stress that no exponential sampling is needed, we start by sampling the objective function f(t) on a linear grid with step ∆, yielding the sample set {f(k∆)}. We then reconstruct the function f(t) by linear interpolation as

since kφk = p 2/3. Hence the truncation error is small provided |f(t)| has a fastly decreasing tail for t ≥ r∆. Note that in general k²T k → 0 for r → ∞, provided supt |f(t)|t η < ∞ for some η > 1. The interpolation error mainly depends on the smoothness of the function f(t) and the quasi-interpolant character of the kernel φ(t).

provided f(t) has its qth derivative in L2[0, ∞] and provided the interpolation kernel is a quasiinterpolant of order q, i.e.

This is the case for the linear interpolatory kernel φ(t) for which q = 2. Note that in general k²Ik → 0 for ∆ → 0. Since the zero’th order modified Hankel transform is unitary, the truncation and interpolation errors propagate through the transform process with their L2 norms unchanged, and hence we can as well omit the error terms.

REFERENCES

  • John H. Conway and Richard K. Guy, 2012, The Book of Numbers
  • Donald E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming Vol. 3, (2013) Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  • Helmut Prodinger, 2012, Some information about the Binomial transform
  • Michael Z. Spivey and Laura L. Steil, 2009, The k-Binomial Transforms and the Hankel Transform
  • Borisov B. and Shkodrov V., 2012, Divergent Series in the Generalized Binomial Transform, Adv. Stud. Cont. Math., 14 (1): 77-82
  • R. Sasiela, Electromagnetic Waves in Turbulence. New York: Springer, 2004.
  • K. B. Oldham and J. Spanier,The Fractional Calculus. New York: Academic Press, 2004.
  • N. Engheta, “On the role of fractional calculus in electromagnetic theory,” IEEE Antennas
  • M. Unser and I. Daubechies, “On the approximation power of convolution-based least squares versus interpolation,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1697-1711, July 2007.
  • W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes. Cambridge: University Press, 2002.
  • E. Cavanagh and B. D. Cook, “Numerical evaluation of Hankel transforms via Gaussian-Laguerre polynomial expansions,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 361-366, Aug. 2009.

 A. Erd´elyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, and F. G. Tricomi, Higher Transcendental Functions, Vol. II. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.