An Analysis on Exact Solution of Klein–Gordon Equation: a Relativistic Version of the Schrodinger Equation

Exploring numerical methods and electromagnetic interactions in the Klein-Gordon equation

by Rajni Rani*, Dr. Yogesh Kumar,

- Published in Journal of Advances in Science and Technology, E-ISSN: 2230-9659

Volume 10, Issue No. 21, Feb 2016, Pages 0 - 0 (0)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

In the present paper is to understand and compare variousnumerical methods for solving the nonlinear Klein–Gordon (KG) equation. Thenonlinear KG equation might be viewed as the most simplest form of the chargedklein-gordon field. We derive exact analysis about physical problems of theKlein-Gordon equation and to introduce electromagnetic interactions into the KGequation.

KEYWORD

exact solution, Klein-Gordon equation, numerical methods, nonlinear, electromagnetic interactions

INTRODUCTION

The Klein-Gordon equation (or Klein-Fock-Gordon equation) is a relativistic version of the Schrodinger equation, which describes scalar (or pseudoscalar) spinless particles. The Klein-Gordon equation was actually first found by Schodinger, before he made the discovery of the equation that now bears his name. He rejected it because he couldn't make it fit the data (the equation doesn't take into account the spin of the electron); the way he found his equation was by making simplification in the Klein-Gordon equation. Later, it was revived and it has become commonly accepted that Klein-Gordon equation is the appropriate model to describe the wave function of the particle that is charge-neutral, spinless and relativistic effects can't be ignored. It has important applications in plasma physics, together with Zakharov equation describing the interaction of Langmuir wave and the ion acoustic wave in a plasma, in astrophysics together with Maxwell equation describing a minimally coupled charged boson field to a spherically symmetric space time , in biophysics together with another Klein-Gordon equation describing the long wave limit of a lattice model for one-dimensional nonlinear wave processes in a bi-layer and so on. Furthermore, Klein-Gordon equation coupled with Schrodinger equation (Klein-Gordon-Schrodinger equations or KGS) is introduced in and it describes a system of conserved scalar nucleons interacting with neutral scalar mesons coupled through the Yukawa interaction. As is well known, KGS is not exactly integrable, so the numerical study on it is very important. Derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation-This chapter is devoted to derive the Klein-Gordon equation. From elementary quantum mechanics , we know that the Schrodinger equation for free particle is

(1)

whereis the wave function, m is the m|ass of the particle,is Planck’s constant, and is the momentum operator. The Schrodinger equation suffers from not being relativistically covariant, meaning that it does not take into account Einstein’s special relativity. It is natural to try to use the identity from special relativity

(2)

for the energy (c is the speed of light); then, plugging into the quantum mechanical momentum operator, yields the equation

(3)

This, however, is a cumbersome expression to work with because of the square root. In addition, this equation, as it stands, is nonlocal. Klein and Gordon instead worked with more general square of this

(4)

where and This operator (Q2) is called as the d’Alember operator. This wave equation (4) is called as the Klein-Gordon equation. It was in the middle 1920’s by E. Schrodinger, as well as by O. Klein and W. Gordon, as a candidate for the relativistic analog of the nonrelativistic Schrodinger equation for a free particle. In order to obtain a dimensionless form of the Klein-Gordon equation (4), we define the normalized variables

(5)

Then plugging (3.5) into (3.4) and omitting all, we get the following dimension- less standard Klein-Gordon equation

(6)

For more general case, we consider the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation

(7)

where Numerical methods for the Klein-Gordon equation - In this chapter, we review some existing numerical methods for the nonlinear Klein- Gordon equation and present a new method for it. For simplicity of notation, we shall introduce the methods in one spatial dimension (d = 1). Generalization to d > 1 is straightforward by tensor product grids and the results remain valid without modification. For d = 1, the problem becomes

(8) (9) (10)

whererepresents the linear part ofandrepresents the nonlinear part of it. As it is known in this Section, the KG equation has the properties

(12) (13)

In some cases, the boundary condition (3.9) may be replaced by

(14)

We choose the spatial mesh size with for M being an even positive integer, the time step beingand let the grid points and the time step be

(15)

Letbe the approximation of Existing numerical methods - There are several numerical methods proposed in the literature for discretizing the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation. We will review these numerical schemes for it. The schemes are the following A). This is the simplest scheme for the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation and has had wide use :

(16) (17)

The initial conditions are discretized as

(18)

B). This scheme was proposed by Ablowitz, Kruskal, and Laclik : (19)

Rajni Rani1 Dr. Yogesh Kumar2

(20)

The initial conditions are discretized as

(21)

C). This scheme has been studied by Jimenez :

(22) (23)

The initial conditions are discretized as

(24)

The existing numerical methods are of second-order accuracy in space and second- order accuracy in time. Our new method shown in the next section is of spectral- order accuracy in space, which is much more accurate than them. Our new numerical method - We discretize the Klein-Gordon equation by using a pseudospectral method for spatial derivatives, followed by application of a Crank-Nicolson/leap-frog method for linear/nonlinear terms for time derivative.

(25)

Where is a constant; a spectral differential operator approximation of is defined as

(26)

wherethe Fourier coefficient of a vector with is defined as

(27)

The initial condition are discretized as

(28)

PHYSICAL PROBLEMS OF THE KLEIN- GORDON EQUATION

The Klein-Gordon equation fulfills the laws of special relativity, but contains two fundamental problems, which have to be taken care of for the equation to be physically meaningful. The first problem becomes obvious when considering the solutions of the different equations. Using the ansatz

(29)

with

(30)

One obtains

(31) (32)

from which follows

(33)

This means thai the Klein-Gordon equal ion allows negative energies as solul ion. Formally, one can see problem of the physical interpretation of negative energies. The second problem with the Klein-Gordon equation is less obvious. Il occurs when interpreting the functionas probability amplitude. Interpretation ofas probability amplitude is only possible if there exists a probability densityand a current that fulfill a continuity equation

(34)

which guarantees that no "probability" is lost. Since we deal with a covariant equation, we define

(35)

and obtain the covariant form

(36)

Eqs. (34 and (35) correspond in form and content the charge conservation in electrodynamics. Non-relativistic ally one lias

(37)

and thus one expects in the relat.ivist.ic case also bilinear expressions inforandIf one defines a densityaccording to (37) with the solution (29), it is easy to show that, this density does not fulfill a continuity equation. This has to be expected sincehas to be a four-vector so that (35) is valid in all Lorentz systems. Thus, it is obvious to generalize (37) to

(38)

where Consider

(40)

If fulfills the Klein-Gordon equation, the right-hand side of (40) vanishes, and the continuity equation (35) holds. However, the four-vector defined in (38) contains the second problem:

(41)

can be positive or negative, depending on the values ofand Since the Klein-Gordon equation denotes a partial differential equation (2nd order) of hyperbolic type, one lias the option to arbitrarily choose the functions

(42)

at the starting time (/, = 0), and thus obtain, e.g., negative values for An interpretation of as probability density would mean that the theory allows negative probabilities. This is the problem of the indefinite probability density.

THE CHARGED KLEIN-GORDON FIELD

In case of a complex, i.e. charged scalar field, the current is given with and a total charge

(43)

To examine charged fields in some more detail, we decomposeinto real and imaginary components (44)

Rajni Rani1 Dr. Yogesh Kumar2

componentsand Conversely, the following is true: If two fieldsandseparately fulfill a Klein-Gordon equation with the same mass, then the equations can be replaced by one equation for a complex field, i.e. With

(45) (46)

By interchangingand. we obtain the opposite charge. Henceand chamctmzti opposite charges. These studies can. e.g., be applied to the pion triplet

KLEIN-GORDON EQUATION WITH INTERACTION

To introduce electromagnetic interactions into the KG equation, we use the socalled 'minimal substitution', known from EM

(47)

whereis a four-vector potential. Inserting this into the KG equation gives

(48) (49)

where the generalized potential U(x) consists of a scalar and vector part

(50)

Note that the symmetrized from of the vector terms is required in order to maintain the hermicity of the interaction. In the most general case, the scalar, S. and vector,, parts of the potential can be independent interactions. For the electromagnetic case they are related by

(51)

Using the 'standard' form of, the KG equation can be written as

(52)

Substituting the positive and negative energy solutions into (52) gives

(53)

Again, once can use (53) as starting point and use it with more general potentials V and A. For example, let A = 0 and, i.e. allow only a scalar potential V. Then (53) gives

(54)

Substituting the relationbetween energy and wave vector and using leads to

(55)

which looks like a Schrodinger equation with the equivalent energy dependent potential

(56)

Another type of potential to consider is the Lorentz scalar, which adds to the mass, since the scalar potential is

(57)

CONCLUSION

It should be stated that this work does not deny the usage of the KG equation as a phenomenological equation. Indeed, by definition, a phenomenological equation is evaluated mainly by its usefulness in describing a specific set of data. This kind of evaluation is of a practical nature and is immune to theoretical counter-arguments. We discuss the implications of our approach for free real scalar fields offering a direct proof of the uniqueness of the relativistic ally invariant positive-definite inner product on the space of real Klein-Gordon fields.

REFERENCES

  • D'Aprile, T., Mugnai, D. (2004). Non-existence results for the coupled Klein-Gordon{Maxwell equations. Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 4:307-322.
  • D'Aprile, T., Mugnai, D. (2004). Solitary Waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon{Maxwell and Schrodinger-Maxwell equations. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 134:1-14.
  • G. Adomian, Nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation, Appl. Math. Lett. 9 (1996) 9–10.
  • H.Pecher, Nonlinear small data scaterring for the wave and Klein–Gordon equation, Math. Z. 185 (1984) 261–270.
  • K.R. Khusnutdinova and D.E. Pelinovsky, On the exchange of energy in coupled Klein-Gordon equations, Wave Motion, 38 (2003), pp. 1-10.
  • T.Motai, On the Cauchy problem for the nonlinear Klein Gordon equation with a cubic convolution, Tsukuba J. Math., 12 (2008), 353-369.
  • W. Cao, B. Guo, Fourier collocation method for solving nonlinear Klein– Gordon equation, J. Comput. Phys. 108 (2003) 296–305.
  • W. Strauss, L. V´azquez, Numerical solution of a nonlinear Klein Gordon equation, J. Comput. Phys. 28 (2008) 271–278.

Numer. Anal. 9 (2000) 449–462.